Whatever you have said is covered in my replies to Booots.<quoted text>The idea was for you to read it, or to find an adult who would read it to you. Didn't think of that, now did you buttercup? Why am I not surprised in the slightest by this? What does surprise me is that you have mistaken my schooling of a seriously misinformed tool, you by the way, for an apology. Sad. Need you say more? Well, I already know you can't tread water in an intellectual, fact based discussion and you're in over your head even in the shallow end of the pool. My suggestion, keep your fingers off your keyboard, but stick around, you've got the chance to actually learn something.
<quoted text>So you pray Sweetie, for your sake I hope Allah has a sense of humor. <quoted text>Proving once again that heterosexuality isn't just a sexual orientation, it's also a serious learning disorder. How else can you possibly explain the notion that all heterosexuals are always just one poof away from complete, full on, flaming, card carrying, queer as folk? Can you people actually forget you are heterosexual? How in the heck does that happen?
<quoted text>Because I wouldn't wish you on someone of whatever your opposite sex is that I don't like, why would I want to inflict you on someone of your own sex? Some folk we pray to be heterosexual, you would be one of them. With apologies to whatever your opposite sex is, but your same sex is more than thankful that you aren't their problem.
Homosexuality will always remain a sin as it has remained since the perversion was initiated by the people of Lot.
It is not "natural" as you would like to throw down our throats. With the same logic, every sexual perversion could be justified as "normal" or "natural".
Free choice logic also does not hold water, because then you will have to justify the "narcotic drugs also and smoking also. Why so much emphasis on Anti Smoking and all that compaign against it?
It is a religious sin.
It is a social sin.
It is a medical sin.
It is sin against human race survival.
How can you say that it is "as normal" as normal and these "couples" have same rights an 'duties" as "Normal couple"?
It is like you are supporting some one who is striking at the very root of human civlization.
What are the numbers of Homos in the world does not count, it is the question of principle.
When they become in majority, then would you be able to control them?