Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#5284 Aug 5, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
WTC 7 had not been hit by a plane, so it was apparently the first steel-framed high-rise building in the known universe to have collapsed because of fire alone.

New York Times writer James Glanz quoted a structural engineer as saying:“[W]ithin the structural engineering community,[WTC 7] is considered to be much more important to understand [than the Twin Towers],” because engineers had no answer to the question,“why did 7 come down?”[2]

From a purely scientific perspective, of course, there would have been an obvious answer.

Scientists, presupposing the regularity of nature, operate on the principle that like effects generally imply like causes.

Scientists are, therefore, loathe to posit unprecedented causes for common phenomena. By 9/11, the collapse of steel-framed high-rises had become a rather common phenomenon, which most Americans had seen on television.

And in every one of these cases, the building had been brought down by explosives in the process known as controlled demolition.

From a scientific perspective, therefore, the obvious assumption would have been that WTC 7 came down because explosives had been used to remove its steel supports.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-c...

Huh Eh !
And unnamed structural engineers all over the world agree too right oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS?

Oh but those same engineers still use SFRM protection against fire in their designs...why would that be again?

Oh right, because fire can destroy structures.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5285 Aug 8, 2013
With regard to the question of science: Far from being supported by good science, NIST’s report repeatedly makes its case by resorting to scientific fraud.

Before going into details, let me point out that, if NIST did engage in fraudulent science, this would not be particularly surprising.

NIST is an agency of the US Department of Commerce. During the years it was writing its World Trade Center reports, therefore, it was an agency of the Bush-Cheney administration.

In 2004, the Union of Concerned Scientists put out a document charging this administration with “distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends.” By the end of the Bush administration, this document had been signed by over 15,000 scientists, including 52 Nobel Laureates and 63 recipients of the National Medal of Science.[10]

Moreover, a scientist who formerly worked for NIST has reported that it has been “fully hijacked from the scientific into the political realm,” with the result that scientists working for NIST “lost [their] scientific independence, and became little more than ‘hired guns.’”11

Referring in particular to NIST’s work on the World Trade Center, he said everything had to be approved by the Department of Commerce, the National Security Agency, and the Office of Management and Budget—“an arm of the Executive Office of the President,” which “had a policy person specifically delegated to provide oversight on [NIST’s] work.”[12]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-c...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5286 Aug 14, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
With regard to the question of science: Far from being supported by good science, NIST’s report repeatedly makes its case by resorting to scientific fraud.
Before going into details, let me point out that, if NIST did engage in fraudulent science, this would not be particularly surprising.
NIST is an agency of the US Department of Commerce. During the years it was writing its World Trade Center reports, therefore, it was an agency of the Bush-Cheney administration.
In 2004, the Union of Concerned Scientists put out a document charging this administration with “distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends.” By the end of the Bush administration, this document had been signed by over 15,000 scientists, including 52 Nobel Laureates and 63 recipients of the National Medal of Science.[10]
Moreover, a scientist who formerly worked for NIST has reported that it has been “fully hijacked from the scientific into the political realm,” with the result that scientists working for NIST “lost [their] scientific independence, and became little more than ‘hired guns.’”11
Referring in particular to NIST’s work on the World Trade Center, he said everything had to be approved by the Department of Commerce, the National Security Agency, and the Office of Management and Budget—“an arm of the Executive Office of the President,” which “had a policy person specifically delegated to provide oversight on [NIST’s] work.”[12]
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-c...
Proves nothing.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5287 Aug 14, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Proves nothing.
To an idiot.

Insults Are Easier

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5288 Aug 15, 2013
Nothing posted on this site "proves" anything.

The bwunkers have no proof except the "good faith" of the govie.

Can you say false flag?

HUH Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#5289 Aug 15, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Nothing posted on this site "proves" anything.

The bwunkers have no proof except the "good faith" of the govie.

Can you say false flag?

HUH Eh !
The US government invented physics and chemistry?

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

Tell us the one where you threw the match into a can of gas and it didn't light on fire so jets crashing at +400 mph can't result in fire balls!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5290 Aug 15, 2013
Continuous Explosions Leveled the Towers

The towers' destruction cannot be accurately described without the word "explosion."

Huge clouds billowed out from the towers, starting around the crash zones, and grew rapidly as they consumed each tower, converting them to fine powder and fragments of steel, and depositing the bulk of the remains outside of each tower's footprint in a radial pattern.

Incredibly, this stark reality has and continues to be so consistently and widely denied in government, media, industry, and academia, that few Americans have even entertained the idea that the towers were intentionally demolished.

One of the key underpinnings of that denial is the fact that the explosions were continuous, extending for the entire 15-second duration of each tower's collapse.

Although witnesses describe loud pops at their onsets, the extended duration and loud roar of the explosions apparently prevented most people from thinking of them as explosions.

Also, the repeated description of the events as collapses by the broadcast networks must have had a powerful effect in shaping people's understanding of them, particularly given the heightened state of suggestibility induced by the profound state of shock and disbelief most of them were in.

http://911review.com/attack/wtc/explosions.ht...

This'll get pig excited? 15 seconds ha ha ha ha ha.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5291 Aug 15, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
To an idiot.
Insults Are Easier
Proves something to mindless trolls.... lmao

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5292 Aug 15, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Continuous Explosions Leveled the Towers
The towers' destruction cannot be accurately described without the word "explosion."
Huge clouds billowed out from the towers, starting around the crash zones, and grew rapidly as they consumed each tower, converting them to fine powder and fragments of steel, and depositing the bulk of the remains outside of each tower's footprint in a radial pattern.
Incredibly, this stark reality has and continues to be so consistently and widely denied in government, media, industry, and academia, that few Americans have even entertained the idea that the towers were intentionally demolished.
One of the key underpinnings of that denial is the fact that the explosions were continuous, extending for the entire 15-second duration of each tower's collapse.
Although witnesses describe loud pops at their onsets, the extended duration and loud roar of the explosions apparently prevented most people from thinking of them as explosions.
Also, the repeated description of the events as collapses by the broadcast networks must have had a powerful effect in shaping people's understanding of them, particularly given the heightened state of suggestibility induced by the profound state of shock and disbelief most of them were in.
http://911review.com/attack/wtc/explosions.ht...
This'll get pig excited? 15 seconds ha ha ha ha ha.
nonsense

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#5293 Aug 16, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Continuous Explosions Leveled the Towers

The towers' destruction cannot be accurately described without the word "explosion."

Huge clouds billowed out from the towers, starting around the crash zones, and grew rapidly as they consumed each tower, converting them to fine powder and fragments of steel, and depositing the bulk of the remains outside of each tower's footprint in a radial pattern.

Incredibly, this stark reality has and continues to be so consistently and widely denied in government, media, industry, and academia, that few Americans have even entertained the idea that the towers were intentionally demolished.

One of the key underpinnings of that denial is the fact that the explosions were continuous, extending for the entire 15-second duration of each tower's collapse.

Although witnesses describe loud pops at their onsets, the extended duration and loud roar of the explosions apparently prevented most people from thinking of them as explosions.

Also, the repeated description of the events as collapses by the broadcast networks must have had a powerful effect in shaping people's understanding of them, particularly given the heightened state of suggestibility induced by the profound state of shock and disbelief most of them were in.

http://911review.com/attack/wtc/explosions.ht...

This'll get pig excited? 15 seconds ha ha ha ha ha.
*yawn*
Guest

Cedartown, GA

#5294 Aug 16, 2013
911 was an inside handjob.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5295 Aug 16, 2013
The truth puts the pig to sleep. LOL

Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#5296 Aug 16, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The truth puts the pig to sleep. LOL

Huh Eh !
Well you'd have to provide something truthful in order to determine that oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

To date, you never have!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5297 Aug 16, 2013
The pig knows his name. pigpork pie.

Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5300 Aug 23, 2013
pork pig pie Huh eh !
WeTasteWar

Charleston, WV

#5301 Aug 25, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
nonsense
shhh...I hear crickets
Porkie Path

Charleston, WV

#5302 Aug 25, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
*yawn*
shhh...listen...do you hear them?
&no redirect=1
the snoring pig

Charleston, WV

#5303 Aug 25, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The truth puts the pig to sleep. LOL
Huh Eh !
it sure does!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5304 Aug 27, 2013
WeTasteWar wrote:
<quoted text>
shhh...I hear crickets
Naw! The frogs ate them.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5305 Aug 27, 2013
I could show you how WasteWater enjoys lying, but its obvious in her posts...

Coups, smears, conspiracies... The American way!

http://youtu.be/rJjucYRLamU

Liberty For No One

http://youtu.be/jSgyDq_Q8J8

Insults Are Easier

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min Catcher1 100,394
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min New Age Spiritual... 670,303
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 23 min New Age Spiritual... 980,149
News Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 1 hr shkreli zionism 121,925
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 2 hr waaasssuuup 445,655
News The 'Fake News' Con: A Case Study 4 hr Libhater 58
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 4 hr 2 tim 2 15 6,146
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 10 hr Pegasus 286,455
More from around the web