Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

There are 38083 comments on the Worcester Telegram & Gazette story from Jun 4, 2007, titled Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says. In it, Worcester Telegram & Gazette reports that:

TEHRAN, Iran- Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad yesterday said the world would witness the destruction of Israel soon, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

Gary

Westerville, OH

#38332 Mar 16, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
01. So what you write is a "prophesy" and in that "prophesy" it says that when Jews see "jesus coming down from heavens, they will fall on his feet and declare that he is their Messiah".
We have another "prophesy"….that majority of Jews of that time would be "in the ranks of Anti Christ" and when Jesus shall fight with Anti Christ, his fight will also be against the jews.
These are two contradicting prophesies. Yours is about "miraculous transformation in the attitude of Jews"…. And mine is "taking into consideration their past 2000 years history and their belligerence towards Jesus and his message and his mother and his religion".
(Any "reasonable person" would think that our prophesy is "more logical" and "More reasonable" and "more in line with the attitudes of Jews for centuries".
Your prophesy is just "wishful thinking"….why Jesus should be interested in "saving Jews at any cost"?
As God and Lord and Creator of everything in Universe, he should be "impartial" to any particular race or people, should be not?
Jesus offers the gift of Salvation to Everyone. He can only be patient so long. As far as your teachings that Jesus fights against both Jews and Anti-Christ during the war of Armageddon-that is just insanity ! What would be the purpose of His Second Coming ? The Muslims and the"king of the north" ,(Russia) would already be defeated. The Bible is very clear on the boundaries of the new Israel and the nature of the new Jerusalem AFTER the Second Coming. The Koran's prophecies have to be false ! Biblical prophecies ARE fulfilled literally .
Gary

Westerville, OH

#38333 Mar 16, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to be DUMBER than Gary. To adore Gary as "virtual god" brings you to sub-human category.
MUQ, you are going through life with blinders on. Why do you follow the koran which is full of hatred , bogotry, and falsehoods ? Aftre all of ththis time on this thread , you have learned nothing. Is that smart ? All that you are doing here is throwing tons of useless information. You are not too bright.
ocxz

Seigy, France

#38334 Mar 16, 2013
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> MUQ, you are going through life with blinders on. Why do you follow the koran which is full of hatred , bogotry, and falsehoods ? Aftre all of ththis time on this thread , you have learned nothing. Is that smart ? All that you are doing here is throwing tons of useless information. You are not too bright.
You think you are bright happy clappy israel firster ?
Michael

Lynbrook, NY

#38335 Mar 16, 2013
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
You think you are bright happy clappy israel firster ?
Where are you from? Africa? Reunion's that island east of Madagascar, right?
Gary

Westerville, OH

#38336 Mar 16, 2013
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
You think you are bright happy clappy israel firster ?
So what about it? Reunion is a tiny little island near Madagascar . You should be more worried about global warming.
Adam

Germany

#38337 Mar 16, 2013
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> Jesus offers the gift of Salvation to Everyone. He can only be patient so long. As far as your teachings that Jesus fights against both Jews and Anti-Christ during the war of Armageddon-that is just insanity ! What would be the purpose of His Second Coming ? The Muslims and the"king of the north" ,(Russia) would already be defeated. The Bible is very clear on the boundaries of the new Israel and the nature of the new Jerusalem AFTER the Second Coming. The Koran's prophecies have to be false ! Biblical prophecies ARE fulfilled literally .
https://www.youtube.com/watch ...

Mankind is in danger. The Gog and Magogs are coming
Adam

Germany

#38338 Mar 16, 2013
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> Jesus offers the gift of Salvation to Everyone. He can only be patient so long. As far as your teachings that Jesus fights against both Jews and Anti-Christ during the war of Armageddon-that is just insanity ! What would be the purpose of His Second Coming ? The Muslims and the"king of the north" ,(Russia) would already be defeated. The Bible is very clear on the boundaries of the new Israel and the nature of the new Jerusalem AFTER the Second Coming. The Koran's prophecies have to be false ! Biblical prophecies ARE fulfilled literally .


Manking in danger. Gog and Magog(yajooj Majooj are coming)
anonymos

Istanbul, Turkey

#38339 Mar 16, 2013
I am not deeply interested in politics ,I have never involved in such blogging activities also. however if thinking in a lay-mans way my comment is that ;with that threats iran makes itself get closed to a nuclear holocaust and does not care about OR maybe carries out his role in that shamed artificial tension so as to keep its petroleum incomes earning from the gulf.but second argument sounds a little bit more logical
Gary

Westerville, OH

#38340 Mar 16, 2013
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =oIVu1m5U8bQXX
Manking in danger. Gog and Magog(yajooj Majooj are coming)
So ?
Adam

Germany

#38341 Mar 16, 2013
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> So ?
Ja so.
Gary

Westerville, OH

#38342 Mar 16, 2013
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
Ja so.
Jawohl !!
United States The Great

Austin, TX

#38343 Mar 16, 2013
Iran needs to realize that just because we are gearing up more missile defense systems, that we won't sit around and do nothing if they actually grow a pair and throws one of there tin cans at us. Right now, we have 5,100+ nuclear warheads ready to rock Irans world if they make a move and I really hope Iran realizes that right off there shores, U.S. Tomahawk, Trident 2 and Polaris missiles from U.S nuclear attack subs are awaiting anxiously for any legitimate excuse to put them back before the stone age. Words are one thing, but make a move You ugly butts, and the U.S. will fire back without hesitation. Your entire country (starting with the 2 leaders personally), would be reduced to fallout before your missile made it to our shores.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#38344 Mar 16, 2013
United States The Great wrote:
Iran needs to realize that just because we are gearing up more missile defense systems, that we won't sit around and do nothing if they actually grow a pair and throws one of there tin cans at us. Right now, we have 5,100+ nuclear warheads ready to rock Irans world if they make a move and I really hope Iran realizes that right off there shores, U.S. Tomahawk, Trident 2 and Polaris missiles from U.S nuclear attack subs are awaiting anxiously for any legitimate excuse to put them back before the stone age. Words are one thing, but make a move You ugly butts, and the U.S. will fire back without hesitation. Your entire country (starting with the 2 leaders personally), would be reduced to fallout before your missile made it to our shores.
Why are you "obsessed" in believing that Iran's nukes are against you?

Why do you not make peace with Iran?

What is your problem?
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#38345 Mar 16, 2013
-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

The Law of War Does Not Shield the CIA and John Brennan's Drone Kill List

The US prosecuted Omar Khadr in Guantánamo for not being a lawful combatant. Exactly the same applies to the civilian CIA

By Morris Davis

February 12, 2013 "The Guardian" -- The disclosure Tuesday evening of the Department of Justice white paper on targeted killing (pdf) has sparked a lot of debate, much of it focused on the Obama administration's extraordinarily broad interpretation of what constitutes an "imminent" threat that justifies lethal force as an act of self-defense. As Senator Rand Paul (Republican, Kentucky) told reporters during a conference call on Wednesday, "only a team of lawyers could define 'imminent' to mean the exact opposite" of what the word means in the real world.

There are, no doubt, many Americans alive today who should be thankful their healthcare providers did not apply the administration's interpretation of "imminent" to decide if they had crossed over the line of imminent death and said pull the plug.

Some people have acquired power and profits in post-9/11 America by pandering to and perpetuating fear. As has been the case on a range of legal issues – torture, indefinite detention, warrantless surveillance, kill lists – all it takes is for someone to say "terrorism" and "threat to security" in the same breath for the vast majority of the public to handover its principles. Rather than a serious discussion on the proper law/liberty/security balance, too often the public accepts the false syllogism that whatever it takes to stop "them" from hurting "us" is obviously, as White House spokesman Jay Carney might say, "legal, ethical and wise".

Targeted killing falls into that category. The discussion tends to glom what should be several discrete inquiries – where will the lethal operation take place; who is the imminent threat and why; who will conduct the operation; and what laws apply, among others – into one big ball that slides through with little scrutiny.

The DOJ white paper discusses the right to take military action against a US citizen who is part of the enemy forces, law of war principles that govern application of military power, judicial deference to military judgments in the conduct of warfare, and combatant immunity that gives legal sanction to a deliberate killing by a member of the armed forces acting in compliance with the law of war. In and of themselves, those are all very valid points.

What the white paper ignores, however, is that the US has both a military and a CIA drone program, each one subject to its own rules. The CIA is a civilian agency with civilian employees and civilian contractors. It is not part of the US armed forces and its drone program is not immune from liability by the law of war principles that might apply to the military drone program.
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#38346 Mar 16, 2013


The deliberate killing of another person is generally murder unless it is excused by some valid legal justification, like the law of war's combatant immunity. For example, the United States charged Omar Khadr with committing murder in violation of the law of war for throwing a grenade and killing a US service member during a battle in Afghanistan.

At his military commission trial at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, the military judge explained to Khadr that the law says a "killing is unlawful when done without legal justification or excuse" and that "the phrase 'in violation of the law of war' means a person … acting as a combatant [who] did not meet the requirements for being a lawful combatant." Khadr pled guilty to the charge and is now in prison in Canada serving a sentence for war crimes.
Under what authority is the CIA legally excused for deliberately killing?

The United States has never made – nor should it – the argument that the CIA is part of the US armed forces and governed by the law of war. The fact that the two entities are separate and operate under distinct rules is clear. John Brennan, President Obama's nominee to head the CIA, made the point in his answers to prehearing questions (pdf) from members of the Senate select committee on intelligence:

"The president must have the ability to select which element [the CIA or Department of Defense] is best suited for the particular mission. Factors to be considered in the selection of the personnel and authorities include the capabilities needed, the material required, and whether the activity must be conducted covertly."

Stated another way, Brennan says that President Obama needs to have a paramilitary force at his disposal to carry out operations the military is prohibited from conducting by the law of war.

Jack Goldsmith, former assistant attorney general in the George W Bush administration and now a professor at Harvard Law School, argues the past decade shows that the United States needs a new statutory framework governing how it conducts secret warfare. Perhaps that would be a positive step, but a new domestic statutory scheme would not make a civilian working for a civilian agency a lawful combatant entitled to immunity under the law of war for acts committed outside the United States.

Neither Congress nor the president has the power to create a legal justification for killing in violation of the law of war.
Gary

Westerville, OH

#38347 Mar 16, 2013
United States The Great wrote:
Iran needs to realize that just because we are gearing up more missile defense systems, that we won't sit around and do nothing if they actually grow a pair and throws one of there tin cans at us. Right now, we have 5,100+ nuclear warheads ready to rock Irans world if they make a move and I really hope Iran realizes that right off there shores, U.S. Tomahawk, Trident 2 and Polaris missiles from U.S nuclear attack subs are awaiting anxiously for any legitimate excuse to put them back before the stone age. Words are one thing, but make a move You ugly butts, and the U.S. will fire back without hesitation. Your entire country (starting with the 2 leaders personally), would be reduced to fallout before your missile made it to our shores.
We also should be able to shoot down their aircraft that target our drones over international waters.
ocxz

Paris, France

#38348 Mar 16, 2013
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> We also should be able to shoot down their aircraft that target our drones over international waters.
Done already, you have shot down iranian civilian airliner.
Fishing boats too. And countless civilians.
Poor Gary, he loves his drones to be able to murder civilians in the world, but not happy if these drones get shot down...
ocxz

Paris, France

#38349 Mar 16, 2013
United States The Great wrote:
Iran needs to realize that just because we are gearing up more missile defense systems, that we won't sit around and do nothing if they actually grow a pair and throws one of there tin cans at us. Right now, we have 5,100+ nuclear warheads ready to rock Irans world if they make a move and I really hope Iran realizes that right off there shores, U.S. Tomahawk, Trident 2 and Polaris missiles from U.S nuclear attack subs are awaiting anxiously for any legitimate excuse to put them back before the stone age. Words are one thing, but make a move You ugly butts, and the U.S. will fire back without hesitation. Your entire country (starting with the 2 leaders personally), would be reduced to fallout before your missile made it to our shores.
Another barbarian american nutjob chest banging while he is deep in debt paying for the military mafia.
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#38353 Mar 17, 2013
Gary wrote:
01. Jesus offers the gift of Salvation to Everyone. He can only be patient so long. As far as your teachings that Jesus fights against both Jews and Anti-Christ during the war of Armageddon-that is just insanity !

02. What would be the purpose of His Second Coming ? The Muslims and the "king of the north" ,(Russia) would already be defeated.

03. The Bible is very clear on the boundaries of the new Israel and the nature of the new Jerusalem AFTER the Second Coming.

04. The Koran's prophecies have to be false ! Biblical prophecies ARE fulfilled literally .



05. MUQ, you are going through life with blinders on. Why do you follow the Koran which is full of hatred , bigotry, and falsehoods ? After all of this time on this thread , you have learned nothing. Is that smart ? All that you are doing here is throwing tons of useless information. You are not too bright.
Ans.

01. Jesus comes down to fight Anti Christ and his forces. Why it is "insanity" to say that "majority of Anti Christ's followers would be Jews"?

Since Jews rejected the "Real Christ"…they would flock to the "anti Christ" when he appears. It seems and sound very reasonable and logical.

02. Jesus' "main purpose" on his second coming would be to "slay" the Anti Christ.

03. "New Isreal" might not be the "Jewish Israel" it would be full of those who believe in Jesus and all prophets of God and not who reject them.

04. Again it shows your bias and ignorance about Both Quran and Bible.

05. I could say the same about you also. You have learned "Nothing" while being on these threads for such a long period.

You just behave like a "Bible Thumper"!!

And you even do not know who wrote the Bible!!

Do not tell me it was Holy Ghost who wrote it for you!!
Gary

Westerville, OH

#38356 Mar 17, 2013
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
Done already, you have shot down iranian civilian airliner.
Fishing boats too. And countless civilians.
Poor Gary, he loves his drones to be able to murder civilians in the world, but not happy if these drones get shot down...
Poor Ocxz, you ar ejust like Muq and a some others here. You never met a terrorist you did not like. Lots of laughs !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min kent 681,598
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 5 min MayDay 6,625
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 8 min onemale 286,430
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 11 min Aerobatty 122,764
topix drops human sexuality forum.......this be... (Jun '16) 1 hr Christ sans politics 101
Guilty of a DUI or DWI? Important IDRC Info (Jan '12) 1 hr Durka 7
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr lil whispers 619,440
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 hr New Age Spiritual... 982,158
More from around the web