Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4641 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Incendiaries, consisting of thermate or thermate possibly with additives such as barium nitrate
EPIC FAIL!

6. Do the chemicals discovered provide a complete thermite signature?

So far the argument seems to be that chemicals A, B, C and D are sometimes associated with thermite; Professor Jones has found them in his samples; therefore, in conjunction with other evidence (video of streams of metal from the WTC etc) this shows thermite may have been used at the World Trade Center. Although this sounds plausible at first, it’s deficient in some important areas.

First, there’s very little information about how the levels of each chemical relate to a typical thermate mix, or what you might expect to find in a post-reaction thermate residue. For example, Professor Jones reports that his “previously molten metal” sample “has (in spots) Aluminum (Al, possibly Al203) Sulfur (S) and Potassium”, along with “abundant Manganese”. Despite thermate having far more aluminum than sulfur, though, Jones sample seems to show more sulfur than aluminum. Perhaps we’re misreading that, maybe the aluminum is consumed in the reaction while most sulfur survives: we don’t know. But it seems to us that figuring out what the relative levels of these elements ought to be, after a thermite reaction, would be useful in proving (or disproving) the theory.

And second, there are other elements that are left out almost entirely. PROFESSOR JONES FINDS SULFUR ON HIS METAL SAMPLES, FOR INSTANCE, BUT DOESN’T REPORT ANY BARIUM NITRATE, EVEN THOUGH THAT’S A MUCH MORE SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE THERMATE MIX. IF THAT CANNOT BE SATISFACTORILY EXPLAINED, THEN SURELY THAT MEANS NO THERMATE, AT LEAST OF THE TYPE PROFESSOR JONES IS DESCRIBING?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4642 May 23, 2013
Of course not. It was a top secret type of thermate developed by NIST and DARPA and other clandestine govie agencies for just such an operation.
.
Whatever type of thermate was used it doesn't change a thing about who and what made the WTC towers explode and fall down.
.
Can you prove it was you who wrote the post under the name Charlie Sheen? If you can't, then it proves you to be an imposter.
.
Sorry charlie you lose again.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4643 May 23, 2013
Because these pyrotechnics are energy-dense, have very specific conditions of ignition and detonation, and leave residues composed of the same elements as building parts; they are well suited to the covert demolition of the Twin Towers.
.
Surprising to most people given popular conceptions about explosives, the energetic materials' characteristics allow them to be deployed throughout the crash zones without risk of premature detonations.
.
The incendiary coatings are unlikely to be ignited by the jetliner crashes because their ignition threshold temperature is so high.
.
But in the event that some are, they will blend in with the hydrocarbon fires.
.
The kicker charges have very specific detonation conditions unlikely to be achieved even by direct impacts of jetliner parts, let alone office fires, and are further protected by encapsulation.
.
Without the very rapid pulse of extreme temperature and pressure required to trigger detonation, the nanocomposite sheets will deflagrate on ignition, and do so slowly enough to appear to burn like office furnishings.
.
See its not Magik at all. Just a carefully thought out plan to make it look like a gravity driven collapse caused by office furniture fires.
.
Clever Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4644 May 23, 2013
Ignition of the incendiaries and detonation of the explosives is controlled through a wireless network using RF repeaters on every floor of the Towers having pyrotechnics.
.
Each of the Stage-2 pyrotechnics units -- the kicker charges and explosive sheets -- has an integrated wireless detonator card that includes a 2-channel RF receiver, an accelerometer, logic, dual wafer batteries, and a micro-detonator.
.
The card is cemented onto the surface of the pyrotechnic's thermitic material so that the detonator is in contact with the material.
.
Similar electronics packages with high-temperature igniters are designed to adhere to the surface of the incendiary coating.
.
The detonator cards are programmed to respond only to RF signals on the network's broadcast frequencies that have specific codes.
.
The cards are manufactured in batches of cards with identical codes, where each batch has a unique code and is destined for a specific floor of one of the Towers.
.
Of a detonator card's two channels, one provides the arm signal, and the other provides a detonation signal.
.
Once the arm signal has been received, the detonator will be triggered by either of two events: rapid acceleration detected by the accelerometer, or receipt of the detonation signal.
.
The detonators are under the wireless control of the RF repeators located on most floors.
.
The repeaters are redundantly controlled from an operations center located a safe distance from the Twin Towers via both high-power directional wireless and an encrypted ethernet channel.
.
The repeaters all broadcast the same signals with ample power to be easily detected by all the detonator receivers on the same floor as well as by most on nearby floors.
.
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/b... #
.
Simple well thought out plan. Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#4645 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Regardless of how thermite materials were installed in the WTC, it is strange that NIST has been so blind to any such possibility.
.
In fact, when reading NIST’s reports on the WTC, and its periodic responses to FAQs from the public, one might get the idea that no one in the NIST organization had ever heard of nano-thermites before.
.
But the truth is, many of the scientists and organizations involved in the NIST WTC investigation were not only well aware of nano-thermites, they actually had considerable connection to, and in some cases expertise in, this exact technology.
.
Here are three of the top ten reasons why nano-thermites, and nano-thermite coatings, should have come to mind quickly for the NIST WTC investigators.
.
NIST was working with LLNL to test and characterize these sol-gel nano-thermites, at least as early as 1999 (Tillotson et al 1999).
.
Forman Williams, the lead engineer on NIST’s advisory committee, and the most prominent engineering expert for Popular Mechanics, is an expert on the deflagration of energetic materials and the “ignition of porous energetic materials”(Margolis and Williams 1996, Telengator et al 1998, Margolis and Williams 1999).
.
Nano-thermites are porous energetic materials. Additionally, Williams’ research partner, Stephen Margolis, has presented at conferences where nano-energetics are the focus (Gordon 1999).
.
Some of Williams’ other colleagues at the University of California San Diego, like David J. Benson, are also experts on nano-thermite materials (Choi et al 2005, Jordan et al 2007).
.
Science Applications International (SAIC) is the DOD and Homeland Security contractor that supplied the largest contingent of non-governmental investigators to the NIST WTC investigation.
.
SAIC has extensive links to nano-thermites, developing and judging nano-thermite research proposals for the military and other military contractors, and developing and formulating nano-thermites directly (Army 2008, DOD 2007).
.
SAIC’s subsidiary Applied Ordnance Technology has done research on the ignition of nanothermites with lasers (Howard et al 2005).
.
In an interesting COINCIDENCE, SAIC was the firm that investigated the 1993 WTC bombing, boasting that --“After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, our blast analyses produced tangible results that helped identify those responsible (SAIC 2004).”
.
And the COINCIDENCES with this company don’t stop there, as SAIC was responsible for evaluating the WTC for terrorism risks in 1986 as well (CRHC 2008).
.
SAIC is also linked to the late 1990s security upgrades at the WTC, the Rudy Giuliani administration, and the anthrax incidents after 9/11, through former employees Jerome Hauer and Steven Hatfill.
.
And we all know terrorists never use explosives of any kind.(Sarcasm for those who need a hint)
.
And of course we all believe in COINCIDENCES don't we?
.
And government Magik Huh Eh !
Thermite would be useless for sequential demolition. What is your point?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#4646 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Ignition of the incendiaries and detonation of the explosives is controlled through a wireless network using RF repeaters on every floor of the Towers having pyrotechnics.
.
Each of the Stage-2 pyrotechnics units -- the kicker charges and explosive sheets -- has an integrated wireless detonator card that includes a 2-channel RF receiver, an accelerometer, logic, dual wafer batteries, and a micro-detonator.
.
The card is cemented onto the surface of the pyrotechnic's thermitic material so that the detonator is in contact with the material.
.
Similar electronics packages with high-temperature igniters are designed to adhere to the surface of the incendiary coating.
.
The detonator cards are programmed to respond only to RF signals on the network's broadcast frequencies that have specific codes.
.
The cards are manufactured in batches of cards with identical codes, where each batch has a unique code and is destined for a specific floor of one of the Towers.
.
Of a detonator card's two channels, one provides the arm signal, and the other provides a detonation signal.
.
Once the arm signal has been received, the detonator will be triggered by either of two events: rapid acceleration detected by the accelerometer, or receipt of the detonation signal.
.
The detonators are under the wireless control of the RF repeators located on most floors.
.
The repeaters are redundantly controlled from an operations center located a safe distance from the Twin Towers via both high-power directional wireless and an encrypted ethernet channel.
.
The repeaters all broadcast the same signals with ample power to be easily detected by all the detonator receivers on the same floor as well as by most on nearby floors.
.
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/b... #
.
Simple well thought out plan. Huh Eh !
Nice fantasy bro.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4647 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Of course not. It was a top secret type of thermate developed by NIST and DARPA and other clandestine govie agencies for just such an operation.
Cough! Back-peddle! Any proof of this, of course not.

Ever find those 20 pilots?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4648 May 23, 2013
Yea, I saw that episode of 24, seemed farfetched even for TV fiction.

And of course you have no proof but are just making stuff up, like you did with the 20 pilots who could not fly.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Ignition of the incendiaries and detonation of the explosives is controlled through a wireless network using RF repeaters on every floor of the Towers having pyrotechnics.
.
Each of the Stage-2 pyrotechnics units -- the kicker charges and explosive sheets -- has an integrated wireless detonator card that includes a 2-channel RF receiver, an accelerometer, logic, dual wafer batteries, and a micro-detonator.
.
The card is cemented onto the surface of the pyrotechnic's thermitic material so that the detonator is in contact with the material.
.
Similar electronics packages with high-temperature igniters are designed to adhere to the surface of the incendiary coating.
.
The detonator cards are programmed to respond only to RF signals on the network's broadcast frequencies that have specific codes.
.
The cards are manufactured in batches of cards with identical codes, where each batch has a unique code and is destined for a specific floor of one of the Towers.
.
Of a detonator card's two channels, one provides the arm signal, and the other provides a detonation signal.
.
Once the arm signal has been received, the detonator will be triggered by either of two events: rapid acceleration detected by the accelerometer, or receipt of the detonation signal.
.
The detonators are under the wireless control of the RF repeators located on most floors.
.
The repeaters are redundantly controlled from an operations center located a safe distance from the Twin Towers via both high-power directional wireless and an encrypted ethernet channel.
.
The repeaters all broadcast the same signals with ample power to be easily detected by all the detonator receivers on the same floor as well as by most on nearby floors.
.
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/b... #
.
Simple well thought out plan. Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4649 May 23, 2013
Dismiss all you want. Doesn't change a thing.
.
The extensive evidence that explosives were used at the WTC includes witness testimony (MacQueen 2006), overwhelming physical evidence (Griffin 2005, Hoffman et al 2005, Jones and Legge et al 2008) and simple common sense (Legge 2007).
.
There is also substantial evidence that aluminothermic (thermite) materials were present at the WTC (Jones 2007), and the presence of such materials can explain the existence of intense fire where it would not otherwise have existed.
.
Additionally, despite agreement from all parties that the assumed availability of fuel allowed for the fires in any given location of each of the WTC buildings to last only twenty minutes (NIST 2007), the fires lasted much longer and produced extreme temperatures (Jones and Farrer et al 2008).
.
These inexplicable fires are a reminder that the WTC buildings were not simply demolished, but were demolished in a deceptive way.
.
That is, the buildings were brought down so as to MAKE IT LOOK like the impact of the planes and the resulting fires might have caused their unprecedented, symmetrical destruction.
.
That is why they call it CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. Huh !
.
Therefore, shaped charges and other typical explosive configurations were likely used, but there was more to it than that.
.
Those committing the crimes needed to create fire where it would not have existed otherwise, and draw attention toward the part of the buildings where the planes impacted (or in the case of WTC 7, away from the building altogether).
.
This was most probably accomplished through the use of nano-thermites, which are high-tech energetic materials made by mixing ultra fine grain (UFG) aluminum and UFG metal oxides; usually iron oxide, molybdenum oxide or copper oxide, although other compounds can be used (Prakash 2005, Rai 2005).
.
The mixing is accomplished by adding these reactants to a liquid solution where they form what are called “sols”, and then adding a gelling agent that captures these tiny reactive combinations in their intimately mixed state (LLNL 2000).
.
The resulting “sol-gel” is then dried to form a porous reactive material that can be ignited in a number of ways.
.
Dismiss out of hand for lack of evidence.
.
It must be Magik not explosives that made these buildings fall down! Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4650 May 23, 2013
The high surface area of the reactants within energetic sol-gels allows for the far higher rate of energy release than is seen in “macro” thermite mixtures, making nano-thermites “high explosives” as well as pyrotechnic materials (Tillotson et al 1999).
.
Sol-gel nano-thermites, are often called energetic nanocomposites, metastable intermolecular composites (MICs) or superthermite (COEM 2004, Son et al 2007), and silica is often used to create the porous, structural framework (Clapsaddle et al 2004, Zhao et al 2004).
.
Nano-thermites have also been made with RDX (Pivkina et al 2004), and with thermoplastic elastomers (Diaz et al 2003).
.
But it is important to remember that, despite the name, nano-thermites pack a much bigger punch than typical thermite materials.
.
It turns out that explosive, sol-gel nano-thermites were developed by US government scientists, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL)(Tillotson et al 1998, Gash et al 2000, Gash et al 2002).
.
These LLNL scientists reported that --
“The sol-gel process is very amenable to dip-, spin-, and spray-coating technologies to coat surfaces. We have utilized this property to dip-coat various substrates to make sol-gel Fe,O,/ Al / Viton coatings.
.
The energetic coating dries to give a nice adherent film.
.
Preliminary experiments indicate that films of the hybrid material are self-propagating when ignited by thermal stimulus”.(Gash et al 2002).
.
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/nist_therm...
.
Or Magik Huh eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4651 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
There is also substantial evidence that aluminothermic (thermite) materials were present at the WTC (Jones 2007), and the presence of such materials can explain the existence of intense fire where it would not otherwise have existed.
WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE UNIGNITED NANOTHERMITES THEY FOUND IN THE DUST SAMPLES IN THAT EXPERIMENT?

Niels Harritt, Steven Jones and other 9/11 controlled demolition theorists claim to have found nanothermite particles in dust samples from the World Trade Center. They made sure the dust samples were untainted, and used advanced instruments to measure what happened when these tiny red-grey chips were heated up.

Thermites reach temperatures of around 4500° and have their own oxygen supply when they burn, so they can burn underwater. Harritt, Jones, et. al. therefore should have heated up the chips in a nitrogen or argon atmosphere to eliminate the possibility that regular hydrocarbons were burning. They also failed to take the carbon-based products out of the mix, so what we may well be seeing is some kind of carbon-based product burning in oxygen. They compared the sudden energy spike of their burning chips with the spikes of known nanothermites, and found that their chips ignited at around 150° C. lower than the known nanothermites, and the energy release was off between their chips and the nanothermites by a factor of at least two. Yet they called this a match for nanothermite!

Attempts to independently replicate this experiment have been dismal. Mark Basile, who appeared in the acknowledgments of the original study, burned the chips in air, replicating the error of the original experiment and not even measuring the energy released. A chemist named Frédéric Henry-Couannier got another dust sample from the original experimenters and wrote,“Eventually the presence of nanothermite could not be confirmed.” The R.J. Lee Company did a 2003 study on the dust and didn’t find thermitic material.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4652 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Thermate incendiary coating compound: A mixture of aluminum powder, iron oxide powder, sulfur and other additives in a binder.
.
Applied in a liquid form like paint, it dries to form a durable coating that requires a high-temperature igniter to start the reaction by heating a spot to the 2,200ºC ignition temperature.
Now this twist has forced the Jones/Harrit/Roberts crew to slightly alter their story-line. Now they are suggesting that this primer paint that was used in the towers was actually the super-secret explosive nano-thermite and that the big plan was to run around spraying the underside of the floor systems with “explosive paint”.

This is completely ridiculous, almost as ridiculous as Jim Hoffman’s “1.8 million ceiling tile bombs” theory…(almost). There is no way to control an even dispersal of paint on the underside of a floor system that is crowded with trusses, transverse trusses, cables, beams, and various other piping, AC ducts, ect… Without an even dispersal of the explosive, there is also no way of having a predictable outcome when it is ignited. Also, when paint is atomized to spray, fine particles of the dust dries and then falls in unexpected places. This dust would also be explosive. There is no way that the experts who designed the destruction of the Twin Towers would spray “explosive paint” on every single floor of the World Trade Center. It’s ridiculous.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4653 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Whatever type of thermate was used it doesn't change a thing about who and what made the WTC towers explode and fall down.
Whatever type? Sounds like you really thought this through 20 pilot boy, ever find a link to those pilots?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4654 May 23, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever type? Sounds like you really thought this through 20 pilot boy, ever find a link to those pilots?
Sounds like you don't have any refute sorry charlie boy.
.
But then you never did. Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4655 May 23, 2013
Are any of you bwunkers saying that many of the scientists and organizations involved in the NIST so-called investigation of 9/11 were NOT well aware of nano-thermites, and had NO connection to, NOR any expertise in, this exact nano-thermite technology?
.
Is THAT what you are struggling to say bwunkers?
.
A simple yes or no would suffice.
.
Somehow I don't think you will answer this simple question either.
.
Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4656 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Are any of you bwunkers saying that many of the scientists and organizations involved in the NIST so-called investigation of 9/11 were NOT well aware of nano-thermites, and had NO connection to, NOR any expertise in, this exact nano-thermite technology?
WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE UNIGNITED NANOTHERMITES THEY FOUND IN THE DUST SAMPLES IN THAT EXPERIMENT?

Niels Harritt, Steven Jones and other 9/11 controlled demolition theorists claim to have found nanothermite particles in dust samples from the World Trade Center. They made sure the dust samples were untainted, and used advanced instruments to measure what happened when these tiny red-grey chips were heated up.

Thermites reach temperatures of around 4500° and have their own oxygen supply when they burn, so they can burn underwater. Harritt, Jones, et. al. therefore should have heated up the chips in a nitrogen or argon atmosphere to eliminate the possibility that regular hydrocarbons were burning. They also failed to take the carbon-based products out of the mix, so what we may well be seeing is some kind of carbon-based product burning in oxygen. They compared the sudden energy spike of their burning chips with the spikes of known nanothermites, and found that their chips ignited at around 150° C. lower than the known nanothermites, and the energy release was off between their chips and the nanothermites by a factor of at least two. Yet they called this a match for nanothermite!

Attempts to independently replicate this experiment have been dismal. Mark Basile, who appeared in the acknowledgments of the original study, burned the chips in air, replicating the error of the original experiment and not even measuring the energy released. A chemist named Frédéric Henry-Couannier got another dust sample from the original experimenters and wrote,“Eventually the presence of nanothermite could not be confirmed.” The R.J. Lee Company did a 2003 study on the dust and didn’t find thermitic material.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4657 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
There is direct evidence for two broad types of thermitic pyrotechnics in the destruction of the Twin Towers:
.
Incendiaries, consisting of thermate or thermate possibly with additives such as barium nitrate
EPIC FAIL!

6. Do the chemicals discovered provide a complete thermite signature?

So far the argument seems to be that chemicals A, B, C and D are sometimes associated with thermite; Professor Jones has found them in his samples; therefore, in conjunction with other evidence (video of streams of metal from the WTC etc) this shows thermite may have been used at the World Trade Center. Although this sounds plausible at first, it’s deficient in some important areas.

First, there’s very little information about how the levels of each chemical relate to a typical thermate mix, or what you might expect to find in a post-reaction thermate residue. For example, Professor Jones reports that his “previously molten metal” sample “has (in spots) Aluminum (Al, possibly Al203) Sulfur (S) and Potassium”, along with “abundant Manganese”. Despite thermate having far more aluminum than sulfur, though, Jones sample seems to show more sulfur than aluminum. Perhaps we’re misreading that, maybe the aluminum is consumed in the reaction while most sulfur survives: we don’t know. But it seems to us that figuring out what the relative levels of these elements ought to be, after a thermite reaction, would be useful in proving (or disproving) the theory.

And second, there are other elements that are left out almost entirely. PROFESSOR JONES FINDS SULFUR ON HIS METAL SAMPLES, FOR INSTANCE, BUT DOESN’T REPORT ANY BARIUM NITRATE, EVEN THOUGH THAT’S A MUCH MORE SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE THERMATE MIX. IF THAT CANNOT BE SATISFACTORILY EXPLAINED, THEN SURELY THAT MEANS NO THERMATE, AT LEAST OF THE TYPE PROFESSOR JONES IS DESCRIBING?

Find those 20 pilots yet?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4658 May 23, 2013
Are any of you bwunkers saying that many of the scientists and organizations involved in the NIST so-called investigation of 9/11 were NOT well aware of nano-thermites, and had NO connection to, NOR any expertise in, this exact nano-thermite technology?
.
Is THAT what you are struggling to say bwunkers?
.
A simple yes or no would suffice.
.
Somehow I don't think you will answer this simple question either.
.
Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#4659 May 23, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Are any of you bwunkers saying that many of the scientists and organizations involved in the NIST so-called investigation of 9/11 were NOT well aware of nano-thermites, and had
SUPER EPIC FAIL!

6. Do the chemicals discovered provide a complete thermite signature?

So far the argument seems to be that chemicals A, B, C and D are sometimes associated with thermite; Professor Jones has found them in his samples; therefore, in conjunction with other evidence (video of streams of metal from the WTC etc) this shows thermite may have been used at the World Trade Center. Although this sounds plausible at first, it’s deficient in some important areas.

First, there’s very little information about how the levels of each chemical relate to a typical thermate mix, or what you might expect to find in a post-reaction thermate residue. For example, Professor Jones reports that his “previously molten metal” sample “has (in spots) Aluminum (Al, possibly Al203) Sulfur (S) and Potassium”, along with “abundant Manganese”. Despite thermate having far more aluminum than sulfur, though, Jones sample seems to show more sulfur than aluminum. Perhaps we’re misreading that, maybe the aluminum is consumed in the reaction while most sulfur survives: we don’t know. But it seems to us that figuring out what the relative levels of these elements ought to be, after a thermite reaction, would be useful in proving (or disproving) the theory.

And second, there are other elements that are left out almost entirely. PROFESSOR JONES FINDS SULFUR ON HIS METAL SAMPLES, FOR INSTANCE, BUT DOESN’T REPORT ANY BARIUM NITRATE, EVEN THOUGH THAT’S A MUCH MORE SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE THERMATE MIX. IF THAT CANNOT BE SATISFACTORILY EXPLAINED, THEN SURELY THAT MEANS NO THERMATE, AT LEAST OF THE TYPE PROFESSOR JONES IS DESCRIBING?

Find those 20 pilots yet?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4660 May 23, 2013
Arden Bement, the metallurgist and expert on fuels and materials who was nominated as director of NIST by President George W. Bush in October 2001, was former deputy secretary of defense, former director of DARPA’s office of materials science, and former executive at TRW.
.
Of course, DOD and DARPA are both leaders in the production and use of nano-thermites (Amptiac 2002, DOD 2005).
.
And military and aerospace contractor TRW has had a long collaboration with NASA laboratories in the development of energetic materials that are components of advanced propellants, like nano-gelled explosive materials (NASA 2001).
.
TRW Aeronautics also made fireproof composites and high performance elastomer formulations, and worked with NASA to make energetic aerogels.
.
Additionally, Bement was a professor at Purdue and MIT.
.
Purdue has a thriving program for nano-thermites (Son 2008).
.
And interestingly, at MIT’s Institute for Soldier Nanotechnology, we find Martin Z. Bazant, son of notable “conspiracy debunker” Zdenek P. Bazant (MIT 2008), who does research on granular flows, and the electrochemical interactions of silicon.
.
Zdenek P. Bazant is interested in nanocomposites as well (Northwestern 2008), and how they relate to naval warfare (ONR 2008).
.
MIT was represented at nano-energetics conferences as early as 1998 (Gordon 1998).
.
If it quacks like a duck ... It ain't Magik Huh Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 43 min RFD 988,411
How did black people get here ( economically) 2 hr RFD 64
What was the Vegas mass murderer's REAL problem? 3 hr RFD 18
Why is Mahattan Johnny a gay trucker 5 hr JuJu 6
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 5 hr Tm Cln 36,449
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 hr Phooey 688,571
Black "bi-racial" college girls and white gray-... 8 hr Doctor REALITY 13
More from around the web