Paul dead most def

Pleasantville, NJ

#2676 Oct 9, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Your point above.---- Are you aware of what you stated?
Because, your statement above is in DIRECT opposite correlation to your other previous "theory" about the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
Awhile back on this thread, in a couple of my previous responses back to you, I listed what happened on that very fateful day in Dallas, back in November, 1963.
One of my points which I stated.---- You, YOURSELF with your above point are now stating the exact, same thing.
This is in regard to Greer turning around and aiming, then firing and blowing off his entire right occipital skull, and right frontal lobe of his brain.

this was my research.

And here, the liar that you really are, are taking credit for it.

How convenient of you SATAN.

This is from post #2421
Paul dead most def

Pleasantville, NJ

#2677 Oct 9, 2013
Johnny wrote:
Paul is dead --- With all due respect, you are throwing up totally contradictory points in regards to your "claims" about the assassination of our nations former president, Democrat John F. Kennedy (JFK).
Here they are.--- 1. Awhile back on this thread, you were saying that John F. Kennedy was killed by an "alleged" shooter on the grassy knoll.
2. But, other times, you have typed up, saying that the driver of the limousine which JFK was in, William Robert Greer was the assassin of JFK.
I called up several other video links regarding the assassination of JFK.---- In every one of these links, nothing pointed out towards showing any such aggressive actions by William Greer.
It is primarily because of these critical factors which show that William Greer was NOT the assassin of JFK.---
In the limousine which William was driving, John & his wife Nellies bodies were situated in front of JFK.
So, Greer, physically could NOT have shot JFK.
Most of all, because of these 2 VERY critical factors. Which points to William F. Greers innocence.----
1. After Lee Harvey Oswalds fatal last shot, the assassination bullet to JFKs head.--- There is a clear crack in the windshield of that limousine. Right in front of William F. Greer. This crack in the windshield was in direct line of fire from Oswalds sniper nest.
2. Right after Lee Harvey Oswalds lethal, last shot, the assassination bullet to JFKs head.--
Two bullet fragments were found in the limo. IN FRONT OF William F. Greer.
These bullets were the EXACT, SAME ammunition which Oswald used for his Carcano rifle. In his assassination of JFK.
This is post #1802. You say here I'm throwing up some more contradictory points. You say, I never said, but you say that I said He was killed from the knoll, and yet another post I claim Greer did it. In yet another post, and I can't presently find it, you claim I'm not definitely certain Greer made the shot. I'll find it, I promise ya. But for now I'll show what a liar you are.
Paul dead most def

Pleasantville, NJ

#2678 Oct 9, 2013
Paul is dead wrote:
They murdered Mr. John Fitgerald Kennedy. The first shot from the grassy knoll(the fenced in hill along side dealy plaza in Dallas. This was to Mr. Kennedy's throat,(and yes, this is evidenced(proof) in the autopsy picture.) Again, William Greer, secret serviceman and driver of Mr. Kennedy's limo, turned around, right hand on the steering wheeland lefted handedly shot Mr. Kennedy's right frontal lobe and skull off with an electric powered, gas operated, assassination pistol with exploding pellets filled with shell fish toxin.(Oh yes, the C.I.A were developing shell fish toxin for up close assassintions in Bethesda,MD, ooohhh yes they were!) No, it isn't science fiction kiddies, the modern age didn't start in 1999, it started in 1946, when Russian Migs were flying at light speed. Mr. Kennedy was murdered on November 22nd, 1963. Three months later, Tavistock brought the Beatles over to bring the drug culture, and druidic-satanic rock(no!? Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, The Rolling Stones, and even the Beatles idolized Aleister Crowley, self admitted satanist. Well, look on the back right(our left) of Sgt. Peppers album, he's there! When the true Paul Mccartney wouldn't go along with the program, they killed him! Oh when did this happen? Wednesday, November 9th, 1966. turn 9 upside down...666. This is the year when Anton Lavey founded the first church of satan. Midnight, April 30th turning into May lst. Oh well golly gee bat man! 4/30 is Walpurgisnaught, which becomes 5/1, May day! May day! May day! Beltaine! Boy, these are both satanic/luciferian/druidic holidays! what a freekin coincidence! I wish I knew as much as Johnny Jack-wagon!
Here I conclusively say the first shot came from said grassy knoll, and Greer made the finishing shot.
Paul dead most def

Pleasantville, NJ

#2679 Oct 9, 2013
Paul is dead wrote:
Mr. John F Kennedy received the throat shot from the grassy knoll from badge man, an Illuminati dressed like a police officer.
He then recieved the mortal head wound, which took off the front right occipital part of his skull, and his right cerebral part of his brain.
It was Illuminati William Greer who turned right hand on steering wheel, and assination in left hand, he was left handed!, blew off John Kennedys right side of his head, leaving an huge exit wound on the left back of JFK's head.
Lee Oswald was a convenient patsy is all. He was drinking a cup of coffe talking with his supervisor, Roy truly, Oswald at that book depository. He was on the second floor there being introduced to Marion Baker a police officer no less, at the time of the assination approximately 12:29 to 12:31 pm, 11/22/1963.
He couldn't have been on the 6th floor making the shot, it is impossible. Furhter, a 52mm bullet issued from a 91/38 Carcano/Carbine will not make an entry shot baseball sized hole in the back of his head as was shown in the autopsy of Mr. Kennedy.
It would make a nickel sized entry hole at best.
Here's a fact, not fiction. A bullet 'ALWAYS' makes a smaller entry hole, and larger exit hole.
Only in the case of an exploding pellet will the entry and exit holes be similar.
And that's how Mr. Kennedy was killed exectly.
And by the way, about black dudes and white broads being persecuted for being together.
It was the land mark case, Loving Vs. the State of Virgina in 1967, which ended it being illegal for people of differn't races to marry.
The dude was 3/4 white 1/4 Cherokee Indian. She was 1/2 black and 1/2 half Rappahanok Indian.
Two American Indians wanted to marry, but because his skin was white, and hers was black, it was forbidden.
I know it's all wierd, you don't have to tell me.
I have made some childish postings, so please forgive me...all.
I hate seeing white men denigrated, even though some,(not all,) might even deserve it.
I am 1/4 Sicilian, and my grandfather was indeed, and infact 1/2 Amerian Indian, from the Creek tribe.
I'm dark! but still consider myself a Caucasian.
I have read, and heard, and experienced the unkind things said about both my heritages from mainly idiots of Northern European extraction.
Infact, I said it before; I was waiting for a bus last year, wearing shorts, and a sweatshirt, and sneakers; nothing to say I was 'Native American.'
A fellla walked by and said,"You're Indian, aren't you?" I said," I am part, how did you know?" He said ," Because you look very Indian."
He was a Puerto Rican dude, not a white dude.
I wanna say God bless everybody, and God bless America.
The Illuminati is evil, and needs to be resisted.
Jesus Christ is the Messiah for the whole of Humanity.
Yes, that brown Middle Eastern Jewish Rabboni, Yaha'Shuah died for you whether you are blond with blue eyes, black, brown, yellow, or red, old or young, male or female.
Maranatha!
post #2416. Here I say Greer made the final shot as well. See Mr. false accuser? No contradictory and/or diametrically opposing statements.
Paul dead most def

Pleasantville, NJ

#2680 Oct 9, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
With all due respect, you are not thinking clearly. Yet again.
Granted, many White dudes fought & died during the United States (US) Civil War. But, the Emancipation Proclamation was NOT at the forefront of White dudes who were from the Northern United States fighting the US Civil War.
To show this.--- In Abraham Lincolns Emancipation Proclamation which was issued back in September, 1862.--- Abraham said.--
"I have urged the colonization of the Negroes back to Africa, and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan of colonization. There is no room for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks. I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal. Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro. Under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desireable".
Here you are directly quoting the famous Emancipation Proclamation.--- In Abraham Lincolns Emancipation Proclamtion, which was issued in 1862--- Abraham said.

Then you proceed to misquote the entire document.

Talk about a diametrically opposing statement! Whew, you're friggin funny man. Haahaahahalol.
Paul dead most def

Pleasantville, NJ

#2681 Oct 9, 2013
Paul is dead wrote:
The Emancipation Proclamation.
Whearas, on the twenty-second day of September, the Year of our Lord, One thousand eight hundred and Sixty two, a Proclamtion was issued by the President of the United States, containing, among other things, to wit:
That on the first day of January, in the Year of our Lord, One thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, that all persons held as slaves in any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, and thenceforward, shall be FOREVER FREE; and the executive branch of the United States, including the Military, and Naval authority, therof, will recognize, and maintain the freedom of such persons, or any of them, and any efforts that they may make in achieving their actual freedom.
That the Executive will, on the first day of January aforesaid, designate that States and parts of States; if any, if the people thereof, respectively, shall be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any State, and the people thereof, shall on that day be, in good faith, represented by the Congress by members chosen whereto at elections wherein at a majority of qualified voters shall have participated, shall, be in the absence of strong counterveiling testimony be deemed conclusive evidence that such State, and people thereof, shall not be in rebellion against the United States of America.
1st letter, page 95, post #2075
Paul dead most def

Pleasantville, NJ

#2684 Oct 9, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
With all due respect, you are not thinking clearly. Yet again.
Granted, many White dudes fought & died during the United States (US) Civil War. But, the Emancipation Proclamation was NOT at the forefront of White dudes who were from the Northern United States fighting the US Civil War.
To show this.--- In Abraham Lincolns Emancipation Proclamation which was issued back in September, 1862.--- Abraham said.--
"I have urged the colonization of the Negroes back to Africa, and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan of colonization. There is no room for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks. I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal. Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro. Under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desireable".
Here's your idiotic post, which is diametric oppostion to the above document.

You directly quote --- In Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, which was issued in September 1862---Abraham Said.

This is your first lie.
Paul dead most def

Pleasantville, NJ

#2685 Oct 9, 2013
TO MAHATANN JOHNNY,
I made a rebuttal to your claim that I said I wasn't sure if Greer made the shot #2559, read it.
I've always said he, Greer made the final shot.
Anway, read your interpretation of the Emancipation Proclamation document, it is line for line in contradiction of the original Emancipation Proclamation Document.
In your post, Mr.Lincoln fears calamity,(a disaster waiting to happen,) if Negroes assimilate into white society.
Again, that was from your post,#2040.
In the actual document, Mr. Lincoln knows that now that the free black man/woman is now assimilating into free white society, they many have to use violence, but only in self defense. He both expects this, and condones this.
Why would he be against it, and yet for it?
You say in a later quote after I had originally posted this, way back, that you quoted outside of the context of the E.P. For what? further clarification of what Mr. Lincoln said.
If so, then your post is neither coherent,or cogent.
Don't you continually accuse me of making incoherent, and non-cogent statements?
Line for line, whether you meant it to be within or without of the context of the original document, it is contradictory from start to finish.
Your interpretation of the Emancipation Proclamation gives no clarity whatsoever to the original letter of the document; and I mean whatsoever.
Comparatively what you say in post#2040,your interpretation of said E.P. that is,is alogether illogical, unreasonable, and contradictory, as well as it being incoherent, and non-cogent(telling in its presentation.)
Yours is in no way telling in its presentation, but is just the opposite. They are both, the real Emancipation Proclamation, and your interpretation of said document therof, whether directly, or indirectly outside of the real authentic context, is , to use your own words ...documentally....in diametric opposition to one another.
Aren't these the things you accue me of continually Johnny?
In addition to being a continual liar who likes to take credit for my research, or falsely accuse me,you are more quilty of the following then I've ever been!
IE.....
Throwing up contradictory points?
Not using logic, or reasoning before you post?
Making diametrically opposite statements?
Incoherency, and non-cogency?
Get real Johnny, you can't beat me in an argument fairly; and I have/do consistantly told/tell the truth.
Bye Johnny,
P.s. Change your stinking attitude toward black people.
The real villains wear $1000.00 dollar suits, and dirve in $100,000 dollar cars.
And no, I'm not advocating class-warfare!
Class warfare is an Illuminati tool to divide us, and conquer us!
It's no sin to have money.
But you bet that there are no poor Illuminists!(Illuminati.)
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2686 Oct 11, 2013
Doctor REALITY wrote:
<quoted text>You're nothing but WHYTE TRASH.
__________

Nope. Totally clean record here.

Same for my parents & 2 older brothers. None of us have ever been on any type of assistance. Not even for 1 day.

I do acknowledge that my points which I typed up in my previous posts,#2611,#2612 & #2613 were not that politically correct.

Posts #2611,#2612 & #2613 on page 121.----

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TBT607N... .

What I typed up, are the reasons why I, my family, friends, acquaintances & co-workers are anti-union & anti-African American (Descendants of black American slaves).

All of the foreign born blacks whom we know, have also seen firsthand the actions of the union leaders.

All of the foreign born blacks whom we know, have also seen African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) behavior, actions & attitudes.

All of the foreign born blacks whom we know are also anti-union & anti-African American (Descendants of black American slaves).
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2687 Oct 11, 2013
Doctor REALITY wrote:
<quoted text>You know, I know some very classy, generous, down-to-earth, humble, friendly, caring European people. Lots of them. But you're not one of them, Johnny.
__________

I'm all for giving help to people who are DESERVING of assistance. Up to a certain extent.

I'm all for helping non-Hispanic Whites, Asians, Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included).

I'm all for helping blacks who have ancestral roots from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations) & from Africa.

I'm all for helping foreign born immigrants of color, because they have honor, pride, respect, dignity, humility, integrity, self gratitude & morals.

I'm all for helping foreign born immigrants of color, because they have goals, drive, ambition, desire, motivation, commitment & dedication.

I'm all for helping foreign born immigrants of color, because they value & cherish work ethic, family values, morals, decency, education, law & order.

I'm NOT for helping African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

Because African American lack honor, lack pride, lack respect, lack integrity & lack morals.

I'm not for helping African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) because they don't care about other groups.

African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) don't even care about themselves.

African Americans don't even have respect for themselves.

African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) collectively ARE a threat to White America.

African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) collectively ARE a threat to the American System.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2688 Oct 11, 2013
Paul is dead wrote:
<quoted text>They were both Socialist forms of goverment. When Hitler launched operation Barbarosa,in June 1941, it was two Socialist forms of government at war.
U.S.S.R Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics
NAZI National SOCIALISM.
MEATHEAD!
__________

The former Soviet Unions left wing communist dictatorship did have a socialist style economic system.

Nazi Germany did NOT.

In my one previous response back to you about the former Soviet Union & Nazi Germany, I listed many examples which pointed this out.

Either you are unable to comprehend. Or, you are deliberately overlooking the points. Or, you are deliberately not agreeing to come across as argumentative.

The Nazis term.---- It stood for National Socialist Workers Party.

The reason why the Nazi leaders had the words "Socialist Workers" in their name, was as a public relations stunt.

In their attempt at winning over the German workers who were voting for candidates of the German Socialist Party & German Communist Party.

Again, the Nazis were NOT socialist.

The Nazis were far Right wing.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2689 Oct 11, 2013
Paul is dead -----

You said "they many have to use violence, but only in self defense".----

Yes, Abraham Lincoln did state this.

But, when did Abraham state this?--- When he was issuing the Emancipation Proclamation.

Lincoln stated this as a public relations move, in his attempt to get African Americans on board with the Union forces.

You said "further clarification of what Mr Lincoln said".----

I sure will.

In my next post, I'll list many examples which show this.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2690 Oct 11, 2013
Paul is dead ----

Here are the examples which show this.----

1. Right after Abraham issued & signed the Emancipation Proclamation.----

Lincoln stated this.---

"There is no room for two distinct races of White men in America, much less for two distinct races of Black and White. I can conceive of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the Negro into our social and political life as our equal...Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro [to Africa] and give him our language, literature, religion, and system of government under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desireable".

This was Abraham Lincolns statement after he issued & signed the Emancipation Proclamation.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2691 Oct 11, 2013
Paul is dead ----

Another example.----

2. Right after Abraham issued & signed the Emancipation Proclamation.----

Lincolns letter to Horace Greenly.

This is what Abraham stated.----

"I am not nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social & political equality of the white and black races - that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negros, nor qualifying them to intermarry white (women) people...there must be the position of superior and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race".
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2692 Oct 11, 2013
Paul is dead ----

Other examples.----

Which shows that Abraham Lincoln, other Republicans & Democrats in Washington D.C. did NOT consider the African American slaves to be equal.----

Granted, Abraham Lincoln was against slavery.

But, Abraham did NOT consider African Americans to be equal.

Lincoln was very much opposed to full integration of free African Americans into American society.

Abraham was a very active proponent of "colonization". Colonization was a movement to resettle freed African American slaves outside the United States.

In mid 1862, even as Lincoln was preparing the Emancipation Proclamation, he negotiated with European powers for resettlement of African Americans in their colonies.

Abraham signed resettlement contracts with private companies to resettle African Americans in black nations.

Lincoln very much had difficulty envisioning African Americans having a full & equal role in post-slavery America.

Abraham was very much against mandating full voting rights & jury service in readmitted states.

Most of all, this here shows that Lincoln did NOT consider African Americans to be equal.----

Abrahams final speech in April, 1865.---- Lincolns speech very much showed that he maintained all of his former positions about African Americans to the end of his life.

For Lincoln, preserving & rebuilding the Union & regaining the trust of Southern Whites took PRECEDENCE over rights for freed African Americans.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2693 Oct 11, 2013
Paul is dead -----

In regards to the White Republican & White Democrat politicians in Washington D.C. back then who were against deporting the African American slaves.----

It wasn't based upon any moral grounds.

It was due to the high financial costs which would have been involved in the rounding up of the African American slaves.

It was due to the high financial costs which would have been involved in the deporting of the African American slaves.

So, the White Republicans & White Democrats in Washington D.C. back then were proponents (Very much so) of using the newly freed African Americans as a very cheap labor supply in agriculture & in industry.

As a voting bloc years down the road.

So, even the White Republicans & White Democrats in Washington D.C. who did not support deportation.-----

They still didn't consider African Americans to be equal.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2694 Oct 11, 2013
Paul dead most def wrote:
TO MAHATANN JOHNNY,
I said I wasn't sure if Greer made the shot.
I've always said he, Greer made the final shot.
__________

With your 2 points above, well, you have done it again. You have done it, yet again.

With a totally contradictory statement.

Your second statement above, totally contradicts your first statement.

Ha, ha.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2695 Oct 11, 2013
Paul dead most def wrote:
<quoted text>I perused the entier year of 2012, and it's nowhere to be found.
__________

It was in 2012.

You stated that twice. In between the first time you stated that, till the second time, it was a few months.

But, I do remember.

You did state it twice.

Maybe go back again. Because we have been blogging with our discussion & debate from around April, 2012 till now.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2696 Oct 11, 2013
Paul is dead ----

You said "The angle in which you claim Oswald held the rifle".----

Had Lee Harvey Oswald not had his face hugging right up to the very front of that Carcano rifle, yes, that sure would have been the reason why Lees face didn't have gun shot residue from that rifle.

You said "He couldn't have avoided getting gun shot contamination from getting on his cheek".----

Lee sure could have.

He could have, had he not had his face hugging right up to that rifle.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2697 Oct 11, 2013
Paul is dead ----

You said "He had gun powder contamination, that is GSR (gun shot residue) on his right hand that is 100% correct".---

Yep.

Are you even aware of what you just stated?---- If you are not, you are NOW agreeing with my previous points in my one other previous response back to you.

You said "He was given a warm parffin test. He failed, for his right hand that is".----

Correct.

Your statement here, are you even aware of what you just stated?---- If you are not, awhile back on this thread, you were in total disagreement about this.

But, with your statement above, you are now in agreement.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min truth 765,473
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 11 min Al Capone 4,971
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 11 min truth 555,197
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 32 min AussieBobby 263,715
Moses never existed 59 min truth 568
Why Topix is dying 1 hr yon 8
Lido Theater, Dallas (Mar '12) 1 hr deedee 290
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr Dr Wu 603,720
Hot gays in Abu Dhabi (Nov '13) 7 hr BottomNow 1,191

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE