Does it? Unfortunately, you are just making stuff up
How wonderfully ironic!<quoted text>
finding melted steel would point to controlled demolition.
Now there, ladies and gentleman, is a bald faced lie!
I've posted a plethora of examples showing that reports of molten steel is common in fires, yet Ignorance is Bliss chooses to completely ignore that and continue down his twoofy path of attempting to lie his way around it.
Not only that, he incessantly whines about NIST not following the scientific method because they didn't do what he, a scientifically illiterate fool, "thinks" they should have done. Meanwhile he makes a claim with zero scientific support even though the data for such a thing should be readily available...if true.
Here's what the NFPA (I know, government so it's automatically hand waved away by the kooks that can't support thier delusions) says about reports of molten steel;
22.3.3 Solid Fuels. Investigators should not interpret the presence of melted metals to be an indicator of the use of an ignitable liquid as an
accelerant, in the belief that only an ignitable liquid can produce
sufficiently high temperatures. Common combustibles and ignitable liquids produce essentially the same flame temperature. Melting temperatures given in handbooks and in this guide are for the pure metal, unless otherwise stated. In many cases, alloys are used rather than the pure metal. The melting temperature of an alloy is generally lower than that of its constituents. The actual composition of a metal part and its melting temperature should be determined before any conclusions are drawn from the fact that it has melted."
Of course this pre-dates September 11 2001 but that only means da ebil gub'ment has been preparing for the attacks for years right?
You feet will be held to the fire over this Ignorance, so you can either admit you lied or start floundering now...just like you did with your lie about steel plating.