Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#172 Jan 16, 2013
Doctor REALITY wrote:
Do you know the name of the new world trade center tower in Lower Manhattan? It's being called 'O-N-E W-O-R-L-D' trade center. ARE YOU LISTENING,AMERICA???
With the subtitle.... A New World Order...
https://www.google.com/search...
.
https://www.google.com/search...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#173 Jan 16, 2013
Forgotten faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok. That's fine. That's grrrreat!!!
Says who though???
Where did you get this info from? Who told you this? We're you there? Did you help process the materials?
This is my problem with this entire deal....
And leave your school yard name calling at the gate please.....
People have come across evidence that supports BOTH sides.
Whether it be from google, you tube, a friend of Sally's who's brothers neighbor worked there. Just as some can throw a bunch of links and crap at you. You in turn toss back some regurgitated news feed and papers.
It does not take a scientist at any level to see something was very odd the way those towers came down.
And this is where the debates come from.
So can you please squash the name calling, the extremely lame accusations of being paranoid and lead me to some real damn proof!!!
You guys are getting pissy with this Time guy on here for posting links to his website.
Big whoop!!!! He's not charging a penny. And perhaps some of us enjoy his foot work.
He's offered more food for thought than anyone else that's come on here. And I appreciate it.
Now if any of the rest of you can do the same well maybe I can start changing my view point.
Agreed and thnx for the kind words. I and others have been dealing with these shills on this forum for over 3 years. They are the sheep of the govt report, thinking the govt would never do anything like 911....they baaalieve it.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#174 Jan 16, 2013
Forgotten faith wrote:
Huh....
Sad. I had come on this topic because I was hoping to get a little insight to both sides of this.
Unfortunately, as always on topix, nothing comes out of it but a bunch of name calling childish arguments.
Not only does it seem people have lost the basic abilities to have a conversation but also have lost the ability to debate.
Those against the conspiracy of it being an inside job have offered nothing.
And no I'm not saying this because it doesn't support my 'theory'.
I have no theory! All I know is what I saw on the footage.
Just as we are butting heads so too are many, many others. So clearly your paranoid trolling lunitcs are all over your country.
The one thing I really don't get at all....
Is how, with all those passengers, there was not one stand up guy!!! Not one!
And even the pilots. If you knew you were going to die anyway wouldn't you have done something??
If I was the pilot I would have face planted in the first open area I saw.
Agreed friend... this is a zoo when it comes to debating... Check out here and join in if you like, I did.
No childish name calling trolls or shills. Just the facts.
http://fightingforliberty.ning.com/

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#175 Jan 16, 2013
And if a remote control was engaged on the plane, the pilots would have had no control over it...
https://www.google.com/search...
.
https://www.google.com/search...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#176 Jan 16, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
You're missing the point as always truck driver,
Yeah like you cleared up all the unanswered Q's P-pie.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TAR7J0U...

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#177 Jan 16, 2013
]And if a remote control was engaged on the plane, the pilots would have had no control over it..

Ok.... Now see, this is what I'm talking about!!!
I only read a quarter of the one. No Suicide Pilots...
And it already answered several of my questions.
The timing, the skilled maneuvering, the lack of initiative of passengers....!
Even a mugger knows better!!! Lolol. I like that.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#178 Jan 16, 2013
Yep straight up inside job

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#179 Jan 16, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>What you seem to be missing is that there isn't evidence to support BOTH sides. Those claiming that the official story is either all or in part false have offered nothing in the way of credible evidence to refute ANY of the official findings, they haven't even offered any credible evidence that casts doubts on any single aspect of those findings and I've been following along on what's being reported by BOTH sides for years now. The so called truth movement cannot even give us a credible outline of what this so called conspiracy allegedly did that day or in the months leading up to it.
It's perfectly natural to have doubts about aspects of the official account, because it is impossible to know everything. But to dismiss the official account as entirely false because you harbor doubts about parts of it isn't exactly rational.
The best way to resolve the doubts is by discussing them objectively and not dismissing contrary ideas out of hand.
Hmmm agreed. To a point.

I find having doubts about parts of the official accounts to be exactly why these conversations come from.

We can't deny what happened. It's way to huge.
But any small event can change the dynamics entirely. And I find more satisfaction in having my small questions answered than to debate the larger aspects of the story.

Like building blocks... You've got to work backwards right? So that's where my doubts come from.
A question must come from somewhere. And that somewhere is doubt.

I believe that's more than rational. If you dont ask, you can't ever know.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#180 Jan 16, 2013
Forgotten faith wrote:
<quoted text>Ok. That's fine. That's grrrreat!!!

Says who though???

Where did you get this info from? Who told you this? We're you there? Did you help process the materials?

This is my problem with this entire deal....
And leave your school yard name calling at the gate please.....

People have come across evidence that supports BOTH sides.
Whether it be from google, you tube, a friend of Sally's who's brothers neighbor worked there. Just as some can throw a bunch of links and crap at you. You in turn toss back some regurgitated news feed and papers.

It does not take a scientist at any level to see something was very odd the way those towers came down.
And this is where the debates come from.

So can you please squash the name calling, the extremely lame accusations of being paranoid and lead me to some real damn proof!!!

You guys are getting pissy with this Time guy on here for posting links to his website.
Big whoop!!!! He's not charging a penny. And perhaps some of us enjoy his foot work.
He's offered more food for thought than anyone else that's come on here. And I appreciate it.

Now if any of the rest of you can do the same well maybe I can start changing my view point.
The ASCE says who and I wasn't in Europe during WW2 but still believe it happened.

There's I'd zero "evidence" from team twoof otherwise people who aren't batshit crazy, intellectually lazy or just plain stupid would believe what they're trying to (literally) sell.

Here's how this will go; I'll post references to the ASCE supporting exactly what I've said (from home computer), you'll ignore it and continue to snivel and whine about the great and wonderful "evidunce" losers like timestunned post yet never be able to produce an actual argument.

What's truly hilarious is that you completely ignore his insults and behaviour and miss the fact that he's treated exactly the way he treats others...although his vulgar sock pretty much rules where insults and bad language is concerned.

And yes, it does take a scientist to fully understand the collapses and claiming they didn't conform to whatever expectation you or others have is extremely meaningless.

Thanks for playing!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#181 Jan 16, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>Agreed and thnx for the kind words. I and others have been dealing with these shills on this forum for over 3 years. They are the sheep of the govt report, thinking the govt would never do anything like 911....they baaalieve it.
Lemme guess, another of your plentiful socks coming to your rescue.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#182 Jan 16, 2013

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#183 Jan 16, 2013
Yeah like you cleared up all the unanswered Q's P-pie.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TAR7J0U...

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#184 Jan 16, 2013
Timesten wrote:
And if a remote control was engaged on the plane, the pilots would have had no control over it...
https://www.google.com/search...
.
https://www.google.com/search...
Sweetie, you seem to believe in many different possible and seemingly mutually conclusive theories at the same time. Break it down for me. What is your short hand explanation of what YOU believe happened that day?

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#185 Jan 16, 2013
Forgotten faith wrote:
]And if a remote control was engaged on the plane, the pilots would have had no control over it..
Ok.... Now see, this is what I'm talking about!!!
I only read a quarter of the one. No Suicide Pilots...
And it already answered several of my questions.
The timing, the skilled maneuvering, the lack of initiative of passengers....!
Even a mugger knows better!!! Lolol. I like that.
And there's a lot more if you keep digging into the matter.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#186 Jan 16, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Sweetie, you seem to believe in many different possible and seemingly mutually conclusive theories at the same time. Break it down for me. What is your short hand explanation of what YOU believe happened that day?
It's all right here Sweetie #2....on the first page of my research.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#187 Jan 16, 2013
Forgotten faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmm agreed. To a point.
I find having doubts about parts of the official accounts to be exactly why these conversations come from.
We can't deny what happened. It's way to huge.
But any small event can change the dynamics entirely. And I find more satisfaction in having my small questions answered than to debate the larger aspects of the story.
Like building blocks... You've got to work backwards right? So that's where my doubts come from.
A question must come from somewhere. And that somewhere is doubt.
I believe that's more than rational. If you dont ask, you can't ever know.
Ask the Q' If one support column caused WTC 7 to collapse. Could that column have been rigged with a shape charge...
The shills here say there was no evidence of any explosion..and that's why they didn't test for demolition by explosives...
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
.
And don't you think the govt. would deny anything pertaining to their involvement in the matter? they have and the shills here back their lies up, by arguing with the truthers.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#188 Jan 16, 2013
Forgotten faith wrote:
Hmmm agreed. To a point.
I find having doubts about parts of the official accounts to be exactly why these conversations come from.
We can't deny what happened. It's way to huge.
But any small event can change the dynamics entirely. And I find more satisfaction in having my small questions answered than to debate the larger aspects of the story.
Like building blocks... You've got to work backwards right? So that's where my doubts come from.
A question must come from somewhere. And that somewhere is doubt.
I believe that's more than rational. If you dont ask, you can't ever know.
This particular discussion came from the mind of Timesten, a mind that doesn't seem to have rational doubts, but a whole lot of irrational ones. There are parts of the official version that I still have my doubts about, but they lie more in the area of the actual culpability of those whose job was to be watching out for sh*t like this. No one has convinced me that there was a need for anything more than exploding jet aircraft inside the towers to bring them down, let alone that someone actually did something else to bring them down. As for building 7, I know somebody whose experience on the 41st floor that day was watching with pretty much everybody in his area from a conference room, as the concussion, debris and flames from the impact of the hit on the north tower blasted in half the windows of the office they were lucky not to be in and ignited every piece of paper in sight. It suffered from massive fires that burned uncontrollably for hours, it suffered damage both when the jet hit the building right above it and when large chunks of that building collapsed into it. Convinced that anything ELSE was needed to bring it down, let alone that there was. Not so much.

Ask yourself, to what end? Would the American public have been less outraged if the buildings had not collapsed and had just watched in horror for hours as every last person trapped by the initial impacts either burned or jumped to their deaths? Those who were unable to leave the buildings on their own but hadn't been trapped by the impact would have been saved, but those on the wrong side of the impacts were doomed from the moment it hit. We were going to be out for justice/righteousness/vengeanc e either way.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#189 Jan 16, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
It's all right here Sweetie #2....on the first page of my research.
(unpaid advertisement redacted)
Sweetie, been there, done that, your website is not an exactly well ordered collection of collected thoughts and there really isn't anything that I could see that laid out a clear and concise theory by you. Let me try again. Lay out your theory, don't make us go looking for it.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#190 Jan 16, 2013
Well supposed the jet's didn't do much damage on their own, what then?
They had to be sure, and the only way to do that was the explosives.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#192 Jan 16, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
The ASCE says who and I wasn't in Europe during WW2 but still believe it happened.
There's I'd zero "evidence" from team twoof otherwise people who aren't batshit crazy, intellectually lazy or just plain stupid would believe what they're trying to (literally) sell.
Here's how this will go; I'll post references to the ASCE supporting exactly what I've said (from home computer), you'll ignore it and continue to snivel and whine about the great and wonderful "evidunce" losers like timestunned post yet never be able to produce an actual argument.
What's truly hilarious is that you completely ignore his insults and behaviour and miss the fact that he's treated exactly the way he treats others...although his vulgar sock pretty much rules where insults and bad language is concerned.
And yes, it does take a scientist to fully understand the collapses and claiming they didn't conform to whatever expectation you or others have is extremely meaningless.
Thanks for playing!
Yes... Please do put up some links!!!

That's what I've been asking for.

And I made no particular ref to who was using vulgar language or insults, that was a general statement. But since you were the worst you were also the one to point fingers.

And please don't assume what I would or will Not do with the information being presented to me.
We are all entitled to free thinking.

I have a question, I take the given info provided and I will make my own judgement in what I feel makes more sense.

You're very quick to jump on people who do NOT follow your line of thinking.

And I believe you are correct it would take an educated engineer ect to make an informed decision on what exactly happened!!!

Which is why i have a bit of confusion when there is experts on both sides of this.... Which expert do I find more credible and who seems to be more logical!?

You also believe any report or explanation that supports your theory of 'what ya see is what ya get!' So in reality you are no different.

I am on the fence with it. So I have no side to be on.

Again I'm only lookING for some sound explanations and some proof of either/or....

I AM NOT interested in your opinions on me!!

So.... Thank you!!! For playing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
No Walls! Don't fence Me In! 3 min Tony 13
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 3 min WildWeirdWillie 184,239
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min bagittagit 99,540
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 13 min Rosesz 670,146
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 57 min nanoanomaly 980,036
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 1 hr Tony 6,134
____*Historic POPE - ISRAEL Meeting MARCH 2017____ 2 hr YTubeNews 1
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 14 hr AussieBobby 286,431
More from around the web