Any proof of that or 20 pilots who could not fly Doc?<quoted text>
Because reconstruction of an external explosion would implicate the US Navy and the govie don't want that can of worms. Can you say "criminal involvement" !?!?!?!?!?
Think a little before you spout off bwunker.
It's your man that says that it contained a high degree of silicone.
And yet why won't he name the so called scientist that stated that the residue is rocket fuel and what rocket fuel has silicone as a major component.
Also why is there no evidence on reconstruction of an external explosion?