Why do white men hate white women who...
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1757 Dec 13, 2012
Paul id dead wrote:
I'm going to turn 50 years old this year. And yes, I would like to take back the 37 years I've been drinking and drugging. I would definitely be further along in life by now.
__________

I see your points above. I sure hope that you aren't doing drugs again.

I say this because via several of your previous posts which you addressed to me, you don't seem to be coherent &/or cogent.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1758 Dec 13, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
NO, it wasa a confrontation out suburb streets of Dallas.
__________

"If" Lee Harvey Oswald was "innocent" of the assasination of our nations former president, John F. Kennedy.--- Then, why did Oswald so very cruelly & cowardly shoot down officer J.D. Tippet?

Lee Harvey Oswald did have extreme violence in him.

An example.--- Back in 1963.--- Lee Harvey Oswald tried to kill Right-wing American General, Edwin Walker.

In Oswalds assasination attempt against General Walker.--- Lee took up a sniper position against General Walkers home. Oswald saw General Walker sitting at a desk in front of a window. Lee fired a shot. Oswalds shot missed General Walkers head by just a little over an inch.

Lee was VERY supportive of Cubas left wing, communist dictatorship. Which was headed by Fidel Castro.

Oswald was totally well aware of John F. Kennedys policies against Cuba. Primarily Americas economic embargo. Also, Kennedy ordering the former Soviet Union to remove their long range nuclear armed missiles which they formerly had stationed in Cuba.

Lee also knew of John F. Kennedy giving the go-ahead for the assasination plots against Fidel Castro.

Oswald was very angered by this.

Lee read a speech by Castro. In Fidels speech, Castro spoke about the plots against him. Fidel called for retaliatory action.

Oswald killed John F. Kennedy to impress Castro.

Lee hoped to gain entry into Cuba.

Within a week before John F. Kennedys assasination, Lee Harvey Oswald tried to obtain a travel visa from Cubas left wing, commmunist dictatorship. This was within a week right before John F. Kennedys assasination.

After Kennedys assasination, Lee hoped to be able to escape capture from American authorities. Oswald hoped to escape to Cuba. Where he hoped to live as a hero.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1759 Dec 13, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
National Socialism, although racially motivated in policy. Again, an elite rulership at the top, in this case the Aryan race, and everyone else a slave, or destroyed in concentration camps.
__________

Not true.

National Socialism had MANY supporters who were not "White Aryans".

Examples of this.---- 1. Japans former, Right-wing, Fascist government from 1931 till 1945.

2. Italys former, Right-wing, Fascist government. From 1936 (With the signing of the Axis Power Pact) till 1943.



3. Hungarys former, Right-wing, Fascist government from 1936 till 1944.

4. Romanis former, Right-wing, Fascist government from 1936 till 1944.

5. Slovakias former, Right-wing, Fascist government from 1938 till 1945.

6. Bulgarias former, Right-wing, Fascist government from 1936 till 1944.

7. In Italy.--- Many Fascist sympathizers.

8. In Romania.--- Many Fascist sympathizers. Primarily the Iron Guard organization.

9. In Hungary.--- Many Fascist sympathizers. Primarily the Arrow Cross organization.

10. In France.-- Many Fascist sympathizers. Primarily the Croix de Feu & the Camelots du Roy organizations.

11. In Belgium.---- Many Fascist sympathizers. Primarily the Rexist & the Flemish Vlaansch National Verbond organizations.

12. In Lithuania.--- Many Fascist sympathizers. Primarily the Iron Wolf organization.

13. In Croatia.--- Many Fascist sympathizers. Primarily the Ustase organization.

14. In Slovakia.--- Many Fascist sympathizers. Primarily the SPP Party organization.

15. In Bulgaria.--- Many Fascist sympathizers. Primarily the Ratniks organization.

In addition, many Fascists from Russia, Ukraine, Latvia & Estonia.

Each & every one of these Fascists &/or "Nazi" groups were NOT "Aryan Whites".

But, they were ALL sworn enemies of leftists. Of all leftists.

Especially sworn enemies of the former Soviet Unions left wing, communist dictatorship of Josef Stalin.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1760 Dec 13, 2012
Paul is dead --- I have to step out now. I still have to respond back to several of your previous posts which you addressed to me.

Hopefully, I should have some time tomorrow.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1761 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
<quoted text>360,000 and a million or more wounded(from the North) fought and died to end it.
__________

From 1860 till 1865, the forces which were under the control of the United States (US) federal government. Who were fighting against the forces which were under the control of the southern American states, the Confederate States of America (CSA -- Aka --- The Conferacy).--- American slavery was NOT at the forefront.

An example.--- Our nations president back then, Abraham Lincoln.--

In Abrahams Emancipation Proclamation which was issued back in September, 1862.---- Lincoln said ---

"I have urged the colonization of the Negroes,(back to Africa), and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan (of colonization). There is no room for two distinct races of White men in America, much less for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks...I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal...Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro...under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desireable".

So, had Abraham Lincoln not been assasinated by John Wilkes Booth, the policies of our nations federal government would have been very different. In regards to African Americans fate.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1762 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead --- Some other examples. Which show that slavery was NOT at the forefront of the United States (US) federal government. Fighting against the forces of the Confederate States of America (CSA --- Aka --- The Confederacy).

Also, to show that our nations president back then, Abraham Lincoln was NO "friend" to the African American slaves.---

Abraham, & pretty much all of the Democrat & Republican politicians in Washington D.C. back then did not consider the African American slaves to be "equal".

Lincoln even made a comment during his presidency where he said --- "That the only way that Whites & Negroes (Abraham used the term negroes to describe the black Americans) could & would be able to get along would be if they'd be an ocean apart".

There was an incident during Lincolns presidency. Where Abraham was watching some young African American kids doing a theatrical play. Abraham made an outward comment where he said --- "Ha, are these little monkeys funny".

In addition, Lincoln & pretty much all of the Democrat & Republican politicians in Washington D.C. back then were in favor of rounding up & deporting African Americans after the Civil War ended. But, due to Lincolns assasination.

Also, due to the high financial costs which would have been involved of rounding up & deporting, the deportation plan was then shelved.

So, American farming, business interests & American politicians in Washington D.C. decided to use African Americans as a cheap labor supply in agriculture & in industry. Maybe as a voting bloc.

Had the deportation plan went forward, these areas would have taken in the deported African Americans.--- The nation of Haiti. Also, areas in what are now the countries of Guyana, Belize & Panama.

The African Americans who were to be deported to Panama were to construct a canal. This was decades before work began on the modern canal in Panama back in 1904.

But, the main nation which was to take in most Arican Americans was the black West African nation of Liberia. Liberia was actually created by the US federal government back in 1821 for this purpose. This was decades even before the US Civil War broke out.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1763 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
Again, he says National Socialism was not originally political.
\\
__________

Uh, in my previous responses back to you, never once did I ever say that National Socialism was not originally political.

Dude (With all due respect), what you are saying above, it sure points to you not thinking clearly. Yet again. Smh.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1764 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
JOHNNY FROM MANHATTAN(NOT WISCONSIN) he says the Illuminati is 'so called', and in other posts he uses the word 'alleged'. But, now recently, he owns up to the existance of the Illuminati;
__________

Via what you typed up above, it appears that you overlooked (Yet again) what I typed up to you in my prior responses back to you about the Bavarian Illuminati.

I DID acknowledge the Bavarian Illuminatis formation way, way back.

When I typed up "so-called" & "alleged", it was in regards to your "charges" that the Illuminati was behind happenings in the United States (US) & throughout the world from 1860 till now.

Primarily in reference to your "charges" that the Illuminati was behind happenings in the US & throughout the world from 1913 till now.

Especially in regards to your "charges" that the Illuminati was behind happenings in the US & throughout the world from 1966 till now.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1765 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
<quoted text>Hitler make a point that Communism was the mortal enemy of German National Socialism, so what in the world are the German Krupps doing manufacturing munitions in Soviet territory.
__________

The German Krupps armaments corporation "was" manufacturing weapons on Soviet territory. But, it was BEFORE the Nazi Party was in power in Germany.

The Krupps had branches on Soviet territory under the German Weimar Republic.

The German Weimar Republic had ties to the former Soviet Union under the Treaty of Rapallo. Starting back in 1922.

From 1922 till January, 1933, the German Weimar Republic did have some mutual pacts & acts of cooperation with the former Soviet Union.

Examples of this.--- 1. Back in 1922.--- The German Junkers corporation built aircraft at Fili. Fili is located right outside of Moscow, in the former Soviet Union (Now Russia).

2. Back in 1922.--- The German Krupp corporation traveled to Rostov-on-Don, in the former Soviet Union (Now Russia). The Krupp corporation worked very closely with the main Soviet artillery manufacturing industries. In developing & building many different forms of field artillery & anti-aircraft guns.

3. Back in 1925.--- Germanys Weimar Republic governments aviation corporations travled to Lipetsk, in Lipetsk, Oblast, former Soviet Union (Now Russia). Lipetsk is located at the Voronezh River, in the Don basin. 272 miles southeast of Moscow.

Weimar Germanys aviation corporations opened up & cooperated with the Soviets in developing & building aircraft.

4. Back in 1926.-- Weimar Germanys tank manufacturing corporations traveled to Kazan, in the Republic of Tatarstan. In the Volga federal district, former Soviet Union (Now Russia).

Weimar Germanys tank manufacturing corporations cooperated with the Soviets in developing & building army tanks.

5. Back in 1926.--- Weimar Germanys main chemical corporations traveled to Samara Oblast. In the federal district of the Volga, Soviet Union (Now Russia).

Weimar Germanys main chemical corporations cooperated with the Soviets in developing & building chemical weapons.

Subsequently, when Germany had the pacts & cooperation with the Soviets, it was when Germany was under the Weimar regime.

It was NOT when Germany was under the rule of the Nazi Party.

It was BEFORE Germany was under the rule of the Nazi Party.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1766 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead ---- When Germany had some pacts & cooperation with the former Soviet Union (USSR).---It was NOT when the Soviet Union was under the control of left wing, communist dictator, Josef Stalin. It was when the Soviet Union was under the control of left wing, communist dictator, Vladimir Lenin.

When the German corporations of Krupp, Junkers, other German aviation manufacturers, German tank manufacturers & German chemical corporations were developing & building in the former Soviet Union (USSR).--- This was NOT when the Soviet Union was under the rule of Josef Stalin. This was when the Soviet Union was under the rule of Vladimir Lenin.

When Germanys Weimar Republic ended with the Nazi Party coming to power in Germany back in late January, 1933.--- From 1933 till August, 1939.---The former Soviet Union & Nazi Germany did NOT have any close ties.

At the very beginning of the Nazi regime, the former economic, trade & cooperative relationship between the former Soviet Union & Germany greatly dwindled.

From late January, 1933 until late August, 1939, Nazi Germany & the former Soviet Union had some diplomatic initiatives continued.

It only got better by the start of the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Which was signed by late August, 1939.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1767 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
JOHNNY FROM MANHATTAN(NOT WISCONSIN) He says Tavistock Institute doesn't exist
__________

Uh, nope. In my previous response back to you.--- My counter points which I typed up.--- That was in regards to your "charges" against the Tavistock Institute.

Primarily your former "charges" against the Tavistock Institute as it pertained to the musical bands, the Beatles, Rolling Stones, Cream, Black Sabbath & Led Zeppelin.

Especially in regards to your former "charges" here.--- Where you "claimed" that the Tavistock Institute developed the AIDs virus in the black West African nation of Liberia. For depopulation purposes.

In 2 of my previous responses back to you, I listed hard evidence. Which totally debunked all of your former "charges" against the Tavistock Institute.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1768 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
JOHNNY FROM MANHATTAN(NOT WISCONSIN) he scoffs at the idea that the C.I.A, in the middle of the cold war mind you, could have come up with an electric operated, gas powered assassination pistol that fired an exploding pellet, which issued shell fish toxin.
__________

Nope. Dude (With all due respect), via what you have been typing up, you have been misconstruing many previous points. Also, that you are overlooking most prior points.

In my previous response back to you regarding that pistol, I wasn't denying its existence.

What I typed up in my previous response back to you was in regards to pointing out that the limousine driver, William Robert Greer who was driving our nations president back then, Democrat John F. Kennedy.--- That William was NOT the one who carried out the assasination of JFK. Primarily not considering the would be effects of that type of gun.

Especially considering the body positions of Texas former Governor, John Connally & his wife Nellie. John & Nellie were in FRONT of JFK.

Subsequently, John & Nellie were totally blocking JFK. From any type of "alleged" shot from William Greer. A shot which you falsely (Very falsely at this) "claim" that William made against JFK.

Which you made false "charges" against William Greer.

This is the MAIN reason as to why that type of pistol wasn't the weapon which assasinated JFK.--- JFKs wounds in his head & back.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1769 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
God put bread in the oven, but not long enough, the first white man. Then, God put bread in the oven, and left it in too long-The black man. God put bread in the oven and let it cook just long enough- haha the Chinese man, how about that!
__________

Uh, do you "think" BEFORE you type up your posts?

Even if you are thinking stuff such as what you typed up above.---Constructive advice.--- Please don't type up such tripe.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1770 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
The first people civilized among people of color were 'not' black. Who were they? The far eastern Chinese and south asian Indians. Yellow-brown people and red-brown people! Gee, isn't that somehing! Not black!
__________

You are absolutely correct about this.

In our in-depth blog discussion & debate on this thread, you have typed up several points which are 150% right on the mark.

Good post.

Since: Dec 12

San Diego, CA

#1771 Dec 15, 2012
Joan wrote:
I am so sick and tired of the white man always bellyaching on "Black men are taking our white women away from us"...boo hoo
Look if the white woman chooses the black man ......... or chose black over you - do you get the picture now white man??
You are in the wrong-grow up
Why do you care what they think? Why is their opinion important to you? Yeah, most white males do resent seeing WW with BM. Not much you can do about it. Is it racist? Yeah, most likely. But is it racist for BM to resent seeing a BW with a WM? Yeah...no different than the white guys hating. But there is nothing uncommon about this. Most racial/ethnicity's resent seeing members of their group with a non-member. Nothing new or unusual about this type of reaction. Not saying it is ok because I believe you should be with whom makes you happy and not what others of your group/different group believe or want. Just saying.....
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1772 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead --- In regards to your previous post to me,#1479. Your points here.---- You said "That's right, I said I believe, because I wasn't there. Yes, I believe there were two shooters".--- Uh, the shooting at the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado was done by ONE shooter. All of Americas respective television media venues & newspaper print outlets have reported it WASN'T two shooters.

It was one shooter.

You said "He was probably, yes, I said probably because I wasn't in on it, a product an MKULTRA, or Paperclip experiment, carried out by either by either Illuminists, or Committee of 300".--- Oh geez.

You really "believe" that?

If you really believe that the shooting at the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado was under the auspices of a MKULTRA operation &/or Paperclip experiment. Carried out by either Illuminists &/or the Committee of 300.--- That is truly SAD. Smh.

I could type up more in regards to this. But, it wouldn't be too politically correct.

But, if you really "believe" that, that is truly tragic.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1773 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
Yes, British Intelligence was behind the assassinations of Abraham Lincoln, William Mckinnley, James Garfield, and John F Kennedy; and the near assassination of Andrew Jackson, all wanting to break away from British banking tyranny.
__________

Really? How so?

Since you are throwing up more "charges". Your latest charges are against the Intelligence Services of the United Kingdom (UK).

Please provide hard evidence which shows that the UKs Intelligence Services were behind the assasinations of our nations former presidents Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, James Garfield & John F. Kennedy.

Provide hard evidence which shows that the UKs Intelligence Services were behind the attempted assasination of Andrew Jackson.

If one is throwing up charges against others. Primarily considering that your charges entail acts which happened against famous, well known, prior American presidents.---

Since you are throwing up these charges, prove them.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1774 Dec 15, 2012
biosnex wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you care what they think? Why is their opinion important to you? Yeah, most white males do resent seeing WW with BM. Not much you can do about it. Is it racist? Yeah, most likely. But is it racist for BM to resent seeing a BW with a WM? Yeah...no different than the white guys hating. But there is nothing uncommon about this. Most racial/ethnicity's resent seeing members of their group with a non-member. Nothing new or unusual about this type of reaction. Not saying it is ok because I believe you should be with whom makes you happy and not what others of your group/different group believe or want. Just saying.....
__________

biosnex, just to give you a heads up about the poster who typed up the first post on this thread, starting it off.--- "Joan".--- This is NOT a natural, real woman. It is an African American (Descendant of a black American slaves) dude.

Jim, from New Jersey. Here are the troll names which he has used on Topixs Top Stories forum.--- Joan, Pam, Lucy, Donna, Gayle, Lisa, Jackie & Kristin.

This African American troll would (He still does) always type up interracial sex stories.

In each & every one of his stories, he always portrays the White women as being major, big time s---s. He portrays the White dudes as being lazy, irresponsible & incompetent. Also, as being abusive, alcoholics or users of other drugs.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1775 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
<quoted text>You scapegoat the downtrodden, and the oppressed,(how dare you!)
__________

Not at all.

First off, it isn't the job of the United States (US) federal government to take care of Americans from the cradle to the grave.

What causes poverty?

Liberals & leftists have said that --- "Poverty breeds crime".

The liberal & leftist is incorrect.

Crime breeds poverty.

Here are many other factors which breed poverty.---

1. Young girls from ages 12-17 getting pregnant & having kids.


2. Young boys from ages 13-17 getting young girls pregnant.

3. Young kids throwing away their money on very frivolous wants.

4. Young kids not investing their money.

5. Young kids doing criminal acts when they are young.

Subsequently, they won't be employable later on in life. Employers don't want to hire them.

6. Kids not going to school.

7. Kids not studying in school.

8. Kids dropping out of school.

9. Kids starting out their work career with a very poor work record. Due to laziness, insubordination &/or not showing up for work.

Again, crime breeds poverty.--- When someone has a criminal record, employers don't want to hire them. Especially if one has a very extensive criminal record.

When one is a high school dropout, employers don't want to hire them.

When one has a very bad work record, employers don't want to hire them.

People are poor due to their own behavior, actions & attitudes.

It is their OWN causing & doing.
Johnny

Muskego, WI

#1776 Dec 15, 2012
Paul is dead wrote:
are now working two or three service jobs. Now we see that a major empoyer of service positions is forcing their highest paid workers out while bringing in people who will do the same job for less. Walmart had been doing that for years, although not blatantly. The shameless anouncement of Circuit City is blatant, and there will be little if any backlash. The presently unemployed or underpaid employeed will happily fill those positions, and after a nice 10 week-interlude, those former Circuit City employees can apply to get hired back at the reduced wage too.
__________

Regardless, this dynamic WON'T be changing in the United States (US).

Capitalism & free trade are here to stay in this nation.

Capitalism & free trade is the trend & wave in all of the other main economic nations throughout the world.

In addition, capitalism & free trade is also the trend & wave in all of the main nations of the 2nd world & developing world.

Capitalism & free trade is also the trend & wave throughout the black, sub-saharan African nations.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min hojo 683,527
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 6 min bad bob 15,181
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr nanoanomaly 982,996
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr Dees Nhutz 286,521
Tribute Wife's DDD's! 2 hr Orangestar4189 1
O.J. Simpson is about to be a free man once again. 2 hr Mirrormirorwall 2
Moroccan Guys Have The Biggest Cocks! (Jun '13) 4 hr Mimi 31
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 5 hr Just Wondering 619,682
More from around the web