Reread what I wrote. Then check the info if you don't understand. Then answer my questions<quoted text>What a great and innovative conservative debate strategy; insults. Please define "violation of design" for me. Yeah, I'm that stupid. And why would scientists need to isolate a "PURPOSE" for a defect? Sexual congress between two consenting adults of the same sex is, in your estimation, "futile" and "fruitless" simply because no offspring can be produced from it. Even I'm smart enough to see that as a pretty narrow view of the "purpose" of intimacy. Please credibly cite the indictment of the APA's body of evidence that supports their stance. While you're at it, also address the official, published, and peer-reviwed "unscientific" stances of the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Association of Family Physicians, to name just a few of the professional organizations who stand in unison on this issue. Just out of curiosity, which "God" is it whose doctrines inform your choices and thought processes? As best you can, try to reply without insults this time.
Then I'll respond to yours.
I made no personal insults. I did sink the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and twist it with a smirk. You squealed.