Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#446 Jan 24, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
and of course you'll just ignore the guys a Lamont Doherty and Protec who say there were no seismic signatures of explosions prior to collpase ..... because being a misinformed dolt is so much easier
<quoted text>
The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001,
recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources.
.
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
.
First of all, we show the contradictions in the official explanation between the
seismic data and the timing of the events.
.
Then we point out that it is strange that identical events (percussions of identical towers on the one hand, and collapses of identical towers on the other hand) at the same location would have generated seismic sources of different magnitudes.
.
We demonstrate that only strong explosives could be the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low frequencies. According to the nature of the recorded waves (body and surface waves), we can propose a location of each explosive source.
.
According to the presence of shear waves or the presence of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean or a subaerial explosion. The magnitude of an aerial explosion is insufficient to provide seismic waves at 34 km.
.
The witnesses and video observation confirm our conclusions of subaerial explosions close to the times of aircraft impacts on WTC1 and WTC2, a strong subterranean explosion closely correlated with the WTC1 collapse, and subaerial explosions closely correlated with the WTC2 and WTC7 collapses, WTC7 not having
been hit by a plane.
.
As a consequence, we draw the conclusion that the three buildings
were demolished by a controlled process.
.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/...
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah aha ha ah
.
That's As Good As Yours Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#447 Jan 24, 2013
Data from the Palisades, NY recording station, located 34 km north-north-east of Manhattan, published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), provide the most detailed seismic waveforms for analysis, particularly for the determination of the locations (surface or underground) and timing of the events that created the seismic waves.
.
Some authors have been puzzled in their analysis of signals recorded for the events at the World Trade Center, as the contradictions are significant.
.
They are particularly intrigued by the presence of seismic "peaks" before the collapses.(See MacQueen, 2009).
.
This text focuses on the study of the seismic signals from Palisades.
.
The new interpretation presented here renders the assertions of the seismic analysis of the events at the WTC, as presented by the government in the NIST and other reports, null and void.
.
On the contrary, all the documented evidence points to explosions as the source of the recorded
seismic signals.
.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/...
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah aha ha ha aha ahahha
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#449 Jan 24, 2013
more copy $ paste from Dr Sock to an article by a guy who knew his paper was so weak he didn't dare have it peer reviewed in a credible magazine like The Journal Of Geology
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001,
recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources.
.
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
.
First of all, we show the contradictions in the official explanation between the
seismic data and the timing of the events.
.
Then we point out that it is strange that identical events (percussions of identical towers on the one hand, and collapses of identical towers on the other hand) at the same location would have generated seismic sources of different magnitudes.
.
We demonstrate that only strong explosives could be the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low frequencies. According to the nature of the recorded waves (body and surface waves), we can propose a location of each explosive source.
.
According to the presence of shear waves or the presence of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean or a subaerial explosion. The magnitude of an aerial explosion is insufficient to provide seismic waves at 34 km.
.
The witnesses and video observation confirm our conclusions of subaerial explosions close to the times of aircraft impacts on WTC1 and WTC2, a strong subterranean explosion closely correlated with the WTC1 collapse, and subaerial explosions closely correlated with the WTC2 and WTC7 collapses, WTC7 not having
been hit by a plane.
.
As a consequence, we draw the conclusion that the three buildings
were demolished by a controlled process.
.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/...
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah aha ha ah
.
That's As Good As Yours Huh eh !
rider

Gwinn, MI

#450 Jan 24, 2013
the christian mafia http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy -...
rider

Gwinn, MI

#451 Jan 24, 2013

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#452 Jan 24, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
more copy $ paste from Dr Sock to an article by a guy who knew his paper was so weak he didn't dare have it peer reviewed in a credible magazine like The Journal Of Geology
<quoted text>
Who peer reviewed Lamont-Doherty's paper and what scientific journal was it published in?
.
Waaa Haaa Haaa Haaa
.
Sour grapes
.
So what ?
.
Just cause you don't happen to agree with the information and are not able to refute it you resort to trying to dismiss the source and attack the author.
.
And what proof do you have that Dr. André Rousseau did NOT have his paper peer-reviewed ? It was published in a peer reviewed scientific journal that you do not happen to like. Oh dear!
.
Where is your paper? Who peer reviewed it? In what journal was it published?
.
Yawn
.
Next
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah aha ha aha ha aha haa ah
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#453 Jan 24, 2013
You can piss on history but you can't make it go away!
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah ah aha ha ha ha aha ha
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#455 Jan 24, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
more copy $ paste from Dr Sock to an article by a guy who knew his paper was so weak he didn't dare have it peer reviewed in a credible magazine like The Journal Of Geology
<quoted text>
Please post a paper on the seismic activity on 9/11, written by anyone, peer reviewed and published by the Journal of Geology.
.
Not just a website that says it was reviewed and published by the Journal of Geology, but the actual paper from the Journal.
.
You've got nothing better to do RIGHT?
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ah aha ah ah aha aha h
.
So Much For Peer Reviewed Jokes Huh eh !

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#456 Jan 24, 2013
well Won-Young Kim from LDEO published a paper in The Earth Institute
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Who peer reviewed Lamont-Doherty's paper and what scientific journal was it published in?
.
Waaa Haaa Haaa Haaa
.
Sour grapes
.
So what ?
.
Just cause you don't happen to agree with the information and are not able to refute it you resort to trying to dismiss the source and attack the author.
.
And what proof do you have that Dr. André Rousseau did NOT have his paper peer-reviewed ? It was published in a peer reviewed scientific journal that you do not happen to like. Oh dear!
.
Where is your paper? Who peer reviewed it? In what journal was it published?
.
Yawn
.
Next
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ah aha ha aha ha aha haa ah
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#458 Jan 24, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
well Won-Young Kim from LDEO published a paper in The Earth Institute
<quoted text>
Oh wow, you say a paper from Sum Yung Guy got published at the Earth Institute.
.
"He led the effort at Lamont to document and interpret seismic signals from the tragedies of 2001 September 11, finding detections up to 400 km from Ground Zero in Manhattan, and supplying numerous investigators with the times of the two plane impacts in Manhattan and the one crash in Pennsylvania. He also showed that claims of a seismic detection of the attack on the Pentagon were false. His work here has been an important part of the official U.S. government report on what actually happened in this tragedy."
.
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/news-events/won-...
.
Oh look another Win By default trophy winner!
.
He was just one of a bunch of paid government sponsored junk scientists that helped write the 9/11 Ommission Report, and the MIST report.
.
Who can believe him ?
.
LDEO's claim by Sum Yung Guy stands refuted by Dr. André Rousseau.
.
Next
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha aha ha ah ah
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#459 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
The real reason the govt won't allow a new investigation of 911
I'm still waiting for your simple coherent explanation of what you believe actually took place on 9/11. Are you ever going to provide one or am I to assume that you really have no idea what you believe?

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#460 Jan 24, 2013
why didn't Dr. André Rousseau have his paper published in the Earth Institute !?!?!?!? BECAUSE HE COULDN'T !!!!!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh wow, you say a paper from Sum Yung Guy got published at the Earth Institute.
.
"He led the effort at Lamont to document and interpret seismic signals from the tragedies of 2001 September 11, finding detections up to 400 km from Ground Zero in Manhattan, and supplying numerous investigators with the times of the two plane impacts in Manhattan and the one crash in Pennsylvania. He also showed that claims of a seismic detection of the attack on the Pentagon were false. His work here has been an important part of the official U.S. government report on what actually happened in this tragedy."
.
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/news-events/won-...
.
Oh look another Win By default trophy winner!
.
He was just one of a bunch of paid government sponsored junk scientists that helped write the 9/11 Ommission Report, and the MIST report.
.
Who can believe him ?
.
LDEO's claim by Sum Yung Guy stands refuted by Dr. André Rousseau.
.
Next
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha aha ha ah ah
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#461 Jan 24, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
why didn't Dr. André Rousseau have his paper published in the Earth Institute !?!?!?!? BECAUSE HE COULDN'T !!!!!
<quoted text>
For the simple reason that it would have proved the Earth Institute and its phoney co-horts completely WRONG. And they wouldn't like that! They needed to save face like all Sum Yung Guys do.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha aha ha aha ah aha ha aha h
.
That's A Funny One Huh eh !

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#462 Jan 24, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>I'm still waiting for your simple coherent explanation of what you believe actually took place on 9/11. Are you ever going to provide one or am I to assume that you really have no idea what you believe?
What you can't read eh? I explained it here on the first page.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
All my thoughts, opinions and findings on the matter. Do you want me to spell it out for you? Okay I will.....Here.

911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.....
Once again in case you missed that one....
911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.....
What part of 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.....
don't you understand?

Can you hear me now...

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#463 Jan 24, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>I'm still waiting for your simple coherent explanation of what you believe actually took place on 9/11. Are you ever going to provide one or am I to assume that you really have no idea what you believe?
You know what happens when you assume don't you?
.
Ahhh go on and do it.
.
Assume in one hand and spit in the other. See which fills up faster.
.
Jet Fuel ha ahha ah aha hah aha ha ha aha ha ha
.
That's An Easy Assumption Huh eh !

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#464 Jan 24, 2013
9/11 INSIDE JOB.....exposed

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#465 Jan 24, 2013
Won-Young Kim
Adjunct Research Scientist
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Seismology Geology and Tectonophysics

Ph.D.
Uppsala University, Sweden
04/1986

Diploma di Perfezionamento in Fisica
University of Trieste, Italy
12/1980

Master of Science
Yonsei University, Korea
02/1977

Bachelor of Science
Yonsei University, Korea
02/1973

Arthur L. Lerner-Lam
Deputy Director
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

Adjunct Professor
Earth and Environmental Sciences

Ph.D.
UC San Diego
1982

Bachelor of Arts
Princeton
1975

AND THEN

André Rousseau

Retired, former researcher in the French National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS)

Fields: Geophysics, Geology

Degrees and Schools: State Doctor (Docteur d'Etat), Faculty of Sciences, Paris, France

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#467 Jan 24, 2013
OH THATS RIGHT, everybody who doesn't agree with you is a phoney or a shill . The Earth Institute is highly respected by professionals in the filed of geology and earth sciences and you are NOT
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
For the simple reason that it would have proved the Earth Institute and its phoney co-horts completely WRONG. And they wouldn't like that! They needed to save face like all Sum Yung Guys do.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha aha ha aha ah aha ha aha h
.
That's A Funny One Huh eh !

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#468 Jan 24, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>
What you can't read eh? I explained it here on the first page.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
All my thoughts, opinions and findings on the matter. Do you want me to spell it out for you? Okay I will.....Here.
911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.....
Once again in case you missed that one....
911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.....
What part of 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.....
don't you understand?
Can you hear me now...
Sweetie, your little blog is pretty much an unreadable mess of random ideas, not a simple, coherent explanation of what you believe. Screaming thoughts reduced to the depth of meaning of a bumper sticker really doesn't help.

1. Who was responsible?

2. What did they do?

3. How did they accomplish this?

4. Why did they do this?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#469 Jan 24, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:

You know what happens when you assume don't you?
.
Ahhh go on and do it.
.
Assume in one hand and spit in the other. See which fills up faster.
.
Jet Fuel ha ahha ah aha hah aha ha ha aha ha ha
.
That's An Easy Assumption Huh eh !
I've tried three, four times to get a simple, coherent explanation from this person as to what they actually believe happened on 9/11 and all I got was dead air. If I can't get a simple, coherent explanation, that must mean that he/she/it hasn't got a clue.

You seem to be operating on the same wave-length, let's hear your simple coherent explanation of what you believe happened on 9/11,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 16 min Aura Mytha 15,295
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 33 min Buck Crick 983,028
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr Just Think 683,544
Sex 2 hr Supersquirrel69 1
O.J. Simpson is about to be a free man once again. 3 hr Unanimous 7
Venting Against FAKE Americans 5 hr Mint Julep 3
JakeDover34 Add me on snap!! 7 hr Jakedover34 1
More from around the web