Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says

[w wmanuk]

Ericka wrote:

<quoted text>
Excellent! Thanks for posting this!

The Gentleman that wrote this is Pat Condell a very brave man . Its on y tube check it out, there is more. Considering how nasty the merhmna get over cartoons this man has totaly nailed how the majority of the UK feel about the religion of perment offence.

[WA-TUSI-666]

Israel Devided..you have The Reform Jew..The Othordox Jew..The Zionest Jew..The Goverment Political Jew..The Military Jew..and The Don't Give a Shit Jews...NormallY From New York..SHALOM!!

[TEEstrong]

B_Girl_Turco wrote:

Go uncle , destroy them , but please dont kill childrens

why do you want to destroy those you hate?

[B_Girl_Turco]

TEEstrong wrote:

<quoted text>why do you want to destroy those you hate?

Isreal is a bullies country , they never be well-behaved child . They will be destroyed , already this is write on quran .

[Jahffar Amin Astro]

iam malaysian gay please contact me:
http://facebook.com/Jahfar.Amin
http://twitter.com/JahfarAmin1
tlp: 0168390413
sorry only israel's gay

[B_Girl_Turco]

Jahffar Amin Astro wrote:

iam malaysian gay please contact me:
http://facebook.com/Jahfar.Amin
http://twitter.com/JahfarAmin1
tlp: 0168390413
sorry only israel's gay

puahahahahahahhaha lol :D how is this from israel >>> http://www.egonomik.com/wp-content/uploads/20...

[MUQ]

-

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...

CIA Lies About Lies
The Iraq War and the Persistent Myth of ‘Intelligence Failure’

By Jeremy R. Hammond (Contd.)

In October 1991, Iraq admitted to the U.N. Special Commission (UNSCOM) that its Al Atheer site had been built in order to conduct research into enriching uranium to build a nuclear weapon. On August 22, 1995, when Hussein Kamal was asked about the work that went on there, and whether it was continuing somewhere else, he replied,“yes, but not now, before the Gulf War.”

That is to say, there were other sites involved in Iraq’s nuclear weapons program, but this program was ended by 1991. He also pointed out that the work done on enrichment “were only studies.” He noted that Iraq already “had highly enriched uranium from France but it was under the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] safeguards.” Iraq thus had worked on building its own centrifuges to enrich uranium,“but had never reached a point close to testing.”

The CIA document nevertheless states that Kamal’s defection “exposed the previously unknown 1991 crash program to develop nuclear weapons.” The program referred to would have entailed using enriched uranium from Iraq’s French-built reactor and enriching additional uranium obtained from Russia to weapons-grade in order to produce material for a bomb. The remarkable dishonesty of this statement is on full display when one compares it with the fact that, when this “crash program” was brought up in his UNSCOM debriefing, Kamal’s actual response was,“no, not true.”

He acknowledged that “the decision was already there to use French uranium, but they were not ready with centrifuges.” In other words, the “crash program” was nothing more than a hypothetical contingency plan involving a scenario in which Iraq would make a final desperate effort to produce a nuclear weapon by kicking out U.N. and IAEA inspectors and enriching its own uranium to weapons-grade—a capability Iraq did not possess.

With regard to Iraq’s biological weapons programs, Kamal was asked during his debriefing,“[W]ere weapons and agents destroyed?” He answered,“[N]othing remained.” He added that the U.N. inspectors “have [an] important role in Iraq with this. You should not underestimate yourself. You are very effective in Iraq.” The unilateral destruction of WMD, Kamal said,“was done before you came in.” On the issue of chemical weapons, the discussion turned to Iraq’s development of VX nerve agent during the Iran-Iraq war. After the war, Kamal told his U.N. debriefers,“the factory was turned into civilian production.”

He added,“Iran also had mustard and sarin and they used mustard [gas] in small quantities. Some of the chemical components came for the US to Iraq”—that the U.S. supplied precursors for Iraq’s WMD is well known. Kamal continued,“[W]e changed the factory into pesticide production. Part of the establishment started to produce medicine.” He also said,“We gave instructions not to produce chemical weapons…. All chemical weapons were destroyed. I ordered destruction of all chemical weapons. All weapons—biological, chemical, missile, nuclear were destroyed.”(He subsequently clarified,“in the nuclear area, there were no weapons”—he had meant that the nuclear program was dismantled.)

(Contd.)

[ocxz]

w wmanuk wrote:

<quoted text> So now you poclaim that islamic women are not baby making machines. Why the change you boasted in previous post that the high muslim birth rate would enable islam to dominate. leave it up to the women to say what they want.

First you say islamic
afterwards you say muslims

debunked

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereig...

Lies and xenophobic propaganda faced with factual information.

Enjoy ...

[Professor Ayreshire]

MUQ wrote:

-
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...
CIA Lies About Lies
The Iraq War and the Persistent Myth of ‘Intelligence Failure’
By Jeremy R. Hammond (Contd.)
In , there were no weapons”—he had meant that the nuclear program was dismantled.)
(Contd.)

Stop the ignorant nonsense!! Iraq's Saddam Hussein created a far greater humanitarian nightmare than Libya. "The Butcher of Baghdad" slaughtered, at minimum, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis -- far more people than were killed in Bosnia and Kosovo, where President Clinton ordered military force for humanitarian reasons. Yet, when weapons hunters found no stockpiles of WMD in Iraq, the dwindling number of pro-war Democrats turned against the war never mind the sickening sight of thousands of Iraqis found in shallow graves.
That Saddam possessed stockpiles of WMD, having used chemical weapons on the Iranians and his own people, was not in dispute. All 16 U.S. intelligences agencies thought so "with the highest probability." France, the United Kingdom, Russia, Egypt, Jordan, China, Israel and even Saddam's own generals assumed Iraq possessed WMD. Even U.N. weapons inspector and Iraq War critic Hans Blix thought Saddam likely possessed these weapons. As Blix admitted at a 2004 University of Berkeley forum:' I'm not here to have gut feelings. But yes, in December 2002 (three months before the invasion) I thought Saddam had weapons of mass destruction." The non-unilateralist Nobel Peace Prize laureate Obama, unlike Bush, sought no congressional war resolution. Obama, therefore, ordered military action against Libya "unilaterally" -- without the congressional approval that he once argued the Constitution demanded.

As Obama further explained in his December 2007 statement, "In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent." So a president, according to Obama, does not need congressional authority -- provided the action involves "self-defense" or "stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

What is the "actual or imminent threat" to America posed by Libya?
Ritter served from 1991 to 1998 as a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq in the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), which was charged with finding and destroying all weapons of mass destruction and WMD-related manufacturing capabilities in Iraq. He was chief inspector in fourteen of the more than thirty inspection missions in which he participated.

In January 1998, his inspection team in Iraq was blocked from some weapons sites by Iraqi officials stating that information obtained from these sites would be used for future planning of attacks. UN Inspectors were ordered out of Iraq by the United States Government, shortly before Operation Desert Fox attacks began in December 1998, using information which had been gathered for the purpose of disarmament to identify targets which would reduce Iraq's ability to wage both conventional and possibly unconventional warfare. UN Weapons Inspectors were thereafter denied access to Iraq. He spoke on the Public Broadcasting Service show. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Ritter

[oczx]

Hi!! I'm filthy disease riddled oczx alias Professor Ayreshire wanna-be alias Tony Blair and hundreds of others! As you can see, I have mental problems due to a rear end disease that I cannot seem to get rid of!! Don't ever travel to my little Island Paradise off Africa! This is why I am a mental nutjob!! The disease situation lead to risk of contraction of malaria, syphilis, tuberculosis, and typhoid fever and lots of genital diseases in Réunion. Water is untreated and not safe to drink. It's no wonder I love it there!! Hopefully the volcano will re-erupt soon and I will be the first to go!

[Professor Ayreshire]

MUQ wrote:

-
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...
CIA Lies About Lies
The Iraq War and the Persistent Myth of ‘Intelligence Failure’
By Jeremy R. Hammond (Contd.)
In October 1991, Iraq admitted to the U.N. Special Commission (UNSCOM) that its Al Atheer site had been built in order to conduct research were no weapons”—he had meant that the nuclear program was dismantled.)
(Contd.)

Learn your history 3 year old clueless wonder Arab boy and stop the brainwashed idiocy!! What the hell do you think Saddam used against the Kurds and Iranians?? Smelling Salt?? LIAR! This is how you stupid idiots manipulate the truth to cover your own ignorance. Iraq produced tons of biological agents all by its lonesome dummy. Iraq managed to produce anthrax, aflatoxin, botulinum toxin, gas gangrene, ricin, and wheat smut, and was also known to be working on cholera, mycotoxins, shigellosis, and viruses (including camelpox, infectious hemorrhaghic conjunctivitis and rotavirus) as well as genetic engineering. There are suspicions that Iraq was also working on smallpox.
Iraq denied that it ever had an offensive BW program until the defection of Hussein Kamal, Saddam Hussein's son-in-law and head of the WMD program in Iraq, in 1995. Even then, Iraq continued to hide as much information, equipment and material from UN inspectors as it could. Thus, many aspects of Iraq's biological weapon program remain unknown. These unknowns include the total amount of germ agent Iraq produced and the status of Iraq's unaccounted for stocks of biological growth media, agents, production equipment and handbooks, as well as munitions and warheads. Furthermore, inspectors say that Iraq became self-sufficient, meaning it no longer needed imports to fuel its BW program. The uncertainties that surround this program made it all the more threatening in the absence of inspections and monitoring.
Iraq's germ weapon program began at a single site "the Al-Hazen Institute" in the 1970s. By the end of the 1980s, Iraq had several more dedicated sites (Al Salman, Al Muthanna, the Technical Research Center at Al Salman, and Al Hakam among them) and had broadened the scope of its research to include just about every major weaponized germ and many viruses. In the late 1980s, Iraq began field tests, although new germs and new sites were still being added. Iraq had also weaponized germ agents before the first Gulf war, and some weapons had even been deployed. Little of this activity was discovered by the UN inspectors until 1995.
By 1989-1990, both Al Hakam and Daura (Al Manal) were producing botulinum toxin on an industrial scale. By September 1990, Iraq had also achieved industrial-scale production of anthrax at Al Hakam and possibly at Al Manal. The activities undertaken in 1989 and 1990, which included field testing of aerial bombs, rockets and other munitions, the expansion of research and agent production, and the acquisition of additional facilities (Al Manal), have never been fully understood, and the inspectors were unable to draw conclusions about the full extent and scope of Iraq's program.
http://www.iraqwatch.org/profiles/biological ....

[Professor Ayreshire]

MUQ wrote:

-
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/arti...
CIA Lies About Lies
The Iraq War and the Persistent Myth of ‘Intelligence Failure’
By were , chemical, missile, nuclear were destroyed.”(He subsequently clarified,“in the nuclear area, there were no weapons”—he had meant that the nuclear program was dismantled.)
(Contd.)

Learn your history 3 year old clueless wonder Arab boy and stop the brainwashed idiocy!! What the hell do you think Saddam used against the Kurds and Iranians?? Smelling Salt?? LIAR! This is how you stupid idiots manipulate the truth to cover your own ignorance. Iraq produced tons of biological agents all by its lonesome dummy. Iraq managed to produce anthrax, aflatoxin, botulinum toxin, gas gangrene, ricin, and wheat smut, and was also known to be working on cholera, mycotoxins, shigellosis, and viruses (including camelpox, infectious hemorrhaghic conjunctivitis and rotavirus) as well as genetic engineering. There are suspicions that Iraq was also working on smallpox.
Iraq denied that it ever had an offensive BW program until the defection of Hussein Kamal, Saddam Hussein's son-in-law and head of the WMD program in Iraq, in 1995. Even then, Iraq continued to hide as much information, equipment and material from UN inspectors as it could. Thus, many aspects of Iraq's biological weapon program remain unknown. These unknowns include the total amount of germ agent Iraq produced and the status of Iraq's unaccounted for stocks of biological growth media, agents, production equipment and handbooks, as well as munitions and warheads. Furthermore, inspectors say that Iraq became self-sufficient, meaning it no longer needed imports to fuel its BW program. The uncertainties that surround this program made it all the more threatening in the absence of inspections and monitoring.
Iraq's germ weapon program began at a single site "the Al-Hazen Institute" in the 1970s. By the end of the 1980s, Iraq had several more dedicated sites (Al Salman, Al Muthanna, the Technical Research Center at Al Salman, and Al Hakam among them) and had broadened the scope of its research to include just about every major weaponized germ and many viruses. In the late 1980s, Iraq began field tests, although new germs and new sites were still being added. Iraq had also weaponized germ agents before the first Gulf war, and some weapons had even been deployed. Little of this activity was discovered by the UN inspectors until 1995.
By 1989-1990, both Al Hakam and Daura (Al Manal) were producing botulinum toxin on an industrial scale. By September 1990, Iraq had also achieved industrial-scale production of anthrax at Al Hakam and possibly at Al Manal. The activities undertaken in 1989 and 1990, which included field testing of aerial bombs, rockets and other munitions, the expansion of research and agent production, and the acquisition of additional facilities (Al Manal), have never been fully understood, and the inspectors were unable to draw conclusions about the full extent and scope of Iraq's program.
http://www.iraqwatch.org/profiles/biological ....

[Professor Ayreshire]

What else can you expect from a nut case like me in a mental institution. I did some checking at the Rio Rancho Al Burqah Institute for the diseased cattle (AIDC) and they found out when they have to lock me up nut case hasbarat wannabe cattledomite nutjob in solitary confinement .
They hear rambling from my cattle box cell for month on end.
This is what they are hearing from me the confort cow :
AssFerHire:..ZIONISTS ARE MY GODS!!! Zionist come and inseminate me, "Jewish milk is what I need ! Satan has planted me with his seed now !
Then there is silence as the veterinarian gives me a good hasbara shot up my cavernous rear end and i drift off into a promised La La Land stupor of wet dreams.of cattle insemination.

[Professor Ayreshire]

I'm a Fkin' Lunatic!! What the hell am I smoking!! I CAN'T SHOW US ANY PROOF OF MY IGNORANT BS!! I just make up this filthy hate in what pea brain I have left as i am a scumbag! What the hell have I achieved by Bashing Muslims, Blacks and Topix users, and the U.S. in an endless charade of lies, propaganda and ignorant nonsense??
I am filthy uneducated low IQ low life nutjob and give you a great example of a HASBARAT war monger and i am the biggest nutjob in Topix today!
Folks, You have never ever seen such cattle so hateful as me in your life! I am a scumbag Nazi Hitler reincarnation and i am downright evil!

[Professor Ayreshire]

ME assclown!! ME FILTHY disgusting nutjob silly name!! Senseless toothless and hundreds of other aliases. ME scumbag and nutjob!! ME moron in Topix !! I see the nurses will put ME in the same room at that mental institution Have them increase the dosage on those meds. ME gumflappin' idiotic nonsense lies and propaganda MULTIPLE ALIASES gum flappin' charade of nonsense coming from big pie hole!! ME clown get it??

I love Using other people's names and changing what they wrote which only shows my childish Low IQ Low life mentality! Me the lap dog Hasbarasodomite will never back up anything but the imbecilic nutjob posts are all I have left!! I don't blame you for being upset! I have some serious cattle mental issues and you all need to insult me as I throw my little baby temper tantrums!!

[ocxz]

On one side you have one people, the Israelis who want:

To have their own nation > they have.
To be recognized in the world > they are.
To be able to move & travel freely, trade freely > they are.
To have an army to defend themselves > they have.

On the other side you have another people, the palestinians who want:

To have their own nation > they don't.
To be recognized in the world > they are not. Vetoed.
To be able to move & travel freely, trade freely > they are not. Ghettoes.
To have an army to defend themselves > they don't have.

These are the causes.
A cause is what you root for.
An argument is what you use to convince others that your cause (what you root for) is just.
But a cause can be wrong.

An argument might be a plea for defense in a court hearing, or at the opposite extreme a 2000 pound bunker buster, and if it reaches its goal it is a good argument, if it does not it is a bad argument.

But a good argument does not mean a just cause, and a bad argument does not mean a bad cause.

[Lisa]

ocxz wrote:

On one side you have one people, the Israelis who want:
To have their own nation > they have.
To be recognized in the world > they are.
To be able to move & travel freely, trade freely > they are.
To have an army to defend themselves > they have.
On the other side you have another people, the palestinians who want:
To have their own nation > they don't.
To be recognized in the world > they are not. Vetoed.
To be able to move & travel freely, trade freely > they are not. Ghettoes.
To have an army to defend themselves > they don't have.
These are the causes.
A cause is what you root for.
An argument is what you use to convince others that your cause (what you root for) is just.
But a cause can be wrong.
An argument might be a plea for defense in a court hearing, or at the opposite extreme a 2000 pound bunker buster, and if it reaches its goal it is a good argument, if it does not it is a bad argument.
But a good argument does not mean a just cause, and a bad argument does not mean a bad cause.

You sound like your whacked out on drugs. Why don't you shoot yourself?

[fadu singh]

B_Girl_Turco wrote:

<quoted text>
Isreal is a bullies country , they never be well-behaved child . They will be destroyed , already this is write on quran .

LMAO!

[Henry]

ocxz wrote:

On one side you have one people, the Israelis who want:
To have their own nation > they have.
To be recognized in the world > they are.
To be able to move & travel freely, trade freely > they are.
To have an army to defend themselves > they have.
On the other side you have another people, the palestinians who want:
To have their own nation > they don't.
To be recognized in the world > they are not. Vetoed.
To be able to move & travel freely, trade freely > they are not. Ghettoes.
To have an army to defend themselves > they don't have.
These are the causes.
A cause is what you root for.
An argument is what you use to convince others that your cause (what you root for) is just.
But a cause can be wrong.
An argument might be a plea for defense in a court hearing, or at the opposite extreme a 2000 pound bunker buster, and if it reaches its goal it is a good argument, if it does not it is a bad argument.
But a good argument does not mean a just cause, and a bad argument does not mean a bad cause.

Palestine could have had a state long ago. But Israel cannot accept a state that is run by Hamas. Fatah not much better bit at least they are open to talks. Palestinians have no state because of Iran. If Iran wanted a state for Palestine then they would recognize Israel, send diplomats to help negotiate a state.

Iran calls the shots, not Palestinians.
Your argument is mute because history shows Israel being open to land for peace deals. Rockets fly, people die.

Glad that there is a ceasefire but ill bet those weapons are still in transit and Israel will regret agreeing to a ceasefire. Sadly.

[ocxz]

Lisa wrote:

<quoted text>
You sound like your whacked out on drugs. Why don't you shoot yourself?

Nothing like a good laid out argument to get your panties in a knot.

Do you want a primary school version ?
I can use simpler words.