Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,787 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

Charlie Sheen

Plattsmouth, NE

#4387 May 11, 2013
spire wrote:
why? because the truth about 9/11 is out and there are not many who are proud of what happened that day in how our leaders responded, in what has happened since, and in the lies that have been perpetrated...there will be no celebration until justice is served.
LOL, In the same week the pulled Loose Change of Netflix streaming due to lack of demand.
Charlie Sheen

San Anselmo, CA

#4391 May 11, 2013
Just last week my section chief told me he was gonna have to fire my sorry ass because of lack of demand for the services of a Dis-Info Spec5. This really chaps my hide as I have been here dutifully redirecting all the criticism of the governments 9/11 story almost 24/7. With any luck, all I'll have left is some loose change in my pockets. I'm not laughing about this at all.
Charlie Sheen

Plattsmouth, NE

#4392 May 11, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
Just last week my section chief told me he was gonna have to fire my sorry ass because of lack of demand for the services of a Dis-Info Spec5.
Sorry to hear that, so are they going to close the drive through window or hire someone else?
Charlie Sheen

Lansing, MI

#4393 May 11, 2013
No man, you don't seem to get it. Its me Charlie Sheen who's gonna be out of a job.
No more free chili cheeseburgers & all the fries I can steal.

Charlie Sheen

Plattsmouth, NE

#4394 May 11, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
No man, you don't seem to get it. Its me Charlie Sheen who's gonna be out of a job.
No more free chili cheeseburgers & all the fries I can steal.
Very sad to hear that, thank your lucky stars Mom does not charge rent.
Charlie Sheen

Lansing, MI

#4395 May 11, 2013
My mom does too charge rent!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4397 May 11, 2013
What happened to the bwunkers ?
.
Magikally disappeared !

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#4398 May 11, 2013
You've given us nothing to be debwunking, bunky. Govie shill is more of a hobby than a profession. I have an extensive life not connected to the internet, you might try it some time. Mine's pretty enjoyable, that's why I'm here nowhere near 24/7 as you seem to be. When I do come here, if there really isn't anything in need of debwunking, why post for free? We only get paid for the posts which meet our evil overseers approval for furthering the official myth. Posts like this however, you get for free. None of your tax dollars will be paid in exchange for this comment, as it contains no actual debwunking of the true story of 9/11. Oops, did I say that out loud?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#4400 May 12, 2013
You're not in Kansas anymore Ricky.
.
I think you meant to say that you CAN NOT debwunk the information I have posted concerning the alleged passengers on the alleged flights of 9/11.
.
You have nothing at all to add except if you did it would be that the whole idea is preposterous and should be totally dismissed.
.
Followed by a declaration of "and that's the end of the story."
.
Well that don't cut it anymore. Never did.
.
I guess we can leave it at "there's nothing to debwunk"
.
That says it all Huh Eh !
Brian

Dover, PA

#4401 May 12, 2013
You don't have to be an Einstein to know that 2 steel buildings can't physically collapse at free fall speed and leave behind a city covered in smoke if there's no explosions to produce that much smoke. People are so blind!

Since: Aug 11

Evanston, WY

#4402 May 12, 2013
Brian wrote:
You don't have to be an Einstein to know that 2 steel buildings can't physically collapse at free fall speed and leave behind a city covered in smoke if there's no explosions to produce that much smoke. People are so blind!
They did. It is also obvious that no explosives were used and that free fall speed is false.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#4403 May 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
They did. It is also obvious that no explosives were used and that free fall speed is false.
Of course. The big chunks being dispelled descend at a faster rate of speed. Tons of steel plate is required for directing charges in the demolition of steel framed buildings.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#4406 May 12, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
You're not in Kansas anymore Ricky.
.
Actually, I am dear. The only time I bother to access this site is when I'm home, here in Kansas.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
I think you meant to say that you CAN NOT debwunk the information I have posted concerning the alleged passengers on the alleged flights of 9/11.
You have nothing at all to add except if you did it would be that the whole idea is preposterous and should be totally dismissed.
.
Followed by a declaration of "and that's the end of the story."
.
Well that don't cut it anymore. Never did.
.
I guess we can leave it at "there's nothing to debwunk"
.
That says it all Huh Eh !
I can debwunk any nonsense you want to toss out here, buttercup, that is, after all, my job here and I'm darn good at it. Would you like to try again with your alleged passenger notion? I haven't read your thoughts on that subject and don't want to go looking for them and they certainly aren't clear here.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#4407 May 12, 2013
Brian wrote:
You don't have to be an Einstein to know that 2 steel buildings can't physically collapse at free fall speed and leave behind a city covered in smoke if there's no explosions to produce that much smoke. People are so blind!
You are right, you don't have to be an Einstein to "know" what you claim to "know", that's the territory of easily confused and misled sheep. I'm no Einstein, but I'm no sheep either and what you claim to "know" has no real basis in actual fact.
Brian

Dover, PA

#4408 May 12, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
They did. It is also obvious that no explosives were used and that free fall speed is false.
Actually there's plenty of evidence for explosives. Demolition light flashes are visible before and during the collapse of both towers. Separate pockets of smoke are visible coming out of both towers as they're collapsing. These pockets of smoke are actually exiting the buildings below where the collapse is occurring. Also, explain something to me. If there were no explosives in those buildings, and only the floors impacted by the airplanes were on fire, why is there smoke coming out of the buildings as they are falling? If it was only a collapsing buildings, you would have no smoke coming out of the buildings.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#4409 May 12, 2013
Brian wrote:
Actually there's plenty of evidence for explosives. Demolition light flashes are visible before and during the collapse of both towers. Separate pockets of smoke are visible coming out of both towers as they're collapsing. These pockets of smoke are actually exiting the buildings below where the collapse is occurring. Also, explain something to me. If there were no explosives in those buildings, and only the floors impacted by the airplanes were on fire, why is there smoke coming out of the buildings as they are falling? If it was only a collapsing buildings, you would have no smoke coming out of the buildings.
You seem to be unaware that when the aircraft impacted the structures, the resulting explosions, venting through elevator, air and other shafts in the building. caused fires on multiple floors, not directly impacted. The flashes of light and puffs of smoke you claim can only be explained by the use of the explosives, can also be explained by the fact that the power was still on to much of the building below the impact when it collapsed and parts of the collapse naturally fell faster than others. Those same shafts that the had fire spread through, would have zero resistance within them when the collapse occurred for debris falling through them and those puffs of smoke, that debris venting out on its way down.
Bjork

Iceland

#4410 May 12, 2013
WTC7 was not hit by a plane and fell all at once at free fall rate. A controlled building implosion, very hard to do!
Bjork

Iceland

#4411 May 12, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>You seem to be unaware that when the aircraft impacted the structures, the resulting explosions, venting through elevator, air and other shafts in the building. caused fires on multiple floors, not directly impacted. The flashes of light and puffs of smoke you claim can only be explained by the use of the explosives, can also be explained by the fact that the power was still on to much of the building below the impact when it collapsed and parts of the collapse naturally fell faster than others. Those same shafts that the had fire spread through, would have zero resistance within them when the collapse occurred for debris falling through them and those puffs of smoke, that debris venting out on its way down.
This is a smelly turd from your butt

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#4413 May 12, 2013
Bjork wrote:
WTC7 was not hit by a plane and fell all at once at free fall rate. A controlled building implosion, very hard to do!
It was not struck by an aircraft, it was however struck by the explosion of an aircraft into a building directly across the street from it and by debris from that building when it collapsed. The building neither fell "all at once", nor at a "free fall rate", to believe that they did, defies observable fact.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#4414 May 12, 2013
Bjork wrote:
...
The adults are talking again dear. If your mommy and daddy need a baby sitter for you, have them get in touch with us, they shouldn't just drop you off here unattended.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 30 min Chess 560,587
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 31 min Mandela 119,693
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 46 min It aint necessari... 778,840
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 hr onemale 265,482
Teacher back in class after Bush-Hitler comparison (Mar '06) 1 hr Swedenforever 96
My wife want mee to peeing her mouth every time... 1 hr vicky9669 2
Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says (Jun '07) 1 hr Mandela 37,845
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr Peace_Warrior 605,359
Straight guys: Would you ever have intercourse ... (Jul '12) 21 hr risque 137
More from around the web