Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

There are 38083 comments on the Worcester Telegram & Gazette story from Jun 4, 2007, titled Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says. In it, Worcester Telegram & Gazette reports that:

TEHRAN, Iran- Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad yesterday said the world would witness the destruction of Israel soon, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

jim

San Leandro, CA

#38308 Mar 14, 2013
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> Actually , your reply is just the opposite of the truth. Islam is getting weaker every day. The more Islam tries to destroy Israel, the closer is the death of Islam. Seriously, you don't realize the power of Israel and how closely God is taking care of Israel. Everytime we discuss this , you keep failing to relize how ppowerful Israel is and that it is protected by God. Allah is no God at all. He's NOBODY . Here's my best recommendation for you, MUQQIE : Just sit back and keep watching events unfold which illustrates my points here.
hopfully this time next year all palestinians will be forced back to the motherland Jordan, and Gaza will become a beautiful country again, and no more missiles, or rocks, build israel build. And maybe the dome will be moved to mecca, once and for all, its really not worth tearing it down, maybe israel will cleanse it by burnind it, yeah thats quite possible.
Freedom

Minneapolis, MN

#38309 Mar 14, 2013
jim wrote:
<quoted text>hopfully this time next year all palestinians will be forced back to the motherland Jordan, and Gaza will become a beautiful country again, and no more missiles, or rocks, build israel build. And maybe the dome will be moved to mecca, once and for all, its really not worth tearing it down, maybe israel will cleanse it by burnind it, yeah thats quite possible.
I just do not understand why people can not understand anything about the Zionist Jews!

Do you know what the Jews did to the people of Germany?
I guess no one never got the other side of the story since it has been one sided since the story has been told!

Jews were only a small percent of the German population, but despite this ...
they were able to control about 60 percent of the media. They also were about 70 percent of the Judges in Germany at the time!

Millions of Germans lost all of their money because of the dirty Jewish bankers in Germany at the time!

It sounds exactly like what is going in the United States , doesn't it?

Jews in Germany had a huge influence in the making of films in Germany!
The Jews made the first Homosexual gay porn movies in Berlin! They not only made gay porn's and showed them in the theaters , but they also made fun of Jesus Christ! They were always saying bad things about Jesus and were putting Jesus down!

Germans were Christians!

But all we ever hear is how bad the Jews were treated!
Bullshit!
Freedom

Minneapolis, MN

#38310 Mar 14, 2013
Hitler should have finished the job
Freedom

Minneapolis, MN

#38311 Mar 14, 2013
jim wrote:
<quoted text>hopfully this time next year all palestinians will be forced back to the motherland Jordan, and Gaza will become a beautiful country again, and no more missiles, or rocks, build israel build. And maybe the dome will be moved to mecca, once and for all, its really not worth tearing it down, maybe israel will cleanse it by burnind it, yeah thats quite possible.
Hitler should have finished the job against those gay ass Jews!
Gary

Westerville, OH

#38312 Mar 14, 2013
jim wrote:
<quoted text> hopfully this time next year all palestinians will be forced back to the motherland Jordan, and Gaza will become a beautiful country again, and no more missiles, or rocks, build israel build. And maybe the dome will be moved to mecca, once and for all, its really not worth tearing it down, maybe israel will cleanse it by burnind it, yeah thats quite possible.
Sounds like a good scenario. The peace-loving parts of the world would give a sigh of relief ! Right on,Jim !
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#38314 Mar 14, 2013
Israel Lobby in USA (Bliss or Bane for USA?)– By John J. Mearsheimer and S. M Walt- Part-18

Anti Semitism- The Great Silencer (Contd.)

It is also worth noting that in 2002 more Jews immigrated to Germany than Israel, making it “the fastest growing Jewish community in the world,” according to an article in the Jewish newspaper Forward.109

If Europe were really heading back to the 1930s, it is hard to imagine that Jews would be moving there in large numbers. We recognize, however, that Europe is not free of the scourge of anti Semitism. No one would deny that there are still some virulent autochthonous anti Semites in Europe (as there are in the United States) but their numbers are small and their extreme views are rejected by the vast majority of Europeans. Nor would one deny that there is anti Semitism among European Muslims, some of it provoked by Israel’s behavior towards the Palestinians and some of it straightforwardly racist. 110

This problem is worrisome, but it is hardly out of control. Muslims constitute less than five percent of Europe’s total population, and European governments are working hard to combat the problem. Why? Because most Europeans reject such hateful views.111

In short, when it comes to anti Semitism, Europe today bears hardly any resemblance to Europe in the 1930s. This is why pro Israel forces, when pressed to go beyond assertion, claim that there is a ‘new anti-;Semitism’, which they equate with criticism of Israel.112

In other words criticize Israeli policy and you are by definition an anti Semite. When the synod of the Church of England recently voted to divest from Caterpillar Inc on the grounds that Caterpillar manufactures the bulldozers used to demolish Palestinian homes, the Chief Rabbi complained that it would have the most adverse repercussions on ... Jewish Christian relations in Britain, while Rabbi Tony Bayfield, the head of the Reform movement, said:“ There is a clear problem of anti Zionist verging on anti Semitic attitudes emerging in the grass roots, and even in the middle ranks of the Church.”113

However, the Church was neither guilty of anti Zionism nor anti Semitism; it was merely protesting Israeli policy.114

Critics are also accused of holding Israel to an unfair standard or questioning its right to exist. But these are bogus charges too. Western critics of Israel hardly ever question its right to exist. Instead, they question its behavior towards the Palestinians, which is a legitimate criticism: Israelis question it themselves. Nor is Israel being judged unfairly.

Rather, Israeli treatment of the Palestinians elicits criticism because it is contrary to widely accepted human rights norms and international law, as well as the principle of national self determination. And it is hardly the only state that has faced sharp criticism on these grounds.

(Contd.)
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#38315 Mar 14, 2013
In sum, other ethnic lobbies can only dream of having the political muscle that pro Israel organizations possess. The question, therefore, is what effect does the Lobby have on U.S. foreign policy?

__________
Notes:

109 Avi Beker,“The Eternally Open Gate,” Ha’aretz, January 11, 2005; Josef Joffe,“A Boom, if Not A Renaissance, in Modern Day Germany,” Forward, July 25, 2003; Nathaniel Popper,“Immigrant Policy Eyed as German Community Swells,”..

110 The chairman of the Education Department of the Jewish Agency recently said that “present day violent anti-Semitism originates from two separate sources: radical Islamists in the Middle East and Western Europe as well as the neo-Nazi youth element in Eastern Europe and Latin America.”.

111 In the ADL’s April 2004 survey,“Attitudes toward Jews, Israel and the Palestinian Israeli Conflict in Ten European Countries,” the following question was asked:“In your opinion, is it very important, somewhat important, somewhat unimportant or not important at all for our government to take a role in combating anti-Semitism in our country?” The percentages for those who strongly agree or somewhat agree were Italy (92), Britain (83), Netherlands (83), France (82), Germany (81), Belgium (81), Denmark (79), Austria (76), Switzerland (74), Spain (73). See p. 19.

112 Phyllis Chesler, The New Anti-;Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do about It (San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2003);

113 Helen Nugent,“Chief Rabbi Flays Church over Vote on Israel Assets,” Times Online, February 17, 2006. Also see Bill Bowder,“Sacks Seeks Talks after Synod Vote on Disinvestment,” Church Times, February 24, 2006; “.

114 That the Church of England was merely criticizing Israeli policy and not engaging in anti-Semitism is clearly reflected in the February 10, 2006 letter that the Archbishop of Canterbury (Dr. Rowan Williams) sent to England’s Chief Rabbi (Jonathan Sacks) explaining the Church’s decision on divestment. For a copy of the letter, see “Archbishop: Synod Call Was Expression of Concern,” February 10, 2006, Downloaded from Church of England website, February 20, 2006.

(Contd.)
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#38316 Mar 15, 2013
Gary wrote:
1.

You are absolutely wrong on many points here.

You have your wires crossed as you contradict yourself many times.

Jesus will accept the Jews back to himself. I do not follow any priests.

You are the one who is brainwashed by the False Prophet Mohammed as he is just another person spouting out lies and BS. The defeat of Islam will be TOTAL and FINAL. So start getting yourself ready now as you will be VERY DISAPPOINTED in teh coming results !

2.

That is unwise of ye to repeat everything you read on the internet. Do some thinking for a change !
Ans.

1. Of course Jesus will accept any one who comes to him in repentance and declaring his faith.

But the point is your "assumption" that most of Jews would realize their mistakes and fall on the feet of Jesus.

This is your assumption about which there is no proof.

While against that assumptions there are many facts.

a. Majority of Jews rejected Jesus even after seeing all those signs and miracles he performed in his first coming. When they were "not moved" by witnessing all those miracles with their own eyes, why would they be moved "by seeing some one descending from the sky"?

b. For past 2000 years most of the Jews kept on rejecting Jesus and did not change their attitude towards him on his mother.

c. Jews living in the Zionist state of Israel (which was really a "gift from their Christian friends" have not changed their attitude towards Jesus and his mother.

Against all this evidence, I would call it a "wishful thinking or brainwashing" your assumptions that they would flock to Jesus in his second coming.

You can dream and there is no restriction on dreams of any one.

Like we have "dream" that Islam would overwhelm every other way of life in Near Future.

02. So let us wait and see, which is true, your assumption or our dreams.

Gary

Westerville, OH

#38317 Mar 15, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
1. Of course Jesus will accept any one who comes to him in repentance and declaring his faith.
But the point is your "assumption" that most of Jews would realize their mistakes and fall on the feet of Jesus.
This is your assumption about which there is no proof.
While against that assumptions there are many facts.
a. Majority of Jews rejected Jesus even after seeing all those signs and miracles he performed in his first coming. When they were "not moved" by witnessing all those miracles with their own eyes, why would they be moved "by seeing some one descending from the sky"?
b. For past 2000 years most of the Jews kept on rejecting Jesus and did not change their attitude towards him on his mother.
c. Jews living in the Zionist state of Israel (which was really a "gift from their Christian friends" have not changed their attitude towards Jesus and his mother.
Against all this evidence, I would call it a "wishful thinking or brainwashing" your assumptions that they would flock to Jesus in his second coming.
You can dream and there is no restriction on dreams of any one.
Like we have "dream" that Islam would overwhelm every other way of life in Near Future.
02. So let us wait and see, which is true, your assumption or our dreams.
What I wrote is not an assumption . That is part of prophesy , so there isn't any dreaming or wishing something to be true. Since they are Jews, they will be accepted back by Jesus because they are the "root" of the olive tree .Gentiles that have been saved are the "branches" . Now you see Jesus has a deep interest in having teh Jews saved.
w wman uk

UK

#38318 Mar 15, 2013
Freedom wrote:
Hitler should have finished the job
Then he would have exterminated dumb shites like you or they wouldnt have even let your parants mate.
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#38319 Mar 15, 2013
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#38321 Mar 15, 2013
Michael

Lynbrook, NY

#38322 Mar 15, 2013
Sigh...poor Mahmoud is going to have to learn to watch his mouth one day.

He probably wouldn't be too thrilled if Obama went around screaming for the death of Persia.
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#38324 Mar 15, 2013
Freedom wrote:
<quoted text>
I just do not understand why people can not understand anything about the Zionist Jews!
Do you know what the Jews did to the people of Germany?
I guess no one never got the other side of the story since it has been one sided since the story has been told!
Jews were only a small percent of the German population, but despite this ...
they were able to control about 60 percent of the media. They also were about 70 percent of the Judges in Germany at the time!
Millions of Germans lost all of their money because of the dirty Jewish bankers in Germany at the time!
It sounds exactly like what is going in the United States , doesn't it?
Jews in Germany had a huge influence in the making of films in Germany!
The Jews made the first Homosexual gay porn movies in Berlin! They not only made gay porn's and showed them in the theaters , but they also made fun of Jesus Christ! They were always saying bad things about Jesus and were putting Jesus down!
Germans were Christians!
But all we ever hear is how bad the Jews were treated!
Bullshit!
You should not have posted this post in these days of "anti-Semitism".

wait till you hear knocks at your door during dead of night.

Have a happy stint at GITMO!!
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#38325 Mar 15, 2013
-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

How America Kills

By Chris Hayes

And it is true polls show that majorities of Democrats, Republicans and Independents support targeted killing and the drone strikes that carry them out. Partly, I think that’s due to the fact that the public hasn’t been given much information about exactly how the administration has come to the conclusion that it can carry out these killings, even against citizens, and partly because the worst effects of the policy, the collateral damage, or more accurately the children as young as one year old who our weapons kill, are almost entirely invisible to us.

But it also seems possible to me that even with a full accounting of the program, many, perhaps even a majority of Democrats, even self-described liberals might support the targeted killing policy for, I believe, the same reason a blogger named Lou Siegel gave this week.“Though this might sound like a ‘cold war liberal’ defending CIA-led coups and military interventions,” he wrote:

“I support President Obama’s drone attacks. And I admit that I’m a hypocrite. If a republican administration were executing these practices, I’d probably join the chorus to condemn them as unconstitutional, authoritarian or worse. But I trust this president’s judgment that the drones are a legitimate way to take out terrorists who would–if they could–kill thousands of Americans. He’s making a trade-off, knowing that a successful massive terrorist attack against us would result in far greater damage to our democratic institutions.”

I think this is probably the most honest defense of the program you’ll hear from liberals. They trust President Obama to wield broad, lethal executive authority with care and prudence. And besides: it’s war, would you rather, I am often asked by supporters of the kill list, that we have boots on the ground, big expensive, destructive deadly disastrous land invasions of countries like the Iraq war? Isn’t the move from wars like Iraq to “surgical strikes” in Yemen precisely the kind of change we were promised?

This narrow choice between big violence and smaller violence shows, I think, just how fully we have all implicitly adopted the conceptual framework of the War on Terror, how much George W. Bush’s advisers continue to set the terms of our thinking years after they’d been dispatched from office. Because that argument presupposes that we are at war and must continue to be at war until an ill-defined enemy is vanquished.

What, people ask, is the alternative to small war, if not big war? And the answer no one ever seems to even consider is: no war. If the existence of people out in the world who are actively working to kill Americans means we are still at war, then it seems to me we will be at war forever, and will surrender control over whether that is the state we do in fact want to be in. There’s another alternative: we can be a nation that declares its war over, that declares itself at peace and goes about rigorously and energetically using intelligence and diplomacy and well-resourced police work to protect us from future attacks.

In 1832, German military theorist Carl von Clausewitz declared that “War is an act of force, and there is no logical limit to the application of that force….a clash of forces freely operating and obedient to no law but their own.” Much of the history of war and international law in the last century, particularly after the horror of the second world war, was an attempt to prove Clausewitz wrong. But we shouldn’t fool ourselves. We may find ourselves at some point facing a stark choice between the war we are now fighting and the law which we all at least pretend is the bedrock of our republic.

I say we choose the law.
jim

San Leandro, CA

#38326 Mar 15, 2013
Gary wrote:
<quoted text> You are absolutely wrong on many points here.
You have your wires crossed as you contradict yourself many times.
Jesus will accept the Jews back to himself. I do not follow any priests. You are the one who is brainwashed by the False Prophet Mohammed as he is just another person spouting out lies and BS. The defeat of Islam will be TOTAL and FINAL. So start getting yourself ready now as you will be VERY DISAPPOINTED in teh coming results !
as always you are 100 percent right again Gary. Amen.
Adam

Germany

#38327 Mar 15, 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

O Christians! Listen to this question! A MUST WATCH!
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#38328 Mar 15, 2013
Gary wrote:
What I wrote is not an assumption . That is part of prophesy , so there isn't any dreaming or wishing something to be true. Since they are Jews, they will be accepted back by Jesus because they are the "root" of the olive tree .Gentiles that have been saved are the "branches" . Now you see Jesus has a deep interest in having teh Jews saved.
Ans.

01. So what you write is a "prophesy" and in that "prophesy" it says that when Jews see "jesus coming down from heavens, they will fall on his feet and declare that he is their Messiah".

We have another "prophesy"….that majority of Jews of that time would be "in the ranks of Anti Christ" and when Jesus shall fight with Anti Christ, his fight will also be against the jews.

These are two contradicting prophesies. Yours is about "miraculous transformation in the attitude of Jews"…. And mine is "taking into consideration their past 2000 years history and their belligerence towards Jesus and his message and his mother and his religion".

Any "reasonable person" would think that our prophesy is "more logical" and "More reasonable" and "more in line with the attitudes of Jews for centuries".

Your prophesy is just "wishful thinking"….why Jesus should be interested in "saving Jews at any cost"?

As God and Lord and Creator of everything in Universe, he should be "impartial" to any particular race or people, should be not?
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#38329 Mar 15, 2013
jim wrote:
<quoted text>as always you are 100 percent right again Gary. Amen.
You seem to be DUMBER than Gary. To adore Gary as "virtual god" brings you to sub-human category.
Gray

Richmond, VA

#38330 Mar 16, 2013
[QUOTE who="Michael" (MORE ZIONO MEDIA PARROTING OF ZIONIST LIES )[/QUOTE]

Ahmadinejad NEVER said anything related to that additional example Proving that Zionists Run Western, Major media (ZIONISTS not "the Jews")

"Wiped Off The Map" - The Rumor of the Century
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php...

" The Iranian President also knew that there would be the pro-Zionist tabloid media blitz against him complete with the now expected degrading and offensive cartoons and the Persian visitor being labeled in the US media, what else, but an “anti-Semite”,“a clown”,“weirdo”,“crackpot”.“th e new Hitler” and the usual moronic libels. " CONTINUED

So what OTHER Zionist, War Mongering Lies have you been duped into believing?

I'm sure you've NEVER read anything truthful written by HONEST and LOYAL American Jews....

Like THIS for example:

“JEWISH WRITERS CLAIM POWERFUL ZIONISTS DROVE USA INTO MID-EAST WAR FOR SAKE OF ISRAEL”
http://www.usa-exile.org/news/0304/13/zionist...
EXCERPTS

-Jack Bernstein, Author, The Life of An American Jew in Racist Israel (following prediction was made in 1984!)

"The Zionists who rule Israel and the Zionists in America have been trying to trick the U.S. into a Mideast war on the side of Israel.

They almost succeeded when U.S. Marines were sent to Lebanon in 1982.

The blood of the 250 American Marines who died in Lebanon is dripping from the hands of the Israeli and American Zionists.

If more Americans are not made aware of the truth about Zionist Israel, you can be sure that, sooner or later, those atheists who claim to be God's Chosen People will trick the U.S. into a Mideast war against the Arabs who in the past have always been America's best friends.”

-At this perilous juncture in US history, there is no effective opposition because Zionist Jews appear to control both parties.

The Jewish "Anti Defamation League" considers it a barometer of anti Semitism to say, "Jews have too much power."

But is something anti-Semitic if it is true?

Anti- Semitism is racial prejudice.

Zionist power is not a racial prejudice; it is a fact of life.

When a special interest group hijacks American foreign policy, it is a patriotic duty to say so.

In recent decades, Zionists have succeeded in making support for Zionism synonymous with "Jewish."

They have made Israel appear to be a vulnerable country facing annihilation in a sea of bloodthirsty Arabs.

In fact, Israel has 200-400 nuclear bombs and is one of the most powerful nations on earth.

It has evaded many opportunities for a just peace because its secret agenda is to dominate the region.

Israel keeps this quiet because most Jews, including Israelis, did not sign on for that. "
---


Our, Ziono-Media Monopoly has rendered the West, & especially Americans, the most professionally, thoroughly and completely deceived and malleable populace on the planet.

Yes, for 60 years, Zionist dominated "News", School Textbooks, Movies, TV has poured the POOR-INNOCENT-JEWS" VS "EVIL-MUSLIM-BABY-EATERS " Lie into gullible US Minds!

Because Israeli media are far more open and objective, I don't mean that "the Jews run all media" but ZIONISTS definitely dominate what has formed innocently gullible American minds for 60 years

PROOF:

“DECLASSIFIED SENATE INVESTIGATION FILES REVEAL CLANDESTINE, ISRAELI PR CAMPAIGN IN AMERICA”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php...
EXCERPT: "It is frightening how easily some in the American news media surrendered to a foreign public relations campaign.“CONTINUED

“The AZC's internal "Information and Public Relations Department" reports.”
http://irmep.org/ila/azc/

“SIX ZIONIST COMPANIES OWN 96% OF THE WORLD’S
MEDIA”
http://www.cnewsworld.com/world-news/six-zion... ’s-media/
“The power of lies, deceptions and disinformation as Americans pay the price of collective stupidity.”

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 4 min Lonestar 104,471
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 27 min RiversideRedneck 672,884
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 38 min Peter Ross 445,842
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr New Age Spiritual... 981,176
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 4 hr Rob Ford Sr 286,299
About Times and Laws 5 hr harvey plunkett 1
Gay/bi Skype Sex ? (Mar '14) 6 hr Mylilsexcrete 19
More from around the web