Zimmerman Found Not Guilty

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#135 Jul 17, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
You forgot the part where Zimmerman started the whole incident by harassing and stalking the kid despite being told to stay in his car by the police dispatcher
And for what reason did Zimmerman decided to go after this kid, what made him decide that this kid was up to no good ...... was he carrying a tv or cans of spray paint or was he prying a door open !?!?!?!??!
<quoted text>
If the thug was innocent why did he attack?
Just because someone is following you do you feel the urge to physically assault them ? If you are not doing anything wrong I find verbal communication works better than bashing someones head ...
But I don't play hockey !!! lol
peace !!

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#137 Jul 17, 2013
Covert Stealth Op wrote:
<quoted text>I know and from 1865 too 1965, Blacks always got a fair trial? This was Florida where the federal government had to oversee the vote count and two presidential elections had blakc votes compromised.
It has been over 21 years and fols like you still claim that the OJ verdict was not fair. That despite the prosecutor admitting that the evidence they had pointed to his innocence.
Only bigots would not see that Trayvon was a child and could not consent to mutual combat. At the least, Zimmerman should receive the equivalent of a manslaughter verdict.
Why should they move on, when a civil trial and federal civil rights charges can be charged?
I have a question for you: Do you think that the Boston marathon bombers were standing their ground and the child should be found not guilty.
You are an idiot ! This is not 1865 or 1965 it is 2013.
If we are to move on and accept racial equality every one needs to stop bringing it up. What is the purpose of claiming the "race card" when demanding to be treated like an American . After all that's what we are , right? A wise man said the other day on another thread that We are all members of the human race . Isn't that what the objective of equality is .


Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#138 Jul 17, 2013
swirlingblack wrote:
it was a fair trial...now move on
So was OJ's trial and many others, some even had people on death row that were not guilty. Why don't you move on?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#139 Jul 17, 2013
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
elk grove california Population in 2011: 153,377.
fort worth texas Population in 2011: 745,231
fort worth is the 16th largest city in the united states.
so by your math there was 38752.012 crimes committed in 2011 in fort worth . Are you sure about your math here ?
That's why I went by crimes per 1000 residents fool. 52 crimes per 1000 residents in Fort Worth. Show me the post where we were talking about population stats? LOL

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#140 Jul 17, 2013
crucifiedguy wrote:
A man was attacked at the train station in fort worth sunday he shot and killed the attacker.
Why isn't this on cnn, msnbc, fox news , etc?
Could it be the man that was shot was a caucasian ?
Or possibly because the shooter feared for his life and the police ruled it as self defense just like the police ruled in the zimmerman case.
If everyone supporting martin doesn't stand up for this " victim" lol it will only prove the racial bias from the media and the people on this thread. lol
What's good for the goose is good for the gander ! Right?
That was a security guard who authorities say was being assaulted shot and killed his attacker Sunday morning at the Fort Worth Intermodal Transportation Center, police and officials said Sunday. How does that relate to the Z case?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#141 Jul 17, 2013
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
If the thug was innocent why did he attack?
Just because someone is following you do you feel the urge to physically assault them ? If you are not doing anything wrong I find verbal communication works better than bashing someones head ...
But I don't play hockey !!! lol
peace !!
The thug was not innocent, and the black thug chaser was not innocent.
Smikin Joe

Bronx, NY

#142 Jul 17, 2013
&#8234;Why Do Blacks Blame Zimmerman&#8236;...
Ezio1579

Dublin, Ireland

#143 Jul 17, 2013
Check out this video explaining it,
http://21f52186.goneviral.com
i think the guy does a really good job of showing why Zimmerman was really not guilty.
kuda

Cincinnati, OH

#144 Jul 17, 2013
John Oliver’s take on the Zimmerman verdict:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-july-15...
Angered American

Rochester, MN

#145 Jul 17, 2013
the Zimmerman verdict was spot on!!!
therealGeorgeZim merman

Howell, MI

#146 Jul 17, 2013
come on man he had middle finger up on his facebook i had to shoot him..

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#147 Jul 17, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>That was a security guard who authorities say was being assaulted shot and killed his attacker Sunday morning at the Fort Worth Intermodal Transportation Center, police and officials said Sunday. How does that relate to the Z case?
only thing different about the two cases would be there location and nothing was said about the dead dudes race..
A security guard or neighbor hood watch both of them have the same purpose ... to patrol the area and observe and detain any suspicious looking persons until the real crooks oops, I mean cops show up. If they feel there life is in danger the use of deadly force is not only warranted but should be encouraged...
The Phanton Hell Rider

Jersey City, NJ

#148 Jul 18, 2013
therealGeorgeZimmerman wrote:
come on man he had middle finger up on his facebook i had to shoot him..
lol..Hell of a Mentor for the Black youth's..can't get through them..Shoot em!!
The Phanton Hell Rider

Jersey City, NJ

#149 Jul 18, 2013
?

“Uroplatus Phantasticus”

Since: Feb 08

South Africa

#150 Jul 18, 2013
kuda wrote:
<quoted text>
“Not guilty” is only a convenient expression. The fact is that the prosecution failed to convince the jury that George Zimmerman was guilty of either criminal charge beyond a reasonable doubt. It did convince some people, however, but not all people in general or the jury specifically.
At the moment, public opinion is divided. I believe that most people are decent souls who believe that Mr. Martin’s murder was not a victory for anyone.
Well said.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#151 Jul 18, 2013
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
only thing different about the two cases would be there location and nothing was said about the dead dudes race..
A security guard or neighbor hood watch both of them have the same purpose ... to patrol the area and observe and detain any suspicious looking persons until the real crooks oops, I mean cops show up. If they feel there life is in danger the use of deadly force is not only warranted but should be encouraged...
You must be really stupid, a security guard can legally be armed, Now notice the word after neighborhood....wait for it...."Watch".

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#153 Jul 18, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>You must be really stupid, a security guard can legally be armed, Now notice the word after neighborhood....wait for it...."Watch".
Actually you must be a tad more stupid than me then because evidently george zimmerman had his chl or he would not have had the LEGAL means to defend himself from the more aggressive man. Good thing for him he was armed or instead of an innocent man receiving a not guilty charge because he was defending himself, it would have been a young man being tried for murdering a tax paying property owner that volunteered his time to maintain a safe neighborhood for the sake of the community .
Watch what ? Watch you try to weasel your way out of admitting this shooing was justified?
lmfao!!!
.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#154 Jul 18, 2013
* shooting*

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#155 Jul 19, 2013
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Good thing for him he was armed or instead of an innocent man receiving a not guilty charge because he was defending himself, it would have been a young man being tried for murdering a tax paying property owner that volunteered his time to maintain a safe neighborhood for the sake of the community .
.
Here's what you should have wrote: "Since he was armed it gave him the offensive to be put in a position that he had to defend himself" Had he been without a gun, I doubt he would have acted so brave.
Sage

Buffalo, NY

#156 Jul 19, 2013
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually you must be a tad more stupid than me then because evidently george zimmerman had his chl or he would not have had the LEGAL means to defend himself from the more aggressive man. Good thing for him he was armed or instead of an innocent man receiving a not guilty charge because he was defending himself, it would have been a young man being tried for murdering a tax paying property owner that volunteered his time to maintain a safe neighborhood for the sake of the community .
Watch what ? Watch you try to weasel your way out of admitting this shooing was justified?
lmfao!!!
.
Do you think Zimmerman would have gotten out of his vehicle if he wasn't armed? Would he have been attacked if he hadn't left his vehicle? The honest, logical answer is NO. Many cowards hide behind loaded weapons, and Zimmerman was a coward and no hero. Don't forget that Martin's family are also tax-paying property owners if they lived in the same area that Zimmerman was.

Zimmerman's past history was just as sketchy as Martin's, but Martin will never have a chance to grow up and become a man. To actually be glad a human is dead because of something he MIGHT have done shows an absence of compassion and points to sociopathy. This country certainly doesn't need more sociopaths with loaded weapons.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 min RiversideRedneck 977,499
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 4 min RiversideRedneck 271
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 9 min AussieBobby 284,685
whos not wearing no underwear now 13 min gaz 1
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 16 min RiversideRedneck 88,486
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 21 min Peter Ross 675
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 23 min Classic 3,954
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 44 min truth 665,576
More from around the web