created by: inquiring minds | Jan 4, 2013

Top Stories

17,784 votes

Was 911 an Inside Job

Click on an option to vote

  • YES
  • No
  • Don't know
  • Possibly
Comments
341 - 360 of 4,996 Comments Last updated Jul 8, 2014

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#362
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>I wouldn't worry anyway. The truth is that I admit when I make a mistake but won't let shysters like yourself off with a free pass when you misinform and lie for twoof.

Steel plating is a textbook example of that and unless if you would have admitted to your claim being a mistake right from the start, I would drop it.

Regarding the amount if mass ejected, studies done on the collapses conclude that once initiation was over, all accumulated mass (aside from the upper block) could be ejected and all that would change would be the time it took to collapse.

Bazant made reference to various processes which would have, aside from chaos, determined mass shedding and interestingly, the first engineer I spoke with brought two of these processes up in our discussions.

One would be compression. How much could the mass compress in the collapse front zone.

We have artifacts of compression that illustrate multiple floors being compressed into one chunk less than 5' thick so this is definitely relevant.

The other issue is that the towers were 95% air so the majority of of mass that doesn't defect over the side cans be assumed to simply follow the direction of gravity; straight down.

Again, science has already answered these questions and some of those answers exists as common knowledge to engineers who've studied to understand such things.

It's all good that you can ask such questions but the reality is that aside from those gullible enough to believe people like you, your queries and claims would never make it if pit to the test in front of those knowledgable enough to see through them.

Steel plating.
Here's my post again Ignorance, try actually addressing it this time.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#363
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

NIST, while not testing for the residue of thermite, did manage to calculate that it would take "many thousands of pounds."
.
This logic is remarkable. An assisted collapse would require many thousands of pounds, yet their preferred explanation of a gravity only collapse would require none.
.
If an assisted collapse requires thermite charges to be placed on hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building, how would a gravity only collapse be able to perform that same task?
.
Where's the piledriver?
.
NIST sure doesn't know.
.
http://gordonssite.tripod.com/id3.html
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah aha hhaahah ahahgghhh
.
That's As Funny As Gravity Only Collapse Huh eh !

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#364
Jan 22, 2013
 
where did you get your degree in structural engineering again !?!?!?!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
NIST, while not testing for the residue of thermite, did manage to calculate that it would take "many thousands of pounds."
.
This logic is remarkable. An assisted collapse would require many thousands of pounds, yet their preferred explanation of a gravity only collapse would require none.
.
If an assisted collapse requires thermite charges to be placed on hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building, how would a gravity only collapse be able to perform that same task?
.
Where's the piledriver?
.
NIST sure doesn't know.
.
http://gordonssite.tripod.com/id3.html
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah aha hhaahah ahahgghhh
.
That's As Funny As Gravity Only Collapse Huh eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#365
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dr_Zorderz wrote:
NIST, while not testing for the residue of thermite, did manage to calculate that it would take "many thousands of pounds."
.
This logic is remarkable. An assisted collapse would require many thousands of pounds, yet their preferred explanation of a gravity only collapse would require none.
.
If an assisted collapse requires thermite charges to be placed on hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building, how would a gravity only collapse be able to perform that same task?
.
Where's the piledriver?
.
NIST sure doesn't know.
.
http://gordonssite.tripod.com/id3.html
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ah aha hhaahah ahahgghhh
.
That's As Funny As Gravity Only Collapse Huh eh !
Wow!

Talk about a straw man wrapped up in circular logic oh elevator boy-SHEEP 20 pilots!

Lets see the context and compare it to your...ahem...selective editing shall we?

"NIST: Therefore, while a thermite reaction can cut through large steel columns, many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed inconspicuously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition."

Obviously NIST is referring to the requirement of thousands of pounds if thermite for twoofcultists delusions to be true.

Now since neither your or Gordon can argue against that , you decided to cherry pick the statement by them resulting in ambiguity that you could then imply a misrepresentation to and pretend you've made some sort of point.

Does that really work in your slurpee coloured world oh elevator boy-SHEEP 20 pilots?

NIST was directly referring to a claim twoofers regularly make yet Gordon and yourself ignore their point completely and create an easily seen straw man argument augmented by the circular reasoning that because you claim it was thermite and NIST says thermite wasn't used, NIST must then be wrong.

Wow...just wow!

Only in twooferdumb would such a failure of logic be acceptable for regurgitation!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#366
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NIST’s findings do not support the "pancake theory" of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel "trusses" integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below).
.
Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards.
.
Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.

It is welcomed as a step in the right direction that NIST do not ascribe to the ludicrous floor pancake theory, but they have failed to give any collapse theory.
.
They tell us what did not happen and even provide a diagram of the floors which did not pancake, yet fail to identify how the collapse progressed.
.
In fact right at the point where NIST says it has found the "probable collapse sequence" the NIST investigation stops because everyone already knows what happened next. The building simply fell down driven only by gravity.
.
http://gordonssite.tripod.com/id3.html
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ha ah a
.
That's Really A Good One Huh eh !

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#367
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Again with a meaningless word salad and a host of new lies.

Yes Ignorance is Bliss, you did spend days insulting 33+ million people in your inept attempt to spite just one of us.

Abd Bazant is one of the most respected structural engineers in the world as opposed to...little old you who has nothing but ad hom attacks and various other logical fallacies to work with all while denying the reality that free fall is defined as an acceleration.

Here's a little test Ignorance, twoofers mindlessly repeat the phrase "free fall speed" as if it had meaning. You claim it represents a value (x) that proves nefarious intent.

Solve for "x"!

Oh wait, we've played this and all you could do was regurgitate twoofer word salad filled with silly memes, misrepresentations and outright lies.

Why is that again?

Oh ya, because,

[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss
Don't you just wish you knew my name so you could spread the rumor that I was a pedophile? Look at your post count, post salad?

Yea, you have credibility. Now thats funny!

When the Apple hit Newton in the head, a witness asked how fast was it going? Did newton reply it wasn't a speed, so you cant ask me that question?

There is one type of free fall, regardless of the semantics quibbled over what meters per second squared means.

The entire waste of time that debunkers go through to argue semantics about what defines free fall is only a diversion to avoid what causes a building to fall at that speed, or free fall.

Buildings in free fall collapses are caused by instantaneously removing the resistance, and that is what explosives need to accomplish in controlled demolition. And thats why NIST never did one test for explosives or even followed the scientific theory.

The argument of easiest resistance for a debunker is to quibble over the semantics of free fall, instead of the harder question as to why the buildings actually fell that fast.

And Bazant may be a respected engineer, but that doesn't mean his opinion about 9/11 was vetted using the scientific method. Einstein was a lowly patent clerk when he had to abide by it.

Are Canadians traitors to the scientific method the same way they were traitors to the American revolution? Perhaps I'm just missing a cultural difference between us.

Accusing people of pedophilia is easy, but

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#368
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>And what's so funny is its you losers always whining even though you do it all the time.

Hell, Ignorance is Bliss spent days trying to insult me by insulting all 30+ million Canadians over and over....yet still whines like a baby about insults (actually just those directed at twoofsheep, he doesn't have an issue when it's twoofcultists doing the insulting!).
Im against all unwarranted insults intended to derail discussion and reduce conversation to school yard pissing contests. The reason I don't argue with my fellow searchers of truth is I know how I was treated by Pork and his troll crew after my first post, so I assume like minded people have also been treated just as shabbily. Thats why my condemnation of insults is not hypocritical when I only address the childish hate trolls like Pork and his sycophants.

The fact that Pork and his hate troll crew are unaware of this basic fact is just another indication how unintelligent and lacking of self awareness they truly are, or perhaps they know it and that further indicates how deceitful they are when attempting to paint those whom which they disagree in a negative light.

The purveyors and worshippers of government lies and indoctrination are forced to go through great lengths to convince the population and themselves that everything is exactly as sold. And many of them will sink to any level of depravity to make sure that twisted vision succeeds.

This is also why

Insults Are Easier

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#369
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I don't need any degree to post here the work of others that do have quite high qualifications and degrees in peer reviewed, journal published papers.
.
Some of these articles are quite long winded and sure not to be read completely by most viewers of this forum.
.
So I find a relevant paragraph or two and post it with the link to where it came from so that anyone else who is interested can go find the original article and read all of it for themselves at their leisure.
.
If anyone doesn't like it, they can STFU.
.
Call it cherry picking or whatever you want. If it happens to be a complete fraud or sneaky strawman argument, then it will stand on its own as that.
.
I did not create most of the articles I post in this forum and am not responsible for their content.
.
As for their relevancy, I let the reader decide that for themselves.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ha ah ha
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#370
Jan 22, 2013
 
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow!
Talk about a straw man wrapped up in circular logic oh elevator boy-SHEEP 20 pilots!
Lets see the context and compare it to your...ahem...selective editing shall we?
"NIST: Therefore, while a thermite reaction can cut through large steel columns, many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed inconspicuously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition."
Obviously NIST is referring to the requirement of thousands of pounds if thermite for twoofcultists delusions to be true.
Now since neither your or Gordon can argue against that , you decided to cherry pick the statement by them resulting in ambiguity that you could then imply a misrepresentation to and pretend you've made some sort of point.
Does that really work in your slurpee coloured world oh elevator boy-SHEEP 20 pilots?
NIST was directly referring to a claim twoofers regularly make yet Gordon and yourself ignore their point completely and create an easily seen straw man argument augmented by the circular reasoning that because you claim it was thermite and NIST says thermite wasn't used, NIST must then be wrong.
Wow...just wow!
Only in twooferdumb would such a failure of logic be acceptable for regurgitation!
You seem to have regurgitated it quite easily.
.
Is there nobody not trying to snare you in your idea of a strawman argument to prove NIST wrong?
.
Let's face it NIST was and is still a sorry joke respective to 9/11.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ah ah ha ha ha
.
That's As Funny As A Circular Strawman Huh eh !

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#371
Jan 22, 2013
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA Oh the IRONY !!!!!!!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
I don't need any degree to post here the work of others that do have quite high qualifications and degrees in peer reviewed, journal published papers.
.
Some of these articles are quite long winded and sure not to be read completely by most viewers of this forum.
.
So I find a relevant paragraph or two and post it with the link to where it came from so that anyone else who is interested can go find the original article and read all of it for themselves at their leisure.
.
If anyone doesn't like it, they can STFU.
.
Call it cherry picking or whatever you want. If it happens to be a complete fraud or sneaky strawman argument, then it will stand on its own as that.
.
I did not create most of the articles I post in this forum and am not responsible for their content.
.
As for their relevancy, I let the reader decide that for themselves.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ha ah ha
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#372
Jan 22, 2013
 
Lets look at some ofe the people from the

ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Assessment Study Team Members

W. Gene Corley, Ph.D., P.E., S.E.(Team Lead)
Senior Vice President
Construction Technologies Labor
Skokie, Illinois
Expert in building collapse investigations; principal
investigator, Murrah Federal Office Building Study

William Baker, P.E., S.E.
Partner, Skidmore Owings & Merrill LLP
Chicago, Illinois
Expert in tall-building design

Jonathan Barnett, Ph.D.
Professor, Center for Fire Safety Studies
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester, Massachusetts
Expert in building fire safety design and fire computer modeling

David T. Biggs, P.E.
Ryan-Biggs Associates
Troy, New York
Expert in facades

Bill Coulbourne, P.E., S.E.
Principal, URS Corporation
Gaithersburg, Maryland
Expert in BPAT Studies

Edward M. DePaola, P.E.
Partner, Severud Associates
Consulting Engineers
New York, New York
Expert in structural engineering

Robert F. Duval
Senior Fire Investigator
National Fire Protection Association
Expert in fire investigations

John W. Fisher, P.E.
The Joseph T. Stuart Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Lehigh University
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Expert in metallurgy and connections

Richard G. Gewain
Senior Engineer, Hughes Associates, Inc.
Baltimore, Maryland
Expert in fire engineerin
g
Ramon Gilsanz, P.E., S.E.
Parner, Gilsanz Murray Steficek, LLP
New York City
Expert in structural engineering

John L. Gross, Ph.D., P.E.
Leader, Structural Systems and Design Group
Building and Fire Research Laboratory
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Gaithersburg, Maryland
Expert in steel design and fire-structure interaction

Ronald Hamburger, P.E., S.E.
Senior Vice President,
EQE Structural
Engineers Division
ABS Consulting
Belmont, California
Expert in structural analysis and design

Nestor Iwankiw
Vice President, Engineering and Research
American Institute for Steel Construction
Chicago, Illinois
Expert in steel design

Venkatesh Kodur, Ph.D., P.E.
Institute for Research in Construction
National Research Council of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
Expert in fire resistance design and fire effects on materials

Eric Letvin
Department Head, Hazards Engineering Group
Greenhorne & O’Mara
Greenbelt, Maryland
Project Manager

Jon Magnusson, P.E.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire, Inc.
Seattle, Washington
Expert in structural analysis and high-rise design

Christopher E. Marrion, P.E.
Fire Strategist, Arup Fire
New York, New York
Expert in fire engineering

Therese P. McAllister, Ph.D., P.E.
Senior Structural Engineer
Greenhorne & O’Mara
Greenbelt, Maryland
Team Coordinator

James Milke, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate Professor & Associate Chair, Department of Fire Protection
Engineering
University of Maryland
College Park, Maryland
Expert in fire resistance analysis

Harold E. "Bud" Nelson
Consultant
Annandale, Virginia
Expert in fire engineering

James A. Rossberg, P.E.
Director, Structural Engineering Institute
ASCE
Reston, Virginia
ASCE Staff Lead
Saw-Teen See, P.E.
Managing Partner

Leslie E. Robertson Associates
New York, New York
Expert in structural analysis and high-rise design

Robert Smilowitz, Ph.D., P.E.
Principal, Weidlinger Associates
New York City
Expert in blast effects

Bruce Swiren
Hurricane Program Manager, Region II
Federal Emergency Management Agency
New York, New York
FEMA Region II Contact

Paul Tertell, P.E.
Program Manager, Building Performance Assessment Team
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C.
FEMA BPAT Project Officer

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#373
Jan 22, 2013
 
RADEKT wrote:
Lets look at some ofe the people from the

ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Assessment Study Team Members

W. Gene Corley, Ph.D., P.E., S.E.(Team Lead)
Senior Vice President
Construction Technologies Labor
Skokie, Illinois
Expert in building collapse investigations; principal
investigator, Murrah Federal Office Building Study

William Baker, P.E., S.E.
Partner, Skidmore Owings & Merrill LLP
Chicago, Illinois
Expert in tall-building design

Jonathan Barnett, Ph.D.
Professor, Center for Fire Safety Studies
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester, Massachusetts
Expert in building fire safety design and fire computer modeling

David T. Biggs, P.E.
Ryan-Biggs Associates
Troy, New York
Expert in facades

Bill Coulbourne, P.E., S.E.
Principal, URS Corporation
Gaithersburg, Maryland
Expert in BPAT Studies

Edward M. DePaola, P.E.
Partner, Severud Associates
Consulting Engineers
New York, New York
Expert in structural engineering

Robert F. Duval
Senior Fire Investigator
National Fire Protection Association
Expert in fire investigations

John W. Fisher, P.E.
The Joseph T. Stuart Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Lehigh University
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Expert in metallurgy and connections

Richard G. Gewain
Senior Engineer, Hughes Associates, Inc.
Baltimore, Maryland
Expert in fire engineerin
g
Ramon Gilsanz, P.E., S.E.
Parner, Gilsanz Murray Steficek, LLP
New York City
Expert in structural engineering

John L. Gross, Ph.D., P.E.
Leader, Structural Systems and Design Group
Building and Fire Research Laboratory
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Gaithersburg, Maryland
Expert in steel design and fire-structure interaction

Ronald Hamburger, P.E., S.E.
Senior Vice President,
EQE Structural
Engineers Division
ABS Consulting
Belmont, California
Expert in structural analysis and design

Nestor Iwankiw
Vice President, Engineering and Research
American Institute for Steel Construction
Chicago, Illinois
Expert in steel design

Venkatesh Kodur, Ph.D., P.E.
Institute for Research in Construction
National Research Council of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
Expert in fire resistance design and fire effects on materials

Eric Letvin
Department Head, Hazards Engineering Group
Greenhorne & OÂ’Mara
Greenbelt, Maryland
Project Manager

Jon Magnusson, P.E.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire, Inc.
Seattle, Washington
Expert in structural analysis and high-rise design

Christopher E. Marrion, P.E.
Fire Strategist, Arup Fire
New York, New York
Expert in fire engineering

Therese P. McAllister, Ph.D., P.E.
Senior Structural Engineer
Greenhorne & OÂ’Mara
Greenbelt, Maryland
Team Coordinator

James Milke, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate Professor & Associate Chair, Department of Fire Protection
Engineering
University of Maryland
College Park, Maryland
Expert in fire resistance analysis

Harold E. "Bud" Nelson
Consultant
Annandale, Virginia
Expert in fire engineering

James A. Rossberg, P.E.
Director, Structural Engineering Institute
ASCE
Reston, Virginia
ASCE Staff Lead
Saw-Teen See, P.E.
Managing Partner

Leslie E. Robertson Associates
New York, New York
Expert in structural analysis and high-rise design

Robert Smilowitz, Ph.D., P.E.
Principal, Weidlinger Associates
New York City
Expert in blast effects

Bruce Swiren
Hurricane Program Manager, Region II
Federal Emergency Management Agency
New York, New York
FEMA Region II Contact

Paul Tertell, P.E.
Program Manager, Building Performance Assessment Team
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C.
FEMA BPAT Project Officer
the appeal to authority argument? Does that also preclude the use of the scientific method?!?!?!?!?!

Insults Are Easier
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#374
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The letters FEMA tells it all, INSIDE JOB.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#375
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Its amazing what a name that someone makes up on Topix can say about the psychological nature of the person. Obviously, yellows urination upon reality says a lot about him. A constantly bitter coward who pretends to be tough by cursing over the internet to cover his own insignificance and impudence, so much so he has never kissed a girl. "Oh whens lord, whens it gonna be my time?"

He knows ;)

How is anyone supposed to trust the words of a person who does nothing but insult, make false accusations, and say constantly ridiculously unintelligent things? And one who obviously doesn't have the gravitas to be aware of his own hypocrisy?
YellowPissreality wrote:
why do you two idiots hide your ISP location ??
He asks this question while hiding his own.
YellowPissreality wrote:
NO SEISMIC SIGNATURE OF EXPLOSIVES RETARD!
Yes, thats one of the benefits of using super thermates.
YellowPissreality wrote:
NFPA 921 is not valid for a terrorist attck Dumb Ass
Possibly the single most ignorant statement ever postulated on Topix, aside from RADEKT's assertion that torture can't affect future testimony.

You really can't make this stuff up!

The scientific method, good enough for Einstein, good enough for you.

Insults Are Easier

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#376
Jan 22, 2013
 
NOOOOOOOO this is the appeal to the experts argument ..... something you know NOTHING about !?!??!?!?!
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
the appeal to authority argument? Does that also preclude the use of the scientific method?!?!?!?!?!
Insults Are Easier

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#377
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Don't you just wish you knew my name so you could spread the rumor that I was a pedophile? Look at your post count, post salad?

Yea, you have credibility. Now thats funny!

When the Apple hit Newton in the head, a witness asked how fast was it going? Did newton reply it wasn't a speed, so you cant ask me that question?

There is one type of free fall, regardless of the semantics quibbled over what meters per second squared means.

The entire waste of time that debunkers go through to argue semantics about what defines free fall is only a diversion to avoid what causes a building to fall at that speed, or free fall.

Buildings in free fall collapses are caused by instantaneously removing the resistance, and that is what explosives need to accomplish in controlled demolition. And thats why NIST never did one test for explosives or even followed the scientific theory.

The argument of easiest resistance for a debunker is to quibble over the semantics of free fall, instead of the harder question as to why the buildings actually fell that fast.

And Bazant may be a respected engineer, but that doesn't mean his opinion about 9/11 was vetted using the scientific method. Einstein was a lowly patent clerk when he had to abide by it.

Are Canadians traitors to the scientific method the same way they were traitors to the American revolution? Perhaps I'm just missing a cultural difference between us.

Accusing people of pedophilia is easy, but

Insults Are Easier
So you still can't solve for "x" and require heaps of word salad to deflect from that fact eh Ignorance?

And I don't give a crap what your name is. Tom (I'm not isreality) Fontaine was dumb enough to post his and so dumb he thinks google searches are sources so showing him what else can be "proven" via a google search is relevant.

Pointing out how dumb one has to be to mindlessly regurgitate idiotic phrases like "free fall speed" is relevant to your inept azz.

Oh and controlled demolitions are done by weakening a building and allowing gravity to do the rest.

The rest of your post is, as always, meaningless drivel with no purpose other than obfuscation.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#378
Jan 22, 2013
 
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Im against all unwarranted insults intended to derail discussion and reduce conversation to school yard pissing contests. The reason I don't argue with my fellow searchers of truth is I know how I was treated by Pork and his troll crew after my first post, so I assume like minded people have also been treated just as shabbily. Thats why my condemnation of insults is not hypocritical when I only address the childish hate trolls like Pork and his sycophants.

The fact that Pork and his hate troll crew are unaware of this basic fact is just another indication how unintelligent and lacking of self awareness they truly are, or perhaps they know it and that further indicates how deceitful they are when attempting to paint those whom which they disagree in a negative light.

The purveyors and worshippers of government lies and indoctrination are forced to go through great lengths to convince the population and themselves that everything is exactly as sold. And many of them will sink to any level of depravity to make sure that twisted vision succeeds.

This is also why

Insults Are Easier
You're also full of crap.

Hell, you spent days insulting 33+ million people just to spite one!

Steel plating.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#379
Jan 22, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
I don't need any degree to post here the work of others that do have quite high qualifications and degrees in peer reviewed, journal published papers.
.
Some of these articles are quite long winded and sure not to be read completely by most viewers of this forum.
.
So I find a relevant paragraph or two and post it with the link to where it came from so that anyone else who is interested can go find the original article and read all of it for themselves at their leisure.
.
If anyone doesn't like it, they can STFU.
.
Call it cherry picking or whatever you want. If it happens to be a complete fraud or sneaky strawman argument, then it will stand on its own as that.
.
I did not create most of the articles I post in this forum and am not responsible for their content.
.
As for their relevancy, I let the reader decide that for themselves.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ha ha ah ha
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !
You've proven, repeatedly, that you have zero concept of even the basics of physics.

Yet you claim you can discern good science from bad.

Now THAT'S funny oh elevator boy-SHEEP 20 pilots!

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#380
Jan 22, 2013
 
Porkpie Hat wrote:
"NIST: Therefore, while a thermite reaction can cut through large steel columns, many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed inconspicuously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition."

Obviously NIST is referring to the requirement of thousands of pounds if thermite for twoofcultists delusions to be true.
This 10 minute vid demonstrates how wrong you and NIST's entire assertion is.

http://youtu.be/Qamecech9m4

Super thermate is more powerful then thermite, no wonder NIST failed to address or check for its use.

And when thermate is used to cut the bolts, much less then the thousands of pounds of thermite is required.

The scientific method, good enough for Einstein, good enough for you.

Insults Are Easier

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#381
Jan 22, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>You seem to have regurgitated it quite easily.
.
Is there nobody not trying to snare you in your idea of a strawman argument to prove NIST wrong?
.
Let's face it NIST was and is still a sorry joke respective to 9/11.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ah ah ha ha ha
.
That's As Funny As A Circular Strawman Huh eh !
Hand waving and insults, your Ignorance is Bliss sock is gonna be pissed!

Oh right, the twoofsheep double standard!

Oh elevator boy-SHEEP 20 pilots, you avoided my entire post!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min atheism is destru... 730,678
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 min mike 599,578
Last Word + 2 4 min Doug77 424
Is ISIS God's Army Sent to Punish the Wicked? 10 min Telegram Sam 0
Would Putin be a better US President than Obama? 12 min The Slider 0
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 15 min well 94,418
Appjoy invite code 17 min g34wof30 36
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 29 min guest 537,304
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 43 min Was 9 11 a conspi... 259,382
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 2 hr An NFL Fan 117,868

Search the Top Stories Forum:
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••