Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,789 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5267 Jun 27, 2013
And you bwunkers wonder why you are made fun of post after post?

LOSERS

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5268 Jun 27, 2013
All you cornholers can marry one another now. It's legal. LOL

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#5269 Jun 27, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
All you cornholers can marry one another now. It's legal. LOL
You first.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5270 Jun 27, 2013
LuLu Ford wrote:
No. 9/11 was not an inside jobity job job.
No, it sure wasn't.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5271 Jun 27, 2013
No You LuLu pig & sorry charlie said you're a cornholer.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5272 Jun 27, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
No You LuLu pig & sorry charlie said you're a cornholer.
keep stroking
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#5273 Jun 27, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Debwunkers Diminutive Disclaimer
Debwunkers Debate Declaration Denied Dutifully Defending Disinformation, Deriding, Degrading, Deliberately Deceiving, Denouncing Damaging Data, Demanding Demonstration of Documented Data to Debwunk, Deny and Desperately Demand Debate Despite Decisive Defeat Deliberately Distracting Defensive Deterrent
This is strange.
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe my mind is misunderstood , meaning , molecuraly miniscule morons might misconceive my motives !Maintaining my marijuana moon mission makes me much more mellow,mitigated,mild mannered,and must mention munchies!
Mental midgets make up masses, masters move massive mountains.You may wanna move minnie mouse!
http://www.topix.com/forum/health/smoking/TGK...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#5275 Jun 28, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>keep stroking
What's funny is he's not even good at mental masterbation yet it's all he does when he's not mindlessly spamming stupid.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5276 Jun 28, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
What's funny is he's not even good at mental masterbation yet it's all he does when he's not mindlessly spamming stupid.
Of course.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#5277 Jun 29, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
No You LuLu pig & sorry charlie said you're a cornholer.
Hey hun? Would you like me to do you with my big black strap-on?
Julio

Faro, Portugal

#5278 Jun 30, 2013
The New York and Washington attacks were self inflicted, obviously. Now, Americans are this deception to justify devastating criminal wars.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5279 Jul 1, 2013
Julio wrote:
The New York and Washington attacks were self inflicted, obviously. Now, Americans are this deception to justify devastating criminal wars.
Right On Dewd ! Huh Eh !
cornholed charlie

Mill Valley, CA

#5281 Jul 16, 2013
nothing to dismiss eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5282 Aug 4, 2013
WTC 7 had not been hit by a plane, so it was apparently the first steel-framed high-rise building in the known universe to have collapsed because of fire alone.

New York Times writer James Glanz quoted a structural engineer as saying:“[W]ithin the structural engineering community,[WTC 7] is considered to be much more important to understand [than the Twin Towers],” because engineers had no answer to the question,“why did 7 come down?”[2]

From a purely scientific perspective, of course, there would have been an obvious answer.

Scientists, presupposing the regularity of nature, operate on the principle that like effects generally imply like causes.

Scientists are, therefore, loathe to posit unprecedented causes for common phenomena. By 9/11, the collapse of steel-framed high-rises had become a rather common phenomenon, which most Americans had seen on television.

And in every one of these cases, the building had been brought down by explosives in the process known as controlled demolition.

From a scientific perspective, therefore, the obvious assumption would have been that WTC 7 came down because explosives had been used to remove its steel supports.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-c...

Huh Eh !

“Bright Waters House ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#5283 Aug 5, 2013
"Any detonation of explosives within WTC 7 would have been detected by multiple seismographs monitoring ground vibration in the general area. No such telltale “spike” or vibratory anomaly was recorded by any monitoring instrument." – Brent Blanchard of Protec Field Monitoring Systems

YOU ARE A CLUELESS MORON ZOREASS !!!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
WTC 7 had not been hit by a plane, so it was apparently the first steel-framed high-rise building in the known universe to have collapsed because of fire alone.
New York Times writer James Glanz quoted a structural engineer as saying:“[W]ithin the structural engineering community,[WTC 7] is considered to be much more important to understand [than the Twin Towers],” because engineers had no answer to the question,“why did 7 come down?”[2]
From a purely scientific perspective, of course, there would have been an obvious answer.
Scientists, presupposing the regularity of nature, operate on the principle that like effects generally imply like causes.
Scientists are, therefore, loathe to posit unprecedented causes for common phenomena. By 9/11, the collapse of steel-framed high-rises had become a rather common phenomenon, which most Americans had seen on television.
And in every one of these cases, the building had been brought down by explosives in the process known as controlled demolition.
From a scientific perspective, therefore, the obvious assumption would have been that WTC 7 came down because explosives had been used to remove its steel supports.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-c...
Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#5284 Aug 5, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
WTC 7 had not been hit by a plane, so it was apparently the first steel-framed high-rise building in the known universe to have collapsed because of fire alone.

New York Times writer James Glanz quoted a structural engineer as saying:“[W]ithin the structural engineering community,[WTC 7] is considered to be much more important to understand [than the Twin Towers],” because engineers had no answer to the question,“why did 7 come down?”[2]

From a purely scientific perspective, of course, there would have been an obvious answer.

Scientists, presupposing the regularity of nature, operate on the principle that like effects generally imply like causes.

Scientists are, therefore, loathe to posit unprecedented causes for common phenomena. By 9/11, the collapse of steel-framed high-rises had become a rather common phenomenon, which most Americans had seen on television.

And in every one of these cases, the building had been brought down by explosives in the process known as controlled demolition.

From a scientific perspective, therefore, the obvious assumption would have been that WTC 7 came down because explosives had been used to remove its steel supports.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-c...

Huh Eh !
And unnamed structural engineers all over the world agree too right oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS?

Oh but those same engineers still use SFRM protection against fire in their designs...why would that be again?

Oh right, because fire can destroy structures.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5285 Aug 8, 2013
With regard to the question of science: Far from being supported by good science, NIST’s report repeatedly makes its case by resorting to scientific fraud.

Before going into details, let me point out that, if NIST did engage in fraudulent science, this would not be particularly surprising.

NIST is an agency of the US Department of Commerce. During the years it was writing its World Trade Center reports, therefore, it was an agency of the Bush-Cheney administration.

In 2004, the Union of Concerned Scientists put out a document charging this administration with “distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends.” By the end of the Bush administration, this document had been signed by over 15,000 scientists, including 52 Nobel Laureates and 63 recipients of the National Medal of Science.[10]

Moreover, a scientist who formerly worked for NIST has reported that it has been “fully hijacked from the scientific into the political realm,” with the result that scientists working for NIST “lost [their] scientific independence, and became little more than ‘hired guns.’”11

Referring in particular to NIST’s work on the World Trade Center, he said everything had to be approved by the Department of Commerce, the National Security Agency, and the Office of Management and Budget—“an arm of the Executive Office of the President,” which “had a policy person specifically delegated to provide oversight on [NIST’s] work.”[12]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-c...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#5286 Aug 14, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
With regard to the question of science: Far from being supported by good science, NIST’s report repeatedly makes its case by resorting to scientific fraud.
Before going into details, let me point out that, if NIST did engage in fraudulent science, this would not be particularly surprising.
NIST is an agency of the US Department of Commerce. During the years it was writing its World Trade Center reports, therefore, it was an agency of the Bush-Cheney administration.
In 2004, the Union of Concerned Scientists put out a document charging this administration with “distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends.” By the end of the Bush administration, this document had been signed by over 15,000 scientists, including 52 Nobel Laureates and 63 recipients of the National Medal of Science.[10]
Moreover, a scientist who formerly worked for NIST has reported that it has been “fully hijacked from the scientific into the political realm,” with the result that scientists working for NIST “lost [their] scientific independence, and became little more than ‘hired guns.’”11
Referring in particular to NIST’s work on the World Trade Center, he said everything had to be approved by the Department of Commerce, the National Security Agency, and the Office of Management and Budget—“an arm of the Executive Office of the President,” which “had a policy person specifically delegated to provide oversight on [NIST’s] work.”[12]
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-c...
Proves nothing.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5287 Aug 14, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Proves nothing.
To an idiot.

Insults Are Easier

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#5288 Aug 15, 2013
Nothing posted on this site "proves" anything.

The bwunkers have no proof except the "good faith" of the govie.

Can you say false flag?

HUH Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min Hidingfromyou 817,643
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min Christina La Vey 579,128
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 36 min Pegasus 270,136
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 1 hr dollarsbill 1,988
Destroying Colored People In America And Across... 1 hr combas 12
ye olde village pub (Jun '07) 1 hr Ruby88 53,327
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr Student 39,960
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr Serah 609,863
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 9 hr transdem0n 176,208
More from around the web