Zimmerman Found Not Guilty

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#180 Jul 20, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Most people of any race don't buy into what not so sharpton or jackson says. It's sad this case is so national. I believe both Martin and Georgie could have prevented this. We do know Zimmerman got out of his vehicle....would he do the same after this trial? That was a mistake, a bad decision. Would he do that if he wasn't packing? If you were a Black kid walking home, and some fat white dude gets out of his truck starts walking towards you, what would you do? Could this be uncle Jerry coming? Martin had ever right to crack the head, he was defending himself.
Totally absurd.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#181 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
But he didn't, so rather than speculating with "what ifs" how about you stick with the facts at hand?
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> The facts are in Zimmerman's hand,
No, the facts were presented to the jury. You don't get that fact real well, do you?
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> the only witness never saw who started the fight.
Then he or she wasn't really a witness.
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> So my speculation comes into play saying had it been reversed, then we could say the facts are in Martin's hand.
No, your speculation does NOT come into play. Evidence trumps your speculation every time. You just don't like the evidence, which is why you insist on ignoring it.
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> Would you stand up for Martin like you are for the fat cop wannabe?
"Fat cop wannabe?" As opposed to the "punk-ass gang banger wannabe?" I'd rather side with Zimmerman.

Stick to the facts at hand, and quit trying to dodge and deflect.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#182 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
George Zimmerman was found not guilty by a jury of his peers
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> and OJ was found innocent.
No, he wasn't. He was found "not guilty," not "innocent."
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> What the courts decide are the so called evidence and how that relates to the law. Doesn't mean you are guilty or not guilty, just means by the law.
Then change the law. For the time being, self-defense is legal.
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> There have been people found guilty that were on death row before finding they were innocent.
Dodge and deflect; we're talking Zimmerman here, not your speculations.
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> It's not a perfect system. In this case, the prosecution messed up with higher charges, when it should have been manslaughter from the start.
In this case, there wasn't sufficient evicence to support any kind of a charge against Zimmerman; the state of Florida and the DA's office originally didn't want to file charges. It was the race-baiters like you who demanded that the "white" dude be prosecuted for the crime of defending himself.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#183 Jul 21, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> Most people of any race don't buy into what not so sharpton or jackson says. It's sad this case is so national. I believe both Martin and Georgie could have prevented this. We do know Zimmerman got out of his vehicle....would he do the same after this trial? That was a mistake, a bad decision. Would he do that if he wasn't packing? If you were a Black kid walking home, and some fat white dude gets out of his truck starts walking towards you, what would you do?
I don't think I'd come out swinging like your little pal Trayvon did.
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> Could this be uncle Jerry coming? Martin had ever right to crack the head, he was defending himself.
He was defending himself against....being questioned? He had no right to instigate that entire chain of events by initially assaulting Zimmerman. You are either a guilty white racist, or a proud black racist. Either way, you're a racist.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#184 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way; can you, as a member of the Liberal Establishment, explain to me how "n***er" (a word that Topix will not allow me to use in *any* context) is a racist term, but "creepy-assed cracker" is not? Care to enlighten us?
I'd sure like to know what the hell is happening to my country. On top of the Zimmerman case, now the one surviving Boston Bomber is being treated like a rock star and a poor innocent victim by Rolling Stone magazine, while they attempt to ignore that he planted bombs in a terrorist attack that killed two and injured and maimed hundreds. The liberal fucktards at Rolling Stone don't want us thinking about that.
If the Liberal Establishment hates this country so much, why don't they leave? Go live in Canada or Cuba, or Venezuela.
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I can't, because I'm not a member of the Liberal or tea party establishment. I'm Independent.
No, you're not. You're not even fooling yourself on that one.
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#185 Jul 21, 2013
Brand new? I think not.

Please show some respect for a teen boy stalked and murdered by an armed adult, self-appointed vigilante.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#186 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>

Stick to the facts at hand, and quit trying to dodge and deflect.
And if Martin killed the great Georgie, the facts at hand would be on Martin's side. I guess you agree OJ was innocent since he had a fair trial?

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#187 Jul 21, 2013
kuda wrote:
Brand new? I think not.
Please show some respect for a teen boy stalked and murdered by an armed adult, self-appointed vigilante.
Please show some respect for someone who was patrolling his neighborhood, discovered someone acting suspiciously, and was attacked and nearly killed by having his head slammed against a cement sidewalk. The only thing that saved his life was his gun.

You hate that, don't you?

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#188 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way; can you, as a member of the Liberal Establishment, explain to me how "n***er" (a word that Topix will not allow me to use in *any* context) is a racist term, but "creepy-assed cracker" is not? Care to enlighten us?
I'd sure like to know what the hell is happening to my country. On top of the Zimmerman case, now the one surviving Boston Bomber is being treated like a rock star and a poor innocent victim by Rolling Stone magazine, while they attempt to ignore that he planted bombs in a terrorist attack that killed two and injured and maimed hundreds. The liberal fucktards at Rolling Stone don't want us thinking about that.
If the Liberal Establishment hates this country so much, why don't they leave? Go live in Canada or Cuba, or Venezuela.
<quoted text>
No, you're not. You're not even fooling yourself on that one.
I'm not a member of the Liberal or tea party establishment. I'm Independent. Stop your subscription. I did 35 years ago.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#189 Jul 21, 2013
kuda wrote:
Brand new? I think not....
I used to be a classic liberal; they have forfeited my allegiance. Now I'm a libertarian.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#190 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think I'd come out swinging like your little pal Trayvon did.
<quoted text>
He was defending himself against....being questioned? He had no right to instigate that entire chain of events by initially assaulting Zimmerman. You are either a guilty white racist, or a proud black racist. Either way, you're a racist.
I wish those Cleveland girls came out swinging at that cracker and wish those kids came out swinging at uncle jerry.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#191 Jul 21, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I can't, because I'm not a member of the Liberal or tea party establishment. I'm Independent. Take each case separately. I think outside the box. I would guess we eat crackers, but the N word is only used in that manner.
Blacks call each other "n***er* all the time; they aren't offended by it.

"Cracker" is a racist term used by the Black Liberal Establishment to describe all whites.

You believe in a double-standard; that makes you a liberal, a hypocrite and a racist.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#192 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
Blacks call each other "n***er* all the time; they aren't offended by it.
"Cracker" is a racist term used by the Black Liberal Establishment to describe all whites.
You believe in a double-standard; that makes you a liberal, a hypocrite and a racist.
When a white person is calling them "N" it don't have the same meaning, does it? To them it's like calling them "pal" is that the same as when you use it? It's when we let these words bother us that we get sucked into the whole race game. I don't care what they call me.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#193 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
Please show some respect for someone who was patrolling his neighborhood, discovered someone acting suspiciously, and was attacked and nearly killed by having his head slammed against a cement sidewalk. The only thing that saved his life was his gun.
You hate that, don't you?
You forgot the part where he got out of his vehicle, that was the mistake.
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#194 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
Please show some respect for someone who was patrolling his neighborhood, discovered someone acting suspiciously, and was attacked and nearly killed by having his head slammed against a cement sidewalk. The only thing that saved his life was his gun.
You hate that, don't you?
The deceased can’t speak on their own behalf.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#195 Jul 21, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text> When a white person is calling them "N" it don't have the same meaning, does it?
Yes, it does. It's just a variation on the original form of "negro."
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>To them it's like calling them "pal" is that the same as when you use it? It's when we let these words bother us that we get sucked into the whole race game. I don't care what they call me.
You're just trying to justify their racism, that's all. You accept the double-standard, I don't.

“B. Hussein Obama---”

Since: Nov 09

---CHINA'S BEST FRIEND

#197 Jul 21, 2013
kuda wrote:
<quoted text>
The deceased can’t speak on their own behalf.
It was his own fault. Had he not tried to kill Zimmerman, he would not have gotten shot.

You black liberal establishment types don't believe in accepting responsibility for your own actions, do you?

Since: Nov 12

United States

#198 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, it does. It's just a variation on the original form of "negro."
<quoted text>
You're just trying to justify their racism, that's all. You accept the double-standard, I don't.
When Black dudes are using the "N" word,it's just like saying "hey pal". How is that the same as when a White dude says it to a Black dude? I'm not justifying racism, Blacks are more racist then ever and racism won't end, it's a human trait. Don't go to Hawaii, they will call you a white name there.

Since: Nov 12

United States

#199 Jul 21, 2013
Brand New Libertarian wrote:
<quoted text>
It was his own fault. Had he not tried to kill Zimmerman, he would not have gotten shot.
You black liberal establishment types don't believe in accepting responsibility for your own actions, do you?
He was legally using the stand your ground law. A stand-your-ground law is a type of self-defense law that gives individuals the right to use reasonable force to defend themselves without any requirement to evade or retreat from a dangerous situation. Martin some a fat white dude get out of his truck and approach him. In Martin's mind, could this be another white pervert like Sandusky, had he killed Zimmerman, he could have used this law.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#200 Jul 21, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>He was legally using the stand your ground law. A stand-your-ground law is a type of self-defense law that gives individuals the right to use reasonable force to defend themselves without any requirement to evade or retreat from a dangerous situation. Martin some a fat white dude get out of his truck and approach him. In Martin's mind, could this be another white pervert like Sandusky, had he killed Zimmerman, he could have used this law.
Staggering ignorance of a wide range of issues.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Buck Crick 865,173
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min Patrick Daniels 599,881
There is Everything Wrong with Abortion (Nov '07) 20 min Grunt56 221,995
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 32 min RiccardoFire 6,497
Why black people smell like poop (Nov '11) 55 min dirtyknotz 28
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 1 hr middleman1 2,784
The Christian Atheist debate 1 hr HipGnosis 2,015
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) 10 hr Frannie 44
More from around the web