Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,786 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#382 Jan 22, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>the appeal to authority argument? Does that also preclude the use of the scientific method?!?!?!?!?!

Insults Are Easier
As opposed to your appeals to ignorance and stupidity?

That's why,

[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss

Oh and given your idiocy regarding anything to do with science, it's obvious you don't understand the scientific method.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#383 Jan 22, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Its amazing what a name that someone makes up on Topix can say about the psychological nature of the person. Obviously, yellows urination upon reality says a lot about him. A constantly bitter coward who pretends to be tough by cursing over the internet to cover his own insignificance and impudence, so much so he has never kissed a girl. "Oh whens lord, whens it gonna be my time?"

He knows ;)

How is anyone supposed to trust the words of a person who does nothing but insult, make false accusations, and say constantly ridiculously unintelligent things? And one who obviously doesn't have the gravitas to be aware of his own hypocrisy?

He asks this question while hiding his own.

YellowPissreality wrote, "
NO SEISMIC SIGNATURE OF EXPLOSIVES RETARD!
"

Yes, thats one of the benefits of using super thermates.

YellowPissreality wrote, " NFPA 921 is not valid for a terrorist attck Dumb Ass"

Possibly the single most ignorant statement ever postulated on Topix, aside from RADEKT's assertion that torture can't affect future testimony.

You really can't make this stuff up!

The scientific method, good enough for Einstein, good enough for you.

Insults Are Easier
Like naming yourself " Insults are Easier" then attempting to insult one person by attacking an entire country.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#384 Jan 22, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
This 10 minute vid demonstrates how wrong you and NIST's entire assertion is.

http://youtu.be/Qamecech9m4

Super thermate is more powerful then thermite, no wonder NIST failed to address or check for its use.

And when thermate is used to cut the bolts, much less then the thousands of pounds of thermite is required.

The scientific method, good enough for Einstein, good enough for you.

Insults Are Easier
Another idiotic vid that relies on nothing but gullibility and speculation.

Why is it you never advise anyone to speak with engineers and fire fighters again?

Oh ya, it's not about finding truth for you and,

[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss

Still waiting for you to solve for "x".

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#385 Jan 22, 2013
NFPA 921 is not valid for a terrorist attack involving airplanes
.... besides how could there be guidlines when this sort of attack never happened before !??!?!?!?!
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Its amazing what a name that someone makes up on Topix can say about the psychological nature of the person. Obviously, yellows urination upon reality says a lot about him. A constantly bitter coward who pretends to be tough by cursing over the internet to cover his own insignificance and impudence, so much so he has never kissed a girl. "Oh whens lord, whens it gonna be my time?"
He knows ;)
How is anyone supposed to trust the words of a person who does nothing but insult, make false accusations, and say constantly ridiculously unintelligent things? And one who obviously doesn't have the gravitas to be aware of his own hypocrisy?
<quoted text>
He asks this question while hiding his own.
<quoted text>
Yes, thats one of the benefits of using super thermates.
<quoted text>
Possibly the single most ignorant statement ever postulated on Topix, aside from RADEKT's assertion that torture can't affect future testimony.
You really can't make this stuff up!
The scientific method, good enough for Einstein, good enough for you.
Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#386 Jan 22, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
<quoted text>NFPA 921 is not valid for a terrorist attack involving airplanes
.... besides how could there be guidlines when this sort of attack never happened before !??!?!?!?!
Ding, ding, ding! We have a new submission for stupidest Topix post ever!

YellowPissReality is gonna be... Pissed?

"Tell him what he won, Bob."

"He's won a blond Scandinavian 6 foot tall girlfriend. Provided from the great folks at yourimaginarygirlfriend.com ."

Now, do you want to keep your prize, or do you wanna risk it and go for double jeopardy?

Oh man,

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#387 Jan 22, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
And I don't give a crap what your name is. Tom (I'm not isreality) Fontaine was dumb enough to post his and so dumb he thinks google searches are sources so showing him what else can be "proven" via a google search is relevant.
So your argument is don't blame the snake for you getting bit. Ok, snake.
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Pointing out how dumb one has to be to mindlessly regurgitate idiotic phrases like "free fall speed" is relevant to your inept azz.
Free fall is not velocity and velocity isn't speed? Ok, snake.
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Oh and controlled demolitions are done by weakening a building and allowing gravity to do the rest.

The rest of your post is, as always, meaningless drivel with no purpose other than obfuscation.
Big words from a small mind.

Oh, and controlled demolitions don't weaken every floor and the central core with explosives? Ok, snake.

This is why *applause*

Insults Are Easier

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#388 Jan 22, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
So your argument is don't blame the snake for you getting bit. Ok, snake.

Porkpie Hat wrote, "

Pointing out how dumb one has to be to mindlessly regurgitate idiotic phrases like "free fall speed" is relevant to your inept azz.

"

Free fall is not velocity and velocity isn't speed? Ok, snake.

Porkpie Hat wrote, "

Oh and controlled demolitions are done by weakening a building and allowing gravity to do the rest.

The rest of your post is, as always, meaningless drivel with no purpose other than obfuscation."

Big words from a small mind.

Oh, and controlled demolitions don't weaken every floor and the central core with explosives? Ok, snake.

This is why *applause*

Insults Are Easier
And of course your straw man, as always, argument has no merit since I didn't claim anything about every floor and the core being weakened.

Do you honestly think your inane drivel would have any impact outside of twooferdumb.

Rhetorical question, it wouldn't and doesn't which is why twoofcultists spend all of their time languishing on obscure message boards and no time actually doing anything tangible to further their already failed cause.

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#389 Jan 22, 2013
LOL ......... you don't have the first clue stupid
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Ding, ding, ding! We have a new submission for stupidest Topix post ever!
YellowPissReality is gonna be... Pissed?
"Tell him what he won, Bob."
"He's won a blond Scandinavian 6 foot tall girlfriend. Provided from the great folks at yourimaginarygirlfriend.com ."
Now, do you want to keep your prize, or do you wanna risk it and go for double jeopardy?
Oh man,
Insults Are Easier

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#390 Jan 22, 2013
....... because for you, being a clueless Morn is easier !!!!
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So your argument is don't blame the snake for you getting bit. Ok, snake.
<quoted text>
Free fall is not velocity and velocity isn't speed? Ok, snake.
<quoted text>
Big words from a small mind.
Oh, and controlled demolitions don't weaken every floor and the central core with explosives? Ok, snake.
This is why *applause*
Insults Are Easier

Since: Sep 08

.

#391 Jan 22, 2013
?

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#392 Jan 22, 2013
.... your Gloop schtick is old .... get a life
The Gloop wrote:
?

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#393 Jan 22, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
And of course your straw man, as always, argument has no merit since I didn't claim anything about every floor and the core being weakened.
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Oh and controlled demolitions are done by weakening a building and allowing gravity to do the rest.
Trying to understand you is confusing. Are you saying controlled demolitions do not weaken the entire building to allow it to completely collapse, snake?
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Do you honestly think your inane drivel would have any impact outside of twooferdumb.
Do you honestly think anyone outside the most morally bankrupt are going to listen to you, Dudley Dowrong?
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Rhetorical question, it wouldn't and doesn't which is why twoofcultists spend all of their time languishing on obscure message boards and no time actually doing anything tangible to further their already failed cause.
Say's the snake with 30,000 posts over 4 years on obscure message boards.

You don't even grasp what you say, how can you grasp science or the scientific method?

Thats why

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#394 Jan 22, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
<quoted text>.... your Gloop schtick is old .... get a life
So is yours, inarticulate yet educated stock broker with the 6 foot tall blond Scandinavian girlfriend who cant even express himself intelligently on the internet.

Better go meet her for real bro, I have a feeling you are being Catfished!

Insults Are Easier

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#395 Jan 22, 2013
the only problem with your little theory is that we work together so we see each other every day ...so tonight when you are on here posting your stupid crap, We'll be having dinner at the Strip House and then we'll go to my apartment on the West Side and spend the night together ..... what will you be doing tonight basement dweller !?!?!?!... LOL
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So is yours, inarticulate yet educated stock broker with the 6 foot tall blond Scandinavian girlfriend who cant even express himself intelligently on the internet.
Better go meet her for real bro, I have a feeling you are being Catfished!
Insults Are Easier

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#396 Jan 22, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Trying to understand you is confusing. Are you saying controlled demolitions do not weaken the entire building to allow it to completely collapse, snake?
The concept of acceleration and velocity is confusing to you too...that's really not my problem.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you honestly think anyone outside the most morally bankrupt are going to listen to you, Dudley Dowrong?
Says the loser who lied about steel plating.

I have no problems with anyone educating themselves to understand the science behind the issues involved, you show 10 minute videos aimed at dumbing them down to your pathetic level.

That speaks for itself.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Say's the snake with 30,000 posts over 4 years on obscure message boards.
You don't even grasp what you say, how can you grasp science or the scientific method?
Thats why
Insults Are Easier
I grasp what I say perfectly well and have stated many times that making fun of scientifically illiterate losers such as yourself is a form of entertainment.

Steel plating.
Say the Truth

San Rafael, CA

#398 Jan 22, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>The concept of acceleration and velocity is confusing to you too...that's really not my problem.
<quoted text>Says the loser who lied about steel plating.
I have no problems with anyone educating themselves to understand the science behind the issues involved, you show 10 minute videos aimed at dumbing them down to your pathetic level.
That speaks for itself.
<quoted text>I grasp what I say perfectly well and have stated many times that
**********
making fun of scientifically illiterate losers such as yourself is a form of entertainment.
**********
Steel plating.
There isn't much else to do around the condo here in the great northern snow wilderness.
.
If you visit be sure to bring yer boots to hold the occasional sheep you find in these parts. There is not too many cliffs you can push em towards sos they don't buck you off.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
.
That's As Funny As Skitty canadian Sheep Huh eh !

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#399 Jan 22, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>The concept of acceleration and velocity is confusing to you too...that's really not my problem.

Insults Are Easier wrote, "<quoted text>
Do you honestly think anyone outside the most morally bankrupt are going to listen to you, Dudley Dowrong?"

Says the loser who lied about steel plating.

I have no problems with anyone educating themselves to understand the science behind the issues involved, you show 10 minute videos aimed at dumbing them down to your pathetic level.

That speaks for itself.

Insults Are Easier wrote, "<quoted text>
Say's the snake with 30,000 posts over 4 years on obscure message boards.
You don't even grasp what you say, how can you grasp science or the scientific method?
Thats why
Insults Are Easier
"

I grasp what I say perfectly well and have stated many times that making fun of scientifically illiterate losers such as yourself is a form of entertainment.

Steel plating.
Galileo (not you) defined speed as the distance covered per unit of time.

http://youtu.be/IMKyfJ6xGUM

Free fall is expressed the same way in meters per second squared, which is simply increasing distance per unit of time or accelerating speed.

Saying free fall speed may not be the most precise way of expressing it, but it still communicates the idea.

Its the idea that scares you and makes you argue the meaningless aspects of free fall, to attempt to discredit the person, while not being able to discredit the idea and the fact that WTC 1&2 fell near free fall, and Building 7 actually attained free fall acceleration during portions of it's collapse. And a building that attains free fall at any point during collapse, will do it only under one condition, explosives.

Thats why NIST was so unscientific, and why you are simply a dishonest parrot of propaganda.

You don't admit your mistakes, you only claim they happen by mistake. You don't admit when you're wrong, you simply blame the person you wronged.

If you had any decency, you would publish your name and apologize to the person you falsely accused of being a pedophile because you disagree with his position about 9/11.

But we all know thats outside your cowardly psychology, and you will always practice the concept of

Insults Are Easier

Since: Sep 08

.

#400 Jan 22, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
.... your Gloop schtick is old .... get a life
<quoted text>
Gloop!!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#401 Jan 23, 2013
Gloop !?!?!?!?!?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#402 Jan 23, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Galileo (not you) defined speed as the distance covered per unit of time.

http://youtu.be/IMKyfJ6xGUM

Free fall is expressed the same way in meters per second squared, which is simply increasing distance per unit of time or accelerating speed.

Saying free fall speed may not be the most precise way of expressing it, but it still communicates the idea.
Good grief Ignorance!

You're the epitome of a sheep in sheepskin clothing.

Blue and red are both colours, but they're not the same colours.

Wheat and rye are grains, but they're not the same grains.

Velocity and acceleration are expressions of movement, but they're not the same expressions of movement.

Now I wouldn't trust someone who can't tell red from blue to recite the order of colours in a rainbow accurately.

I wouldn't trust a baker who doesn't know the difference between wheat and rye to bake me a loaf of Winnipeg rye.

And I definitely wouldn't trust a twoofer who doesn't know the difference between velocity and acceleration to discern good science from bad.

But you would, which explains why you're so willing to play the fool.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Its the idea that scares you and makes you argue the meaningless aspects of free fall, to attempt to discredit the person, while not being able to discredit the idea and the fact that WTC 1&2 fell near free fall, and Building 7 actually attained free fall acceleration during portions of it's collapse. And a building that attains free fall at any point during collapse, will do it only under one condition, explosives.
The idea that you think anything twoof claims is scary to me, makes me laugh.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Thats why NIST was so unscientific, and why you are simply a dishonest parrot of propaganda.
According to you, the defender of the phrase "free fall speed".

I have no problems proclaiming that the real science done by real scientists at NIST will survive your onslaught of ignorance.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>You don't admit your mistakes, you only claim they happen by mistake. You don't admit when you're wrong, you simply blame the person you wronged.
Hahahahaha!

What a marvellous failure of logic!

I don't admit my mistakes but I admit when I've made a mistake.

All this from the loser who lied about steel plating.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>If you had any decency, you would publish your name and apologize to the person you falsely accused of being a pedophile because you disagree with his position about 9/11.

But we all know thats outside your cowardly psychology, and you will always practice the concept of

Insults Are Easier
Really?

What's truly hilarious is that you completely miss the point of this...which isn't surprising at all.

Tom (I'm not isreality) Fontaine regularly uses google search results as a source for his delusions. If you google "tom fontaine molested children", it results in millions of hits.

If his argumentum ad googlium has any validity, then we can also assume he's truly is a child molester.

Your failure to understand the logic of that is hardly surprising and your defence of a scumbag like Fontaine is your problem, not mine.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min June VanDerMark 550,761
Senator Kay Hagan, Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush, A... 5 min Power_2014 5
Homosexuals BLASPHEME God by their lifestyle 18 min Enter Username 2
Before and After 22 min Enter Username 6
Nine Eleven 23 min Enter Username 147
Pope: 'Corruption Is a Greater Evil than Sin' 26 min Enter Username 7
Moses never existed 26 min thewordofme 80
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 39 min WasteWater 262,055
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 42 min Anon 753,481
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Innocent Holy dr ... 602,754
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 5 hr Chris Clearwater 174,524

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE