Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“ Soon: too late to protest”

Since: Jan 09

Location hidden

#3698 Apr 1, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The Four Horsemen of Banking,
(Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo)
own the Four Horsemen of Oil,
(Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths.
.
But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.
.
According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.[1]
.
So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?
.
This information is guarded much more closely. My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds. This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.
.
One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust Corporation – founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America. A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild. Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley.[2]
.
J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US.
.
They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
.
These are our Masters.
.
Remember them when hyperinflation is upon us and your bank account is seized.
.
Or Do You Believe In Magik?
.
Audit The Fed Now!
Good points. They ARE our masters, but only because the American people are the world’s biggest cowards. Then there are conservatives who are not only the most gutless, but also so dumb they keep voting for the traitors who push the New World Order on us by sabotaging us, and our economy, in every way they can.
(next post)

“ Soon: too late to protest”

Since: Jan 09

Location hidden

#3699 Apr 1, 2013
The Fed plans to destroy the economy
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/TNTT0NJV32TJDOF...
US News

How to Easily defeat the Fed
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/T5I4C787DGGSCA1...
US News
Kompressor

New York, NY

#3700 Apr 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Chandler claimed free fall. The huge chunks fell at a much higher rate of speed showing exactly what free fall would be.
NEXT
Here is physics teacher David Chandler offering incontrovertible evidence that the roof line of World Trade Center Building 7 is dropping at free fall:



Sentient beings will see with their own eyes that no "huge chunks fell at a much higher rate of speed," that in fact Chandler's analysis is correct, which is why NIST was forced to concede free fall.

But before NIST conceded free fall, NIST's lead investigator Shyam Sunder let slip why free fall was problematic and underminded the fire-induced failure hypothesis:

SUNDER:
"a free fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it ... there was structural resistance that was provided in this particular case. And you had a sequence of structural failures that had to take place. Everything was not instantaneous."
Here is Sunder saying this on camera:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

But, as David Chandler demonstrates, the roof-line of WTC 7 WAS IN FREE FALL FOR THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE BUILDING, indicating that -- as Shyam Sunder confesses, "there were no structural components below" that falling building!! The entire top floor suddenly has no structural components below? I wonder if it is possible for this to happen for any reason other than synchronized demolition? NIST's "progressive failure" CANNOT explain sudden simultaneous failures that lead to symmetric free fall of the top floor.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#3701 Apr 1, 2013
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
but also so dumb they keep voting for the traitors who push the New World Order on us by sabotaging us, and our economy, in every way they can.
Don't wake and bake!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#3702 Apr 1, 2013
Kompressor wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is physics teacher David Chandler offering incontrovertible evidence that the roof line of World Trade Center Building 7 is dropping at free fall:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =rP9Qp5QWRMQXX
Wrong!

16 to 18 seconds, you might need to take off your shoes so you get a full count.

"But the building doesn't look like it fell over, it fell "In it's own foot print" you might ask. That's because it is impossible for a 47 story steel building to fall over like that. It's not a small steel reinforced concrete building like the ones shown as *Examples* of buildings which fell over. Building 7 is more like the towers, made up of many pieces put together. It's not so much as a solid block as those steel reinforced concrete buildings.
The evidence supports the NIST contention that the building collapse progressed from the penthouse out as columns weakened by the fires. The slow sinking of the penthouses, indicating the internal collapse of the building behind the visible north wall, took 8.2 seconds according to a NIST preliminary report. Seismograph trace of the collapse of WTC 7 indicates that parts of the building were hitting the ground for 18 seconds. This means the collapse took at least 18 seconds, of which only the last approximately 15 seconds are visible in videos: 8 seconds for the penthouses and 7 seconds for the north wall to come down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3703 Apr 1, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
It's all they have left , long debunked crap, these idiots haven't had anything new since 2006
<quoted text>
Exactly. Chandler failed right from the get-go with his false free-fall assumption. It is clear the Towers collapsed at a much slower rate/ It is also a proven fact.

Chandler is King of Twoof.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3704 Apr 1, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong!
16 to 18 seconds, you might need to take off your shoes so you get a full count.
"But the building doesn't look like it fell over, it fell "In it's own foot print" you might ask. That's because it is impossible for a 47 story steel building to fall over like that. It's not a small steel reinforced concrete building like the ones shown as *Examples* of buildings which fell over. Building 7 is more like the towers, made up of many pieces put together. It's not so much as a solid block as those steel reinforced concrete buildings.
The evidence supports the NIST contention that the building collapse progressed from the penthouse out as columns weakened by the fires. The slow sinking of the penthouses, indicating the internal collapse of the building behind the visible north wall, took 8.2 seconds according to a NIST preliminary report. Seismograph trace of the collapse of WTC 7 indicates that parts of the building were hitting the ground for 18 seconds. This means the collapse took at least 18 seconds, of which only the last approximately 15 seconds are visible in videos: 8 seconds for the penthouses and 7 seconds for the north wall to come down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =G86yuunRBIwXX
Exactly.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3706 Apr 1, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
It's all they have left , long debunked crap, these idiots haven't had anything new since 2006
One would hope that the reality that in the 12 years since this happened, not a single solitary element of their myriad of possible theories has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, let alone to a scientific certainty, would begin to sink in by this point. The truth is, all they have left on their side of the debate is the otherwise seriously obsessively compulsive, making sure that door is unlocked thousands of times before they are finally sure they can open it.
Jonathan

Anonymous Proxy

#3707 Apr 1, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong!
16 to 18 seconds, you might need to take off your shoes so you get a full count.
"But the building doesn't look like it fell over, it fell "In it's own foot print" you might ask. That's because it is impossible for a 47 story steel building to fall over like that. It's not a small steel reinforced concrete building like the ones shown as *Examples* of buildings which fell over. Building 7 is more like the towers, made up of many pieces put together. It's not so much as a solid block as those steel reinforced concrete buildings.
The evidence supports the NIST contention that the building collapse progressed from the penthouse out as columns weakened by the fires. The slow sinking of the penthouses, indicating the internal collapse of the building behind the visible north wall, took 8.2 seconds according to a NIST preliminary report. Seismograph trace of the collapse of WTC 7 indicates that parts of the building were hitting the ground for 18 seconds. This means the collapse took at least 18 seconds, of which only the last approximately 15 seconds are visible in videos: 8 seconds for the penthouses and 7 seconds for the north wall to come down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =G86yuunRBIwXX
Don't you mean "you might need to take out your eyes" or "you might need to unplug your brain"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Oh look! Measurements of position of the roof line over a time interval indicate free fall acceleration of the roof line! I wonder what that means?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3708 Apr 1, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>One would hope that the reality that in the 12 years since this happened, not a single solitary element of their myriad of possible theories has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, let alone to a scientific certainty, would begin to sink in by this point. The truth is, all they have left on their side of the debate is the otherwise seriously obsessively compulsive, making sure that door is unlocked thousands of times before they are finally sure they can open it.
I wonder why some people dismiss all the obvious facts in favor of pure fantasy.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3710 Apr 1, 2013
Jonathan wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you mean "you might need to take out your eyes" or "you might need to unplug your brain"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =iGMvnwjUizYXX
Oh look! Measurements of position of the roof line over a time interval indicate free fall acceleration of the roof line! I wonder what that means?
Keep wondering buddy.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3711 Apr 1, 2013
Nick wrote:
<quoted text>
These victims' family members have seen enough evidence to convince them that a new, honest investigation into the destruction of WTC7 is necessary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Are you afraid of what an honest investigation would reveal?
Who is supposed to do such an investigation? How would such an investigation help them in a court of law?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3712 Apr 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
I wonder why some people dismiss all the obvious facts in favor of pure fantasy.
Pure and absolute faith in the evil They.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3713 Apr 1, 2013
Nick wrote:
These victims' family members have seen enough evidence to convince them that a new, honest investigation into the destruction of WTC7 is necessary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Are you afraid of what an honest investigation would reveal?
Yes dear, I'm sure you are able to find folk that gullible among any group you poll. What do you imagine you have actually proven? Despite your speculations to the contrary, given the massive amount of evidence collected since then, any new investigation will reach the exact same conclusions as the first. You have not proved a single element of your so called conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3714 Apr 1, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Pure and absolute faith in the evil They.
But which evil is the question right?
Says It All

Santa Cruz, CA

#3715 Apr 1, 2013
Was 911 an Inside Job
No 8,869 58%
YES 6,244 41%
Possibly 45 0%
Don't know 35 0%
Current Total 15,193

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3716 Apr 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Chandler failed right from the get-go with his false free-fall assumption. It is clear the Towers collapsed at a much slower rate/ It is also a proven fact.
Chandler is King of Twoof.
Nothing is clear as your ridicule of a real truth seeker.
.
Ad Hom much ? You fuhking liar.
.
Clearly Magik Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3717 Apr 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
But which evil is the question right?
Its the govie evil of course.
.
lying waste of water is evil.
.
How was your sunday off work at the computer center?
.
Magikal Huh Eh !

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3719 Apr 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
But which evil is the question right?
Everything They do is intrinsically evil in intent and/or purpose, there's no need to sort.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3720 Apr 1, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Its the govie evil of course.
.
lying waste of water is evil.
.
How was your sunday off work at the computer center?
.
Magikal Huh Eh !
None of which you have proven to be factual yet.

Keep trying.

NEXT

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 6 min kook kent kant st... 701,538
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 8 min Prince of Darkness 6,869
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 11 min youRjoking 80,195
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 14 min Prince of Darkness 995,765
Last Post Wins !!! [ game time :) ] (Jan '11) 16 min Hatti_Hollerand 2,538
Tronald Dump's Fascist NAZI Coup d'Etat 34 min Johnny 2
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 2 hr Dang Jersey Piney 448,396