Is homosexuality a sin?

Is homosexuality a sin?

Created by Travis Morgan on Oct 27, 2007

59,181 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#101317 Jun 14, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
The Carbon never pays for the date.
unless you are the great fraudster, the liar + al gore

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#101318 Jun 14, 2014
Rosa_Winkel wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an IDer.
From the article.

Carbon dating was not invented until 1949. When the schools started to teach that the earth is billions of years old, back in 1830, the reasoning was not because of carbon dating. Carbon dating had not even been thought of yet. So why were they teaching that the earth was billions of years old back in the 1800’s? Billions of years are needed to make the evolution theory look good. Without billions of years to hide in, the theory looks absolutely ridiculous

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#101319 Jun 14, 2014
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>that is an assumption.
It's a fact using the Biblical time-line.

Adam and Eve: 4004 BC
http://amazingbibletimeline.com/timeline_onli...

Creation: 5315 BC
http://www.bible.ca/b-bible-timeline-religiou...

Adam: 4004 BC
http://www.blueletterbible.org/study/parallel...

Creation: 2,500 BC
http://timeline.biblehistory.com/home

Unlike any other book ever written, the Holy Bible is compiled of writings that cover a span of about 1400 years and include some 40 writers. Within its pages are 66 books, yet it is considered one book, The Book, The Holy Scriptures, The Word of God. The time period recorded during those 1400 years covers nearly 4000 years of human history and God's revelation of Himself to and through man. The history of the Holy Bible is the history of God's involvement with mankind.
- See more at: http://www.allabouttruth.org/history-of-the-h...

“When Jesus was born, the Earth was exactly 4,134 years old.”
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.asp...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#101320 Jun 14, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text>
From the article.
Carbon dating was not invented until 1949. When the schools started to teach that the earth is billions of years old, back in 1830, the reasoning was not because of carbon dating. Carbon dating had not even been thought of yet. So why were they teaching that the earth was billions of years old back in the 1800’s? Billions of years are needed to make the evolution theory look good. Without billions of years to hide in, the theory looks absolutely ridiculous
Evolution is quite apparent is just a few generations in the plant world. What do you think the natural selection process is? Evolution is a fact.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#101321 Jun 14, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a fact using the Biblical time-line.
Adam and Eve: 4004 BC
http://amazingbibletimeline.com/timeline_onli...
Creation: 5315 BC
http://www.bible.ca/b-bible-timeline-religiou...
Adam: 4004 BC
http://www.blueletterbible.org/study/parallel...
Creation: 2,500 BC
http://timeline.biblehistory.com/home
Unlike any other book ever written, the Holy Bible is compiled of writings that cover a span of about 1400 years and include some 40 writers. Within its pages are 66 books, yet it is considered one book, The Book, The Holy Scriptures, The Word of God. The time period recorded during those 1400 years covers nearly 4000 years of human history and God's revelation of Himself to and through man. The history of the Holy Bible is the history of God's involvement with mankind.
- See more at: http://www.allabouttruth.org/history-of-the-h...
“When Jesus was born, the Earth was exactly 4,134 years old.”
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.asp...
Genesis 5:3-5

King James Version (KJV)

3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:

4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.........now what part of that said 4004 bc? read what you post, more speculation.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#101322 Jun 14, 2014
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Genesis 5:3-5
King James Version (KJV)
3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:
4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:
5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.........now what part of that said 4004 bc? read what you post, more speculation.
Cherry picking the Bible means nothing. Anyone could work out the generations. Besides, Bible historians already can trace the origin of those great Biblical Myths to around 6,000 BC. coinciding with the first great civilizations around the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#101323 Jun 14, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Cherry picking the Bible means nothing. Anyone could work out the generations. Besides, Bible historians already can trace the origin of those great Biblical Myths to around 6,000 BC. coinciding with the first great civilizations around the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
The records of ancient languages never go back beyond . 3000 B.C. ANCIENT HISTORICAL RECORDS The oldest dates go back to about 3000 B.C. WHY??????????

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#101324 Jun 14, 2014

“True Blue”

Since: Jun 13

Sunburnt Country

#101325 Jun 15, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
The Carbon never pays for the date.
What a cheapskate. LOL

“True Blue”

Since: Jun 13

Sunburnt Country

#101326 Jun 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Cherry picking the Bible means nothing. Anyone could work out the generations. Besides, Bible historians already can trace the origin of those great Biblical Myths to around 6,000 BC. coinciding with the first great civilizations around the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
Yes, back to about the time of the first written history.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#101327 Jun 15, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Evolution is quite apparent is just a few generations in the plant world. What do you think the natural selection process is? Evolution is a fact.
Molecules to man non Intelligent evolution is a fact only in your wet dreams.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#101328 Jun 15, 2014
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>The records of ancient languages never go back beyond . 3000 B.C. ANCIENT HISTORICAL RECORDS The oldest dates go back to about 3000 B.C. WHY??????????
You don't know the answer to that question? That's the time written language evolved in the Western World. The ancient myths pre-date the written word.

Glad I could help.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#101329 Jun 15, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> Molecules to man non Intelligent evolution is a fact only in your wet dreams.
What evidence do you have to back such a worthless opinion?

“Free your mind”

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#101330 Jun 15, 2014
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>You just proved my point. "a good gay is not a Republican" ....and it's the R's bad and the D's good. You are what is wrong with our country. There are gays on both sides of politics and religion, just the ones here are the Liberals. I think you need to stop looking at the poster of your model politician, Anthony Weiner. Or Clinton using the oval office for oral. Mel Reynolds, Roosevelt Dobbins, Brock Adams, Gary Becker to name just a few.
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>You Wrote: " Republican caught in the airport men's room with the male prostitute.*shudder* Short memory problems?
Yes, because Larry Craig was indeed a Republican Senator from the state of Idaho which makes him part of the Republican party. Republicans, the GOTP in general, have moved away from republicanism thanks to the baggers like yourself. Republicanism and democracy are compatible concepts. However, since the baggers began their march against individual rights in favor of corporatism about 30 years ago, Republicans in general have walked in lock step against the interests of all citizens, in favor of the party line and affiliation. Huge difference between Republican and republicanism now days.

I, myself, remain a democratic republican living in a democratic republic and refuse to bow to the higher echelons of the Republican elites which to you are like gods who can do no wrong your eyes, nevermind you argue against homosexuality and claim "a good gay is not a Republican." Tell that to Craig, Mark Foley, Ted Haggard, Liz Cheney, etc. There are many others, and even more Republican heterosexuals caught being perverts. I have no idea if the gay ones are "good gays" or not, but they are indeed Republicans.

Exactly how does one know if a homosexual is a "good" one or not? Please do elaborate on that.

“Free your mind”

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#101331 Jun 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You can teach baseball so that makes you a capable father?
There goes that gay blonde brain again...
You aren't being hard enough on yourself. I suggest self-flagellation for your purposefully taking things out of context, girly man.

“Free your mind”

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#101332 Jun 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Show me one child produced without sperm.
Smile.
I'm going to have to send you a bill for all this science you have failed to learn.

"With expanding reproductive choices, we can expect to see more women choose to reproduce without men entirely. Fortunately, the data for children raised by only females is encouraging. As the Princeton sociologist Sara S. McLanahan has shown, poverty is what hurts children, not the number or gender of parents.

That’s good, since women are both necessary and sufficient for reproduction, and men are neither. From the production of the first cell (egg) to the development of the fetus and the birth and breast-feeding of the child, fathers can be absent. They can be at work, at home, in prison or at war, living or dead.

Think about your own history. Your life as an egg actually started in your mother’s developing ovary, before she was born; you were wrapped in your mother’s fetal body as it developed within your grandmother.

After the two of you left Grandma’s womb, you enjoyed the protection of your mother’s prepubescent ovary. Then, sometime between 12 and 50 years after the two of you left your grandmother, you burst forth and were sucked by her fimbriae into the fallopian tube. You glided along the oviduct, surviving happily on the stored nutrients and genetic messages that Mom packed for you.

Then, at some point, your father spent a few minutes close by, but then left. A little while later, you encountered some very odd tiny cells that he had shed. They did not merge with you, or give you any cell membranes or nutrients — just an infinitesimally small packet of DNA, less than one-millionth of your mass."
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/opinion/men...

The Y chromosome is passed from father to son, it's what makes babies into boys. Basically the human template is a female: the Y chromosome kicks in a few weeks after conception and makes a boy. "Men are genetically modified women," explained Sykes. But unlike other chromosomes, the Y chromosome can't repair itself and will, says Sykes, disappear altogether in about 125,000 years.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story...

The sperm you thought you could not do without for procreation might soon be reduced to a quaint, rarely used option.
http://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/report-plan...

Here, learn some science on parthenogenesis and asexual reproduction, because one day we will go back to the natural asexual reproduction, which can be done from both genders without sex being involved at all. That is clear from data showing men becoming less fertile.

Parthenogenesis /&#716;p&#593;r&#9 52;&#601;no&#650;& #712;d&#658;&#603;n &#601;s&#616;s/ is a form of asexual reproduction in which growth and development of embryos occur without fertilization. In animals, parthenogenesis means development of an embryo from an unfertilized egg cell and is a component process of apomixis...
...The word parthenogenesis comes from the Greek &#960;&#945;&#961; &#952;&#941;&#957; &#959;&#962;, parthenos, meaning "virgin" and &#947;&#941;&#957; &#949;&#963;&#953; &#962;, genesis, meaning "birth".[1] The term is sometimes used inaccurately to describe reproduction modes in hermaphroditic species that can reproduce by themselves because they contain reproductive organs of both sexes in a single individual's body.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenogenesis

“Free your mind”

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#101333 Jun 15, 2014
Some1 Else wrote:
<quoted text>
"I'm not the 1." Unless you plan on saying "hello to my little friend" too.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, Blondie, you don't have the balls.
Smirk.
Nor would I want such sensitive, can't take a pounding, chicken gizzards hanging between my legs. But I do have plenty of bullets and cartridges. Show up at my door if you want. I triple dare you, ya freaking lewd, perverted POS.

“Free your mind”

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#101334 Jun 15, 2014
Dingringsing wrote:
Homosexuality is not just a sin it is the purest form of evil in this world. It is disgusting, unnatural, dirty, a mistake, vile, an abomination. a perversion, aberration, demeaning and even insulting.
Your opinion is an abomination. Child murderers and rapists I suppose are considered just honky dory in your little mind. Serial killers are ok too, no abomination there, right? 88% of serial killers are white heterosexual males, but homosexuality is "the purest form of evil?" You are freaking nuts.

“Free your mind”

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#101335 Jun 15, 2014
Le_le wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus of Nazareth.
ROTFLMAO!! Good one.

Wonder if all that plundering back then set humans back a few millennia... Considering we have city built on top of city built on top of other cities, and ancient technology like the Greek Antikythera mechanism, I think man has destroyed much knowledge held by the ancients. The biblical NT is very heavily Hellenized; and the Island of Lesbos was all females. Perhaps we are just rediscovering what others knew thousands of years ago...

“Free your mind”

Since: Sep 07

Location hidden

#101336 Jun 15, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. It is the first example of in vitro.
Nice try though.
Smile.
So you dispute that God is immaterial and claim him to be nothing but a man, a sperm donor? How does that exclude rape from being charged against him, according to the canonical stories?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min hojo 649,920
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min Aura Mytha 56,400
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 19 min Hangman 972,410
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 50 min New Age Spiritual... 445,888
bambam 1 hr brandy trujillo 5
Kristen Bell shares photos from her wedding to ... 1 hr Yahoo sale 2
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr Student 44,926
my cousin touches me when i am asleep and i kin... (Mar '14) 10 hr Jesus 47
Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12) Fri Noname 69
More from around the web