Is homosexuality a sin?

Is homosexuality a sin?

Created by Travis Morgan on Oct 27, 2007

59,181 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#96608 Feb 5, 2014
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I am a man married to a female and that makes us a heterosexual couple, with that said, I have never felt threatened or felt a homosexual was trying to hijack my marriage. Why are you so scared? You sound just like the Islamics.
My thanks. This guy is really bonkers. And I seem to have hit all the right buttons.

In anycase I offer this to the mix.

"When women got the vote, they did not redefine voting. When African-Americans got the right to sit at a lunch counter alongside white people, they did not redefine eating out. They were simply invited to the table. That is all we want to do; we have no desire to change marriage. We want to be entitled to not only the same privileges but the same responsibilities as straight people."
-Cynthia Nixon

mandingowillsay

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#96609 Feb 5, 2014
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>My thanks. This guy is really bonkers. And I seem to have hit all the right buttons.
In anycase I offer this to the mix.
"When women got the vote, they did not redefine voting. When African-Americans got the right to sit at a lunch counter alongside white people, they did not redefine eating out. They were simply invited to the table. That is all we want to do; we have no desire to change marriage. We want to be entitled to not only the same privileges but the same responsibilities as straight people."
-Cynthia Nixon
No but you are redefining things you buffoon; marriage one of the oldest institutions in the world that was always between a man and a woman is now between a man and a man or a woman and a woman. So how dare you claim you are the same as any of the above mentioned groups?

You horrors are even trying to re-write the bible of all things. You don't want inclusion you want to change everything as we know it to include you deranged oxymoron's.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#96610 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
<quoted text>
No but you are redefining things you buffoon; marriage one of the oldest institutions in the world that was always between a man and a woman is now between a man and a man or a woman and a woman. So how dare you claim you are the same as any of the above mentioned groups?
You horrors are even trying to re-write the bible of all things. You don't want inclusion you want to change everything as we know it to include you deranged oxymoron's.
If marriage was "always one man one woman" please explain why the religious right needed to have the law CHANGED TO SAY THAT?

How dare I compare myself to other groups that faced discrimination?

Are you that clueless?

"When women got the vote, they did not redefine voting. When African-Americans got the right to sit at a lunch counter alongside white people, they did not redefine eating out. They were simply invited to the table. That is all we want to do; we have no desire to change marriage. We want to be entitled to not only the same privileges but the same responsibilities as straight people."
-Cynthia Nixon

"All progress is precarious, and the solution of one problem brings us face-to-face with another problem."
-MLK Jr.

The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men. Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival.
-Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren's opinion from "Loving vs. Virginia,”

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#96611 Feb 5, 2014
BTW 'mandingowillsay'

Since no church is ever forced to perform a religious ritual against their wishes what iis the problem then?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#96612 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
<quoted text>
You have not and WILL not prove a thing because yo can not.
Like I already told you nothing you've said has shown there is overpopulation kids not getting food is nothing to do with overpopulation, so stop making this claim so you can continue pushing your homo agenda.
Of course same sex marriage effects how society looks and even views marriage. You have made marriage seem stupid to people by including gay marriage.
Already have. For example, the Sahara desert is growing in size each year. It cannot sustain human population. genocide and starvation are endemic to many African nations which are overpopulated given the prevailing conditions. Even with HIV at 50% of the population in some countries, over population is a huge problem. Other countries make feeble attempts to feed these people but do cannot take them in and support them. Water is also very scarce. Without water people cannot live.

You are correct. I cannot prove anything to a total ignoramus who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.

Prove that same sex marriage has any effect on opposite sex marriage. Nobody has been able to prove such an allegation in a court of law.

Marriage fails around 50% of the time. People don't take marriage seriously. Is that my fault?

mandingowillsay

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#96613 Feb 5, 2014
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>If marriage was "always one man one woman" please explain why the religious right needed to have the law CHANGED TO SAY THAT?
How dare I compare myself to other groups that faced discrimination?
Are you that clueless?
"When women got the vote, they did not redefine voting. When African-Americans got the right to sit at a lunch counter alongside white people, they did not redefine eating out. They were simply invited to the table. That is all we want to do; we have no desire to change marriage. We want to be entitled to not only the same privileges but the same responsibilities as straight people."
-Cynthia Nixon
"All progress is precarious, and the solution of one problem brings us face-to-face with another problem."
-MLK Jr.
The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men. Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival.
-Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren's opinion from "Loving vs. Virginia,”
Martin Luther King hated homosexuals so don't you even dare you deranged twit!!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#96614 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
<quoted text>
Martin Luther King hated homosexuals so don't you even dare you deranged twit!!
That's an outright lie.

Rustin Bayard, organizer of the million man march, was gay.

Bayard Rustin (/&#712;ba&#618;&# 601;rd/; March 17, 1912 – August 24, 1987) was an American leader in social movements for civil rights, socialism, pacifism and non-violence, and gay rights. He was born and raised in Pennsylvania where his family was involved in civil rights work. In 1936, he moved to Harlem, New York City and earned a living as a nightclub and stage singer, and continued activism for civil rights.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayard_Rustin

Coretta Scott King favored LGBT rights.

Mrs. King played a prominent role in the years after her husband's 1968 assassination when she took on the leadership of the struggle for racial equality herself and became active in the Women's Movement and the LGBT rights movement. King founded the King Center and sought to make his birthday a national holiday.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coretta_Scott_Ki...

HUGE FAIL BRO

Try again

mandingowillsay

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#96615 Feb 5, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
That's an outright lie.
Rustin Bayard, organizer of the million man march, was gay.
Bayard Rustin (/&#712;ba&#618;&# 601;rd/; March 17, 1912 – August 24, 1987) was an American leader in social movements for civil rights, socialism, pacifism and non-violence, and gay rights. He was born and raised in Pennsylvania where his family was involved in civil rights work. In 1936, he moved to Harlem, New York City and earned a living as a nightclub and stage singer, and continued activism for civil rights.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayard_Rustin
Coretta Scott King favored LGBT rights.
Mrs. King played a prominent role in the years after her husband's 1968 assassination when she took on the leadership of the struggle for racial equality herself and became active in the Women's Movement and the LGBT rights movement. King founded the King Center and sought to make his birthday a national holiday.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coretta_Scott_Ki...
HUGE FAIL BRO
Try again
Again read what that post says; it says Martin Luther King despises gays it says nothing about anyone else, so please don't talk crap about who is gay or who supported it (other than MLK himself) and think you made a point.

In short I don't even know why you think you have a point. But someone has to be gay, lol!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#96616 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
<quoted text>
Again read what that post says; it says Martin Luther King despises gays it says nothing about anyone else, so please don't talk crap about who is gay or who supported it (other than MLK himself) and think you made a point.
In short I don't even know why you think you have a point. But someone has to be gay, lol!
Prove you claim. Given his widow's views and the fact that the man who made the civil rights movement possible was gay, your claim lacks validity.

For now, your previous post is an outright lie. Why do you have to make crap up?

mandingowillsay

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#96617 Feb 5, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove you claim. Given his widow's views and the fact that the man who made the civil rights movement possible was gay, your claim lacks validity.
For now, your previous post is an outright lie. Why do you have to make crap up?
Look you stupid little homo-freak, I do not care what MLK's widow endorsed or thought was okay. MLK despised gay people, do not use a Black figure the same way you are trying to use the bible to endorse your ORRIBLE selves.

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/mar...

Martin Luther King was nothing to do with you freakazoid!! So rather than trying to use Black icons to endorse yourselves look towards the known homosexuals of the day and use them as your heroes; I.e., the aids spreading Rock Hudson.

mandingowillsay

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#96618 Feb 5, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove you claim. Given his widow's views and the fact that the man who made the civil rights movement possible was gay, your claim lacks validity.
For now, your previous post is an outright lie. Why do you have to make crap up?
Just in case you don't find the line here it is;

" Martin Luther King Jr. is viewed as something of an American saint.... Like most Americans in his day, King was homophobic"

Back then the homo didn't have the power to persecute everyone who disagrees with their butt-fucking agenda. Today the homo is the greatest tyrant on the planet. There are even homo White supremacists.

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelli...

Don't you dare try and con anyone that you can align your homo cause with civil rights and liberties struggles. If it were the same thing there would not be one homosexual racist on the planet.

mandingowillsay

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#96619 Feb 5, 2014
Take note of the principal homosexual tactic, the idea is to use everything you hold dear and true then align themselves with it, I.e., pretend these people were fighting for their liberation; This is why rather than say the bible is nonsense they will claim the bible does not condemn homosexuality.

If they could they would claim Che Guevara and Bob Marley were also fighting or singing for their operation; because the con is that homosexuality is something that ever had to fight for rights it is not.

That's why you should be weary of these people because they come at you in disguise hidden in all the things embraced by the normal world. This is why a homosexual has to hijack everything a heterosexual couple holds dear and real including the right to adopt kids. And play daddy and daddy or mummy and mummy with them.

MLK has never endorsed homosexuality nor have men like Malcolm X. They fought for liberation of Black people not homosexual rights.
Toby

Portland, OR

#96620 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
<quoted text>
"just a common garden variety poofter basher"
And the attempts at feminizing and victimizing big hairy MALE homos continues; A homo hides behind the picture of a young woman, Then this big hairy monster proceeds to promote the idea of these poor helpless big hairy bum loving men as victims of little me on Topix, Forum.
The fact they are all here out in force attacking less than four men bold enough to speak out against them means nothing to these selective (docile when you want) homo's.
Poor things are being are being hounded and persecuted wherever they go. The persecution is akin to the mass murder of Jews in Nazi Germany, or the harassment and psychological warfare against African Americans right up till today!! They are like the Native American Indians who are now nearly extinct due to the fact they have been massacred!! you can even compare them to the aboriginal Australians who have pretty much been rehoused miles outside Australia cut off, and targeted by drug dealers and alcohol peddlers; yes and like gays you will never see the Aboriginals in any active employment.
In fact the bum brigade who fight for the right for men to fuck men and call them husband, or wife, or husband or wife? And women to fuck women and call them husband or wife or husband or wife!!!!!!(I know I get confused to pertaining both homo genders!!!) Are the biggest victims of marginalization and persecution on the planet today!!! And you know these fools are fighting for such a worthy cause!!!
What's happening in Iraq and Afghanistan goes over their head in fact they may even support the carnage because they believe the world is overpopulated so killing kids and women can only be good. And of course overpopulation is the greatest justification for flooding the planet with homo propaganda about how normal they are.
WEll we know that you are anti- anal wonder boy and KiMare is the anti-anal crusader and both of you are incredibly "Bold" superheroes, and we know that MUQ is a fundamentalist gay bashing Muslim, that makes three "Bold" homophobes, but who is the forth homophobic gay basher? Please do tell!
Toby

Portland, OR

#96621 Feb 5, 2014
I still haven't gotten any answer to the question as to just how homosexual marriages "hijack heterosexual marriages"? It won't prevent heterosexual marriages from occurring, it certainly won't have any effect on any heterosexual orientation, heterosexuals will not cease having sex or cease getting married, how exactly would homosexual marriages impede on heterosexual marriages at all?
I also find it amusing that when anyone defends homosexual marriages those opposed to it automatically begin to label them as homosexual, it's school yard bully tactics, it's the (well if you defend sissy George, we are going to attack you too) type of homophobic mentality.
I don't believe anyone in here is saying that homosexuals are victims at all, what people are saying is that homosexuals are now standing up for themselves and refusing to be objects of ridicule and denigration, quite a difference. People like mandingo accuse them of whining because basically he wants them to shut up, he desires to silence them. With all the invidious remarks that he makes about homosexuals it's easy to see that he is not authentically shocked at the negative reactions to it, he's a troll that's what his objective is.
I haven't yet seen the unholy homophobic trinity (KiMare, MUQ and Mandingo), really present a valid premise that could be possibly debated. An even amount of Americans, believe that homosexuality is not a sin, and an overwhelming majority of Americans believe that society should accept homosexuality, do our anti- gay crusaders really believe that the majority of Americans who believe homosexuality should be socially accepted, are homosexuals?
Toby

Portland, OR

#96622 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
Take note of the principal homosexual tactic, the idea is to use everything you hold dear and true then align themselves with it, I.e., pretend these people were fighting for their liberation; This is why rather than say the bible is nonsense they will claim the bible does not condemn homosexuality.
If they could they would claim Che Guevara and Bob Marley were also fighting or singing for their operation; because the con is that homosexuality is something that ever had to fight for rights it is not.
That's why you should be weary of these people because they come at you in disguise hidden in all the things embraced by the normal world. This is why a homosexual has to hijack everything a heterosexual couple holds dear and real including the right to adopt kids. And play daddy and daddy or mummy and mummy with them.
MLK has never endorsed homosexuality nor have men like Malcolm X. They fought for liberation of Black people not homosexual rights.
Homosexuals hijack everything a heterosexual couple holds dear, really, elucidate on that a bit? There are millions of heterosexual couples that engage in anal and oral sex, there are plenty of heterosexual couples that engage in all kinds of sexual fetishes, there are hundreds of thousands of open marriages,etc., what specifically are homosexuals hijacking, don't just repeat that and then not care to explain, it's similar to saying the moon is made of cheese,but then not caring to explain why you believe the moon is made of cheese, explain just how homosexuals are hijacking everything that is "dear" to heterosexual couples?

mandingowillsay

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#96623 Feb 5, 2014
Toby wrote:
<quoted text>
WEll we know that you are anti- anal wonder boy and KiMare is the anti-anal crusader and both of you are incredibly "Bold" superheroes, and we know that MUQ is a fundamentalist gay bashing Muslim, that makes three "Bold" homophobes, but who is the forth homophobic gay basher? Please do tell!
Dude it does not matter how much you try and feminize yourself you're still a man. Stop wasting your time, no one is about to think of you as this poor little victim of some big bad heteros. You constantly try to victimize yourself putting yourself in the place of all other persecuted people and pretending their spokespeople were/are fighting for you. The truth is none of those people believe your cause is a worthy one. It's hedonistic, voyeuristic and definitely not a cause that helps anyone but homosexuals. You try to make out you are some kind of helpless feeble victim purely because you're gay. This in itself amongst other things only shows how dishonest not how victimized you are.

You outnumber all the people who speak against you, and you all childishly prop each other up by thumbing yourselves up and us down. Yet you would still have people believe you are the victim.

mandingowillsay

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#96624 Feb 5, 2014
Toby wrote:
<quoted text>
Homosexuals hijack everything a heterosexual couple holds dear, really, elucidate on that a bit? There are millions of heterosexual couples that engage in anal and oral sex, there are plenty of heterosexual couples that engage in all kinds of sexual fetishes, there are hundreds of thousands of open marriages,etc., what specifically are homosexuals hijacking, don't just repeat that and then not care to explain, it's similar to saying the moon is made of cheese,but then not caring to explain why you believe the moon is made of cheese, explain just how homosexuals are hijacking everything that is "dear" to heterosexual couples?
"elucidate on that a bit"

I already did with two very clear points; you try to pretend that Martin Luther King would have fought for gay rights.
You also pretend that the bible does not condemn you.
You hijack the institution of marriage which is nothing to do with joining a husband and a husband in any kind of holy union.
You are little more than con artists. You have no case and you know it.
Toby

Portland, OR

#96625 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
<quoted text>
No but you are redefining things you buffoon; marriage one of the oldest institutions in the world that was always between a man and a woman is now between a man and a man or a woman and a woman. So how dare you claim you are the same as any of the above mentioned groups?
You horrors are even trying to re-write the bible of all things. You don't want inclusion you want to change everything as we know it to include you deranged oxymoron's.
There you go referencing the Bible again, and remember you have said the Bible is a "pile of shit", yet why would it be of any significance whether something that is invalid in the first place is misconstrued or rewritten ? You're constantly making equivocations and then presenting false premises in you attempt to support with additional false premises.

When you constantly make reference to the Bible in a defensive posture, after you have expressed that the Bible is null and void, then anyone would naturally question your motives. you have always seemed rather confused and discombobulated.
Toby

Portland, OR

#96627 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude it does not matter how much you try and feminize yourself you're still a man. Stop wasting your time, no one is about to think of you as this poor little victim of some big bad heteros. You constantly try to victimize yourself putting yourself in the place of all other persecuted people and pretending their spokespeople were/are fighting for you. The truth is none of those people believe your cause is a worthy one. It's hedonistic, voyeuristic and definitely not a cause that helps anyone but homosexuals. You try to make out you are some kind of helpless feeble victim purely because you're gay. This in itself amongst other things only shows how dishonest not how victimized you are.
You outnumber all the people who speak against you, and you all childishly prop each other up by thumbing yourselves up and us down. Yet you would still have people believe you are the victim.
I am not gay, so I certainly don't live a gay lifestyle, I can defend homosexual marriage and their right to expression if I choose to, no one needs your permission to do so. You're one extremely paranoid human, when you decide to bring a valid premise to an argument, and come to the realization that ad hominem and demagoguery is not real debate, then people will take you seriously, other than that, you are just a below average bigot with nothing pertinent to say at all.
Toby

Portland, OR

#96628 Feb 5, 2014
mandingowillsay wrote:
<quoted text>
"elucidate on that a bit"
I already did with two very clear points; you try to pretend that Martin Luther King would have fought for gay rights.
You also pretend that the bible does not condemn you.
You hijack the institution of marriage which is nothing to do with joining a husband and a husband in any kind of holy union.
You are little more than con artists. You have no case and you know it.
I don't know how many times I have to tell you this, but I don't read the bible, I don't put any faith in the bible, I don't have a religious bone in my body, but you seem to be obsessed with a religion that you say is a "pile of shit", yet you project your own dissonance concerning the Bible onto other people who are not even religious at all. You are a very confused person , try and get some therapy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 min Ooogah Boogah 970,123
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min Steve III 641,998
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 7 min Joe Fortuna 38,811
What's the most embarrassing thing you have done? 50 min pusherman_ 23
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr Student 44,472
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr onemale 280,919
---*PHOTO of ANTICHRIST 'seated' in TEMPLE 2 hr RevelationInPlain... 1
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 11 hr Ricky F 38,443
More from around the web