created by: inquiring minds | Jan 4, 2013

Top Stories

17,784 votes

Was 911 an Inside Job

Click on an option to vote

  • YES
  • No
  • Don't know
  • Possibly
Comments
1,561 - 1,580 of 4,996 Comments Last updated Jul 8, 2014
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1637
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
The children at WACO were hostages,
Then why was David having sex with them?

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1638
Feb 13, 2013
 
If you are a Branch Davidian, Christ lives on a threadbare piece of land 10 miles east of here called Mount Carmel. He has dimples, claims a ninth-grade education, married his legal wife when she was 14, enjoys a beer now and then, plays a mean guitar, reportedly packs a 9mm Glock and keeps an arsenal of military assault rifles, and willingly admits that he is a sinner without equal - Opening of "Sinful Messiah

THAT's why all those people died Moron, because of ONE Idiot !!!!!
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Man, you shrills prove the point that you can't fix stupid.
In Waco, the FLIR video showed the tanks pumping in fire after the walls were knocked down, and you believe the obviously doctored audio.
The children at WACO were hostages, yet ATF did everything in its power to attempt to inflame the situation, by playing loud music all night mixed with the sounds of rabbits being slaughtered. Then at the end burned them to death.
Now you see this same tactic being employed against the cop killer last night, and you ignorantly applaud. Then when the police will inevitably claim the maniac set the fire himself, you will believe it, even though the police scanners show the opposite to be true.
When the police act as judge, jury, and executioners, and due process is ignored, all Americans have a problem. When police kill children to teach parents a lesson, all Americans have a problem.
When people like you support it, you are the problem.
This is a perfect example of why the unthinking support anything the government claims, and the 9/11 official story, because you are the cult members that worship being told how to think.
I can't blame a Canadian thinking as a slave, because their history is not based in freedom and liberty, but Americans are a different story.
Thats why for you shameful Americans,
Insults Are Easier
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1639
Feb 13, 2013
 
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems the authorities overlooked the obvious. IOWS, they never went through a scenario to consider all the possibilities or role playing. With all the technology and defense industry spending, the only thing that would have prevented 9/11 was to keep the hijackers off the planes in the first place. It seems we have been defected with IEDs and suicide bombers, both are very low-tech and inexpensive compared to what we do.
And who do you suppose was the single company in charge of security at all airports the accused hi-jackers used to board the alleged aircraft?

All these college age muslim men had been under surveillance for many years before by the entire intelligence community of the US.

Why were they allowed to board the aircraft when they were known terrorists under suspicion?

Like the government version of events you will say "what does it matter who was in charge of security?" It's a done deal.

That figures don't it!


Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1640
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Now you see this same tactic being employed against the cop killer last night, and you ignorantly applaud. Then when the police will inevitably claim the maniac set the fire himself, you will believe it, even though the police scanners show the opposite to be true.
No news and you already decided that he was set on fire by the government, let me see, shoots unarmed people, writes a crazy manifesto but hey, has a hit list....

... he seems so rational ...

no way he would set the place on fire and go out in a blaze of glory, that would take a crazy man.

LMFAO! You have already decided what happened, now you just need to find the evidence, such impeccable logic.
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1641
Feb 13, 2013
 
RADEKT wrote:
If you are a Branch Davidian, Christ lives on a threadbare piece of land 10 miles east of here called Mount Carmel. He has dimples, claims a ninth-grade education, married his legal wife when she was 14, enjoys a beer now and then, plays a mean guitar, reportedly packs a 9mm Glock and keeps an arsenal of military assault rifles, and willingly admits that he is a sinner without equal - Opening of "Sinful Messiah
THAT's why all those people died Moron, because of ONE Idiot !!!!!
<quoted text>
Actually all those people died because they BELIEVED in the words of one idiot.

Just like all you debwunkers believe in the words of a government that brought you the Wag The Dog false flag black op for political gain of 9/11.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1642
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
In Waco, the FLIR video showed the tanks pumping in fire after the walls were knocked down, and you believe the obviously doctored audio.
Wrong and!

Justice Department lawyers have told U.S. District Judge Walter S. Smith
that strict federal limits on how and when the government can be sued
preclude the court from considering whether authorities contributed to the
1993 deaths by ordering tanks to demolish the sect's building and then
refusing to let fire trucks approach after it caught fire.

They have also argued that a report by government arson investigators
ruled that sect members set the fire. That report relied heavily on an
infrared video recorded from an FBI airplane, which showed the heat
signatures of fires erupting within two minutes in three separate parts of the
compound.

The government has contended that additional evidence used in the 1994
criminal trials of surviving Branch Davidians supports that claim. In that
case, prosecutors argued that FBI surveillance devices recorded voices of
sect members discussing their preparations to burn their building.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1643
Feb 13, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
<quoted text>
Why were they allowed to board the aircraft when they were known terrorists under suspicion?
If they were known terrorists they would have been arrested. You make no sense. Please tell us what acts of terrorism they engaged in before 9/11 Mr Insults.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1644
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Insults Are Easier
The term "burner" had led to speculation that the fire had been started deliberately, but burner is thought to be police slang for tear gas, and may refer to "BurnSafe" containers for CS gas canisters, made by the Covina-Thomas Company in Covina, California. On its website the company lists among its recent customers the LAPD, although not the San Bernardo County sheriff's office, which led the raid.

----------

Fears that tear gas rounds may have sparked blaze that killed ex-policeman after recording surfaces purporting to be of police scanner conversation during raid

A six-day hunt for a former policeman suspected of a killing spree in California ended on Wednesday when a cabin in the mountains above LA went up in flames.

A body suspected to be that of Christopher Dorner was found in the ruins of the building. Dorner is suspected to have killed four people in a vendetta against LA police officers and their families; the fourth was an officer from San Bernardino County sheriff's department killed in a shootout at the cabin on Tuesday night.

Dorner had threatened to bring "warfare" to the LAPD, having claimed he had been the subject of racism when he was sacked from his job as a policeman there. Rory Carroll has the full story.

It is not yet clear how the fire at the cabin was started, but some evidence seems to suggest it may have been as a consequence of the tear gas fired by police.

A recording purporting to be of the conversation on police scanners as officers surrounded the cabin where Dorner was hiding seems to show police discussing "going forward with the plan, with, er, with the burn" or "burner".

The term "burner" had led to speculation that the fire had been started deliberately, but burner is thought to be police slang for tear gas, and may refer to "BurnSafe" containers for CS gas canisters, made by the Covina-Thomas Company in Covina, California. On its website the company lists among its recent customers the LAPD, although not the San Bernardo County sheriff's office, which led the raid.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1645
Feb 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Its called BurnSafe yet they call it burners? Why not safers?

Don't sound too safe if thats how they refer to it.

So what do they call the actual tactic of setting fire to the building and burning to death all the occupants? Tear gassing?

You so twisted Charlie, because your so quick to copy/paste something, yet so slow in understanding.

The official worshippers in a nutshell, same lack of logic applied to 9/11.

As the Canadian claps.

Insults Are Easier
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1646
Feb 13, 2013
 
The Patriot Act and other illegal executive legislation makes it perfectly clear that you do not have to engage in a terrorist act to be labeled and treated as a terrorist.

But for you bwunkers I will just call the alleged 9/11 hi-jackers "person's of interest under close surveillance" by the most prominent intelligence defense agencies of the great country of Keystone Koppers, the USA.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1647
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Its called BurnSafe yet they call it burners? Why not safers?
LMAO, That is your logic, the slang has to be the second half of the term?

Question, If they wanted to burn him up, why did they say burn him out, sounds more like tear gas to force him out than a call to burn him up.

But we get it, if the person is a criminal scumbag he's a good guy guy and the government is evil.

Religious child molesting nutbags with 500 drop in autosears to illegally convert AR15's into machine guns.

Cop killers.

Good people, Government bad people, why, because they fail to follow your rules of slang.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1648
Feb 13, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
<quoted text>Actually all those people died because they BELIEVED in the words of one idiot.

Just like all you debwunkers believe in the words of a government that brought you the Wag The Dog false flag black op for political gain of 9/11.
So the "government" is one person and accepting converging evidence from multiple sources is believing in the words of an idiot.

As opposed to mindlessly accepting some dolts claim that included elevators that can't go up or down, accepting Prison Planets claim that there was a stand down order ;when the source they cited said something completely different) and accepting the word of 20 unknown pilots who can't hit the broad side of a barn.

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots glop!

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1649
Feb 13, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

You actually get nothing, in fact less then noting.
I'm not saying the criminal was a good person, or even didn't deserve to be burned alive. I didn't say David Koresh was a good person, but I did say those children were. I'm simply talking about the government, and the tactics they employ that allow thier amrmed enforcers to act just as bad as the maniac they were supposed to apprehend in a professional manner.
Burn motherf*r, after the burners are deployed, don't sound to professional to me. It's not how the crazy criminals act, its how professional are the professionals.
You should be ashamed of your mindlessness, always quick to take the side of the police state, always slow to see logic and reality.
Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1650
Feb 13, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
But for you bwunkers I will just call the alleged 9/11 hi-jackers "person's of interest under close surveillance" by the most prominent intelligence defense agencies of the great country of Keystone Koppers, the USA.
How high were they on the surveillance radar and how many others were at that time in total.

Resources and estimated threat level makes all the difference in the world.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1651
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Its called BurnSafe yet they call it burners? Why not safers?
Why do drug dealers call prepaid untraceable cell phones "burners" why not cellies or phoneies? WHY BURNERS? Please explain and work shape shifting lizards into your theory.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1652
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
I'm simply talking about the government, and the tactics they employ that allow thier amrmed enforcers to act just as bad as the maniac they were supposed to apprehend
So killing a cold blooded killer on the loose is the moral equivalent of killing an innocent party in your book, call me not shocked (especially if they are Jewish).

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1653
Feb 13, 2013
 
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>When our government learned of the possibility of Al-Qaeda using aircraft as weapons they slipped on the complacency that security procedures already in place would prevent that from happening here, there hadn't been a successful takeover of a domestic or international flight originating in the US in years. Our efforts went into preventing another 1993 style attack, truck bombs and worse, suit case sized nukes and bio-terrorism, we weren't looking for the people who we should have been watching out for.
Exactly. We never thought anyone would do such a thing. We always had the mindset that nobody would kill themselves just to achieve some kind of objective.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1654
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
You actually get nothing, in fact less then noting.
I'm not saying the criminal was a good person, or even didn't deserve to be burned alive. I didn't say David Koresh was a good person, but I did say those children were. I'm simply talking about the government, and the tactics they employ that allow thier amrmed enforcers to act just as bad as the maniac they were supposed to apprehend in a professional manner.
Burn motherf*r, after the burners are deployed, don't sound to professional to me. It's not how the crazy criminals act, its how professional are the professionals.
You should be ashamed of your mindlessness, always quick to take the side of the police state, always slow to see logic and reality.
Insults Are Easier
Over 18,000 children starve to death every day. What are you doing about that? Anything?

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1655
Feb 13, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly. We never thought anyone would do such a thing. We always had the mindset that nobody would kill themselves just to achieve some kind of objective.
Yea, because suicide bombers never existed before 9/11.

Can you chew gum and walk simultaneously?

They ran drills of aircraft crashing into the Pentagon before 9/11 too. So the only person who never imagined it are people dumb as you.

Why do you even bother writing? Oh thats right, you enjoy lying.

Id provide you with a link but you wouldn't understand it, so

Insults Are Easier

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1656
Feb 13, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, because suicide bombers never existed before 9/11.
Can you chew gum and walk simultaneously?
They ran drills of aircraft crashing into the Pentagon before 9/11 too. So the only person who never imagined it are people dumb as you.
Why do you even bother writing? Oh thats right, you enjoy lying.
Id provide you with a link but you wouldn't understand it, so
Insults Are Easier
You are misinformed. Suicide bombers did exist prior to 9/11.

"Tracing the history of how suicide has been used as a weapon and as a protest through history offers up many illuminating parallels to what might motivate those who undertake the suicide missions in Iraq. It was the Japanese who made the use of suicide as a military strategy so feared, and the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka in the 1980s who applied it as a technique for assassinations. Both were part of wider military efforts which were not always easily distinguishable from a suicide mission. The line in war between a suicidal mission and a reckless disregard for one's own life can be very blurred."

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0514-26.h...

Between 1981 and 2006, 1200 suicide attacks occurred around the world, constituting 4% of all terrorist attacks but 32%(14,599 people) of all terrorism related deaths.[1] 90% of these attacks occurred in Iraq, Israel, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Sri Lanka.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_attack

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 3 min JudgeNJury 259,193
Tamil vs Kannada. Which one is the oldest langu... (Oct '12) 4 min Naveen kumar 978
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 4 min andet1987 4,247
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 5 min lisw 172,914
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 6 min 1859Petesake 117,774
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min BenAdam 729,936
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min seriously the ori... 537,024

Search the Top Stories Forum:
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••