But you prove my point here genius. The entry hole is always smaller. If the entry hole in the back of Mr. Kennedy's head was a baseball size hole, and it was, then it being an entry wound, the exit wound would have been atleast twice the size.<quoted text>
This is why.---- That Carcano rifle fired a 6.5 by 52mm bullet.
That bullet with the muzzle velocity of that Carcano rifle SURE could make that type of entry wound into the back of a persons head.
That type of bullet, upon entering into the back of a persons skull, sure would NOT have the penetrating power to also take off a persons face.
But, a 12.7mm rifle sure could do both.
He wouldn't have had a face left if that were the entrance of the 6.5 x 52 mm bullet, which a small cartridge of that nature couldn't make that big a hole anyway! Most wise one!
This is sworn testimony of Dr. Charles Crenshaw, attending physician/Surgeon to Mr. President John Fitzgerald Kennedy at Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas, November 22nd, 1963; approximately 1:16 PM, Central standard time, or about 45 minutes after the assassination of JFK. He said," The bullet hole to Mr. Kennedy's temple, is small enough to be considered an ENTRY WOUND!"
The temple is in front of the head, above the eye socket, you are aware of this aren't you?
the Occipital part of the skull is directly behind the temple, this completely corresponds with, and doesn't contradict whatsoever an exploding pellet, making a small entry level wound through the temple, exploding and destroying the right occipital skull, and frontal right lobe of John F. Kennedy's brain!
You prove my point in your innane rebuttal wrong way!