Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4580 May 18, 2013
Rothschild's Energy Discovery.
.
Or "How did Mayer Amschel Rothschild originally create the wealthiest banking empire on the planet (it still is) and become the richest man in the world?"
.
Mayer was the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, who was a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house in Frankfurt Germany.
.
Moses Bauer had placed a red sign above the entrance door to his counting house.
.
This sign is a red hexagram (which geometrically and numerically translates into the number 666) which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later.
.
Around 1760 following his father's death, Mayer
Bauer returns to Frankfurt to take over his father's money lending business.
.
Bauer recognizes the significance of the red hexagram and changes his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door ("Rot," is German for, "Red," "Schild," is German for, "Sign").
.
Now while running his money lending business, Mayer Rothschild made a discovery.
.
What Mr. Rothschild had discovered was the basic principle of power, influence, and control over people as applied to economics.
.
That principle is "When you assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you."
.
Mayer Rothschild had discovered that currency or deposit loan accounts had the required appearance of power that could be used to induce people (inductance, with people corresponding to a magnetic field) into surrendering their real wealth in exchange for a promise of greater wealth (instead of real compensation).
.
They would put up real collateral in exchange for a loan of promissory notes.
.
Mayer Rothschild found that he could issue more notes than he had backing for, so long as he had someone's stock of gold as a persuader to show his customers.
.
Mayer Rothschild loaned his promissory notes to individual and to governments.
.
These would create overconfidence.
.
Then he would make money scarce, tighten control of the system, and collect the collateral through the obligation of contracts.
.
The cycle was then repeated.
.
These pressures could be used to ignite a war.
.
Then he would control the availability of currency to determine who would win the war.
.
That government which agreed to give him control of its economic system got his support.
.
Collection of debts was guaranteed by economic aid to the enemy of the debtor.
.
The profit derived from this economic methodology mad Mr. Rothschild all the more able to expand his wealth.
.
He found that the public greed would allow currency to be printed by government order beyond the limits (inflation) of backing in precious metal or the production of goods and services.
.
All the world's wars, economic depressions and periods of growth are engineered this way by the men who control the money.
.
And the world economy has been the under the heavy influence of the international banksters ever since.
.
http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/sw4qw/
.
"Compound interest is the most powerful force in the universe." -- Albert Einstein
.
It seems like Magik Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#4581 May 18, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah it's a real LuLu alright! What a waste of good water under the bridge. Yellow piss water that is.
The false report of hijacked airplanes landing elsewhere sure is.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#4582 May 18, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
There is ample evidence, from both witnesses and recordings, of explosions associated with the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7).
.
NIST sidestepped investigating explosions and explosives by setting up an artificially high threshold of interest.
.
They swept aside any testimony or recordings of explosions that would not register 130-140 dB one kilometer away.
.
They established this criterion using RDX (one of the loudest explosives) in a scenario that produced a far higher sound level than other possible uses of explosives to bring down the building.
.
Then they turned around and used sound level as the sole criterion for deciding whether the use of explosives was a credible hypothesis.
.
By this maneuver, they sidestepped investigating the testimony of explosives or possible evidence of explosive residues.
.
This is just one more instance of fraudulent behavior on the part of the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center disaster.
.
Deceptive wasn't it? Kinda like Magik Huh Eh !
Not really. Just more stupidity.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#4583 May 18, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really. Just more stupidity.
The plane obviously went to Fantasy Island. ;)

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4584 May 18, 2013
LuLu Ford wrote:
<quoted text>
The plane obviously went to Fantasy Island. ;)
WOW OMG That's a LuLu! Huh Eh !?!?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4585 May 18, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The false report of hijacked airplanes landing elsewhere sure is.
The alleged false report of allegedly hijacked airplanes.
.
I don't suppose you have any sources for that do ya?
.
Just another empty desperate claim of disbelief of the facts.
.
Yawn !
.
It's not Magik ya know Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4586 May 18, 2013
Ever notice how wasted water never cites sources for his evidunce.
.
Most of time he just says proposterous, it never happened that way, with no citations of how he knows it didn't happen that way.
.
Just a hunch I suppose.
.
That don't cut it anymore!?!?!?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4587 May 18, 2013
Tell us another funny LuLu !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#4588 May 19, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
The alleged false report of allegedly hijacked airplanes.
.
I don't suppose you have any sources for that do ya?
.
Just another empty desperate claim of disbelief of the facts.
.
Yawn !
.
It's not Magik ya know Huh Eh !
Airport security.
Airline personnel.
Thousands of witnesses.

Very funny huh? What criteria do you use to dismiss them?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#4589 May 19, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Tell us another funny LuLu !
We will leave that up to you. We know you won't disappoint us.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#4590 May 19, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW OMG That's a LuLu! Huh Eh !?!?
Enjoying yourself on Fantasy Island? Have a pleasant stay.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#4591 May 19, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Airport security.
Airline personnel.
Thousands of witnesses.
Very funny huh? What criteria do you use to dismiss them?
Everything is funny on Fantasy Island.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4592 May 20, 2013
It is a fact that more than 8 years after 9/11, there is still no consensus whatsoever on the total death toll.
.
Indeed, the first and last of the above-listed memorials show a discrepancy of a full 714 names!
.
These are entirely verifiable figures – in full public view. Of course, even a discrepancy of only 2 or 3 victims should be considered unacceptable at this time.
.
Let’s hope that the National 9/11 Memorial, currently under construction in Manhattan will finally reveal to the world the exact number of the 9/11 victims...
.
Whatever that figure will be (and which names will be retained or discarded), the fact remains that for all of 8 years virtually all memorials have displayed wildly conflicting casualty tolls.
.
Magik perhaps Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4593 May 20, 2013
MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(2): The ghost names nonsense
.
So, how do these conflicting death tolls translate as one takes a close look at the various memorials?
.
Does that mean we may find random,‘ghost’ victims listed on some memorials, complete with tributes and obituaries, who are simply missing on others?
.
Yes.
.
Is there a significant amount of such nonsensical examples, such as to rule out ‘innocent sloppiness’ on the part of the various memorial curators?
.
Yes.
.
Let’s take a look, for instance, at the “Wall of Americans” memorial.
.
At the very top of letter “A”, we find two people named “AALYIGH”.
.
Why its almost as if a computer program spit out some names to add to the memorial list.
.
Could the government do that?
.
Yes it could.
.
Kinda like Magik Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4594 May 20, 2013
Inexplicably, the two “AALYIGH”s (as indeed many other names) are found only in some memorials and are absent from others (such as CNN’s).
.
Now, imagine for a minute that your surname is “Aalyigh”.
.
Would you not try contacting (in over 8 years) the ‘offending’ 9/11 memorials and have them correct their listings?
.
Who are the “Aalyigh’s”? Or perhaps we should ask : why are the “Aalyigh’s” to be found only in selected memorials?
.
Is there indeed anyone called “Aalyigh” on this planet apart from Diana Aalyigh (Die-In-A-Lie?) and Justin Aalyigh (Just- In-A-Lie?).
.
One may be tempted to surmise that some brave whistleblower was trying to tell us some truth about 9/11:“it’s all AALYIGH”.
.
Interestingly, the Wall of Americans memorial has now been shut down.
.
This is the message we may find on the blank internet page which ‘explains’ its sudden closure:
.
Magik Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4595 May 20, 2013
Staying with letter “A”, there is the case of Mrs.“Cici AADA”, another of the many ‘ghost names’ to be found bouncing around the various 9/11 memorials.
.
Now, if you google “AADA” you will bump right into the “American Academy of Dramatic Arts”. http://www.aada.org/home/home.html
.
A coincidence, perhaps. However, since a great deal of characters rotating within the 9/11 saga (Mark Humphrey, Gary Welz, et al) have been exposed as professional actors, one may reasonably wonder whether this also could be the work of a heroic whistleblower.
.
The fact remains that “Cici (See-See?) AADA” and both the “AALYIGH’s” are only to be found on a few 9/11 memorials – and are simply missing on others (most notably the CNN memorial).
.
There are plenty more examples of ‘ghost names’ appearing only in selected 9/11 memorials.
.
To list them all in this article (with comprehensive cross-comparisons between all the lists) is not realistic and would surely be a tedious read.
.
So let’s just compare three alphabetical groups (Q, X, Y, Z) which contain moderate amounts of names (so that the reader may easily check out these facts personally).
.
Below is a list of 9/11 memorials; for each one we have the number of people listed under the surname initials “Q”,“X”,“Y” & “Z”:
.
CNN memorial : http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/memorial/......
Q:8 X:0 Y:20 Z:24
.
VOICES OF SEPTEMBER11 : http://voicesofsept11.org/dev/memorial_fam......
Q:8 X:0 Y:20 Z:25
.
IN MEMORIAM ONLINE : http://inmemoriamonline.net/List_WTC-Q.html
Q:7 X:0 Y:15 Z:19
.
SEPTEMBER 11TH MEMORIAL : http://www.sept11thmemorial.com/all_names.asp
Q:16 X:0 Y:25 Z:26
.
FOX memorial : http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,62151,00....
Q:9 X:0 Y:21 Z:24
.
CYPRESS TIMES http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/New......
Q:9 X:0 Y:13 Z:23
.
PRAYERS FOR PEACE http://www.prayersforpeace.org/wall.shtml
Q:11 X:4 Y:24 Z:26
.
http://www.dailypaul.com/120138/deconstructin...
.
Simon Shack is a no planer and no deather.
.
But he does raise some good questions! Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4596 May 20, 2013
Let's turn this thread into a NO PLANER ONLY thread!?!?!?
.
Huh Eh !
Epic Glottus

San Rafael, CA

#4597 May 20, 2013
AIRLINES PARTICIPATING IN A CRIMINAL COVER-UP?
.
As mentioned already in the previous section, part of the public relations efforts carried out by Weber Shandwick, at the request of American Airlines, was to “subtly steer[.,.] reporters away from rumors and leaked information”. What type of “leaked information” was AA concerned with?
.
It is argued here that the information AA did not want to “leak” to the public was the same information that AA refuses to reveal to the families of the victims and to the public in general since 9/11. Such information includes:
.
(a) Names of ground personnel who saw off the passengers and crew at the departure gate on 9/11 and could testify on what they saw;
.
(b) Authentified copies of the flight manifests, which would show the names of the alleged hijackers and of the passengers;
.
(c) Copies of boarding cards, which would show the names of the alleged hijackers and of the passengers and confirm their seat numbers;
.
(d) Computer listing of the boarding times of individual passengers and hijackers;
.
(e) Positive evidence that the aircraft which left the airport was indeed the aircraft which later crashed into the known target (aircraft serial number, tail number, engine serial numbers, black boxes, etc.);
.
(f) Names and contacts of AA personnel who reportedly communicated by cellphones with crew or passengers on the hijacked aircraft and could publicly testify on these conversations.
.
The present author asked both American and United Airlines to provide some of the above information..
Both airlines declined to provide the information and referred the author to the FBI for all such data.
.
The last attempt to obtain information from American Airlines (a letter to AA spokesman Marty Heires of October 6, 2004) did not elicit any response at all.
.
Neither airline, however, justified in its answer its refusal on a legal restraining order or on the need to protect the privacy of the families of the victims or of its personnel.
.
The author has not come across any Justice Department order, or any legal ruling, that prohibits airlines from releasing the above information and airline personnel to communicate freely with the media on matters relating to 9/11..
However, Tim Doke, in his email to the present author claimed that the FBI “limited what we could say publicly through the media” and that “employees who were in contact with the terrorists on the ground... could not talk to reporters... under the FBI's restrictions.”
.
A spokesperson of the FBI, asked why the agency has not publicized the original flight manifests in support of its allegation against 19 named hijackers, did not maintain that the FBI or the airlines were legally prohibited from disclosing the original flight manifest.
.
She simply referred the present author to the airlines for such information.
.
The airlines’ apparently uncoerced refusal to produce the above information suggests that this refusal is prompted by their interest to prevent their employees, the families of victims and the public from knowing the full truth on the events of 9/11.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#4598 May 21, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So really, your happy being a part of a likeminded group of idiots who engage in smears, use circular reasoning, can't debate, and use fallacious arguments like "big chunks fall faster" when describing falling bodies in the WTC collapses?
No wonder you dishonestly pose the question is free fall "a" speed, to suggest these mythical "twoofers" that you describe in cartoon, actually believe the speed is constant in free fall.
Yes, I'm quite content with being associated with posters who point out that the dislodged chunks falling at free fall fell faster than the the tower which fell slower than free fall.

And whine, snivel and twist all you want. The reality is that twoofers generally don't give a crap that the ignorance they spew has no scientific validity because, like you, most twoofers are completely scientifically illiterate. And your continued attempts to justify idiotic phrases like "they fell at free fall speed" instead of working to correct the average twoofers understanding of physics do nothing for your argument but reiterate the validity of my previous claim regarding scientific illiteracy.

Thanks for that!
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
You do it because understanding of a building collapse, that attains free fall acceleration through multiple floors of resistance means that resistance has been sequentially removed or completely removed all at once; and only explosive force can account for this.
My car accelerates, does that mean my speedometer never works?
All anyone needs to know about free fall is an object falls without resistance, and a building collapsing without explosives or incendiaries naturally resists.
You've been asked many, many times to prove, using science, that the structural integrity of a building can't be removed by the failure of load bearing supports by fire (and lets not forget the planes).

You've continuously failed to do so and just spew idiotic twoofer memes where your opportunity to put your money where your mouth is by validating your claim with real science presents itself. Then you go on to whine that NIST didn't follow the scientific method.

The irony is so thick even thermite couldn't cut it!
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
An example and analysis of gravity driven collapse.
http://youtu.be/NiHeCjZlkr8
Heres a good video for you to ignore that discusses the free fall of Building 7.
http://youtu.be/e8N6V68jotg
Right, yourube videos rather than supporting your position...and you can't even summarize what your dumb little videos say.

Perfect example of why twoofers fail at everything.

Your understanding is so poor that you can't explain in your own words what you believe so you mindlessly allow someone else to say it for you.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
NIST never had physical evidence to examine anything about building 7, and had a few hundred pieces out of the countless debris from WTC 1 & 2 to study, and against basic investigative protocol, failed to check for their presence.
And of course they ignored witness testimony.
http://youtu.be/ERhoNYj9_fg
I made multiple posts regarding the collection of materials and why it would be extremely difficult to find examples that weren't damaged by subsequent fires to a point where they couldn't be used for discovery.

You ignored everyone of those posts because you can't argue from a position of knowledge, all you can do is mindlessly shill twoofer memes as if they had validity...which they don't.

You also posted NIST explanation that they couldn't conclusively say what pieces came from WTC 7 and this had to do with the type of markings used by the fabricators at the point of construction.

The reality is you still have no valid argument and just spew the same old tired twoofer memes.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#4599 May 21, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So you just be quite comfortable on the team that can't think, debate, or understand anything more than you are told. And I'll stay on the team that has known since I was seven years old that "big chunks free fall the same rate as little chunks".
Compared to Newton,
Insults Are Easier
And there's a perfect example of the dishonesty you claim others are exhibiting.

It's been pointed out that the big chunks which were free of the building (dislodged) fell faster than the collapse front which proves the towers fell slower than free fall...yet in the absence of a valid argument, you lie because,

[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 38 min RW lies and malfe... 88,118
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr science is god 996,502
loan shark needed asap (Mar '09) 2 hr Steve Carl 20
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 3 hr Tony 6,921
How many MILLIONS of MEXICAN MEN R N in U.S. IL... 3 hr Mr magoo goo guy... 32
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr The AnswerTo 1984... 703,712
Is a career in web development rewarding? 4 hr keith29 1