Paul is dead

Pleasantville, NJ

#2551 Sep 29, 2013
Johnny wrote:
Paul is dead --- In regards to your previous post,#1362.--- You said "two shooters were involved, not just one, and that one was in custody, and one was at large".--- Uh, no.
The recent mass shooting in Aurora, Colorado.--- It was carried out by one person, James Holmes.
Oh geez.
With all due respect, do you ever think, use logic & reasoning before you type up your posts?
I don't know if you genuinely "believe" what you type up. Or, if what you type up, you do know that it is kooky. That you are typing up the truly bizarre tripe as a way of trolling.
But dude, you are really out there. Smh.
The Media, on Friday morning approximately 4:15 to 4:20 am eastarn standard time, reported on July 20th,2012 that there were 2 shooters for the next 45 minutes.

Now where do you suppose they got there information from Johnny?

The people,(eye-witnesses)in the Aurora theatre who were there.

You weren't! You say you know for sure that there was only one shooter?

This means the people in the theatre at the time were not credible eye-witnesses but you are?

In-friggin-credible!

Wow!

Heheha you're friggin somethin else palsie!
Paul is dead

Pleasantville, NJ

#2552 Sep 29, 2013
Johnny wrote:
With all due respect, do you ever think, use logic & reasoning before you type up your posts?
I don't know if you genuinely "believe" what you type up. Or, if what you type up, you do know that it is kooky. That you are typing up the truly bizarre tripe as a way of trolling.
But dude, you are really out there. Smh.
"With all due respect" Do you really use reasoning or logic before you post?

If people in the theatre in Aurora Colorado say they saw 2 shooters in the theatre that night; but the Media says no they were imagining things, then who can be believed here?

And you believe the Media over the people who were there, then what can I possibly say to you except..

With all due respect your the one who is really out there...DUDE!

Shaking my friggin head for real!

SMFHFR!!!!!!!
Paul is dead

Pleasantville, NJ

#2553 Sep 30, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Prior to you typing up your statement above.--- You said that ---"James Earl Ray may have been a patsy".
After you typed up your statement above, where you said --- "And James Earl Ray was a patsy, no doubt about it".---
You then said "That you weren't sure that James Earl Ray was a patsy".
Dude (With all due respect), are you even aware of what you are typing up?
You are not coherent.
Don't just accuse me, show some COGENT,CREDIBLE PROOF; using LOGIC, and REASONING. Show me thes diametrically opposing posts.
Paul is dead

Pleasantville, NJ

#2554 Sep 30, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Geez, how "convenient" of you to state that you stand corrected.
AFTER I pointed out your former incorrect statements which you addressed to me about which American states were slave holding states.
Here this pg 108, post#2358. You say here that it's very convenient of me to finally admit that it wasn't Pennsylvania, whcih was a free State, but actually it was Vermont.

You see Johnny, I always knew one state was free, and I mistakenly said it was Pennsylvania. PA gave up its slaves in 1848.

You also said you corrected me in that Maine never had slaves. No, Maine gave up its alaves in 1835.

You say you knew it was Vermont all along, that had no slaves per their state Constitutional charter circa 1777; and I will find that post I can promise you that!

Now in the next post I'll show what you actually said!
Paul is dead

Pleasantville, NJ

#2555 Sep 30, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Ha, ha.
Uh, the northeastern American state of Maine NEVER had slaves.
Maine was one of the "free states".
Here you say the Nothern states were all "free states" and never had slaves.

I knew they,'all states', had slaves at one time or another. I just mistakenly said it was Pennsylvania, when actually it was Vermont!

Uh, how convenient of you to take credit for my correcting my own mistake!

Caught you in a multiple this time!

You multiply lied, falsely accused, and misquoted!

Ha!
Paul is dead

Pleasantville, NJ

#2556 Sep 30, 2013
TO MANHATTAN JOHNNY, NOT FROM WISCONSIN OR CALIFORNIA...WHO KNOWS ALL...SEES ALL....

Yes, that's the place page 108, post #2358. On page 110, post #2387, I corrected myself. It was there where I admit wrong, it was Vermont that was the only free state, and not as I mistakenly thought it to be PA.

In post #2101 You say the Northern states were free and never had slaves.

Here, go and read it for yourself. You take credit for my correction.

Pg 108, post# 2358.

In post# 2101, you claim no free state, ie Northeastern state ever had slaves.

You see Johnny?

I've caught you in multiple lies, contradictions, false accusations, and your own multiple diametrically opposing,contradictory statements.

All you've done to me is falsely accuse, and yet never prove!

How so? You claim I said the Real Paul was murdered in early 67. You even gave the month of December, 2012 as the time period where I said.

I perused the whole month of 12/2012!

Guess what Johnny! It ain't there!

Boy howdy!
Paul is dead

Pleasantville, NJ

#2557 Sep 30, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Ha, ha.
Uh, the northeastern American state of Maine NEVER had slaves.
Maine was one of the "free states".
One more time oh most wise one.

This is post# 2101, page 96. You said, not me!, Maine being one of the 'free states' of the Northeast, that it never had slavery.

I correct myself on page 108 post# 2358

You take credit for it on page 110 post # 2387

Hey Johnny boyo, if ye caint win an argument against a mildly retarded,drug addled, alceholeek...

Then what bloody good are ye?

Harhar har har har hardy har har hehehehehahahahaaaahahaaaahaah aa!

LMFAOFF!!!!!!!!!hahahahaahah
Paul is dead

Pleasantville, NJ

#2558 Sep 30, 2013
Anyway, things are mixed up here. I came to the library today, and forgot to bring my spectacles.

My specs, meaning me glasses.

I'm working without glasses, I've freakin half blind.

How convenient of me heh Johnny?

Anywho'sll it's still all there in the above posts.

You making an greater incorrect statement, regarding the Northeast never owning slaves.

Me, making a smaller error, in that I got the only free state mixed up...it was Vermonat after all, not PA.

Me correcting my own error, without your help mind you.

You making an incorrect statement, not owning up to it, and lying just to win an argumennt.

Like I said, I don't have my glasses, my home is miles away; and I'm travelling in power wheelchair.

Since it'll take me too long to travel home and git me glasses then I'll....

just have to rip you a new one on a differn't day Johnny boyo

I almost like ya, ya wanna know why?

'At the end of the day,'(boy I hate that saying!)

You makea me laugh Giovanni!

Hahahahaahahalolololol!
Paul is dead for sure

Pleasantville, NJ

#2559 Oct 1, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
Your points above.---- Are you aware of what you stated?
I pose this question, because awhile back on this thread when we were blogging with our discussion & debate.---- You typed up these exact, same points which I quoted above. In that other post, you stated that William Greer turned around. But, that you weren't sure if he pulled any trigger.
Yet, in your post above, you are "definitive" that William Greer pulled the trigger.
Regardless, William Greer was NOT the assassin of John F. Kennedy (JFK).
Here, yet another lie from you!

Jean Hill, the lady in the red coat, the closest witness to the assassination ....saw a rifleman,(yes, a man dressed as a policeman,) on the grassy knoll(nothing mysterious, a grass covered hill, fenced in with a few trees, adjacent to the Dall North/South freeway sign,(a perfect place to make a shot from, but I digress,))and she saw;(when I was a 13 month old baby, and you weren't even born yet mind you!)Greer slow the car down and point the pistol at Mr. Kennedy's head.

She cannot conclusively say for sure on whether she saw William Greer fire the shot,(it was a near to silent assassination pistol(gas powered, electric operated,)delveloped by the C.I.A. for assassination purposes.))

It happened in? what were your exact words Johnny? 7 to 11 seconds!

That's what I said!

And if she(Ms. Hill,) did see Greer turn and aim that pistol,and she did!,the secret serviceman in the passenger side should have killed him.

There was a complicity of many players there that day.

That's why Mr. and Mrs. Connally, incuding Mrs. Kennedy,(whom her, and all of her children were watched and guarded for the rest of their life by)decided to zip their lips!

No, and I never ever said, as you have accused me of doing,that Mr. Kennedy was killed from the knoll, and then diametrically change my story and say driver Greer did it!

I have alwasys consistantly said the shot to the throat, which would have probably killed him anyway, came first, and then Greer finished him off; turning round right hand on steering wheel, and left handedly blow off the top right of his occipital skull, and entire top of his the frontal lobe of his brain.

Yes! Greer most definitely used an assassination pistol, first developed out of Bethesda,MD to off Fidel Castro; but used instead on John Fitzgeral Kennedy, approximately 12:29 to 12:31 pm, November 22nd,1963.

The said assassination pistol was electric operated,(ran on a charge,)gas powered,(had no need for gun powder for discharge,hence the lack of necessity for a warm paraffin test(I never said these bastards weren't clever!))

You wanna accuse all the time, show proof; show the contradictory post then accuse!

By the by Johnny, I still can't locate the post where I said True Paul was murdered in early 1967!

Yes, to use your innane phraseology yet again, I'm 150% most definitely sure that Greer made the final damaging shot with above said pistol.

If I've ever posted anything to the contrary, then the burden remains with you; prove it!!!!
Paul is dead for sure

Pleasantville, NJ

#2560 Oct 1, 2013
Mama Amanda wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow I think you are genuinly truly sick, you better go look for some help seriously psycho
Hey Johnny this is post from your bud Mama Amanda back on page 96.

Wow man! the chick's got you pegged!
Paul is dead for sure

Pleasantville, NJ

#2561 Oct 1, 2013
Paul is dead wrote:
The Emancipation Proclamation.
Whearas, on the twenty-second day of September, the Year of our Lord, One thousand eight hundred and Sixty two, a Proclamtion was issued by the President of the United States, containing, among other things, to wit:
That on the first day of January, in the Year of our Lord, One thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, that all persons held as slaves in any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, and thenceforward, shall be FOREVER FREE; and the executive branch of the United States, including the Military, and Naval authority, therof, will recognize, and maintain the freedom of such persons, or any of them, and any efforts that they may make in achieving their actual freedom.
That the Executive will, on the first day of January aforesaid, designate that States and parts of States; if any, if the people thereof, respectively, shall be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any State, and the people thereof, shall on that day be, in good faith, represented by the Congress by members chosen whereto at elections wherein at a majority of qualified voters shall have participated, shall, be in the absence of strong counterveiling testimony be deemed conclusive evidence that such State, and people thereof, shall not be in rebellion against the United States of America.
I posted this on page 95, post# 2075.
Paul is dead for sure

Pleasantville, NJ

#2562 Oct 1, 2013
Paul is dead wrote:
Emanicipation Proclamation continued:
Now, therefore I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, by virtue of the power in me vested, as Commander-and-Chief of both the Army, and Navy of the United States in actual armed rebellion against the authority, and government of the United States, and as a fit and necessary war measure against said rebellion, do, on this first day of January, One thousand eight-hundred and sixty-three; and in accordance purpose so to do publically proclaimed for the full period of one hundred days, from the day first above mentioned, order and designate in the States, and parts of States, wherein the people thereof respectively, are in rebellion against the United States,the folowing, to wit:
Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Missippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina, and Virginia.(I(Paul is dead) didn't include every parish and particular county, just because it wasn't necessary to type it.)
And by the virtue of the power, and for the purpose aforesaid, I do order and declare, that all persons held as slaves in designated States, and parts of States, are,and henceforward shall be FOREVER FREE, and that the executive government of the United States; including the military, and naval authorities thereof; maintain recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.
post# 2076 pg 95.
Paul is dead for sure

Pleasantville, NJ

#2563 Oct 1, 2013
Paul is dead wrote:
Emancipation Proclamation continued:
And I hereby enjoin, upon the people so declared to be free, to abstain from all violence, unless in necessary self defense;(see black on white violence is immoral! unless for self defense only! no, Johnny! I ain't lettin anybody off the hook! knuckle head!)and I recommend to them,that in all cases when allowed, they labor faithfully for reasonable wages.(So much Obama's distribution of wealth progam! hehehe.)
And I further declare, and make known, that such persons in suitable condition, will be recieved into the armed service of the United States,(which ofcourse freed black men did, willingly!)to garrison forts,postions, stations, and other places, and to man vessels of all sorts in said service.
And upon this act,sincerely believed to be act of Justice,( ya see Johnny, he didn't do it out of distain, but out of mercy! ya familiar with that word,'mercy?', probably not, but I digress!,)and warranted by the Constitution,upon military necessity, I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind,(again from the heart!)and the gracious favor of Almighty God.(See? the last part said here? THE GRACIOUS FAVOR OF ALMIGHTY GOD! He wasn't dragging his feet here, his heart was in it because he feared God!)
Funny, I hear no mention of forced deportment of black people, or of their being an inferior race!
Johnny? are you sure you know what you're typing up there!?
Knothead!
#2077 page 95
Paul is dead for sure

Pleasantville, NJ

#2564 Oct 1, 2013
Johnny wrote:
<quoted text>
__________
With all due respect, you are not thinking clearly. Yet again.
Granted, many White dudes fought & died during the United States (US) Civil War. But, the Emancipation Proclamation was NOT at the forefront of White dudes who were from the Northern United States fighting the US Civil War.
To show this.--- In Abraham Lincolns Emancipation Proclamation which was issued back in September, 1862.--- Abraham said.--
"I have urged the colonization of the Negroes back to Africa, and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan of colonization. There is no room for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks. I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal. Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro. Under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desireable".
This is you directly quoting Mr. Abraham Lincoln from his famous Emancipation Proclamation.

You typed above, "In Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, which was isssued back in September,1862---Abraham said---", And then you proceed to directly quote him.

I have posted the famous Emancipation Proclamation in toto above; non of what you type here is found there.

You say later on that you quoted this outside of the context of said Proclamation; this is obviously a lie.

However,if it was a faupaus as you claim it is, and you meant to mention it but didn't, that is, that the above post was originally meant as outside of the direct context, I guess to what? show clarification of what Mr. Lincoln really meant?

Then you make our greatest President into a two-face, which I'll prove in the next post.
Paul is dead for sure

Pleasantville, NJ

#2565 Oct 1, 2013
Within context, I will interpret simply.

In the first two above paragrahs, he states that 'any' state or territory, within the Sovereign U.S.A, holding slaves, is in rebellion against said Sovereignty.

And that all present slaves in said state, or territory are now forever free.

He repeats this in the second paragraph, but now he names all slave holding states;(all mentioned are south of the Mason Dixon line.)

In the final, and third letter,or paragraph, he reminds freed Negroes to abstain from violence, but does condone it, but only if is in self defense.

He considers this action,(said E.P.,)to be a sincere act of justice, and he seeks the favor of Almighty God.

Here's Mr. Lincoln,(in your text,)"There is no room for two distince races of Whites and Blacks(then why did Mr. Lincoln give the black man the vote?)I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the Negro into our social and political life."

Why would Mr. Lincoln be against assimilation of Whites and Blacks; but then sanction black people to use violence only in self defense due to their having to assimilate into white society, now as free men?

Why would he, Mr. Abraham Lincoln, consider it calamitous,(basically a disaster waiting to happen,)for said assimilation, but then free black from the tyranny of slavery, and call it a sincere act of justice, and showing fear of God when doing it?

In other words seeking favor of Almighty God, and showing human justice toward black people doesn't jibe not even one iota with what you have typed above.

Your Mr. Lincoln has two faces!

The Mr. Lincoln of the Emancipation Proclamation is a man of loving kindness, showing justice toward men of a differn't skin color, and a reverance for the Almighty Father,(seeking the favor of the Almighty.)

Your Mr. Lincoln sounds like a Klansman!

Seriously Johnny! Are you really aware of what your'e typing on these posts?

Do you use Logic, and reasoning before you post!?

All along Johnny, I've show on the past 3 to 4 pages that you are guilty of what you accuse me of!

Making diametrically opposing statements, contradicting continually, posting non-cogent, and
incoherent statements!

Wow, you need to get some freakin help boyo!

Or change your meds ....either or.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2566 Oct 2, 2013
Paul is dead for sure wrote:
<quoted text>Hey Johnny this is post from your bud Mama Amanda back on page 96.
Wow man! the chick's got you pegged!
__________

Amanda did state that. But, she misconstrued my post which I addressed to her. I was explaining to her about the poster who created this thread. She initially thought that I meant her. When I didn't. In a follow up post, I explained that to her.

From that point onwards, she & I have been cool.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2567 Oct 2, 2013
Paul is dead ----

You said "TO MANHATTAN JOHNNY Doesn't it strike you, as being odd the U.S.S.R. and the Nazi's were bitter enemies".---- Not at all.

You said "when they were both 'Socialists?".----

Nope.

The former Soviet Unions left wing communist dictatorships economic planning & policy was socialist.

Nazi Germanys economic planning & policy was NOT socialist.

You said "the U.S.S.R. Johnny, what does that stand for? Union of Soviet 'Socialist!' Republics!".---- Correct.

You said "They were both Socialists pal!".----

You are 150% INCORRECT.

In my next post, I'll list many examples which show why you are incorrect.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2568 Oct 2, 2013
Paul is dead -----

Examples which show why you are incorrect. You are incorrect, yet again.----

The former Soviet Unions left wing communist dictatorships politics was on the far left wing.

Nazi Germanys & Fascist Italys politics were on the far Right wing.

The Soviet Unions left wing communist dictatorships economic planning & policy was socialist.

Nazi Germanys & Fascist Italys economic planning & policy was NOT socialist.

The ideology of Italian Fascism & German Naziism came about IN RESPONSE TO the dangers of left wing communism.

In Italy, Fascism came into power in 1922. Fascism stressed (It still does) to protect the upper class & the middle class from the dangers of the underclass. When left wing movements had a support base among the underclass.

In Germany, Naziism came into power in 1933. Naziism stressed to protect the upper class & the middle class from the dangers of the underclass. When left wing movements had a support base among the underclass.

In the Soviet Unions left wing communist dictatorship, their leaders (Primarily Vladimir Lenin & Josef Stalin) attempted to remove the class structure. For wealth redistribution. For nationalizing (Taking over) all of the banks, businesses & the farms.

In Italian Fascism & German Naziism, the respective class structure remained. There was NO wealth redistribution. There was NO nationalizing (Taking over) of banks, businesses or farms.

Italian Fascism & German Naziism stressed helping the underclass via increasing jobs. Primarily via public works projects & building weapons.

Italian Fascism & German Naziism stressed the NEED to contain & counter their left wing opponents.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2569 Oct 2, 2013
Paul is dead ----

You said "You've been brainwashed into thinking JFK was turning Dealy Plaza in a horse pulled stage coach".---- Uh, no. I never stated (I didn't imply) any such thing.

You said "today's Paul is William Campbell".---- Geez, if you really "think" that, you SURE aren't thinking clearly. You aren't thinking clearly, yet again.

Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#2570 Oct 2, 2013
Paul really is dead wrote:
<quoted text>Why the hell would Paul Mccartney have to get plastic surgery to look more like ....Paul Mccartney?!
__________

Ha, ha. Oh geez, you really "think" that? Not good.

The reason why Paul McCartney got some work done on his face was to look younger.

Many, many people who are up there in years get plastic surgery done, to look younger.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min It aint necessari... 838,916
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 10 min RiccardoFire 99,994
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 13 min RoSesz 590,301
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 19 min janeebee 4,442
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 19 min Truths 612,192
searching for lesbian partner... 38 min het4u 1
is it wrong i like to wear womens underwear (Nov '12) 1 hr Alix 254
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 7 hr swedenforever 176,949
More from around the web