created by: inquiring minds | Jan 4, 2013

Top Stories

17,784 votes

Was 911 an Inside Job

Click on an option to vote

  • YES
  • No
  • Don't know
  • Possibly
Comments
1,081 - 1,100 of 4,996 Comments Last updated Jul 8, 2014

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#1150 Feb 7, 2013
tsunami wrote:
<quoted text>
it's much bigger than a tidal wave
When are you going to start talking to your socks like timestwit?

“The Biggest Liar on Topix”

Since: Jan 11

Pittsfield, MA

#1151 Feb 7, 2013
looks like the start of a mental breakdown, I hope your parents keep all sharp objects away from you

Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
I like all your plans, and they all have valid points, Kent. Some of your best work here has been logic comedy, so its cool you haven't left entirely.
I enjoy a good insult to people who deserve it, and this hate crew deserves it, but the problem is each shrill wants more than nothing else for the conversation to get reduced only to insults, off topic, nonsense. And for that reason, I'm torn.
The whole "I am a highly educated person but my personality is grade school schtick" is entirely invented to end the conversation, not debate it, or discuss it.
And I especially hate to let cretins win, especially the fake wall street persona... jealous?!?!?!?!?!
Even though they pretty much insult themselves with the bad repetitive jokes, false accusations and faulty logic, while crudely distracting with changing stories, which is really, really, obvious... You know, like claiming a definition and a picture in the dictionary is their target of smear, and thats funny enough to have them rolling on the floor laughing. Man, thats so not funny.
I think I'm drawn to it because it reminds me of cultist from the 70's and 80's who used to hang out at airports and when questioned, they would give you a Unification Church pamphlet and say that is the proof.
9/1 1 Myths dot com..
Unfortunately, these cultist are hidden from their cover being blown by morning television and Oprah. Relying on an appeal to authority that denies basic physics while hiding ignorance behind a fake laugh. In most cases a mere recitation, to an originally flawed explanation, followed by bitchin cat names for a week, then the declaration nobody will debate them.
You're just crazy, Deary, as the Canadian claps.
I dont debate them as a show of anything other than only occasionally pointing out their flawed characters, and to challenge the culture of nonsense and deceit they so joyously espouse, just so some poor unsuspecting sap doesn't get takin in by their lies.
So it's tough not to set them straight from time to time.
The metaphor thing was good stuff.
As always,
Insults Are Easier

“The Biggest Liar on Topix”

Since: Jan 11

Pittsfield, MA

#1152 Feb 7, 2013
How's your comic book collection doing ?
Truce Bane wrote:
<quoted text>
That's why I gave up and left the "Was 9/11 a Conspiracy?" forum years ago when I had a registered account. At the time it was Tomk52 the supposed forum "expert", who constantly was dishonest, "Honest" g, a real degenerate POS, and Rambum aka Radekt, a fake ass Rico Suave who couldn't put together a sentence above a fourth grade level unless he copied and pasted it, who claims he's graduated from Stanford with an MBA and is some type of big shot on Wall Street (wink, nod).
Frankly I don't see why you, Bill and others are even wasting your time with a bunch of lowlife, self important wannabe Internet bullies who openly admit that "picking on" and "making fun" of others is a form of entertainment. That's a bully in my book, and bullies deserve absolutely no respect. The bullying type often has to make himself seem so important while trying to exercise power over others. Guaranteed these Internet bullies would fold like little b*t hes in real life. They're not deserving of a debate nor civility. They're simply a bunch of degenerates defending liars and the corrupt and are part of the problem. At this point, I don' t blame these corrupt politicians and the like. They're only doing what we the people allow them to. But I'll be damned, every time there's an attempt to expose these devils and their ways, lo and behold, an army of useful idiots will fight tooth and nail defending them.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Carstairs, Canada

#1153 Feb 7, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok word salad of lies, show us a natural, symmetrical, global collapse that attained free fall at at any point.
We'll be waiting... Until then,
Insults Are Easier
Oh goodie!

The old shifting of the burden of proof fallacy!

Sorry loser, your claim that symmetry and free fall can only happen due to bombs is what's for supper.

If you can't support it, it dies from neglect.

Oh and, steel plating.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Carstairs, Canada

#1154 Feb 7, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, the Towers survived the plane impacts, so this debate is moot.
If you follow the link that I provided that describes design parameters, you will find that the B-707 traveling at top speed, the contingency described in the 1964 tests, will actually impart more kinetic energy than the B-767s that hit the towers.
Again, here's the link, although again your bickering over this point neglects the fact that both Towers survived the plane impacts:
http://911research.com/wtc/analysis/design.ht...
Even NIST concedes that the impacts were NOT the ultimate cause for global failure. The TOWERS had plenty of reserve capacity.
The designers never claimed the 707 would be travelling at 600mph, they did a few pages of hand written calculations based on a 707 lost in the fog and travelling at about 200mph.

The difference in impact energy is around 10 times greater for the actual attacks.

Don't worry though, your perfect record of getting nothing correct is still intact!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Carstairs, Canada

#1155 Feb 7, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? can you link to those tables that describe free-fall conditions in the draft?
I didn't think so.
Not even the slightest problem "Bill".

It's table 3-1 on pg. 39 of the draft report.

Although you linked to the final report earlier...most likely because you're not looking at the report, you're just mindlessly copying and pasting from a twoofer website without bothering to actually read the source document.

I don't believe the draft is still accessible from the NIST site but I do have it saved on my laptop.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Carstairs, Canada

#1156 Feb 7, 2013
Truce Bane wrote:
<quoted text>
That's why I gave up and left the "Was 9/11 a Conspiracy?" forum years ago when I had a registered account. At the time it was Tomk52 the supposed forum "expert", who constantly was dishonest, "Honest" g, a real degenerate POS, and Rambum aka Radekt, a fake ass Rico Suave who couldn't put together a sentence above a fourth grade level unless he copied and pasted it, who claims he's graduated from Stanford with an MBA and is some type of big shot on Wall Street (wink, nod).
Frankly I don't see why you, Bill and others are even wasting your time with a bunch of lowlife, self important wannabe Internet bullies who openly admit that "picking on" and "making fun" of others is a form of entertainment. That's a bully in my book, and bullies deserve absolutely no respect. The bullying type often has to make himself seem so important while trying to exercise power over others. Guaranteed these Internet bullies would fold like little b*t hes in real life. They're not deserving of a debate nor civility. They're simply a bunch of degenerates defending liars and the corrupt and are part of the problem. At this point, I don' t blame these corrupt politicians and the like. They're only doing what we the people allow them to. But I'll be damned, every time there's an attempt to expose these devils and their ways, lo and behold, an army of useful idiots will fight tooth and nail defending them.
In other words, your arguments couldn't stand up to the scrutiny of this forum so you took your ball and ran home.

What's funny is losers like Ignorance is Bliss have had to make up lies about things like steel plating in order to pretend they still have a horse in a face long since finished.

That's a reality that will never change for twoof.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Carstairs, Canada

#1157 Feb 7, 2013
I smell Farts wrote:
Aaaawwww..... Did your government bwow up your wittle buildings!!!????
welllll dddaaaaaauuuuhhhhhh
Of course they did!!!!
Cabooom!!!
And da all fall down!!
You really are desperate aren't you vulgar-tommy?
Truce Bane

Oklahoma City, OK

#1158 Feb 7, 2013
Timeten wrote:
How's your comic book collection doing ?
<quoted text>
The same as your anal bead collection, Radekt.
Truce Bane

Oklahoma City, OK

#1159 Feb 7, 2013
Timeten wrote:
looks like the start of a mental breakdown, I hope your parents keep all sharp objects away from you
<quoted text>
Hey, Radekt, you forgot to type "?!?!?!?!?!"
Truce Bane

Oklahoma City, OK

#1160 Feb 7, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>In other words, your arguments couldn't stand up to the scrutiny of this forum so you took your ball and ran home.
What's funny is losers like Ignorance is Bliss have had to make up lies about things like steel plating in order to pretend they still have a horse in a face long since finished.
That's a reality that will never change for twoof.
No what it means is I have a life outside of Topix and other obligations and could give two shats about conversing with self important dishonest lowlife wannabe internet bullies who fold like little school girls if they tried their bullying tactics in real life. I've been following your post for a while now and YOU'RE EXACTLY the Internet bullying type I was describing to IAE. Self important, loser in real life so he/she has to come into an Internet forum and try to bully others and brag about his non existent credentials to feel validated by other lowlife losers that must do the same. Now you and the "reach around" bunch go ahead a punch the spam, clueless, and nuts "judge it" buttons as if I give a damm.
You constantly lie and misrepresent what people post. Kinda remind me of that other degenerate "Honest G" from years ago. You should be thanking IAE for even giving you the time of day, because frankly I wouldnt waste my time with a liar like you.

Since: Jan 11

Westbury, NY

#1161 Feb 7, 2013
BOOOOO HOOOOOOO ... I'm getting picked on
Truce Bane wrote:
<quoted text>
No what it means is I have a life outside of Topix and other obligations and could give two shats about conversing with self important dishonest lowlife wannabe internet bullies who fold like little school girls if they tried their bullying tactics in real life. I've been following your post for a while now and YOU'RE EXACTLY the Internet bullying type I was describing to IAE. Self important, loser in real life so he/she has to come into an Internet forum and try to bully others and brag about his non existent credentials to feel validated by other lowlife losers that must do the same. Now you and the "reach around" bunch go ahead a punch the spam, clueless, and nuts "judge it" buttons as if I give a damm.
You constantly lie and misrepresent what people post. Kinda remind me of that other degenerate "Honest G" from years ago. You should be thanking IAE for even giving you the time of day, because frankly I wouldnt waste my time with a liar like you.

Since: Jan 11

Westbury, NY

#1162 Feb 7, 2013
Please tell us you don't have access to any type of firearm
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
I like all your plans, and they all have valid points, Kent. Some of your best work here has been logic comedy, so its cool you haven't left entirely.
I enjoy a good insult to people who deserve it, and this hate crew deserves it, but the problem is each shrill wants more than nothing else for the conversation to get reduced only to insults, off topic, nonsense. And for that reason, I'm torn.
The whole "I am a highly educated person but my personality is grade school schtick" is entirely invented to end the conversation, not debate it, or discuss it.
And I especially hate to let cretins win, especially the fake wall street persona... jealous?!?!?!?!?!
Even though they pretty much insult themselves with the bad repetitive jokes, false accusations and faulty logic, while crudely distracting with changing stories, which is really, really, obvious... You know, like claiming a definition and a picture in the dictionary is their target of smear, and thats funny enough to have them rolling on the floor laughing. Man, thats so not funny.
I think I'm drawn to it because it reminds me of cultist from the 70's and 80's who used to hang out at airports and when questioned, they would give you a Unification Church pamphlet and say that is the proof.
9/1 1 Myths dot com..
Unfortunately, these cultist are hidden from their cover being blown by morning television and Oprah. Relying on an appeal to authority that denies basic physics while hiding ignorance behind a fake laugh. In most cases a mere recitation, to an originally flawed explanation, followed by bitchin cat names for a week, then the declaration nobody will debate them.
You're just crazy, Deary, as the Canadian claps.
I dont debate them as a show of anything other than only occasionally pointing out their flawed characters, and to challenge the culture of nonsense and deceit they so joyously espouse, just so some poor unsuspecting sap doesn't get takin in by their lies.
So it's tough not to set them straight from time to time.
The metaphor thing was good stuff.
As always,
Insults Are Easier
Truce Bane

Oklahoma City, OK

#1163 Feb 7, 2013
Timestin wrote:
BOOOOO HOOOOOOO ... I'm getting picked on
<quoted text>
Oh my Lawdy, Radekt, you actually capitalized the first letter of a sentence. I guess that edumacation at Stamfud online college actually paid off. And what... no "?!?!?!?!?" ?!?!?!?!?!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1164 Feb 7, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
I enjoy a good insult to people who deserve it, and this hate crew deserves it
...like people that claim playing poker is the equivalent to a degree in structural engineering.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#1165 Feb 7, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
20 pilots and the parroting of Porkies claim
Yea, Did you ever come up with names for those pilots and how the tests were run or is this just more twoof?

Since: Jan 11

Westbury, NY

#1166 Feb 7, 2013
Why don't you log in with your Dr Zoreazz account Bill ?
Truce Bane wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh my Lawdy, Radekt, you actually capitalized the first letter of a sentence. I guess that edumacation at Stamfud online college actually paid off. And what... no "?!?!?!?!?" ?!?!?!?!?!
Truce Bane

Monroe, LA

#1167 Feb 7, 2013
Timestin wrote:
Why don't you log in with your Dr Zoreazz account Bill ?
<quoted text>
Because I'm neither, Radekt!?!?!????!

Since: Jan 11

Westbury, NY

#1168 Feb 7, 2013
And we'll just take your word for it Poker Boy
Truce Bane wrote:
<quoted text>
Because I'm neither, Radekt!?!?!????!
Truce Bane

Monroe, LA

#1169 Feb 7, 2013
Timestin wrote:
And we'll just take your word for it Poker Boy
<quoted text>
Now when you say " we'll" are you talking about you, Radekt, and the other reach around bunch or "we'll" as in you and your "other" personalities/usernames?!?!?!? !?!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Robert F 538,917
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 6 min Seraphima 599,883
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 8 min It aint necessari... 732,915
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 15 min Dr_Zorderz 257,966
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 15 min JUDEletePete 117,969
"50" BEHEADINGS Next in USA ? (*News) 40 min Monty Anaconda 3
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 43 min Stilgar Fifrawi 226,336
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••