Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,792 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#1742 Feb 15, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>The only evidence presented below is moobs is insane.
And that his understanding of oncology is right up there with his understanding of structural engineering and geology!

And physics.

And biology.

Etc.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1743 Feb 15, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
And that his understanding of oncology is right up there with his understanding of structural engineering and geology!
And physics.
And biology.
Etc.
Or Logic, I love following his Flight 93 Claims

No plane crashed near Shanksville ....

But United 93 was shot down over Shanksville and crashed ....

But there are no serial numbered parts that the FFA sent to Tom so United 93 never existed ....

But United 93 (that did not exist) was diverted to Cleveland ...

Where the passengers were taken to a NASA hanger and killed ....

But there were no passengers because it was remote controlled...

But the remote controlled plane that did crash at Shanksville was actually....

Parts dumped out of another plane or part planted beforehand.

YUP, Makes total sense to me!
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

#1744 Feb 15, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Or Logic, I love following his Flight 93 Claims
No plane crashed near Shanksville ....
But United 93 was shot down over Shanksville and crashed ....
But there are no serial numbered parts that the FFA sent to Tom so United 93 never existed ....
But United 93 (that did not exist) was diverted to Cleveland ...
Where the passengers were taken to a NASA hanger and killed ....
But there were no passengers because it was remote controlled...
But the remote controlled plane that did crash at Shanksville was actually....
Parts dumped out of another plane or part planted beforehand.
YUP, Makes total sense to me!
Funny, how everything the government says makes perfect sense to you.

Everything else is too difficult to understand so it is hand-waved away into nothing-ness.

So much debwunking, so little time!?!?!?!?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1745 Feb 15, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Or Logic, I love following his Flight 93 Claims
No plane crashed near Shanksville ....
But United 93 was shot down over Shanksville and crashed ....
But there are no serial numbered parts that the FFA sent to Tom so United 93 never existed ....
But United 93 (that did not exist) was diverted to Cleveland ...
Where the passengers were taken to a NASA hanger and killed ....
But there were no passengers because it was remote controlled...
But the remote controlled plane that did crash at Shanksville was actually....
Parts dumped out of another plane or part planted beforehand.
YUP, Makes total sense to me!
Yes there are so many mutually exclusive theories.

1. Actual planes did not hit the buildings, it was all faked and presented by the new media.

2. Actual planes hit the buildings but they were substituted. The real passengers and planes vansished into thin air.

3. The actual planes and passengers hit the buildings because the planes were rigged with sophisticated RC devices or programming.

4. The hijackers passed through airport security but somehow wound up elsewhere alive and well.

5. Flight 77 was substituted with a missle. The actual plane vanished into thin air. A few pieces of aircraft debris were planted at the scene by unknown conspirators.

6. It is impossible for damaged buildings to fall because a number of architects and engineers say so without any investigation of the actual evidence.

7. Twenty pilots say it was impossible to fly an aircraft into the Pentagon so item #5 must be true.

Are these guys kidding? They must be joking right?
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

#1746 Feb 16, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes there are so many mutually exclusive theories.
1. Actual planes did not hit the buildings, it was all faked and presented by the new media.
2. Actual planes hit the buildings but they were substituted. The real passengers and planes vansished into thin air.
3. The actual planes and passengers hit the buildings because the planes were rigged with sophisticated RC devices or programming.
4. The hijackers passed through airport security but somehow wound up elsewhere alive and well.
5. Flight 77 was substituted with a missle. The actual plane vanished into thin air. A few pieces of aircraft debris were planted at the scene by unknown conspirators.
6. It is impossible for damaged buildings to fall because a number of architects and engineers say so without any investigation of the actual evidence.
7. Twenty pilots say it was impossible to fly an aircraft into the Pentagon so item #5 must be true.
Are these guys kidding? They must be joking right?
# 5 above: Actually it was a missile!

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#1747 Feb 16, 2013
according to WHO Dufi !?!?!!?!?!
Guise Faux wrote:
<quoted text>
# 5 above: Actually it was a missile!

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1748 Feb 16, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
How about the aircraft frame slicing through the building full of windows? How about many heavy parts? If you were familiar with high impact crashes, you would know that the skin shatters like an egg.
Yeah right 1/8 to 1/4 inch thick aluminum is far stronger than 5" x 22"x 54" thick steel....
the box is 54 x 22 inches made of 5 inch thick steel.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1749 Feb 16, 2013
Seems there are thicker pcs that are not just skin cladding that you overlooked.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1750 Feb 16, 2013
And tell us all how aluminum, jet fuel and office fires weakened the WHOLE core.
http://wtc7.net/articles/stevenjones_b7_files...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1751 Feb 16, 2013
Explain how fires that were not kept at a constant 1500 degrees or above, weakened and softened the WHOLE Core to a point of structural failure.
http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/images/pa...

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1752 Feb 16, 2013
And the second plane didn't come head on with the core. It sideswiped it. and all of the fire was on one side of the core, leaving the other side unscathed, unburned and unheated. That side should have held it's integrity and a partial collapse should have taken place only.
Perdue made the simulation.....it was computer generated. Not factual, not real.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#1754 Feb 16, 2013
Also is is a little experiment that shows a smaller scale of the same scenario...

Hardly made a scratch.....hmmmmm

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1755 Feb 16, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah right 1/8 to 1/4 inch thick aluminum is far stronger than 5" x 22"x 54" thick steel....
the box is 54 x 22 inches made of 5 inch thick steel.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
The planes penetrated the buildings. It's an observable fact moron.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1756 Feb 16, 2013
Timesten wrote:
And the second plane didn't come head on with the core. It sideswiped it. and all of the fire was on one side of the core, leaving the other side unscathed, unburned and unheated. That side should have held it's integrity and a partial collapse should have taken place only.
Perdue made the simulation.....it was computer generated. Not factual, not real.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =NOKJ4ZXgK4QXX
So now you say the plane did penetrate the building.

Did the plane penetrate the building or not?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1757 Feb 16, 2013
Timesten wrote:
And the second plane didn't come head on with the core. It sideswiped it. and all of the fire was on one side of the core, leaving the other side unscathed, unburned and unheated. That side should have held it's integrity and a partial collapse should have taken place only.
Perdue made the simulation.....it was computer generated. Not factual, not real.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =NOKJ4ZXgK4QXX
And the upper part of the building can be observed tilting into the void created on that side as the structural members below begin to fail. This is all observable evidence bro.
penetrated

Winchester, KY

#1758 Feb 16, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The planes penetrated the buildings. It's an observable fact moron.
The government has penetrated your mind and uranus. It's an observable fact moron.
the void

Winchester, KY

#1759 Feb 16, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
And the upper part of the building can be observed tilting into the void created on that side as the structural members below begin to fail. This is all observable evidence bro.
and your skull can be observed caving into the void created when that side of your brain disintegrated. This is all observable evidence bro.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1760 Feb 16, 2013
penetrated wrote:
<quoted text>
The government has penetrated your mind and uranus. It's an observable fact moron.
How so? I can observe the videos taken of the event and hear what the people who were there have to say. Everything I have seen indicates the Offical 9/11 Report to be correct. Obviously you have nothing to contribute here except ad hominem statements. You can run along now.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1761 Feb 16, 2013
the void wrote:
<quoted text>
and your skull can be observed caving into the void created when that side of your brain disintegrated. This is all observable evidence bro.
Nice!

Juvenile repartee.
penetrate

Winchester, KY

#1762 Feb 16, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
So now you say the head did penetrate my ass.
Did my head penetrate my ass or not?
look around in there, what do you see? I would have to say that your head is still up your ass as we speak.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 7 min Stilgar Fifrawi 836,819
No one should blaspheme Prophet Mohammad, peace... 8 min RiccardoFire 408
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 14 min RiccardoFire 4,045
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 17 min WasteWater 5,880
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 19 min RiccardoFire 40,442
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 25 min confrinting with ... 589,232
Hey guys......... 30 min VinayKhanna 10
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 35 min WildWeirdWillie 176,744
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 40 min Fists of Jesus 271,239
More from around the web