Since: Mar 13
#2111 Mar 14, 2013
This kinda cracked me up. This lady is talking about people stereotyping white women who are with black men all the while she is stereotyping white men all together. I know this was originally posted 2 years ago but it just caught my eye. I am new to the topix world but I am going to throw my two sense in. I can understand a little why this lady feels the way she does. My wife and I have been married almost 10 years now. We had been dating for about 6 months when she told me this story. She says she had dated a guy for almost a year. While they were dating he tried repeatedly to get her to have sex with him. She resisted every attempt. Finally after about 11 months she was giving in for fear of losing him to another woman who "put out". She stripped down in front of him and because she wasn't a perfect "10"on the llooks and body style he started laughing at her and told her he would never have sex with a cow like her. She has never been what I would call fat but she wasn't a freaking bean pole either. She ended very depressed and started starving her self. We started dating about a year later. We had been dating for about 6 months when we were standing outside of a McDonalds when a guy was pulling out of the drive thru and yelled to me...."dude, that fat bitch is ugly." It devastated her. She already thought she wasn't good enough for me because I was a popular kid in our high school. I played all of the sports, other than soccer, and was quite successful at them. I even had a scholarship offered to me from The university of Miami for pitching and football which I turned down to pursue my life with her and to reach our goals together. Best decision I have ever made. I went and received my associates degree in business management and eventually accounting. Our life with our family is fantastic. Could I have done better, some people may have thought so, but why would I want better? I married the woman of my dreams. Don't stereotype all men based on a few. By the way, our family consists of 5 adopted children, all different races. Not all "white"men or people have a problem with different race families. I just had to put my 2 sense in.:)
#2112 Mar 14, 2013
Not at all. It is true that the person who typed up this thread is NOT a natural, real woman. It is an African American (Descendant of a black American slave) dude from New Jersey. Jim, from New Jersey.
This poster & troll has been typing up his sex stories for a few years now on Topix.
Since: Mar 13
Den Haag, Netherlands
#2113 Mar 14, 2013
No I am Amanda from the hague holland
#2114 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead --- In regards to your previous post to me,#1991. Your 2 points here.--- You said "LEE WAS DISENCHANTED WITH MARXIST COMMUNISM AS PRACTICED IN COMMUNIST RUSSIA".--- Lee Harvey Oswald said that he felt a betrayal by the way how the Soviet Unions (USSRs) government treated him. In regards to Lee having a long term stay in the Soviet Union.
But, Lee also expressed many points which were very supportive of the Soviet Unions domestic policy.
Oswald primarily expressed a lot of support for the Soviet Unions foreign policy.
Lee especially expressed support for the Soviet Unions government giving military aid & "humanitarian aid" to many left wing liberation movements. These left wing liberation movements were in operation throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Latin America & the Caribbean.
#2115 Mar 14, 2013
No, I know that.
In my previous response back to you, I was referring to the poster who typed up this thread, who was going by the name of "Joan".
Again, "Joan" is NOT a natural, real woman. It is an African American (Descendant of a black American slave) dude. Jim, from New Jersey.
The poster who typed up this thread has been posting & trolling on Topix Top Stories & Top Stories in the Blogosphere forums for a few years nows.
Since: Mar 13
Den Haag, Netherlands
#2116 Mar 14, 2013
#2117 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead --- You said "BUT TRULY ADMIRED JOHN F KENNEDY!".--- Lee Harvey Oswald was supportive of John F. Kennedys (JFKs) domestic policies.
But, Lee was very much AGAINST John F. Kennedys (JFKs) foreign policy initiatives.
Primarily in regards to JFKs policy towards the former Soviet Unions (USSRs) left wing, communist dictatorship.
Examples of this.---
1. JFK taking a hard line approach to the former Soviet Union stationing their long range nuclear armed missiles in Cuba.
2. JFK giving the government of the former Soviet Union a very stern WARNING. For them to remove their missiles from Cuba.
Lee Harvey Oswald didn't like JFK doing this.
JFKs policy towards Cubas left wing, communist dictatorship. Which was headed by Fidel Castro.
1. Very soon after JFK was elected & sworn in as president of the United States (US), JFK put an economic embargo on Cuba.
Lee Harvey Oswald did not like JFK doing this to Cuba.
2. After the economic embargo was placed on Cuba.--- JFK gave the go ahead for an assassination plot against Fidel Castro.
Lee Harvey Oswald was very angered by JFK doing this.
3. When Fidel Castro gave a speech in Cuba. Fidel very openly spoke about a few of the assassination attempts on his life. Which JFK gave the go ahead for.
Lee Harvey Oswald was even MORE angered by this.
Six days prior to JFKs assassination, Oswald tried to obtain a travel visa from Cubas left wing, communist dictatorship. This was within a week before JFKs assassination.
After JFKs assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald hoped to be able to escape capture from American authorities. Oswald hooped to escape to Cuba. Where he hoped to live as a hero.
Lee Harvey Oswald supported JFKs domestic policies.
But, Lee very much OPPOSED JFKs foreign policy.
It was JFKs foreign policy. Especially JFKs policy towards Cuba.-- Which led Lee to assassinate JFK.
#2118 Mar 14, 2013
Amanda, glad to have cleared that up. Much respect.
Since: Mar 13
Den Haag, Netherlands
#2119 Mar 14, 2013
Okay yes me too glad we are on the same page respect back
#2120 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead --- In regards to your previous points which you typed up to me, about the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Where you said that NAFTA has been bad for the United States (US).
Dude, how can you say that?
NAFTA has been GREAT for the United States (US).
In my next posts, I'll list many examples. Which show how very BENEFICIAL NAFTA has been.
#2121 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead ---- Examples.--- Which show that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is very BENEFICIAL. To the United States (US), Canada & Mexico.----
Here are many reasons why.--- 1. It is an agreement to ship goods between the 3 nations.
2. NAFTA was designed to foster greater trade between the 3 countries.
Which it has done.
3. NAFTA eliminates a large number of tariffs on goods shipped between the 3 nations.
4. NAFTA is the largest free trade area in terms of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
5. NAFTA reduces trading costs.
6. NAFTA increases business investments.
7. NAFTA helps North America to be more competitive in the global marketplace.
Granted, labor unions were (They still are) very anti-NAFTA.
But, despite the unions being a very critical, core constituency of the Democratic Party.--- Most of the Democrats in the House & Senate still voted for NAFTA.
Our nations president back then, Democrat Bill Clinton signed NAFTA into law.
#2122 Mar 14, 2013
"Wink, wink". Amanda, how do you like the Netherlands?
Holland is known for having many, many top kickboxers.
I'd say probably the top Dutch kickboxers would be these. In no particular order.--- Bas Rutten, Ernesto Hoost, Alistair Overeem, Badr Hari, Remy Bonjasky, Peter Aerts & Semmy Schilt.
Since: Mar 13
Den Haag, Netherlands
#2123 Mar 14, 2013
Yes I love the Netherlands Yes I know we are known for producing good fighters but don't know them by name myself
#2124 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead ---- To show the benefits of NAFTA. For these respective areas.--- For the United States (US) consumers. For US businesses. For US jobs. For US & Mexican industries. For the environment in the US, in Canada & in Mexico.
In regards to the benefits of NAFTA for US consumers.---
1. It has brought about more free trade.
This has resulted in greater choices in goods & services.
2. It has brought about lower prices & improved quality products.
3. It has brought about stronger health & safety standards.
4. It has brought about improved economic stability in the US marketplace.
5. It has brought about a marketplace that is increasingly driven more by supply & demand than by barriers to commerce.
How NAFTA has benefited US businesses.---
1. It has brought about larger North American market access for businesses.
2. It has brought about new export & investment opportunities for businesses.
3. It has eliminated tariffs.
Because of this, products from Canada, the US & Mexico have flowed freely.
4. It has created strong "rules of origin" for North American made products.
5. It has implemented procedures to resolve trade disputes.
6. It has established compatible standards of goods between the US, Canada & Mexico.
7. It has greatly facilitated an effective & a smooth movement of goods & services between the US, Canada & Mexico.
#2125 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead ---- How NAFTA has benefited US jobs.---
1. NAFTA has created A LOT of jobs for US workers.
This is how this was done.--- NAFTA expanded the access to US goods & services in the Mexican & Canadian markets.
Examples.--- 1. Jobs which were supported by the export of US goods to Mexico & to Canada.-- Increased from 311,000 back in 1993 (1993 was before NAFTA became law) to OVER 2.3 million by 1996.
2. Export supported jobs (Which are higher productivity) pay 13% to 16% MORE than the average US wage.
#2126 Mar 14, 2013
Very good to hear. Were you born in the Netherlands?
Oh yes, the Netherlands have produced a lot of very good fighters. In the contact sport of Kickboxing. Also, in Mixed Martial Arts (MMA).
I've heard that the Netherlands is also known for partying. Red light district, etc.. Lol.
#2127 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead ---- NAFTAs benefits to American industries.
In regards to these respective areas.--- 1. Agriculture. 2. The Automotive Industry.
In regards to #1, the benefits of NAFTA to American agriculture.---
Under NAFTA, North Americas agricultural marketplace has become more integrated between the United States (US), Canada & Mexico.
Also, under NAFTA, North Americas agricultural marketplace has become more integrated with the nations of Central America, South America & the Caribbean basin.
In addition, Americas agricultural sector has become way more productive & way more efficient.
What this has led to is a "rising of the tide" for Canadas & Mexicos agricultural sectors.
It has also led to a rising of the tide for the nations of Central America, South America & the Caribbean basins agricultural sectors.
Under NAFTA, US consumers have had a more open access to MUCH wider sources of supply.
Because of this, US consumers have benefited greatly.
Furthermore, since NAFTA became law.--- US agricultural exports to North America have grown RAPIDLY.
Examples of this.--- 1. Back in 1996, it was at 11.6 billion.
As of 2005, it was at OVER $30 billion.
From 2005 till now.--- It has risen by A LOT more.
#2128 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead --- How NAFTA has been very BENEFICIAL to the Automotive Industry.---
Now, prior to NAFTA becoming law, US motor vehicle exports to Mexico faced restrictive trade balancing & local content requirements.
US motor vehicle exports to Mexico faced Mexican tariffs which were at a little over 20%.
But, with NAFTA, these Mexican trade tariffs have been removed.
This has brought about liberalized investment rules & preferential rules of origin.
Because of this.--- US parts & vehicle manufacturers have become more efficient & more competitive in the North American market.
Here's an example.--- For 1996.--- The US exported over 51,000 new cars & 31,500 new trucks to just Mexico ALONE.
The value of this trade was at OVER $1.2 billion.
#2129 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead --- How NAFTA has been very BENEFICIAL in these areas.--- 1. Textiles. 2. Apparel.
Since NAFTA became law.--- There has been increased economic activity & enhanced export prospects for textile & apparel producers in the US.
Under NAFTA, this has enabled US producers to optimize production & manufacturing investment in North America.
This has resulted in a shift of production. From the Far East to North American markets.
This has greatly STRENGTHENED the North American market.
Here's an example. Of the growth in this field.--Back in 1993 (Before NAFTA became law), it was at just over $6.4 billion.
In 1996, it was at OVER $12.4 billion.
So, trade nearly doubled.
From 1996 till now.--- It has risen WAY more.
#2130 Mar 14, 2013
Paul is dead --- Last points.--- Which show how very BENEFICIAL NAFTA has been.
In these respective areas.--- 1. The environment. 2. Overall benefits of NAFTA from early 1994 till now.
In regards to #1, how NAFTA has been very beneficial to the environment.--
Under the NAFTA Commission for Environment Cooperation (CEC).-- The United States (US), Canada & Mexico have undertaken cooperation on a broad range of environmental issues.
Especially in regards to these areas.---
1. For countering illegal trade in hazardous wastes.
2. For countering trade in endangered wildlife.
3. For the elimination of certain toxic chemicals & pesticides.
Under the CEC, Mexico has agreed to join the US & Canada in banning the pesticides DDP & chlordane.
Mexico has also ensured that these long lived substances WON'T be crossing the United States (US) border.
In addition, the US & Mexico have also launched a Border 21 program.
Under this Border 21 program, 5 year objectives have been established for achieving a clean border environment.
A blueprint has been established for meeting these objectives.
In regards to #2, the overall benefits of NAFTA from 1994 till now.---
NAFTA has MORE than proved its worth to the US, to Canada & to Mexico.
From 1994 till now, these respective areas have been greatly INCREASED.---
1. Consumer choice.
2. Improving the market access for US products.
3. Greatly expanded US jobs supported by exports.
So, NAFTA has been very BENEFICIAL for Canada, the US & Mexico.
NAFTA has also been very BENEFICIAL for the nations of Central America, South America & the Caribbean basin.
Add your comments below
|The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15)||4 min||Bongo||77,844|
|Bush is a hero (Sep '07)||5 min||Rider on the Storm||183,779|
|Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07)||38 min||here||283,684|
|Prove there's a god. (Mar '08)||40 min||Catcher1||975,281|
|Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07)||44 min||Juan||45,740|
|ye olde village pub (Jun '07)||1 hr||AnnBonney||53,980|
|ladies is there such thing as too big? (Jun '13)||1 hr||Shazzaw||23|
|Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12)||2 hr||Ajay||162|
|Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07)||5 hr||truth||661,445|
|Why are Mexicans trash? (Apr '10)||9 hr||Slimy Daniel||240|
Find what you want!
Search Top Stories Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC