Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

There are 38105 comments on the Worcester Telegram & Gazette story from Jun 4, 2007, titled Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says. In it, Worcester Telegram & Gazette reports that:

TEHRAN, Iran- Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad yesterday said the world would witness the destruction of Israel soon, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

Peace for all

Calgary, Canada

#41886 May 13, 2014
Love of peace for all humanity and love for entire human life on planet earth will sure make us survive as happy humans and all of us.
w wmanuk

Manchester, UK

#41888 May 14, 2014
Peace for all wrote:
Love of peace for all humanity and love for entire human life on planet earth will sure make us survive as happy humans and all of us.

Oh yes the irainian goverment are such a lovable bunch..Peaceful nuke tec a presidents who son comited suicide statiung, btating the lothing an disgust her felt for his father.
Its so great thee thousands have fled risking everthing to get out . Where is the humanity in islam?
BigRabbit

Cumberland Park, Australia

#41891 May 16, 2014
w wmanuk wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes the irainian goverment are such a lovable bunch..Peaceful nuke tec a presidents who son comited suicide statiung, btating the lothing an disgust her felt for his father.
Its so great thee thousands have fled risking everthing to get out . Where is the humanity in islam?
Did you know we could...

Win The War on Terror Without a Single Dead Soldier
"...Iran is a vibrant, ethnically diverse melting-pot of Kurds, Turks, Azeris, and Arabs...owes its Islamic heritage to a wave of immigration from Arabia...
...urge the President to build upon this multicultural heritage and declare Iran a "Nation of Immigrants."
...Iran will be obliged to accept millions of immigrants from West Africa and Latin America.
Any Iranian who resisted would surely be called "racist" and fired from his job.
By 2060, Iranians would be reduced to a small minority and no longer a threat. By 2100 the Iranians would disappear completely.
Don't declare "War." Declare "Nation of Immigrants." The results are the same without a single shot fired."
Mandela

Rivervale, Australia

#41892 May 16, 2014
BigRabbit wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you know we could...
Win The War on Terror Without a Single Dead Soldier
"...Iran is a vibrant, ethnically diverse melting-pot of Kurds, Turks, Azeris, and Arabs...owes its Islamic heritage to a wave of immigration from Arabia...
...urge the President to build upon this multicultural heritage and declare Iran a "Nation of Immigrants."
...Iran will be obliged to accept millions of immigrants from West Africa and Latin America.
Any Iranian who resisted would surely be called "racist" and fired from his job.
By 2060, Iranians would be reduced to a small minority and no longer a threat. By 2100 the Iranians would disappear completely.
Don't declare "War." Declare "Nation of Immigrants." The results are the same without a single shot fired."
>
Iran is a threat to no one in the world or the mid east..........
>
Zionist Israel since inception has always been the threat..........
>
If it doesn't soon recognises the error of its ways ..........
.it will bring destruction to the whole world

<
Its government have openly stated ..........
>>>>>>> >>>>>.If we go down ..........we will take the whole world with us....!!
>

>
BigRabbit

Naracoorte, Australia

#41895 May 16, 2014
Mandela wrote:
<quoted text>
>
Iran is a threat to no one in the world or the mid east..........
>
Zionist Israel since inception has always been the threat..........
>
If it doesn't soon recognises the error of its ways ..........
.it will bring destruction to the whole world
<
Its government have openly stated ..........
>>>>>>> >>>>>.If we go down ..........we will take the whole world with us....!!
>>
Yes you are right. Maybe we could declare Israel 'a nation of immigrants' because lets face it most of them are.

Then we could flood Israel with millions of Africans and Indians and Asians. We will get them to sing 'Diversity is our greatest strength' and make them diverse because Israel was built by Immigrants. In fifty to one hundred years Jews would be assimilated and would no longer be a problem.

If I really hated a race I would do that to them but I'm not doing that. Anti-whites are doing that to every white country.

Diversity in All and Only white countries only gets rid of us.

Diversity is a code words for white genocide

This is Diversity in Israel

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#41897 May 16, 2014
Mandela wrote:
<quoted text>
>
Iran is a threat to no one in the world or the mid east..........
>
Zionist Israel since inception has always been the threat..........
>
If it doesn't soon recognises the error of its ways ..........
.it will bring destruction to the whole world
<
Its government have openly stated ..........
>>>>>>> >>>>>.If we go down ..........we will take the whole world with us....!!
>
>
History repeats Nevelle
Moses Kestenbaum ODA

New York, NY

#41899 May 18, 2014
Muhamad was a dog fcker, muhamad had sex with dogs, muhamad so fcked up the muslims that there is no chance for muslims to return to normalcy. Its a sad story when you have a billion Muslims believing muhamads garbage trash prophecies , trash muhammad religion into the river , say good by to this muhamad dogshit

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41901 Jun 1, 2014
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

BBC In The Service Of Israeli Propaganda

By Amena Saleem


Credulous BBC news team

The BBC’s source for the story is, in its own words,“the Israel Defense Forces.” There is a link from the BBC’s page to the story on the Israeli army’s website.
The story is based entirely on the claims of the Israeli prime minister and Israeli army officials, and doesn’t even begin to question how surface-to-surface missiles could possibly be smuggled into besieged Gaza.

Nor is the timing of the Israelis’ find questioned by the credulous BBC news team. The announcement came just days before EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton’s relationship-building visit to Iran (which denied any involvement in the shipment).
Instead, the Middle East desk chose to run a corresponding feature headlined “Israel’s clandestine battle with weapons smugglers.”

An incredibly lengthy report, written by the BBC’s diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus, it claims to reveal how the “major shipment of weaponry heading to the Gaza Strip from Iran throws a spotlight on alleged ongoing attempts to arm militants there, and Israel’s aim to thwart them.”

The feature continues in predictable BBC form, with subheadings such as:“So how does this compare to previous Gaza arms interceptions?”

All Israeli allegations of where the arms were headed and what they were to be used for are taken as fact. There is no critical analysis at all of Israel’s sudden announcement.
“Israel has lied”

However, while the BBC remained oblivious to the absurdities of claims that a missile-loaded ship might be headed to Gaza, under land, sea and air blockade, and to the possibility that it was acting as a pliable conduit for Israeli propaganda, more skeptical news organizations challenged Israel’s allegations.
Mandela

Australia

#41902 Jun 2, 2014
>
>
>
uzit wrote:
<quoted text>
Can I help if yuo are stupid??? We say and always said that there is and never was a COUNTRY called Palestine. Prove me wrong.
And of course there were never a people called Palestinians.
Look up first where the word Palestine came from.

>
.
>
OMG what lumpkin yo be uzit...!!
>
No PALESTINE yo say agen..........
>
The what aboot the statement "ONE COW IN PALESTINE.......... "
>

Yo zionist masters back in their dealins wit the british in early 1900s screamed aboot
requiring land in PALESTINE fo to build a zionist homeland ....
>

When the nazis in 1944 offered the zionist regime 600,000 hungarian jews
gud ole Chaim Weitzman, the first "zionist statesman" who stated:
"The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in PALESTINE......,
and
the 600,000 jews are not important to our cause and must take their fate......
>
Weitzman's cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with this observation
>
" ONE COW IN PALESTINE IS WORTH MORE THAN ALLL THE JEWS IN EUROPE .
>

Yes of course
>

Ths post is repeated because we are aware o yo inability to
absorb the blatant truth..........

>
>

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41903 Jun 2, 2014
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

BBC In The Service Of Israeli Propaganda

By Amena Saleem

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz ran a story headlined:“Netanyahu’s display of seized ship: meaningless Hollywood-style propaganda.”
Columnist Amir Oren writes:“From David Ben-Gurion’s time to the present, Israel has lied when it believed it had to.”

In its report “Doubts surface on Gaza destination of rockets seized by Israel,” the respected news agency Reuters quotes an unnamed US official as saying:“You look at those things and it’s obvious they couldn’t have been slipped into Gaza.”

Even the right-wing Times of Israel chose to cover the story from all angles, and not just from Israel’s perspective, as the BBC had done. Its report is headlined:“Iran arms ship may have been bound for Sinai, not Gaza.”

Correspondent Marissa Newman refers to investigations by US and Middle East intelligence analysts which concludes that:“Israel may have obfuscated [the ship’s] real destination in order to spare Egypt the humiliation of conceding the security unrest in the peninsula.”
Fact or speculation?

Compare these reports, responsibly analyzing the possibility that this story was no more than Israeli propaganda, with the BBC’s decision to use Israel’s claims as an opportunity to manufacture a feature on how an embattled Israel is fighting a “clandestine battle” with weapons smugglers.

Even when US doubts about the story began to emerge, the BBC refused to report on them, sticking with the Israeli side of the story which paints Palestinians in Gaza as violent militants.

Questioned on why the BBC is so willing to believe and report on all Israel has to say, the online Middle East desk replied:“The veracity of all stories can be called into question if there is not independent verification, but this depends on the reliability of the source and the credibility of the available information.”

And who is the source for this story? Back to the Middle East desk:“The article makes it clear that the announcement has come from Israel, i.e. that is the source.”
In other words, the BBC’s news teams are willing to throw journalistic values to the wind and accept Israel – a country which remains implicitly dishonest about its nuclear arsenal – as a credible and reliable source, in a way it probably wouldn’t do with any other country.

The Middle East desk certainly places what Israel has to say above what US and Middle East analysts have to say. Asked to follow up its original story by reporting on their doubts about the arms shipment, the Middle East desk replied that “to comment further would be purely speculative.”

So, according to the BBC, what US officials have to say is speculation, but what comes out of the mouths of Israeli officials is fact.
Promoting Israel’s viewpoint

On 21 March, BBC Online ran another story that could be viewed as propaganda for Israel under the headline:“Israel ’uncovers longest Gaza tunnel.’”
The BBC’s source once again is the Israeli army, and a link is provided to the story on the army’s website as verification for its authenticity.

The BBC reports:“A spokesman said it was the longest tunnel found to date and was meant for use in attacks on Israeli civilians.”
The story came five months after a similar BBC story headlined “Gaza ‘terror tunnel’ uncovered inside Israel.”

In the intervening five months, BBC Online carried no stories on how tunnels between Gaza and Egypt have served as a lifeline to the Palestinians, held under an illegal blockade for seven years. When the

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41904 Jun 2, 2014
BBC reports on tunnels under Gaza, they are solely “terror tunnels.”

And so, in March, the BBC ignored the killings of Palestinian youths in the West Bank, choosing instead to run dubious stories on arms shipments to Gaza and “terror tunnels,” both of which propagate Israel’s hasbara viewpoint of Palestinians as terrorists hellbent on its destruction.

The truthful image of Palestinians that Israel does not want promoted – that of victims of unprovoked Israeli aggression – is kept from BBC audiences.

This week, BBC Online airbrushed another historical moment from its news pages. This time it was the comments of US Secretary of State John Kerry, blaming Israel for the breakdown of talks with the Palestinian Authority, which the BBC decided to withhold from its licence fee-paying audience.

Incredibly, the BBC begins its article in a way that placed the blame on the Palestinians for the collapse of the talks, a claim made by Israel. Once again, the BBC reported from the viewpoint of Israel. The US perspective that Israel precipitated the breakdown was not reported.

So why is BBC Online’s Middle East desk seemingly so determined to shield Israel from bad publicity by withholding important news stories from its audiences, while, on the other hand, pushing anti-Palestinian stories provided by the Israeli army?

Could it be anything to do with the desk’s editor, Raffi Berg, who took up his post in August 2013, and was exposed by The Electronic Intifada for having sent emails to BBC journalists asking them to promote the Israeli perspective in their reporting?
It is, of course, impossible to say. But what can be said, by just looking at its reporting of Israel and the Palestinians over the last five weeks, is that it is becoming almost impossible to hide the pro-Israeli bias of BBC Online’s Middle East desk. For that, the BBC should surely take collective responsibility.

© 2000-2014 electronicIntifada.net
Cry Baby Muq

Chicago, IL

#41905 Jun 2, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
BBC reports on tunnels under Gaza, they are solely “terror tunnels.”
And so, in March, the BBC ignored the killings of Palestinian youths in the West Bank, choosing instead to run dubious stories on arms shipments to Gaza and “terror tunnels,” both of which propagate Israel’s hasbara viewpoint of Palestinians as terrorists hellbent on its destruction.
The truthful image of Palestinians that Israel does not want promoted – that of victims of unprovoked Israeli aggression – is kept from BBC audiences.
This week, BBC Online airbrushed another historical moment from its news pages. This time it was the comments of US Secretary of State John Kerry, blaming Israel for the breakdown of talks with the Palestinian Authority, which the BBC decided to withhold from its licence fee-paying audience.
Incredibly, the BBC begins its article in a way that placed the blame on the Palestinians for the collapse of the talks, a claim made by Israel. Once again, the BBC reported from the viewpoint of Israel. The US perspective that Israel precipitated the breakdown was not reported.
So why is BBC Online’s Middle East desk seemingly so determined to shield Israel from bad publicity by withholding important news stories from its audiences, while, on the other hand, pushing anti-Palestinian stories provided by the Israeli army?
Could it be anything to do with the desk’s editor, Raffi Berg, who took up his post in August 2013, and was exposed by The Electronic Intifada for having sent emails to BBC journalists asking them to promote the Israeli perspective in their reporting?
It is, of course, impossible to say. But what can be said, by just looking at its reporting of Israel and the Palestinians over the last five weeks, is that it is becoming almost impossible to hide the pro-Israeli bias of BBC Online’s Middle East desk. For that, the BBC should surely take collective responsibility.
© 2000-2014 electronicIntifada.net
Is it true that you sleep with goats in your bed?

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41907 Jun 3, 2014
Cry Baby Muq wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it true that you sleep with goats in your bed?
What IS True is that you sleep with lots of dogs in your bed.

First look at your own bedroom before telling others.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#41909 Jun 3, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
BBC reports on tunnels under Gaza, they are solely “terror tunnels.”
I agree, they should nuke those tunnels.
Cry Baby Muq

Chicago, IL

#41911 Jun 3, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
What IS True is that you sleep with lots of dogs in your bed.
First look at your own bedroom before telling others.
Dogs are cleaner than goats, butt head.

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41912 Jun 3, 2014
Cry Baby Muq wrote:
<quoted text>
Dogs are cleaner than goats, butt head.
When you stand on your head, you see things reversed.

Dogs in bedrooms turn most western people like dogs.

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41913 Jun 3, 2014
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

Washington Drives The World To War
By Paul Craig Roberts

April 15, 2014 "ICH" - The CIA director was sent to Kiev to launch a military suppression of the Russian separatists in the eastern and southern portions of Ukraine, former Russian territories for the most part that were foolishly attached to the Ukraine in the early years of Soviet rule.

Washington’s plan to grab Ukraine overlooked that the Russian and Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine were not likely to go along with their insertion into the EU and NATO while submitting to the persecution of Russian speaking peoples. Washington has lost Crimea, from which Washington intended to eject Russia from its Black Sea naval base. Instead of admitting that its plan for grabbing Ukraine has gone amiss, Washington is unable to admit a mistake and, therefore, is pushing the crisis to more dangerous levels.

If Ukraine dissolves into secession with the former Russian territories reverting to Russia, Washington will be embarrassed that the result of its coup in Kiev was to restore the Russian provinces of Ukraine to Russia. To avoid this embarrassment, Washington is pushing the crisis toward war.

The CIA director instructed Washington’s hand-picked stooge government in Kiev to apply to the United Nations for help in repelling “terrorists” who with alleged Russian help are allegedly attacking Ukraine. In Washington’s vocabulary, self-determination is a sign of Russian interference. As the UN is essentially a Washington-financed organization, Washington will get what it wants.

The Russian government has already made it completely clear some weeks ago that the use of violence against protesters in eastern and southern Ukraine would compel the Russian government to send in the Russian army to protect Russians, just as Russia had to do in South Ossetia when Washington instructed its Georgian puppet ruler to attack Russian peacekeeping troops and Russian residents of South Ossetia.
Washington knows that the Russian government cannot stand aside while one of Washington’s puppet states attacks Russians. Yet, Washington is pushing the crisis to war.

The danger for Russia is that the Russian government will rely on diplomacy, international organizations, international cooperation, and on the common sense and self-interest of German politicians and politicians in other of Washington’s European puppet states.

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41914 Jun 3, 2014
For Russia this could be a fatal mistake. There is no good will in Washington, only mendacity. Russian delay provides Washington with time to build up forces on Russia’s borders and in the Black Sea and to demonize Russia with propaganda and whip up the US population into a war frenzy. The latter is already occurring.
Kerry has made it clear to Lavrov that Washington is not listening to Russia. As Washington pays well, Washington’s European puppets are also not listening to Russia. Money is more important to European politicians than humanity’s survival.

In my opinion, Washington does not want the Ukraine matters settled in a diplomatic and reasonable way. It might be the case that Russia’s best move is immediately to occupy the Russian territories of Ukraine and re-absorb the territories into Russia from whence they came. This should be done before the US and its NATO puppets are prepared for war. It is more difficult for Washington to start a war when the objects of the war have already been lost. Russia will be demonized with endless propaganda from Washington whether or not Russia re-absorbs its traditional territories. If Russia allows these territories to be suppressed by Washington, the prestige and authority of the Russian government will collapse. Perhaps that is what Washington is counting on.

If Putin’s government stands aside while Russian Ukraine is suppressed, Putin’s prestige will plummet, and Washington will finish off the Russian government by putting into action its many hundreds of Washington-financed NGOs that the Russian government has so foolishly tolerated. Russia is riven with Washington’s Fifth columns.

In my opinion, the Russian and Chinese governments have made serious strategic mistakes by remaining within the US dollar-based international payments system. The BRICS and any others with a brain should instantly desert the dollar system, which is a mechanism for US imperialism. The countries of the BRICS should immediately create their own separate payments system and their own exclusive communications/Internet system.

Russia and China have stupidly made these strategic mistakes, because reeling from communist failures and oppressions, they naively assumed that Washington was pure, that Washington was committed to its propagandistic self-description as the upholder of law, justice, mercy,and human rights.

In fact, Washington, the “exceptional, indispensable country,” is committed to its hegemony over the world. Russia, China, and Iran are in the way of Washington’s hegemony and are targeted for attack. The attack on Russia is mounting.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest books are, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and How America Was Lost. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
Mandela

Kardinya, Australia

#41916 Jun 3, 2014
>
uzit wrote:
<quoted text>
Can I help if yuo are stupid??? We say and always said that there is and never was a COUNTRY called Palestine. Prove me wrong.
And of course there were never a people called Palestinians.
Look up first where the word Palestine came from.

>
.
>
OMG what lumpkin yo be uzit...!!
>
No PALESTINE yo say agen..........
>
The what aboot the statement "ONE COW IN PALESTINE.......... "
>

Yo zionist masters back in their dealins wit the british in early 1900s screamed aboot
requiring land in PALESTINE fo to build a zionist homeland ....
>

When the nazis in 1944 offered the zionist regime 600,000 hungarian jews
gud ole Chaim Weitzman, the first "zionist statesman" who stated:
"The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in PALESTINE......,
and
the 600,000 jews are not important to our cause and must take their fate......
>
Weitzman's cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with this observation
>
" ONE COW IN PALESTINE IS WORTH MORE THAN ALLL THE JEWS IN EUROPE .
>

Yes of course
>

Ths post is repeated because we are aware o yo inability to
absorb the blatant truth..........

>
>

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#41917 Jun 4, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
For Russia this could be a fatal mistake. There is no good will in Washington, only mendacity. Russian delay provides Washington with time to build up forces on Russia’s borders and in the Black Sea and to demonize Russia with propaganda and whip up the US population into a war frenzy. The latter is already occurring.
Kerry has made it clear to Lavrov that Washington is not listening to Russia. As Washington pays well, Washington’s European puppets are also not listening to Russia. Money is more important to European politicians than humanity’s survival.
In my opinion, Washington does not want the Ukraine matters settled in a diplomatic and reasonable way. It might be the case that Russia’s best move is immediately to occupy the Russian territories of Ukraine and re-absorb the territories into Russia from whence they came. This should be done before the US and its NATO puppets are prepared for war. It is more difficult for Washington to start a war when the objects of the war have already been lost. Russia will be demonized with endless propaganda from Washington whether or not Russia re-absorbs its traditional territories. If Russia allows these territories to be suppressed by Washington, the prestige and authority of the Russian government will collapse. Perhaps that is what Washington is counting on.
If Putin’s government stands aside while Russian Ukraine is suppressed, Putin’s prestige will plummet, and Washington will finish off the Russian government by putting into action its many hundreds of Washington-financed NGOs that the Russian government has so foolishly tolerated. Russia is riven with Washington’s Fifth columns.
In my opinion, the Russian and Chinese governments have made serious strategic mistakes by remaining within the US dollar-based international payments system. The BRICS and any others with a brain should instantly desert the dollar system, which is a mechanism for US imperialism. The countries of the BRICS should immediately create their own separate payments system and their own exclusive communications/Internet system.
Russia and China have stupidly made these strategic mistakes, because reeling from communist failures and oppressions, they naively assumed that Washington was pure, that Washington was committed to its propagandistic self-description as the upholder of law, justice, mercy,and human rights.
In fact, Washington, the “exceptional, indispensable country,” is committed to its hegemony over the world. Russia, China, and Iran are in the way of Washington’s hegemony and are targeted for attack. The attack on Russia is mounting.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest books are, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and How America Was Lost. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
You ISlamics spend a lot of time blaming others for your problems, I suggest buying a big mirror.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 min RiversideRedneck 49,611
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 11 min hojo 647,072
4 Best book to learn CPA 37 min VPNproxy 1
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr Steve III 44,730
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr The Hangman 971,823
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 2 hr WasteWater 2,116
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 hr WasteWater 105,691
topix drops human sexuality forum.......this be... 6 hr Jockfullonutz 28
More from around the web