created by: inquiring minds | Jan 4, 2013

Top Stories

17,784 votes

Was 911 an Inside Job

Click on an option to vote

  • YES
  • No
  • Don't know
  • Possibly
Comments
861 - 880 of 4,996 Comments Last updated Jul 8, 2014
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#919
Feb 4, 2013
 
9/11 Commission + NIST + science = mutually exclusive
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#920
Feb 4, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes, I just imagined them the same way I imagined NIST didn't follow the scientific method and check for any explosive residue in its fraudulent investigation that started after most of the evidence had already been destroyed that NIST officials themselves testified before congress that they actually needed to keep.
My imagination also has concocted evidence of firefighters stating they saw molten steel, heard explosions, and NIST disregarded this completely because they claim to have visually inspected it at various landfills before it was destroyed without being documented. I only imagine thats called destruction of a crime scene.
http://youtu.be/nwgkA5rlwKI
I just imagined NIST did not follow the guidelines of NFPA 921, that states any investigation should investigate accelerants and incendiaries if the results were global collapse. But I only imagined NIST disregarded this completely and I must be paranoid for wanting them to adhere to it.
Boy, that imagination of mine sure does play tricks on scientists that generate peer reviewed papers such as this that found thermate in the recovered dust from WTC that NIST itself refused to even check for.
http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/arti...
Yes, Im just a crazy guy who imagines this research found energetic material that did not dissolve in solvents the way paint would.
I only imagined Building 7 falling at free fall acceleration during it's initial collapse by trusting my own eyes when watching the roof fall straight down.
http://youtu.be/rVCDpL4Ax7I
Yep, my mind just imagines these things and cant be as sane and smart as you who thinks regardless of what evidence is found it can't be true because your ideology and religion of state superiority indoctrinates you to believe it's impossible, regardless of facts.
But I imagine you'll keep worshipping your "State God" by believing with blind faith while hypocritically condemning others "religions".
Im only imagining that claiming illegal
controlled demolitions require permits is the most ignorant thing ever claimed.
I am only imagining idiots laugh a lot, as I imagine you will always prescribe to the notion that
Insults Are Easier
My my Insults, you have a Very active imagination !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#921
Feb 4, 2013
 
Klink wrote:
<quoted text>
WTC designer speaks
www.metacafe.com/watch/338148/wtc_designer_sp...
Two bad the head the person who conducted and wrote the report, Leslie Robertson says the towers were not designed to handle the resulting fire, but they did survive the impact as per the video, they fell much latter.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#922
Feb 4, 2013
 
Leo Tolstoy wrote:
<quoted text>
A purely gravity driven collapse at near free fall acceleration?
Absolutely impossible!
Show your math, why would near free-fall be impossible, let's see, because the claim used to be freefall was what proved if to be a controlled demolition, anything less did not, then the twoofers found out it was not freefall and changed their tune.
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#923
Feb 4, 2013
 
This video tracks the motion of the NW corner of Building 7 of the World Trade Center on 9/11 2001. For a period of ~2.5 seconds.

This means it was falling through itself for over 100 feet with zero resistance, an impossibility in any natural scenario.

This period of freefall is solid evidence that explosives had to be used to bring the building down.

In the final draft for public comment (August 2008) NIST denied that WTC7 fell at freefall.

In the final report in Nov 2008 they reversed themselves and admitted freefall, but denied its obvious significance.
-----
[The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements.

I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page: http://www.911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-F... . I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference for other questions that arise as well.]
----------
My new DVD: "9/11 Analysis" is now out. Go to:

http://www.911speakout.org .

This video here:
&fe ature=youtu.be
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#925
Feb 4, 2013
 
sorry charlie and friends = handwaving away relevant information at its finest.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#926
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
This video tracks the motion of the NW corner of Building 7 of the World Trade Center on 9/11 2001. For a period of ~2.5 seconds.
This means it was falling through itself for over 100 feet with zero resistance, an impossibility in any natural scenario.
Why is it impossible, chopping the total time and building up looking for any freefall is pointless and proves nothing, most parts falling at some point hit open air and possibly freefall till it hit resistance.

For all resistance to be removed by Controlled Demolition the building would have been in free-fall the whole way down, by saying it was just a corner for a few seconds would mean most of the building hit resistance so columns were NOT severed in a Controled Demolition.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#927
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
Eyewitness: Interviews with 9/11 responders
by TomFontaine December 30, 2012 11:00 AM EST
LMFAO!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#928
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
Eyewitness: Interviews with 9/11 responders
by TomFontaine December 30, 2012 11:00 AM EST
1. Some of the supposed hijackers turned up alive after 911. Mistaken identity was said. Then why are the mistakes still on the pictures lineup?
Yes, A person with the same name was pictured, the picture was changed, did you want them to just make up a new name for him moobs?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#929
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
Eyewitness: Interviews with 9/11 responders
by TomFontaine December 30, 2012 11:00 AM EST
3. No 757 wreckage at the Pentagon. at least none to speak of.
So it's none or none you want to speak off, LMFAO!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#930
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
3. No 757 wreckage at the Pentagon. at least none to speak of.
4. Same goes for flight 93
95 percent of Untied 93 was recovered

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/24/inv.pen...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#931
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
Eyewitness: Interviews with 9/11 responders
by TomFontaine December 30, 2012 11:00 AM EST
5. Reason to go to war.... was that OBL was behind 911...Later it was said he was not wanted for 911.
A: He was always wanted.

B: Let me get this right, a false flag was set up to go to war with Iraq but the false flag included no (fake) involvement by Iraqi's?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#932
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
Eyewitness: Interviews with 9/11 responders
by TomFontaine December 30, 2012 11:00 AM EST
6. Bldg 7 falls into its own footprint because of a few small fires.
That's a few small fires?

http://www.debunking911.com/WTC7_Smoke.jpg
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#933
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Guise Faux wrote:
Eyewitness: Interviews with 9/11 responders
by TomFontaine December 30, 2012 11:00 AM EST
8. Explosions heard by many, before and during the collapse, from sub level areas
Yea, Willie said that was from the jet fuel racing down the elevator shaft and igniting, depending on the day you ask him.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#934
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
9. Operation Northwoods was a written confession detailing that the govt. is fully capable of engaging a 911 scenario.
Actually since it was rejected it is no proof of engagement at all MOOBS!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#935
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
10. Israels Mossad had people on the ground in NY celebrating the crash while filming it.
Prove they were Mossad or had foreknowledge.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#936
Feb 4, 2013
 
Guise Faux wrote:
13. What was burning in the sub level areas of the WTC for months after the collapse? Molten metals have to have a relative heat source to retain the state of molten, or even cherry red.
Since thermie/thermate combusts in a few minutes then is expended what would the above even prove?

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#937
Feb 4, 2013
 
As we got to the third floor of the B stairway, we forced open an elevator door which was burnt on all three sides. The only thing that was remaining was the hoistway door. And inside the elevator were about I didnít recognize them initially, but a guy from 1 Truck said oh my God, those are people. They were pretty incinerated. And I remember the overpowering smell of kerosene. Thatís when Lieutenant Foti said oh, thatís the jet fuel. I remember it smelled like if youíre camping and you drop a kerosene lamp.- FDNY Firefighter Peter Blaich

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#938
Feb 4, 2013
 
After I hooked up, I went into the lobby of the north tower and I saw the command post being set up there. I noticed some people on the floor that were badly burned. One man was deceased, and there was a woman there that was very badly burned. - FDNY Firefighter John Ottrando

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#939
Feb 4, 2013
 
The elevators looked like they were on fire in the lobby. There wasn't smoke coming out of them, but it looked like they all bubbled up and everything and there had been a fire in there. - FDNY Firefighter Kevin Murray

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min June VanDerMark 538,620
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 5 min macumazahn 732,538
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 8 min shyam 5,290
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 18 min ChristineM 226,167
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 28 min Clearwater 173,259
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 31 min WasteWater 257,770
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 43 min WasteWater 94,611
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr Epiphany2 599,750
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••