Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1809 Feb 18, 2013
No work again today eh RADEKT? Oh Washington's Birthday I see. And of course you get 2 weeks off for these holidays huh?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#1810 Feb 18, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
and still not a single peer reviewed paper published in any engineering juournal
.... bjut hey it's only been 11 years maybe they are still proof reading it !?!?!?!
When are you going to realize that it isn't the credibility of the evidence that matters, it is that the evidence exists at all that does? You are talking to folk, who have for all intents and purposes, created a God in their single minded belief that a higher power did this to us and it is up to us to figure out who, what, why and how. Are you doubting their God?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1811 Feb 18, 2013
Timesten wrote:
YES 376 73%
No 115 22%
Possibly 14 2%
Don't know 7
Says it all
No 3,010 60%
YES 1,948 38%
Possibly 31 0%
Don't know 23 0%

HEY MOOBS, YOU ARE RIGHT

Says it all!
Says it all!
Says it all!

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1812 Feb 18, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
and still not a single peer reviewed paper published in any engineering juournal
.... bjut hey it's only been 11 years maybe they are still proof reading it !?!?!?!
<quoted text>
"What you need to know about "Peer-review"
Since the days of Sir Isaac Newton, Science has proceeded through the publication of peer-reviewed papers. Peer-review means a thorough reading, commentary and even challenge before publication by "peers", that is, other PhD's and professors. This paper was thoroughly peer-reviewed with several pages of tough comments that required of our team MONTHS of additional experiments and studies. It was the toughest peer-review I've ever had, including THREE papers for which I was first author in NATURE
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/04/stev...
.
If you were going to be labeled a nut case would you stand up and talk or take sides with the govt.
.
If it meant your job family and livelihood, would you stand up and talk and take sides against the govt. or would you just go with the flow of what the govt says as to not make waves
.
Wake up RAD.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#1813 Feb 18, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
WOW, You mean they only examined columns where the failure initiated to determine why they failed?
But you're not getting that they didn't examine every last piece of steel and other last bit of debris down to the dust for evidence of the presence of speculated to exist thermitic incendiaries/explosives, suitcase nukes, cruise missiles and/or any of the other of myriad of possibilities that would prove the existence of their higher power that is really to blame for not just the collapse, but the attack itself. Just because you have doubts isn't proof that their God does not exist.
I smell Farts

Canada

#1814 Feb 18, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Shocking, you are saying that two identical buildings that suffer very similar damage should react in totally different ways.
Hows that work?
No... I'm asking....
If 3 different buildings, one in which wasn't even struck by a plane, fall the exact same way how could that be possible??

And how would 2 similar buildings who have sustained 'similar' damage react the exact same way when they were hit at different points.

If you were to pull out all the stats of weight and velocity and impact points.... Oh hell and whatever other fancy science physics shiat there is....

What are the ODDS of those twins falling in the exact same fashion?

And what are the ODDS that a third unrelated building falls the same way?

WTF do I know......

KaBOOOOM

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#1815 Feb 18, 2013
Timesten wrote:
"What you need to know about "Peer-review"
Hey look, it's exactly the kind of whine you would expect from a researcher whose "science" can't survive even the less than credible versions of peer review. But, that's okay. we know that your belief in your evil higher power has reached the godlike and just about any sort of evidence will help you to cling to it.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1816 Feb 18, 2013
Link us to the peer reviews and the reviewers qualifications, last I knew it was Theologians and a grad student lab assistant.

Hardly experts in the filed MOOBS!
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
"What you need to know about "Peer-review"
Since the days of Sir Isaac Newton, Science has proceeded through the publication of peer-reviewed papers. Peer-review means a thorough reading, commentary and even challenge before publication by "peers", that is, other PhD's and professors. This paper was thoroughly peer-reviewed with several pages of tough comments that required of our team MONTHS of additional experiments and studies. It was the toughest peer-review I've ever had, including THREE papers for which I was first author in NATURE
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/04/stev...
.
If you were going to be labeled a nut case would you stand up and talk or take sides with the govt.
.
If it meant your job family and livelihood, would you stand up and talk and take sides against the govt. or would you just go with the flow of what the govt says as to not make waves
.
Wake up RAD.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1817 Feb 18, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>But you're not getting that they didn't examine every last piece of steel and other last bit of debris down to the dust for evidence of the presence of speculated to exist thermitic incendiaries/explosives, suitcase nukes, cruise missiles and/or any of the other of myriad of possibilities that would prove the existence of their higher power that is really to blame for not just the collapse, but the attack itself. Just because you have doubts isn't proof that their God does not exist.
I bet urinal 7 from the lobby bathroom holds the key!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1818 Feb 18, 2013
I smell Farts wrote:
<quoted text>
No... I'm asking....
If 3 different buildings, one in which wasn't even struck by a plane, fall the exact same way how could that be possible??
Heat weakened the steel in all three and 7 was hit by a huge chuck of the North tower.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1819 Feb 18, 2013
I smell Farts wrote:
<quoted text>
What are the ODDS of those twins falling in the exact same fashion?
And what are the ODDS that a third unrelated building falls the same way?
WTF do I know......
KaBOOOOM
Since each one was a separate and distinct incident the odds of any one do not influence the odds of the other two, basic statistics.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#1820 Feb 18, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
I bet urinal 7 from the lobby bathroom holds the key!
One trip to the former Fresh Kills landfill with a shovel and you can be the one to finally offer proof of the existence of their evil higher power.
Timesten

Pittsfield, MA

#1821 Feb 18, 2013
Timesten

Pittsfield, MA

#1822 Feb 18, 2013
I smell Farts wrote:
<quoted text>
No... I'm asking....
If 3 different buildings, one in which wasn't even struck by a plane, fall the exact same way how could that be possible??
And how would 2 similar buildings who have sustained 'similar' damage react the exact same way when they were hit at different points.
If you were to pull out all the stats of weight and velocity and impact points.... Oh hell and whatever other fancy science physics shiat there is....
What are the ODDS of those twins falling in the exact same fashion?
And what are the ODDS that a third unrelated building falls the same way?
WTF do I know......
KaBOOOOM
Exactly...
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
I smell Farts

Canada

#1823 Feb 18, 2013
So is that noraml...?

Impact + fire = pancake?!

Geez they had some lousy engineers back in the day...!

So how long does one get to make smores for before the steel finally goes all ooey gooey and falls down?
Straight down. All the way down, down, down.

So let me get the dumbazs version of all this. Acorn sized nut shell

A big ole plane slams itself into the topish of a very tall tower. Starts a fire...? Wait what is that?' Jet fuel hahahha that's a good one'....
Melts the steel collapsing the top floors and than the weight of that causes the rest of the building to pancake down on top of itself. Because the steel and joints and crap couldnt hold the weight??

And than a nice big chunk of crap flings over and lands on top of the other little building 7. Sets it up in smoke... We make more s'mores than its steel goes all ooey gooey and it falls straight down down down all the way down.

Huh....

No I get it.

But WTF do I know.....

KaBOOOOM

But WTF do I know.....

I still smell a

KaBOOOOM
I smell Farts

Canada

#1824 Feb 18, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Since each one was a separate and distinct incident the odds of any one do not influence the odds of the other two, basic statistics.
So if the same dealer deals out 3 sets of hands from the same deck I should expect to get the same hand all 3 times???

Oooohhh

Hey..... Who be up for Vegas??? I got me an inside tip!

I'm just some fn guy

WTF do I know.

KakaKaBOOOOOM

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1825 Feb 18, 2013
I smell Farts wrote:
So is that noraml...?
Impact + fire = pancake?!
Geez they had some lousy engineers back in the day...!
So how long does one get to make smores for before the steel finally goes all ooey gooey and falls down?
Straight down. All the way down, down, down.
So let me get the dumbazs version of all this. Acorn sized nut shell
A big ole plane slams itself into the topish of a very tall tower. Starts a fire...? Wait what is that?' Jet fuel hahahha that's a good one'....
Melts the steel collapsing the top floors and than the weight of that causes the rest of the building to pancake down on top of itself. Because the steel and joints and crap couldnt hold the weight??
And than a nice big chunk of crap flings over and lands on top of the other little building 7. Sets it up in smoke... We make more s'mores than its steel goes all ooey gooey and it falls straight down down down all the way down.
Huh....
No I get it.
But WTF do I know.....
KaBOOOOM
But WTF do I know.....
I still smell a
KaBOOOOM
I guess building fires don't get hot in your fantasy land. Do you know what carpets, office patricians computers, copiers, printers and many other things found in offices are made of? Petroleum products which burn very well after reaching the right flash point. So much for your silly opinion.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1826 Feb 18, 2013
I smell Farts wrote:
Melts the steel collapsing the top floors and than the weight of that causes the rest of the building to pancake down on top of itself. Because the steel and joints and crap couldnt hold the weight??
No one claimed steel melted to cause the collapse, it just had to weaken enough steel to shift and cause 5/8 inch bolts to snap and start dropping floors.

THEORY

http://www.debunking911.com/sagt.jpg

PROOF

http://www.debunking911.com/sag.ht1.jpg

http://www.debunking911.com/pullin2.jpg
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1827 Feb 18, 2013
I smell Farts wrote:
<quoted text>
So if the same dealer deals out 3 sets of hands from the same deck I should expect to get the same hand all 3 times???
LMAO! You are giving MOOBS and obtuse run for the money, were they the same building or three distinct ones?
I smell Farts

Canada

#1828 Feb 18, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Since each one was a separate and distinct incident the odds of any one do not influence the odds of the other two, basic statistics.
I clearly don't understand this statement....

You said fire and melting steel are the common links to how these 3 identical collapses.

So they do Infact share a common denominator. And werent the twins erected( hahah erected) by the same means by the same 16 year old kids at roughly the same time. Hence their cute name 'The Twins'.... So that's another common thing they share?

So yes they stand/stood as their own entities however they were in a sense cut from the same cloth...

Which is kinda what you said.

And if they are separate from one another wouldn't the chances of all 3 ending up the same be even greater odds?

I'm really am just some fn guy.

KaBOOOba

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 4 min Sammy 80,196
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min kent 701,588
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 1 hr Dang Jersey Piney 448,403
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Sammy 995,788
I'm ON BOARD: James Harden for NBA MVP 3 hr Doctor REALITY 2
Why does Draymond Green act like such a BLEEP! ... 3 hr Doctor REALITY 10
Judas Iscariot and Mark Fuhrman 3 hr Doctor REALITY 44