Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#839 Feb 2, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
If you were to supply me with better material, it might take a bit more effort on my part, but this...
Yes, You claim remote control, A Aviation Maintenance Technician/Avionics Technician explains why it is impossible in a 25 technical paper with schematics why it cant be done AND THAT IS YOUR REBUTTAL, LMFAO!

http://www.911myths.com/Remote_Takeover.pdf
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#840 Feb 2, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
So what you are saying is that barium nitrate is NOT an essential ingredient of thermite. At all.
Thanks, I was aware of that.
LMFAO ...

Thermate (which is what was claimed to be found) combines aluminum/iron oxide (thermite) with barium nitrate (29%).

Thanks for playing!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#841 Feb 2, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that the east penthouse fell a few seconds prior to the roof-line *IN NO WAY* undermines the building implosion scenario. In fact it demonstrates a standard implosion technique: destroy the core just prior to the perimeter destruction and the building perimeter will pull inward into its own footprint (if all goes well). In the case of WTC-7, we see a masterpiece of building implosion.
You claimed freefall, no freefall, way to change the subject, do you think the Federal Reserve is audited?
Bill

Austin, TX

#842 Feb 2, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
Explain the lack of Barium!
<quoted text>
Barium is not needed in a thermite reaction. Good enough for you?
Bill

Austin, TX

#843 Feb 2, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, You claim remote control, A Aviation Maintenance Technician/Avionics Technician explains why it is impossible in a 25 technical paper with schematics why it cant be done AND THAT IS YOUR REBUTTAL, LMFAO!
http://www.911myths.com/Remote_Takeover.pdf
I claim pre-planned demolition of the buildings is a proven fact. And demolition is 100%*INCOMPATIBLE* with the official 9/11 fairy tale. Also, the vast majority of fatalities were a direct result of the demolitions. The plane impacts were an attempt to establish a spectacular deceptive cause for the building destruction, but they were clearly not responsible.
Bill

Austin, TX

#844 Feb 2, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO ...
Thermate (which is what was claimed to be found) combines aluminum/iron oxide (thermite) with barium nitrate (29%).
Thanks for playing!
Where do I make claims about "thermate"?

YOU are the one making false claims about the essential composition of *thermite*.
Bill

Austin, TX

#845 Feb 2, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You claimed freefall, no freefall, way to change the subject, do you think the Federal Reserve is audited?
My claim if free-fall descent of the roof-line has been consistent throughout, and it is incompatible with the government's fairy tale. It is 100% compatible with carefully planned demolition.

Are YOU trying to change the subject?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#846 Feb 2, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
Where do I make claims about "thermate"?
YOU are the one making false claims about the essential composition of *thermite*.
That was what was claimed to have been found.

In summary, red/gray chips with the same morphological characteristics, elemental spectra and magnetic attraction as those shown in Harrit et al.1 were found in WTC dust samples from four different locations than those examined by Harrit, et al.1 The gray side is consistent with carbon steel. The red side contains the elements: C, O, Al, Si, and Fe with small amounts of other elements such as Ti and Ca. Based on the infrared absorption (FTIR) data, the C/O matrix material is an epoxy resin. Based on the optical and electron microscopy data, the Fe/O particles are an iron oxide pigment consisting of crystalline grains in the 100-200 nm range and the Al/Si particles are kaolin clay plates that are less than a micrometer thick. There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles detected by PLM, SEM-EDS, or TEM-SAED-EDS, during the analyses of the red layers in their original form or after sample preparation by ashing, thin sectioning or following MEK treatment.

http://aneta.org/911experiments_com/millette/...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#847 Feb 2, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
My claim if free-fall descent of the roof-line has been consistent throughout, and it is incompatible with the government's fairy tale. It is 100% compatible with carefully planned demolition.
Are YOU trying to change the subject?
You don't count part of the building decent in calling it freefall. If all columns were severed at the same time the penthouse would not have collapsed through the roof first.

Any thoughts on remote controlled planes and a those comments by an expert?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#848 Feb 2, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
I claim pre-planned demolition of the buildings is a proven fact. And demolition is 100%*INCOMPATIBLE* with the official 9/11 fairy tale. Also, the vast majority of fatalities were a direct result of the demolitions. The plane impacts were an attempt to establish a spectacular deceptive cause for the building destruction, but they were clearly not responsible.
And the planes were remote controlled and you were wrong!

http://www.911myths.com/Remote_Takeover.pdf
Mel Amine

San Anselmo, CA

#849 Feb 2, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You claimed freefall, no freefall, way to change the subject, do you think the Federal Reserve is audited?
Sure the Fed says they audit themselves but they never publish the results for anyone to take a gander at. So what's your point?

The fox is guarding the henhouse in this case.
And that ain't no red herring baby.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#850 Feb 2, 2013
Mel Amine wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure the Fed says they audit themselves but they never publish the results for anyone to take a gander at.
Wrong!

http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/...

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#851 Feb 2, 2013
Dr. S. Shyam Sunder

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sc.D., Structural Engineering, 1981

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, S.M., Civil Engineering, 1979

Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, B. Tech.,(Honors), Civil Engineering, 1977

Dr. John L. Gross


Cornell University, Ph.D., Civil (Structural) Engineering, 1980

Cornell University, M.E., Civil (Structural) Engineering, 1970

Cornell University, B.S., Civil (Structural) Engineering, 1969

WHAT ARE YOUR EDUCARIONAL CREDENTIALS BILLY !?!?!?!?
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
That fact that the roof-line of WTC-7 fell symmetrically at free-fall acceleration, as that 10 second video clearly shows, coupled with the attempt by the NIST clowns to deny that FACT that we can all see with report that (they hoped) no one would read.
I want to see these NIST "experts"/co-conspir ators Shyam Sunder and John Gross repeat the following performances and oath:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =mtRlOVymmz8XX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
(I bet John Gross would implode in under 7 seconds...)

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#852 Feb 2, 2013
The debate tactics of Charlie, and virtually all official fairy tale parrots.

Recite debunking sites verbatim.

When questioned, recite them again, clearly showing no understanding of the material.

When questioned again, start talking about something else, while claiming other people are changing the subject.

After losing the argument, claim victory and appear to laugh.

Then have some idiot stop by to claim the credentials of the experts supersede the evidence of bad science.

Then rely on the fact that

Insults Are Easier

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#853 Feb 2, 2013
and then we have You the Biggest Imbecile on Topix , and your parents said you would never amount to anything
Insults Are Easier wrote:
The debate tactics of Charlie, and virtually all official fairy tale parrots.
Recite debunking sites verbatim.
When questioned, recite them again, clearly showing no understanding of the material.
When questioned again, start talking about something else, while claiming other people are changing the subject.
After losing the argument, claim victory and appear to laugh.
Then have some idiot stop by to claim the credentials of the experts supersede the evidence of bad science.
Then rely on the fact that
Insults Are Easier
Guise Faux

San Anselmo, CA

#854 Feb 2, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
Dr. S. Shyam Sunder
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sc.D., Structural Engineering, 1981
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, S.M., Civil Engineering, 1979
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, B. Tech.,(Honors), Civil Engineering, 1977
Dr. John L. Gross
Cornell University, Ph.D., Civil (Structural) Engineering, 1980
Cornell University, M.E., Civil (Structural) Engineering, 1970
Cornell University, B.S., Civil (Structural) Engineering, 1969
**********
WHAT ARE YOUR EDUCARIONAL CREDENTIALS BILLY !?!?!?!?
**********
<quoted text>
Pissface (aka golden showers) you certainly didn't get through 5th grade spelling.

Oh pissface get someone to give you another golden shower OK
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#855 Feb 2, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
The debate tactics of Charlie, and virtually all official fairy tale parrots.
Recite debunking sites verbatim.
LOL, This from the guy who claims he does not need science to determine cause and effect because he is good at reading a poker face.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#856 Feb 2, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>LOL, This from the guy who claims he does not need science to determine cause and effect because he is good at reading a poker face.
Really, you appear to be incapable of honesty or comprehension.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
And playing poker doesn't help me analyze science, it helps me analyze people. My logic helps me analyze science.
Insanity is doing the same thing while expecting different results, while claiming to be a person with advanced education as you talk and act as a child.

The official story is for children and you represent it well.

But hey,

Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#857 Feb 2, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Really, you appear to be incapable of honesty or comprehension.
LOL, How would you know, you can't see my poker face!

PS: Show me one place I have been dishonest, I have never, ever claimed you had a functioning IQ!

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#858 Feb 2, 2013
just let us know when you get accepted to Cornell or MIT ... AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHAAA AAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAH! !!
Guise Faux wrote:
<quoted text>
Pissface (aka golden showers) you certainly didn't get through 5th grade spelling.
Oh pissface get someone to give you another golden shower OK

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min Catcher1 100,394
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min New Age Spiritual... 670,303
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 23 min New Age Spiritual... 980,149
News Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 1 hr shkreli zionism 121,925
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 2 hr waaasssuuup 445,655
News The 'Fake News' Con: A Case Study 4 hr Libhater 58
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 4 hr 2 tim 2 15 6,146
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 10 hr Pegasus 286,455
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 23 hr WildWeirdWillie 184,287
More from around the web