Hundreds of years ago, Lord Acton noted this; "Power corrupts. Absolute power absolutely corrupts."<quoted text>
You posted that "the issue isn't, who is broken, but rather, how are you dealing with it",then you went on to say you freely admit that you're broken", I was asking what do you mean by broken? You reply with "you tell me". You then say that the premise to my argument is that if everyone does something wrong that makes it right, that is not my argument at all.
You have to first establish the fact that something is really a sin, something is wrong, before you can demonstrate that my argument has a false premise, or as you put it " an idiotic argument", but where have you proven to any degree that fornication is wrong, or a sin, or oral sex or anal sex is wrong, or a sin? If you are relying on a religious cultural human construct such as sin to base your repudiation on then you haven't proven anything at all. Moral absolutism is no starting point to base any argument on, let alone a starting point to refute someones else's argument on.
If you want to discuss ethics(religion set aside) and whether it is ethical to fornicate,since I mentioned that just about every human fornicates, then let's hear what is ethically wrong with fornicating, since all fornicators are supposedly going to hell. My contention is that you are anyone else has never really proven that fornication is wrong, and when has it been proven that oral sex or anal sex is wrong, or unethical, maybe in your own mind perhaps.
I know you refer to all anal sex heterosexual or homosexual as (anal abuse) but what if you have a woman who enjoys it, who wants it, or a partner that request it, is it abuse in those circumstances? I also wonder what your stance is on oral sex, do you believe that all oral sex is oral abuse alsoI guess right? You see I don't believe that oral sex or anal sex is wrong to begin with, so if most adults are involved with those sexual activities that is certainly not saying that two wrongs make a right, or many wrongs make a right, the presupposition is that it is not ethically wrong in the first place.
He noted something that any honest observer sees. The closer man comes to being god, the more they abuse that power. I call that brokenness. Religion calls it depravity.
I use simple points of reality to expose fallacy and denial.
I use anal sex as one of those points of reality. I have posted medical evidence noting the harm of anal sex, as if that were necessary. I have posted articles about the demeaning nature of anal sex BY A HOMOSEXUAL. Yet you deny the fact. Then you accuse me of being fascinated by it, deny that you did, and turn around and make the same accusation again IN THE SAME POST!
As to religion, I don't argue faith with faithless people.
You also accuse me of focusing on anal sex. That is a lie. I have noted a number of distinctions between ss couples and marriage, and other evidences that homosexuality is a sexual defect.
You ignore those posts to accuse me of anal fascination and religious motives. I would suggest that is evidence of YOUR brokenness.
The simplest morality is,'do no harm'. Fornication has many implications of harming others. While it represents the powerful evolutionary motivation of mating behavior, humans have elevated themselves above animals by the constraint of marriage to protect from those abuses. Not just Christianity, but every single culture known in human history. In fact, they estimate marriage existed up to 10 million years ago.
SS couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.