Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

Full story: Worcester Telegram & Gazette

TEHRAN, Iran- Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad yesterday said the world would witness the destruction of Israel soon, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.
Comments
33,301 - 33,320 of 36,729 Comments Last updated 35 min ago
Gary

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38305
Mar 14, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
I am just posting a report that appeared on internet.
If you have any problem with the facts presented, you can contact the authors.
That is unwise of ye to repeat everything you read on the internet. Do some thinking for a change !
w wman uk

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38306
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

MUQ wrote:
Finally, when a French Jew was brutally murdered last month by a Muslim gang, tens of thousands of French demonstrators poured into the streets to condemn anti Semitism. Moreover, President Jacques Chirac and Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin both attended the victim’s memorial service in a public show of solidarity with French Jewry.108
_________
Notes:
103 Quoted in Tony Judt “Goodbye to All That?” Nation, January 3, 2005.
104 Anti-Defamation League (ADL),“Attitudes toward Jews, Israel and the Palestinian Israeli Conflict in Ten European Countries,” April 2004; The Pew Global Attitudes Project, A Year After Iraq War: Mistrust of America in Europe Even Higher, Muslim Anger Persists (Washington, DC:..
105 Martin Peretz, the editor-in-chief of the New Republic, says,“The headquarters of anti-Semitic Europe today, just as during the Third Republic, is Paris.”“Cambridge Diarist: Regrets,” New Republic, April 22, 2002, p. 50. The data in this paragraph are from “Anti Semitism in Europe: Is It Really Rising?” Economist, May 4, 2002.
106 Quoted in Marc Perelman,“Community Head: France No More Antisemitic Than U.S.,” Forward, August 1, 2003. Also see Francois Bujon de l’Estang,“A Slander on France,” Washington Post, June 22, 2002; “French President Accuses Israel of Conducting Anti French Campaign,” Ha’aretz, May 12, 2002.
107 “French Police: Anti-;Semitism in France Sharply Decreased in 2005,” Ha’aretz, January 19, 2006.
108 “French Protest for Murdered Jew,” BBC News Online, February 26, 2006; Michel Zlotowski,“Large Memorial Held for Parisian Jew,” Jerusalem Post, February 23, 2006.
(Contd.)
Some fool drew a cartoon just a cartoon an murhumna took time off from beating their wives in their thousands burned cars deaths took place over a cartoon of the disgraced prophet mohamed. The same happened when a badly made film came out murhumna everywhere even though they had not been forced to watch that crap did the same.Its so islamic.
What the French were doing is showing peacefully that they are growing increasing alarmed fed up with the murhumna living under the protection of france.
jim

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38308
Mar 14, 2013
 
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> Actually , your reply is just the opposite of the truth. Islam is getting weaker every day. The more Islam tries to destroy Israel, the closer is the death of Islam. Seriously, you don't realize the power of Israel and how closely God is taking care of Israel. Everytime we discuss this , you keep failing to relize how ppowerful Israel is and that it is protected by God. Allah is no God at all. He's NOBODY . Here's my best recommendation for you, MUQQIE : Just sit back and keep watching events unfold which illustrates my points here.
hopfully this time next year all palestinians will be forced back to the motherland Jordan, and Gaza will become a beautiful country again, and no more missiles, or rocks, build israel build. And maybe the dome will be moved to mecca, once and for all, its really not worth tearing it down, maybe israel will cleanse it by burnind it, yeah thats quite possible.
Freedom

Rockford, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38309
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

jim wrote:
<quoted text>hopfully this time next year all palestinians will be forced back to the motherland Jordan, and Gaza will become a beautiful country again, and no more missiles, or rocks, build israel build. And maybe the dome will be moved to mecca, once and for all, its really not worth tearing it down, maybe israel will cleanse it by burnind it, yeah thats quite possible.
I just do not understand why people can not understand anything about the Zionist Jews!

Do you know what the Jews did to the people of Germany?
I guess no one never got the other side of the story since it has been one sided since the story has been told!

Jews were only a small percent of the German population, but despite this ...
they were able to control about 60 percent of the media. They also were about 70 percent of the Judges in Germany at the time!

Millions of Germans lost all of their money because of the dirty Jewish bankers in Germany at the time!

It sounds exactly like what is going in the United States , doesn't it?

Jews in Germany had a huge influence in the making of films in Germany!
The Jews made the first Homosexual gay porn movies in Berlin! They not only made gay porn's and showed them in the theaters , but they also made fun of Jesus Christ! They were always saying bad things about Jesus and were putting Jesus down!

Germans were Christians!

But all we ever hear is how bad the Jews were treated!
Bullshit!
Freedom

Rockford, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38310
Mar 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hitler should have finished the job
Freedom

Rockford, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38311
Mar 14, 2013
 
jim wrote:
<quoted text>hopfully this time next year all palestinians will be forced back to the motherland Jordan, and Gaza will become a beautiful country again, and no more missiles, or rocks, build israel build. And maybe the dome will be moved to mecca, once and for all, its really not worth tearing it down, maybe israel will cleanse it by burnind it, yeah thats quite possible.
Hitler should have finished the job against those gay ass Jews!
Gary

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38312
Mar 14, 2013
 
jim wrote:
<quoted text> hopfully this time next year all palestinians will be forced back to the motherland Jordan, and Gaza will become a beautiful country again, and no more missiles, or rocks, build israel build. And maybe the dome will be moved to mecca, once and for all, its really not worth tearing it down, maybe israel will cleanse it by burnind it, yeah thats quite possible.
Sounds like a good scenario. The peace-loving parts of the world would give a sigh of relief ! Right on,Jim !
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38314
Mar 14, 2013
 
Israel Lobby in USA (Bliss or Bane for USA?)– By John J. Mearsheimer and S. M Walt- Part-18

Anti Semitism- The Great Silencer (Contd.)

It is also worth noting that in 2002 more Jews immigrated to Germany than Israel, making it “the fastest growing Jewish community in the world,” according to an article in the Jewish newspaper Forward.109

If Europe were really heading back to the 1930s, it is hard to imagine that Jews would be moving there in large numbers. We recognize, however, that Europe is not free of the scourge of anti Semitism. No one would deny that there are still some virulent autochthonous anti Semites in Europe (as there are in the United States) but their numbers are small and their extreme views are rejected by the vast majority of Europeans. Nor would one deny that there is anti Semitism among European Muslims, some of it provoked by Israel’s behavior towards the Palestinians and some of it straightforwardly racist. 110

This problem is worrisome, but it is hardly out of control. Muslims constitute less than five percent of Europe’s total population, and European governments are working hard to combat the problem. Why? Because most Europeans reject such hateful views.111

In short, when it comes to anti Semitism, Europe today bears hardly any resemblance to Europe in the 1930s. This is why pro Israel forces, when pressed to go beyond assertion, claim that there is a ‘new anti-;Semitism’, which they equate with criticism of Israel.112

In other words criticize Israeli policy and you are by definition an anti Semite. When the synod of the Church of England recently voted to divest from Caterpillar Inc on the grounds that Caterpillar manufactures the bulldozers used to demolish Palestinian homes, the Chief Rabbi complained that it would have the most adverse repercussions on ... Jewish Christian relations in Britain, while Rabbi Tony Bayfield, the head of the Reform movement, said:“ There is a clear problem of anti Zionist verging on anti Semitic attitudes emerging in the grass roots, and even in the middle ranks of the Church.”113

However, the Church was neither guilty of anti Zionism nor anti Semitism; it was merely protesting Israeli policy.114

Critics are also accused of holding Israel to an unfair standard or questioning its right to exist. But these are bogus charges too. Western critics of Israel hardly ever question its right to exist. Instead, they question its behavior towards the Palestinians, which is a legitimate criticism: Israelis question it themselves. Nor is Israel being judged unfairly.

Rather, Israeli treatment of the Palestinians elicits criticism because it is contrary to widely accepted human rights norms and international law, as well as the principle of national self determination. And it is hardly the only state that has faced sharp criticism on these grounds.

(Contd.)
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38315
Mar 14, 2013
 
In sum, other ethnic lobbies can only dream of having the political muscle that pro Israel organizations possess. The question, therefore, is what effect does the Lobby have on U.S. foreign policy?

__________
Notes:

109 Avi Beker,“The Eternally Open Gate,” Ha’aretz, January 11, 2005; Josef Joffe,“A Boom, if Not A Renaissance, in Modern Day Germany,” Forward, July 25, 2003; Nathaniel Popper,“Immigrant Policy Eyed as German Community Swells,”..

110 The chairman of the Education Department of the Jewish Agency recently said that “present day violent anti-Semitism originates from two separate sources: radical Islamists in the Middle East and Western Europe as well as the neo-Nazi youth element in Eastern Europe and Latin America.”.

111 In the ADL’s April 2004 survey,“Attitudes toward Jews, Israel and the Palestinian Israeli Conflict in Ten European Countries,” the following question was asked:“In your opinion, is it very important, somewhat important, somewhat unimportant or not important at all for our government to take a role in combating anti-Semitism in our country?” The percentages for those who strongly agree or somewhat agree were Italy (92), Britain (83), Netherlands (83), France (82), Germany (81), Belgium (81), Denmark (79), Austria (76), Switzerland (74), Spain (73). See p. 19.

112 Phyllis Chesler, The New Anti-;Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do about It (San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2003);

113 Helen Nugent,“Chief Rabbi Flays Church over Vote on Israel Assets,” Times Online, February 17, 2006. Also see Bill Bowder,“Sacks Seeks Talks after Synod Vote on Disinvestment,” Church Times, February 24, 2006; “.

114 That the Church of England was merely criticizing Israeli policy and not engaging in anti-Semitism is clearly reflected in the February 10, 2006 letter that the Archbishop of Canterbury (Dr. Rowan Williams) sent to England’s Chief Rabbi (Jonathan Sacks) explaining the Church’s decision on divestment. For a copy of the letter, see “Archbishop: Synod Call Was Expression of Concern,” February 10, 2006, Downloaded from Church of England website, February 20, 2006.

(Contd.)
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38316
Mar 15, 2013
 
Gary wrote:
1.

You are absolutely wrong on many points here.

You have your wires crossed as you contradict yourself many times.

Jesus will accept the Jews back to himself. I do not follow any priests.

You are the one who is brainwashed by the False Prophet Mohammed as he is just another person spouting out lies and BS. The defeat of Islam will be TOTAL and FINAL. So start getting yourself ready now as you will be VERY DISAPPOINTED in teh coming results !

2.

That is unwise of ye to repeat everything you read on the internet. Do some thinking for a change !
Ans.

1. Of course Jesus will accept any one who comes to him in repentance and declaring his faith.

But the point is your "assumption" that most of Jews would realize their mistakes and fall on the feet of Jesus.

This is your assumption about which there is no proof.

While against that assumptions there are many facts.

a. Majority of Jews rejected Jesus even after seeing all those signs and miracles he performed in his first coming. When they were "not moved" by witnessing all those miracles with their own eyes, why would they be moved "by seeing some one descending from the sky"?

b. For past 2000 years most of the Jews kept on rejecting Jesus and did not change their attitude towards him on his mother.

c. Jews living in the Zionist state of Israel (which was really a "gift from their Christian friends" have not changed their attitude towards Jesus and his mother.

Against all this evidence, I would call it a "wishful thinking or brainwashing" your assumptions that they would flock to Jesus in his second coming.

You can dream and there is no restriction on dreams of any one.

Like we have "dream" that Islam would overwhelm every other way of life in Near Future.

02. So let us wait and see, which is true, your assumption or our dreams.

Gary

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38317
Mar 15, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
1. Of course Jesus will accept any one who comes to him in repentance and declaring his faith.
But the point is your "assumption" that most of Jews would realize their mistakes and fall on the feet of Jesus.
This is your assumption about which there is no proof.
While against that assumptions there are many facts.
a. Majority of Jews rejected Jesus even after seeing all those signs and miracles he performed in his first coming. When they were "not moved" by witnessing all those miracles with their own eyes, why would they be moved "by seeing some one descending from the sky"?
b. For past 2000 years most of the Jews kept on rejecting Jesus and did not change their attitude towards him on his mother.
c. Jews living in the Zionist state of Israel (which was really a "gift from their Christian friends" have not changed their attitude towards Jesus and his mother.
Against all this evidence, I would call it a "wishful thinking or brainwashing" your assumptions that they would flock to Jesus in his second coming.
You can dream and there is no restriction on dreams of any one.
Like we have "dream" that Islam would overwhelm every other way of life in Near Future.
02. So let us wait and see, which is true, your assumption or our dreams.
What I wrote is not an assumption . That is part of prophesy , so there isn't any dreaming or wishing something to be true. Since they are Jews, they will be accepted back by Jesus because they are the "root" of the olive tree .Gentiles that have been saved are the "branches" . Now you see Jesus has a deep interest in having teh Jews saved.
w wman uk

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38318
Mar 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Freedom wrote:
Hitler should have finished the job
Then he would have exterminated dumb shites like you or they wouldnt have even let your parants mate.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38319
Mar 15, 2013
 
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38321
Mar 15, 2013
 
Michael

Lynbrook, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38322
Mar 15, 2013
 
Sigh...poor Mahmoud is going to have to learn to watch his mouth one day.

He probably wouldn't be too thrilled if Obama went around screaming for the death of Persia.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38324
Mar 15, 2013
 
Freedom wrote:
<quoted text>
I just do not understand why people can not understand anything about the Zionist Jews!
Do you know what the Jews did to the people of Germany?
I guess no one never got the other side of the story since it has been one sided since the story has been told!
Jews were only a small percent of the German population, but despite this ...
they were able to control about 60 percent of the media. They also were about 70 percent of the Judges in Germany at the time!
Millions of Germans lost all of their money because of the dirty Jewish bankers in Germany at the time!
It sounds exactly like what is going in the United States , doesn't it?
Jews in Germany had a huge influence in the making of films in Germany!
The Jews made the first Homosexual gay porn movies in Berlin! They not only made gay porn's and showed them in the theaters , but they also made fun of Jesus Christ! They were always saying bad things about Jesus and were putting Jesus down!
Germans were Christians!
But all we ever hear is how bad the Jews were treated!
Bullshit!
You should not have posted this post in these days of "anti-Semitism".

wait till you hear knocks at your door during dead of night.

Have a happy stint at GITMO!!
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38325
Mar 15, 2013
 
-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

How America Kills

By Chris Hayes

And it is true polls show that majorities of Democrats, Republicans and Independents support targeted killing and the drone strikes that carry them out. Partly, I think that’s due to the fact that the public hasn’t been given much information about exactly how the administration has come to the conclusion that it can carry out these killings, even against citizens, and partly because the worst effects of the policy, the collateral damage, or more accurately the children as young as one year old who our weapons kill, are almost entirely invisible to us.

But it also seems possible to me that even with a full accounting of the program, many, perhaps even a majority of Democrats, even self-described liberals might support the targeted killing policy for, I believe, the same reason a blogger named Lou Siegel gave this week.“Though this might sound like a ‘cold war liberal’ defending CIA-led coups and military interventions,” he wrote:

“I support President Obama’s drone attacks. And I admit that I’m a hypocrite. If a republican administration were executing these practices, I’d probably join the chorus to condemn them as unconstitutional, authoritarian or worse. But I trust this president’s judgment that the drones are a legitimate way to take out terrorists who would–if they could–kill thousands of Americans. He’s making a trade-off, knowing that a successful massive terrorist attack against us would result in far greater damage to our democratic institutions.”

I think this is probably the most honest defense of the program you’ll hear from liberals. They trust President Obama to wield broad, lethal executive authority with care and prudence. And besides: it’s war, would you rather, I am often asked by supporters of the kill list, that we have boots on the ground, big expensive, destructive deadly disastrous land invasions of countries like the Iraq war? Isn’t the move from wars like Iraq to “surgical strikes” in Yemen precisely the kind of change we were promised?

This narrow choice between big violence and smaller violence shows, I think, just how fully we have all implicitly adopted the conceptual framework of the War on Terror, how much George W. Bush’s advisers continue to set the terms of our thinking years after they’d been dispatched from office. Because that argument presupposes that we are at war and must continue to be at war until an ill-defined enemy is vanquished.

What, people ask, is the alternative to small war, if not big war? And the answer no one ever seems to even consider is: no war. If the existence of people out in the world who are actively working to kill Americans means we are still at war, then it seems to me we will be at war forever, and will surrender control over whether that is the state we do in fact want to be in. There’s another alternative: we can be a nation that declares its war over, that declares itself at peace and goes about rigorously and energetically using intelligence and diplomacy and well-resourced police work to protect us from future attacks.

In 1832, German military theorist Carl von Clausewitz declared that “War is an act of force, and there is no logical limit to the application of that force….a clash of forces freely operating and obedient to no law but their own.” Much of the history of war and international law in the last century, particularly after the horror of the second world war, was an attempt to prove Clausewitz wrong. But we shouldn’t fool ourselves. We may find ourselves at some point facing a stark choice between the war we are now fighting and the law which we all at least pretend is the bedrock of our republic.

I say we choose the law.
jim

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38326
Mar 15, 2013
 
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> You are absolutely wrong on many points here.
You have your wires crossed as you contradict yourself many times.
Jesus will accept the Jews back to himself. I do not follow any priests. You are the one who is brainwashed by the False Prophet Mohammed as he is just another person spouting out lies and BS. The defeat of Islam will be TOTAL and FINAL. So start getting yourself ready now as you will be VERY DISAPPOINTED in teh coming results !
as always you are 100 percent right again Gary. Amen.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38327
Mar 15, 2013
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

O Christians! Listen to this question! A MUST WATCH!
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38328
Mar 15, 2013
 
Gary wrote:
What I wrote is not an assumption . That is part of prophesy , so there isn't any dreaming or wishing something to be true. Since they are Jews, they will be accepted back by Jesus because they are the "root" of the olive tree .Gentiles that have been saved are the "branches" . Now you see Jesus has a deep interest in having teh Jews saved.
Ans.

01. So what you write is a "prophesy" and in that "prophesy" it says that when Jews see "jesus coming down from heavens, they will fall on his feet and declare that he is their Messiah".

We have another "prophesy"….that majority of Jews of that time would be "in the ranks of Anti Christ" and when Jesus shall fight with Anti Christ, his fight will also be against the jews.

These are two contradicting prophesies. Yours is about "miraculous transformation in the attitude of Jews"…. And mine is "taking into consideration their past 2000 years history and their belligerence towards Jesus and his message and his mother and his religion".

Any "reasonable person" would think that our prophesy is "more logical" and "More reasonable" and "more in line with the attitudes of Jews for centuries".

Your prophesy is just "wishful thinking"….why Jesus should be interested in "saving Jews at any cost"?

As God and Lord and Creator of everything in Universe, he should be "impartial" to any particular race or people, should be not?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••