Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

There are 38083 comments on the Worcester Telegram & Gazette story from Jun 4, 2007, titled Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says. In it, Worcester Telegram & Gazette reports that:

TEHRAN, Iran- Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad yesterday said the world would witness the destruction of Israel soon, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41202 Mar 15, 2014
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

The Sordid Roots of the National-Security State

By Jacob G. Hornberger

December 20, 2013 "Information Clearing House - "fff" - Given that most all of us living today have been born and raised under a national-security state apparatus, we’ve all been inculcated with the notion that the enormous military empire, CIA, and NSA are a necessary and permanent part of our lives. We’ve all been taught that our very freedom and well-being depend on the existence of these agencies. In fact, we praise them and glorify them for “defending our freedoms,”“keeping us safe,” and protecting “national security.”

It’s important, however, to bear in mind that the Founding Fathers fully and totally rejected this type of governmental structure and way of life, which is why our American ancestors lived without such an apparatus for the first 150 years of American history. Our predecessors understood that enormous, permanent military establishments and secret intelligence agencies were hallmarks of totalitarian regimes, not free societies, and, in fact, constituted grave threats against the freedom and well-being of the citizenry.

So, how did the U.S. national-security state apparatus come into existence? What caused the American people to move in this totalitarian-like direction? Why did Americans decide to reject the philosophy of liberty and limited government of the Founding Fathers in favor of militarism, empire, foreign interventionism, covert operations, coups, torture, assassinations, spying, surveillance, and the like?

The justification for this revolutionary change in direction for the United States was rooted in the post- World War II fear of the Soviet Union in particular (and to a certain extent communist China) and communism in general. U.S. officials convinced the American people that a national-security state apparatus was necessary to prevent the United States from being conquered by communism and the Soviet Union.
As Senator Arthur Vandenberg told President Harry Truman, the president needed to “scare hell out of the American people,” which is precisely what Truman and his successor President Eisenhower did.

Americans who grew up in the 1950s lived lives of constant fear—fear that communists were everywhere, fear that communism was a contagious illness of the mind that was spreading throughout America and the rest of the world, and fear that the Soviet Union was going to initiate a nuclear attack on the United States. Fear became the coin of the realm for the national-security state.

Why was there even a Cold War? Why was there a constant state of hostilities between the United States and Soviet Union for so long? After all, let’s not forget that these two nations worked together in partnership for four years to defeat the Nazi regime. Why couldn’t that spirit of cooperation have continued after World War II?
Sure, the Soviet Union was a brutal communist regime. No doubt about that. But the fact remains—the United States and the Soviet Union worked together to win the war. It didn’t have to be that way. The war could have been waged with the Soviet Union and the United States (and the Allied powers) acting independently of each other to defeat Nazi Germany. Instead, they worked together.

w wman uk

Norwich, UK

#41203 Mar 16, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
http://www.informationclearing house.info/article37179.htm
The Sordid Roots of the National-Security State
By Jacob G. Hornberger
December 20, 2013 "Information Clearing House - "fff" - Given that most all of us living today have been born and raised under a national-security state apparatus, we’ve all been inculcated with the notion that the enormous military empire, CIA, and NSA are a necessary and permanent part of our lives. We’ve all been taught that our very freedom and well-being depend on the existence of these agencies. In fact, we praise them and glorify them for “defending our freedoms,”“keeping us safe,” and protecting “national security.”
It’s important, however, to bear in mind that the Founding Fathers fully and totally rejected this type of governmental structure and way of life, which is why our American ancestors lived without such an apparatus for the first 150 years of American history. Our predecessors understood that enormous, permanent military establishments and secret intelligence agencies were hallmarks of totalitarian regimes, not free societies, and, in fact, constituted grave threats against the freedom and well-being of the citizenry.
So, how did the U.S. national-security state apparatus come into existence? What caused the American people to move in this totalitarian-like direction? Why did Americans decide to reject the philosophy of liberty and limited government of the Founding Fathers in favor of militarism, empire, foreign interventionism, covert operations, coups, torture, assassinations, spying, surveillance, and the like?
The justification for this revolutionary change in direction for the United States was rooted in the post- World War II fear of the Soviet Union in particular (and to a certain extent communist China) and communism in general. U.S. officials convinced the American people that a national-security state apparatus was necessary to prevent the United States from being conquered by communism and the Soviet Union.
As Senator Arthur Vandenberg told President Harry Truman, the president needed to “scare hell out of the American people,” which is precisely what Truman and his successor President Eisenhower did.
Americans who grew up in the 1950s lived lives of constant fear—fear that communists were everywhere, fear that communism was a contagious illness of the mind that was spreading throughout America and the rest of the world, and fear that the Soviet Union was going to initiate a nuclear attack on the United States. Fear became the coin of the realm for the national-security state.
Why was there even a Cold War? Why was there a constant state of hostilities between the United States and Soviet Union for so long? After all, let’s not forget that these two nations worked together in partnership for four years to defeat the Nazi regime. Why couldn’t that spirit of cooperation have continued after World War II?
Sure, the Soviet Union was a brutal communist regime. No doubt about that. But the fact remains—the United States and the Soviet Union worked together to win the war. It didn’t have to be that way. The war could have been waged with the Soviet Union and the United States (and the Allied powers) acting independently of each other to defeat Nazi Germany. Instead, they worked together.

Whats happened to Muq is it that its DNA has been cloned so many time it turned to shite?
Have they sent the poor little dallet back to india to carry on cleaning toilets.
w wman uk

Norwich, UK

#41204 Mar 16, 2014
aegege wrote:
Again, why are my posts being spammed and over-runned?
These are jews who say that they deliberatly impose Multiculturalism into Europe and they predict that they will be hated for it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =5jl-OJJVAEgXX

They dont need spaming they are spam.
aegege

Tórshavn, Faroe Islands

#41205 Mar 16, 2014
w wman uk wrote:
<quoted text>
They dont need spaming they are spam.
No they are not. You f*cking asshole.
The fact is that the western media is lying about ahmadinijad.
He did never promised to wipe out isreal.
The lying media in the west is contributing to hatred and contempt and is complicit in mass murder of arab contries.
They are jewish swindlers and liars. Anyone who examine this knows this the meida is EXTREMLY over represented by jews.
aegege

Tórshavn, Faroe Islands

#41206 Mar 16, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
http://www.informationclearing house.info/article37179.htm
The Sordid Roots of the National-Security State
By Jacob G. Hornberger
December 20, 2013 "Information Clearing House - "fff" - Given that most all of us living today have been born and raised under a national-security state apparatus, we’ve all been inculcated with the notion that the enormous military empire, CIA, and NSA are a necessary and permanent part of our lives. We’ve all been taught that our very freedom and well-being depend on the existence of these agencies. In fact, we praise them and glorify them for “defending our freedoms,”“keeping us safe,” and protecting “national security.”
It’s important, however, to bear in mind that the Founding Fathers fully and totally rejected this type of governmental structure and way of life, which is why our American ancestors lived without such an apparatus for the first 150 years of American history. Our predecessors understood that enormous, permanent military establishments and secret intelligence agencies were hallmarks of totalitarian regimes, not free societies, and, in fact, constituted grave threats against the freedom and well-being of the citizenry.
The answer is that we have let the jews and the marxist communists into government and by doing that you get control freaks who will grow government enormously.

the biggest activists who want to introduce more surveilance, more police state messures, take your freedom and BAN GUNS -- are jews. Dianne Feinstein.

Those who are the most hell bent to get USA to new wars are JEWS also. they have AIPAC.
aegege

Tórshavn, Faroe Islands

#41208 Mar 16, 2014
w wman uk wrote:
<quoted text>
They dont need spaming they are spam.
A jew accused muslims for being the problem in the west. I'm here to show and prove that jews are behind this:


These are jews openly admitting that they are bringing in Muslims.

Jews are typicaly MARXISTS - Their aim to bring in muslims is because they want conflicts stirred up so they can increase government power, police and millitary.

They want to create a USSR 2 . or a palestine 2 if you will.

these parasite jews do also want to ban weapons in USA for the private people.
w wman uk

Norwich, UK

#41209 Mar 16, 2014
aegege wrote:
<quoted text>
No they are not. You f*cking asshole.
The fact is that the western media is lying about ahmadinijad.
He did never promised to wipe out isreal.
The lying media in the west is contributing to hatred and contempt and is complicit in mass murder of arab contries.
They are jewish swindlers and liars. Anyone who examine this knows this the meida is EXTREMLY over represented by jews.
The little roach amjad is past.
Now iran has a leader far worse.
Speaking of arsoles their leader the supreme arshollas own son commited suicide siting that he couldnt live with the disgust he felt for his father.
Remember these are the arsehollas that say they come in peace while devoloping nuclear weapons.
The same ones suppling arms and rockets to thugs that are firing them at Isreal.
Then dipshits like you a cry when there is a measured responce from the IDF.
The Jews will survive
Perhaps you should stick to white washing the druids.
Wearing white sheets and pestering livestock.
You show very little of the wisdom you claim for the druids, reading you postsyou sound like a poisoned fairy.
aegege

Tórshavn, Faroe Islands

#41210 Mar 16, 2014
Will you please deal with the subject.
Western media is lying about ahmadinijad- STAY ON SUBJECT!

Normal people will be pretty shocked on how many lies are told in our media:

Uzi

Herzliya, Israel

#41214 Mar 16, 2014
aegege wrote:
<quoted text>
A jew accused muslims for being the problem in the west. I'm here to show and prove that jews are behind this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =53A5AJoRxF0XX
These are jews openly admitting that they are bringing in Muslims.
Jews are typicaly MARXISTS - Their aim to bring in muslims is because they want conflicts stirred up so they can increase government power, police and millitary.
They want to create a USSR 2 . or a palestine 2 if you will.
these parasite jews do also want to ban weapons in USA for the private people.
Seems too worried nazi shitstain hahahaah hahahah. Power to where it belongs!!! To the Jews!!!!!!!
w wman uk

Norwich, UK

#41215 Mar 16, 2014
aegege wrote:
Will you please deal with the subject.
Western media is lying about ahmadinijad- STAY ON SUBJECT!
Normal people will be pretty shocked on how many lies are told in our media:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =4mScWWtRfGQXX
The subject is the dog shite moohamedan sect that are ruling and ruining iran arsewipe
Why are you suprised that media tell lies after all they are media fool.
Normal people would be suprised if they told the truth.
The koran does not tell lies it leves anyone reading is in no doudt what they would like to do to the non believer that means you dumbarse.

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#41216 Mar 16, 2014
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

The Sordid Roots of the National-Security State

By Jacob G. Hornberger (Contd.)

So, why couldn’t the United States and the Soviet Union have co-existed after World War II in the same way that the United States coexists with countries like China and Vietnam today? Those two countries are run by brutal communist regimes. In fact, during the Cold War U.S. officials taught Americans to hate China as much as the Soviet Union. Why couldn’t that type of situation have developed after World War II?

One big reason is that then there would have been no justification for the national-security state apparatus that the statists wanted to graft onto our constitutional order. In order to induce Americans to move in a totalitarian-type direction, the statists needed a new big official enemy, one as big as the Nazi regime, one that could be used to “scare hell out of the American people.”

U.S. officials pointed to the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe after the war was over and essentially ordered the Soviets to get out of those countries and to refrain from installing puppet regimes there. They expected their orders to be followed, especially given that the U.S. government was the only power to have nuclear weapons and, as shown by Nagasaki and Hiroshima, had the will to employ them.
President Truman went out of his way to insult and demean the Soviets. At a meeting in April 1945, Truman lashed out at Soviet Minister Molotov, insulting and demeaning him to such an extent that Molotov said to Truman that he had never been talked to like that. Truman said to him—Keep your agreements and you won’t be talked to like that. Truman later bragged to a friend that he had given Molotov “the straight one-two to the jaw.”

To Truman, it was irrelevant that the United States and Great Britain had previously delivered Eastern Europe into the hands of the Soviet Union. That was the cost of the partnership between the West and the Soviets. In fact, at any time during the war, the United States could have attempted to negotiate a peace with Germany before the Soviets had begun pushing the German forces back across Eastern Europe, that could have, say, sent Hitler and his henchmen to South America and kept Eastern Europe free and independent of both Nazi and Soviet control. FDR said no because this would constitute a betrayal of his partnership with the Soviet communists. Unconditional surrender was his policy.

Was it any surprise that the Soviets remained occupying Eastern Europe after the war? How could it be? The Soviet Union had been invaded by Germany twice in the past 20 years. Moreover, don’t forget that the United States was quickly rebuilding and rearming West Germany as well as integrating many Nazi officials into its Cold War military-intelligence operations.

While no one could condone the Soviet Union’s refusal to exit East Germany and Eastern Europe, one can still understand why they were doing it—to provide a buffer against a possible third invasion from Germany. Don’t forget, after all, that the extreme irrational paranoia that the U.S. government displayed with communist regimes in Cuba, Chile, and elsewhere in Latin America. Why would we expect the Soviet Union to behave with less paranoia about another German attack in the future?

But U.S. officials couldn’t see it that way. They used the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe and East Germany to convince Americans that the Soviet Union was bent on worldwide conquest. The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming They’re going to attack the United States, occupy our country too, run the IRS and the public schools, and brainwash Americans into loving communism.
w wman uk

Longfield, UK

#41217 Mar 17, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
http://www.informationclearing house.info/article37179.htm
The Sordid Roots of the National-Security State
By Jacob G. Hornberger (Contd.)
So, why couldn’t the United States and the Soviet Union have co-existed after World War II in the same way that the United States coexists with countries like China and Vietnam today? Those two countries are run by brutal communist regimes. In fact, during the Cold War U.S. officials taught Americans to hate China as much as the Soviet Union. Why couldn’t that type of situation have developed after World War II?
One big reason is that then there would have been no justification for the national-security state apparatus that the statists wanted to graft onto our constitutional order. In order to induce Americans to move in a totalitarian-type direction, the statists needed a new big official enemy, one as big as the Nazi regime, one that could be used to “scare hell out of the American people.”
U.S. officials pointed to the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe after the war was over and essentially ordered the Soviets to get out of those countries and to refrain from installing puppet regimes there. They expected their orders to be followed, especially given that the U.S. government was the only power to have nuclear weapons and, as shown by Nagasaki and Hiroshima, had the will to employ them.
President Truman went out of his way to insult and demean the Soviets. At a meeting in April 1945, Truman lashed out at Soviet Minister Molotov, insulting and demeaning him to such an extent that Molotov said to Truman that he had never been talked to like that. Truman said to him—Keep your agreements and you won’t be talked to like that. Truman later bragged to a friend that he had given Molotov “the straight one-two to the jaw.”
To Truman, it was irrelevant that the United States and Great Britain had previously delivered Eastern Europe into the hands of the Soviet Union. That was the cost of the partnership between the West and the Soviets. In fact, at any time during the war, the United States could have attempted to negotiate a peace with Germany before the Soviets had begun pushing the German forces back across Eastern Europe, that could have, say, sent Hitler and his henchmen to South America and kept Eastern Europe free and independent of both Nazi and Soviet control. FDR said no because this would constitute a betrayal of his partnership with the Soviet communists. Unconditional surrender was his policy.
Was it any surprise that the Soviets remained occupying Eastern Europe after the war? How could it be? The Soviet Union had been invaded by Germany twice in the past 20 years. Moreover, don’t forget that the United States was quickly rebuilding and rearming West Germany as well as integrating many Nazi officials into its Cold War military-intelligence operations.
While no one could condone the Soviet Union’s refusal to exit East Germany and Eastern Europe, one can still understand why they were doing it—to provide a buffer against a possible third invasion from Germany. Don’t forget, after all, that the extreme irrational paranoia that the U.S. government displayed with communist regimes in Cuba, Chile, and elsewhere in Latin America. Why would we expect the Soviet Union to behave with less paranoia about another German attack in the future?
But U.S. officials couldn’t see it that way. They used the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe and East Germany to convince Americans that the Soviet Union was bent on worldwide conquest. The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming They’re going to attack the United States, occupy our country too, run the IRS and the public schools, and brainwash Americans into loving communism.
Where is did the last muq clone go?
Is it that the last mug has been replaced by then new and not improved muq1?
aegege

Tórshavn, Faroe Islands

#41219 Mar 17, 2014
Uzi wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems too worried nazi shitstain hahahaah hahahah. Power to where it belongs!!! To the Jews!!!!!!!
I leave that open for the world to see..

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#41220 Mar 17, 2014
aegege wrote:
<quoted text>
1. There are hundreds of contradicions in the bible.
One place it says god can do everything, in another verse it decribes when isrealites were in war with another tribe they couldn't stop them becuase the enemy had chariots of Iron.
I can site LOTS of contraditions in the bible.
2. The bible has LOTS of scientific errors.
Claims that the earth is flat (or that you can see the whole world from the mountain tops, claims that the earth rests on pillars, claims that when you are sick you should bleed a person because the dirt is in the blood.
3. The bible is ONLY about isreal and the surrounding cultures, there is nothing about scandinavians, americans or latin americans in the bible.
4. If the bible would have been real, it surely would be a puny and patetic god who requires certain behaviours what concerns our private life, what concerns working on sundays. Animal sacrifices, and human sacrifices.
To say it short: THERE IS NO CHANCE IN HELL THAT THE BIBLE CAN BE ANYTHING CLOSE TO A GODS WRITTEN OR INSPIRED BOOK AS ONE VERSE CLAIMS IT IS.
Those jews who invented it, invented it for own benifit and because they gained power by claiming that jews are gods people.
Your understanding of the Bible is laughable. LOL......"Claims that the earth is flat"? LOL..... Many a skeptic claims that the Bible depicts a flat earth. Scriptural references such as Revelation 7:1 are cited, which speaks of “four angels standing at the four corners of the earth.” However, this passage makes reference to the cardinal directions as seen on a compass – i.e. north, south, east and west. Terminology to a similar effect is used today when we speak of the sun rising and setting each day, even though we know that it is, in fact, the earth which orbits around the sun.

Another passage often referred to is Psalm 75:3, which speaks of God holding the pillars firm. However, the psalms are written in the poetry genre. Rather than referring to literal pillars, this is representative of God’s guaranteeing the earth’s stability. Even when the moral order of the world seems to have crumbled, God will not fully withdraw His sustaining power.

In contrast to the supposed “flat earth” verses, there are numerous Scriptures that clearly indicate otherwise. The earth is described in Job 26:7 as being suspended over empty space, implying a spherical figure. This notion is further entertained in Isaiah 40:21-22, which refers to “the circle of the earth.” This is further supported by Proverbs 8:27 (NKJV), which speaks of God drawing a circle on the face of the deep. From a “bird’s-eye view” of the ocean, the horizon is seen as a circle. Such an observation indicates that where light terminates, darkness begins, describing the reality of day and night on a spherical earth.

The round-earth idea is further supported by Jesus in Luke 17:31,34:“In that day, he who is on the housetop, and his goods are in the house, let him not come down to take them away. And likewise the one who is in the field, let him not turn back...I tell you, in that night there will be two people in one bed: the one will be taken and the other will be left.” This would seem to indicate the phenomenon of day on one side of the globe while darkness abides on the other.

In conclusion, the curvature of the earth is certainly a biblical concept, and there is little or no basis for the charge that the Bible teaches a flat earth. The Scriptures that seem to present a flat earth can all easily be explained when correctly interpreted and understood.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#41221 Mar 17, 2014
Muslims in Pakistan burn down a Hindu neighborhood on
rumor that a copy of the Quran was (inadvertently) destroyed.
Unlike other religions, Islam rarely inspires peace and love, but it
does do an excellent job of turning grown men into angry children.
w wman uk

Longfield, UK

#41222 Mar 17, 2014
RiccardoFire wrote:
Muslims in Pakistan burn down a Hindu neighborhood on
rumor that a copy of the Quran was (inadvertently) destroyed.
Unlike other religions, Islam rarely inspires peace and love, but it
does do an excellent job of turning grown men into angry children.

islime the religion of perminate offence.
The koran states that all way are to be the murhmnas way or off with your head
It says world domination for islime.
It says kill the jews.
It give istructions on how to beat your wife.
The penalty for not swollowing the crock of shite that is islime is death.
Not oh well you can believe it or not its up to but death.
All these traits are so simular to the nazzies.
No wonder the previous muq expressed his affection for hitler.
w wman uk

Longfield, UK

#41223 Mar 17, 2014
l wonder if our resident islamist or another who may be better informed could explain why the koran is so full of this kind of crap.
That is if he is not to cowardly or to busy cut and pating???
The Islamic Hell or Jahannum which was an imagination of Prophet Mohammed used primarily for two reasons:
To have a torture chamber for all the kafirs (unbelievers and people of other religions)
To terrorize people into accepting Islam.
The purpose of Hell in Islam is not to punish the Muslim wrong-doers. Because, for them Mohammed will recommend paradise, beautiful virgins and young boys on the Day of Judgment. His recommendation is final and Allah cannot deny it. It is available to all murderers, rapists, arsonists, cheats, thugs, pickpockets and pimps provided they are following Islam. On the contrary, a flaming Hell is reserved only for all Hindus, Sikhs, Jews and Christians, no matter how pious and God-fearing they may have been.
This article is divided in two sections. The first section deals with the brutal instructions Prophet Mohammed gives to his followers about Kafirs and how to torture, maim and murder them ruthlessly.
The second section explains the various procedures devised by Prophet Mohammed's sick imagination for torturing people of other religions in Hell.
Instructions to Muslims about Unbelievers
Koran 9:29
Fight those who do not profess the true faith (Islam) till they pay the jiziya (poll tax) with the hand of humility.
w wman uk

Longfield, UK

#41224 Mar 17, 2014
So here Prophet Mohammed is instructing a true Muslim to fight people of other religions until the unbelievers debase themselves and pay tax for their existence. So the greatness of Islam is revealed only when follwers of other religions are humiliated.
Koran 8:12
Remember Thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the believers, I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, Smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger tips of them."
Here Mohammed is giving step by step instruction on how to torture and kill Kafirs if they don't follow Islam.
Koran 9:5
"Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolators wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."
In the above verse Prophet Mohammed is clearly instructing his followers to kill the idolators in any brutal way possible until the idolators submit themselves to Islam. Allah is indeed merciful !!
w wman uk

Longfield, UK

#41225 Mar 17, 2014
Koran 9:73
Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their Home: an evil fate.
Here Mohammed is trying to justify his brutal acts. He conveniently claims divine justification for the expression of his hatred by saying Allah himself revealed to him personally that people of other religions are evil and belong in Hell. Therefore, according to Mohammed any barbaric act against the unbelievers is completely justified.
Koran 4:144
Believers, do not choose the unbelievers rather than the faithful as your friends. Would you give Allah a clear proof against yourselves ?
w wman uk

Longfield, UK

#41226 Mar 17, 2014
This verse clearly states that a Muslim can only befreind a Muslim. Mohammed in order to ensure that his followers will not befriend and get influenced by people of other religions, revealed this verse. This verse illustrates that if a Muslim befriends a Non-Muslim than the wrath of Allah will be on him. Therefore in Islam, people of other religions should be treated with contempt,disrespect and cruelty.
Koran 47:4
When you meet the unbelievers in the Jihad strike off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take ransom from them, until War shall lay down her burdens.
In the above verse, Mohammed is giving detailed instruction about how to maim and torture unbelievers in Jihad. And finally when the Muslims are satisfied enough after torturing and maiming the unbelievers, they should proceed to demand ransom for the captives. All for the sake for all-merciful Allah !!
Koran 5:33-34
The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet and alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom; Save those who repent before ye overpower them. For know that Allah is Forgiving, merciful.
In this verse, Mohammed devises another recipe for torturing unbelievers. This particular recipe involves chopping off alternate limbs and expelling the Kafirs (people following other religions) out of the land.
Instructions to Muslims regarding Christians and Jews
Prophet Mohammed has reserved special position for certain sects of Unbelievers in his so called "Holy Book" Koran. Those unbelievers are none other than followers of Christianity and Judaism. I have selected few verses from Koran to display what Muslims are taught and instructed as far as treating Christians and Jews is concerned.
Koran 5:51
Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends. They are friends with one another. Whoever of you seeks their friendship shall become one of their number. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers.
In this verse Prophet Mohammed is clearly instructing his followers never to befriend a Christian or a Jew. Because if they take a Christian or a Jew as a friend, they will commit a wrong deed and Allah's wrath will be on them.
Koran 5:57
Believers, do not seek the friendship of the infidels and those who were given the Book before you, who have made your religion a jest and a pasttime...
Here "those who were given the Book before you" refers to Christians and Jews. Once again Mohammed is warning Muslims of all time never to befriend a Christian or a Jew.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 3 min CodeTalker 7,169
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 44 min Aerobatty 123,341
Virginia man charged with espionage for deliver... 57 min Brice N Livingston 4
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 5 hr onemale 286,526
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 5 hr lil whispers 619,446
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 8 hr Huh 982,215
_ VATICAN to get 'Legal Right' to TEMPLE MOUNT _ 8 hr NewsJune2017 YTube 1
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 9 hr Born Again Holy C... 681,739
More from around the web