Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,794 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

Francis

Atlanta, GA

#3629 Mar 30, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
A quick summary of things I would need to convince me 9/11 was not an Inside Job:
.
1. A Single Piece of evidence to prove this was Al Qaeda which couldn't possibly have been manufactured by the CIA.
.
All the evidence appears manufactured. Show me something substantial which couldn't possibly have been manufactured.
.
2. The original Black Boxes and NTSB data which matches reality. ie forensic serial number identification back to the records of arcft in question
.
3. An Image or video proving a Boeing 757 really hit the Pentagon.
.
4. Chemical Testing of Physical Evidence and debris from Ground Zero.
.
5. Cheney's complete timeline and testimony before congress with the ability to subpoena documents and files from the day of 9/11 to prove the timeline of both Cheney and NORAD as well as any and all orders given to NORAD by Dick Cheney on 9/11.
.
Is that too much to ask for?
.
Because I Do Not Believe In Magik. Huh Eh !
There is a slight problem with your first point. The "al Qaeda" was a fabrication of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#3630 Mar 30, 2013
Lizbeth Salander wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a grumpy little boy! Quoting a page number must have been an unusual strain!
Take your time. Take a few days off.
(Or maybe NIST didn't manage to explain the free-fall drop of WTC 7
in the official report?)
Hey Liz, Ever heal up from that romp with your social worker?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#3631 Mar 30, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
A quick summary of things I would need to convince me 9/11 was not an Inside Job:
.
1. A Single Piece of evidence to prove this was Al Qaeda which couldn't possibly have been manufactured by the CIA.
OK, 20 Fake pilots who could not fly, that was manufactured by tin foil twoofers!

Since: Feb 11

THE WORLD IS MY OYSTER

#3632 Mar 30, 2013
Actually it was more like finding a dead man with a knife sticking out of his chest and you Idiots demanding an investigation for a heart attack
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The government so called investigation into 9/11 was more like finding a dead man with a knife sticking out of his chest and concluding that he died from a heart attack.
.
But Then The Government Expects Us To Believe In Magik Huh eh !
.
9/11 = Pure Wag The Dog Magik

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3633 Mar 30, 2013
Francis wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a slight problem with your first point. The "al Qaeda" was a fabrication of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Exactly!?!?!?
.
Everything about Al Qaeda has been manufactured by the CIA or other govie agency.
.

This should not be a problem for you to understand.
.
Unless You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3634 Mar 30, 2013
Captain John O Dung wrote:
Actually it was more like finding a dead man with a knife sticking out of his chest and you Idiots demanding an investigation for a heart attack
<quoted text>
You got it wrong again dung heap.
.
Actually it was more like finding a dead man with a knife sticking out of his chest and demanding an investigation.
.
Do You Believe In Magik dung heap Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3635 Mar 30, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
You got it wrong again dung heap.
.
Actually it was more like finding a dead man with a knife sticking out of his chest and demanding an investigation.
.
Do You Believe In Magik dung heap Huh Eh !
Then throwing away the knife and pronouncing him dead of a heart attack.
.
Why do the govie, the dung heap, waste of water, fag in kansas, mu shu, pissface, ratdick et al always get it so wrooong? Huh Eh !
.
Is it because:
.
They Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#3636 Mar 30, 2013
Says the Idiot who wants to check foe explosives even though we all saw a fully loaded 767 crash into the building at high speed ... OH THE IRONY 20 pilots, elevator, sheep boy HAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAAAAHHAAAAAAA AAAA !!!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Then throwing away the knife and pronouncing him dead of a heart attack.
.
Why do the govie, the dung heap, waste of water, fag in kansas, mu shu, pissface, ratdick et al always get it so wrooong? Huh Eh !
.
Is it because:
.
They Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3637 Mar 30, 2013
Unless you were there, and you were not, what you saw on TV was totally fake. Pure Wag The Dog.
.
The most spectacular moments of the "LIVE 9/11 TV BROADCASTS" were undoubtedly the images showing an “airplane” striking the World Trade Center. This comparative analysis is essential viewing to understand that those broadcasts were entirely fabricated from scratch:
.
These are the first 11 minutes of the September 11, 2001 LIVE TV BROADCASTS. The five major US TV networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, NBS and CNN) are synchronized - visually - using cues from apparent, shared 'satellite feeds' seen in the various broadcasts.
.
In spite of this, several inexplicable synch offsets occur randomly - at various times of the broadcasts.
.
A host of aberrations suggest that these 'LIVE broadcasts' simply cannot be real: artificial, saturated, monochromatic color schemes; unrealistic camera motions; numerous/aimless chopper fly-bys; one single, surreal bird-flock fly-by, etc. One must wonder what those many 'choppers' are up to in the first place: most simply fly across the screen at sustained speed.
.
Some are synched (between the networks), while some are not - or altogether missing. All of this suggests these images are merely a pre-fabricated batch of computer simulations designed to fool the world.
.
Keep in mind that these broadcasts should represent the immediate aftermath of a most unexpected event (the 1st “hijacked plane’s” strike at 8:46AM).
.
Yet, the 5 rival TV networks appear to be instantly interconnected – often sharing identical images in real-time, as if all were actually mixed in a single TV studio.
.
A series of other oddities occur in these crucial minutes of the day's 'newscasts. I have chosen to point out only a few significant ones – leaving the opportunity for anyone to pick out the rest. Test your observation skills !
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Too bad you don't have any skills pissface.
.
I got a gallon of dark stinky yellow piss saved up for your next golden shower pissy boy.
.
Since You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3638 Mar 30, 2013
Harold wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you mean by "out of context"? Please explain.
The report explained a small portion of the collapse caused by both fire and failure of an essential support column. What the report was explaining was the fact that the building collapsed due to a structural failure. Your post was out of context.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3639 Mar 30, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Unless you were there, and you were not, what you saw on TV was totally fake. Pure Wag The Dog.
.
The most spectacular moments of the "LIVE 9/11 TV BROADCASTS" were undoubtedly the images showing an “airplane” striking the World Trade Center. This comparative analysis is essential viewing to understand that those broadcasts were entirely fabricated from scratch:
.
These are the first 11 minutes of the September 11, 2001 LIVE TV BROADCASTS. The five major US TV networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, NBS and CNN) are synchronized - visually - using cues from apparent, shared 'satellite feeds' seen in the various broadcasts.
.
In spite of this, several inexplicable synch offsets occur randomly - at various times of the broadcasts.
.
A host of aberrations suggest that these 'LIVE broadcasts' simply cannot be real: artificial, saturated, monochromatic color schemes; unrealistic camera motions; numerous/aimless chopper fly-bys; one single, surreal bird-flock fly-by, etc. One must wonder what those many 'choppers' are up to in the first place: most simply fly across the screen at sustained speed.
.
Some are synched (between the networks), while some are not - or altogether missing. All of this suggests these images are merely a pre-fabricated batch of computer simulations designed to fool the world.
.
Keep in mind that these broadcasts should represent the immediate aftermath of a most unexpected event (the 1st “hijacked plane’s” strike at 8:46AM).
.
Yet, the 5 rival TV networks appear to be instantly interconnected – often sharing identical images in real-time, as if all were actually mixed in a single TV studio.
.
A series of other oddities occur in these crucial minutes of the day's 'newscasts. I have chosen to point out only a few significant ones – leaving the opportunity for anyone to pick out the rest. Test your observation skills !
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Too bad you don't have any skills pissface.
.
I got a gallon of dark stinky yellow piss saved up for your next golden shower pissy boy.
.
Since You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
Thousands of witnesses on the street disagree with your opinion. I'll take their word over your word.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3640 Mar 30, 2013
Captain John O Dung wrote:
Actually it was more like finding a dead man with a knife sticking out of his chest and you Idiots demanding an investigation for a heart attack
<quoted text>
Good straw-man argument. I agree it would be exactly like that.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3641 Mar 30, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Thousands of witnesses on the street disagree with your opinion. I'll take their word over your word.
Excuse me, but are you under the impression that I was I trying to convince YOU of anything?
.
I don't care who or what you believe!?!?!?!?!?
.
Cause You Obviously Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3642 Mar 30, 2013
What about the thousands of eye-witnesses in Manhattan ?”
.
A: There is no denying the existence of a large amount of eye-witness testimonies reported by the mainstream media - and even by more credible, independent sources. The vast majority refer to the sightings of the 2nd event at WTC2 - while strikingly few refer to the 1st event at WTC1. With this in mind - and permitting that witness reports might be a reliable source of information - we should concentrate on the available witness reports.
.
Of course, eye-witness testimonies are notoriously unreliable, particularly in the case of brief, rapidly unfolding events. In spite of this commonly-accepted fact, many people seem to be strongly attached to what (they perceive) was reported by "thousands" of eye-witnesses in Manhattan. A key question should be raised: Did most people report a “large passenger airliner?” The firm answer to this is: No.
.
Of those people who provided details of the object they saw, the majority reported anything but a large airliner. I submit below a cross-section of such testimonies: Of course, this selective list is only meant to get an idea of the variety of the 9/11 eye-witness reports – and is not intended to establish any conclusive proof. However, it goes to show that there was no general consensus on what precisely hit WTC2 :

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3643 Mar 30, 2013
SELECTED EYEWITNESS REPORTS DESCRIBING OBJECT STRIKING WTC2:

A SMALL PLANE
1. "At that point we were still not sure that it was a plane that had hit the tower. There was some talk from the civilians coming down that a plane hit. The consensus was that it was a small plane."- Credited to: Roy Chelson

A CESSNA OR LEAR JET TYPE OR...
2.“Numerous civilians were telling me that a plane had hit the building. There were discrepancies as to the type of plane. Some were saying it was a Cessna or Lear jet type, a small jet plane. Some said it was a large passenger plane. One person actually said that it was like a military style plane that actually shot missiles into the building”.- Credited to: Anthony Bartolomey

A SMALL (TRAINING) PLANE
3.“I saw it come up from the left, and I saw the plane coming through to the building, go inside, a small plane….no, no, it was plane, you know, like they teach the people to pilot a plane, a small plane, you know, it was that kind of plane…, and I never saw that plane before. It's like something, I don't know, it's like they worked with the motors, I never saw a plane like that before!”- Credited to: Karim Arraki

A CESSNA
4.“I was on my way to work…traffic was excellent…I received a call saying a small Cessna had hit the World trade Center…I was asked to go and man the Office of Emergency Management at the World Trade Center 7 on its 23d floor…”– Credited to: Barry Jennings

LIKE A SMALLER PLANE
5.“I was waiting a table and I literally saw a, it seemed to be a small plane. I just heard a couple of noises, it looked like it like it ‘bounced’ off the building and then I heard a, I just saw a huge like ball of fire on top and then the smoke seemed to simmer down…it just seemed like a smaller plane, I don’t think it was anything commercial.”- Stuart Nurick, LIVE on CBS NEWS

A SMALL, SMALL JET PLANE
6.“…We saw a plane flying low overhead which caught all of our attention. We looked up. It was making a b-line for the World Trade Centre. It was very low, extremely low, not a big plane like an airliner …uh… but not a tiny propeller plane, a small, small jet plane.”- Credited to: Mary Cozza

A LIGHT COMMUTER PLANE
7. "I mean, I hate to admit this, but I'm sitting there hoping that someone has made a mistake; there has been an accident; that this isn't the hijacked airplane, because there is confusion. We were told it was a light commuter airplane." Credited to:(news report)

THOUGHT PLANE WAS MUCH SMALLER
8. "I thought it could have been an accident...I thought the plane was much smaller..."- Credited to: Sid Bedingfield

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3644 Mar 30, 2013
A PROP JET
9. "I was told by somebody that we had an eyewitness who happened to be an off-duty firefighter who told me that he saw the first building get hit and it was hit by a prop jet, which I think turned out to be the wrong information, but everybody sees things differently."- Credited to: Steven Mosiello

A SMALLER TYPE PLANE
10. "And we went to a high point in our building, which is on the 25th floor, and you had a clear view of both World Trade Centers and the one that was smoking hard, and there was another plane that was flying low, and we just looked at it, and before we know it, it was just kamikaze, boom, right into the other tower... but it didn't seem like a big passenger jet. It was a smaller type plane, because it made some pretty radical turn, and flying low..." - Credited to: Mr. Tractsonburg

A SMALL JET
11.“We’re walking the dogs and we saw a plane flying really low, a jet, a small jet, and it flew directly into the World Trade Center..”- Credited to:(news report)

SMALL CARGO MILITARY
12. I got out of the car, and I told Larry I saw an FBI agent and I was going to start talking to him. I gave him my card, and he gave me a card. I said I thought that that second plane that went into the south tower was a military plane, like a transport or small cargo military.- Credited to: Battalion Chief Brian O’Flaherty

A BOMB....A MISSILE
13. "Hey Grandpa, I'll tell you what woke me up. They bombed the World Trade Centre. I'm looking at it and Mi-Kyung's video taping it. Terrible. I heard, Grandpa, I saw it. It could have been a plane, but I think it was a bomb...a missile...er...this could be world war three."- Credited to: Mi Kyung Heller

LIKE A MISSILE
14.“…I can only describe as, it sounded like a missile, not an airplane….it was definitely not the sound of a prop plane or anything like that….I grew up on military bases and I know the sound of jets and I’ve been in war zones and heard those kinds of different sounds….the sound itself was not of a prop plane , it was perhaps a jet, but it could have been a missile as well….it was high pitched, but it had a…er…a…whooshing sound, not, not like a prop plane…”- Don Dahler, LIVE on ABC TV

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3645 Mar 30, 2013
A ROCKET
15.“It was a big fireball or something from the plane I guess, came from across the street in front of our rig, and as we get out of the rig, there's a cop, city police officer, in the street. He's telling us, "I'm getting out of here. I just saw a rocket." He said he saw it come off the Woolworth Building and hit the tower”.- Credited to: Peter Fallucca

SOMETHING - PLANE OR MISSILE
16.“At that point I assumed you can't have two -- it can't be an accident to have two planes. So, I don't know if there's planes or missiles or what but something was hitting this thing. You saw debris was falling down.“- Credited to: Brian Dixon

NOT A BIG PLANE
17.”I was saying to him, "That plane is closer to us. It's really not a big plane going towards the building." Two seconds later it rammed into the building. "- Credited to: James Murphy

THOUGHT THEY SAW A MISSILE
18. " Some people thought they saw a missile, now I don't know how they could differentiate, but we might leave open the possibility that this was a missile attack on these buildings ..." Dick Oliver, LIVE on FOX News

LIKE THE SIZE OF A GOLF BALL
19.“I saw two other planes. One came in one way, and the other came in the other way, and there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance. Then the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fireball. It looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it. And the other two planes veered off into opposite directions.”- Credited to: Patricia Ondrovic

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3646 Mar 30, 2013
Note that 'missile' is mentioned in no uncertain terms even by a few newsmedia people: What to do with those? Did they simply tell the truth? Or were they actually instructed to do so? The latter option is theorized by some and may well be contemplated: If a "Joe Public" had very clearly seen a missile, he would undoubtedly find comfort in the fact that even war-zone experts like ABC's Don Dahler had been initially 'mistaken' as to what he saw. The endless TV replays of the BOEING 767 animation would have eventually put Joe's torments to rest. The TV images would have "cleansed" his recollections.

Generally speaking, the eye-witnesses on record reported a smaller airborne object than a wide-body passenger airliner. This fact alone is, to say the least, rather puzzling : how can a large, low-flying and very loud BOEING 767 be mistaken for a “small aircraft” by so many people? Try to picture yourself in New York that day: would you possibly have mistaken a 767 passing 700ft above you for a "small plane"?

Take “Flight 11”, for instance (the first alleged "hijacked plane"): It would have roared across the full length of Manhattan – from tip to toe, at full thrust and extremely low altitude: tens of thousands should recall that deafening event - yet hardly any witnesses on record (but a handful of newsmedia people) ever mention it.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3647 Mar 30, 2013
FACT: The only documented reports of a “Large Passenger Airplane” came from newsmedia employees.
(See: September Clues part D).

THE MISSILE HYPOTHESIS Arguably, what witnesses saw was a winged, plane-shaped missile. Interestingly, one such missile existed in 2001: Lockheed Martin’s flagship at the time was the JASSM AGM158, a precision-guided cruise missile with a titanium penetrator warhead.

Its speed was 550mph and its CEP (Center Error Probable) as little as 8ft; of course, a pre-placed homing device in the WTC would have reduced that margin of error to zero. The point is, the AGM 158 could have undoubtedly by relied upon to hit a target as wide as the WTC (208ft) with utmost precision. Of course, such a winged missile - though considerably smaller than a Boeing 767 - would have effectively generated real eyewitnesses reporting “some sort of airplane" striking the tower.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3648 Mar 30, 2013
We may only wonder why we have so many witness reports of a small aircraft.
.
Since there is no photographic record of it, determining just what hit the WTC2 (if anything at all) will remain in the domain of speculation.
.
In any event, anyone lending relevance to the available witnesses must do the effort to read their statements: Out of those who specify anything about the size of the object seen impacting the WTC2, most describe some sort of small aircraft.
.
Consequently, at this stage and with the elements at hand, the missile hypothesis cannot be discounted.
.
Ultimately, determining the precise object that flew into the WTC is a secondary issue: the bottom line is that the bulk of witness reports provide no support to the official 'BOEING 767' story.
.
Unless Of Course You believe In Magik Huh Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min Stilgar Fifrawi 879,496
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 3 min WasteWater 8,146
The Christian Atheist debate 3 min Critical Eye 3,882
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 16 min The swamiji 7,634
Though God is 'silent', His Creations EXCLAIM H... 19 min just saying 5
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 19 min phooey 603,299
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 24 min Peace_Warrior 613,075
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr bad bob 177,878
More from around the web