created by: inquiring minds | Jan 4, 2013

Top Stories

17,784 votes

Was 911 an Inside Job

Click on an option to vote

  • YES
  • No
  • Don't know
  • Possibly
Comments
3,341 - 3,360 of 4,996 Comments Last updated Jul 8, 2014

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3534 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Ever hear of the military jamming the enemy's radar so their missiles don't work? They been doing it for years.
.
All of lower Manhattan was jammed. No cell phones, digital camera or digital anything worked. Except the shielded cameras set up specially for this staged event.
.
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event..
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew: in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
See for yourself here:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
THE 45 “AMATEUR” VIDEOS: A Formidable Fakery Festival
1) CLONED IMAGERY: As we compare the “amateur videos”, one by one, even the layman will notice their obvious falseness. Many simply turn out to be different versions (cropped/warped/seam-carved) of a single scenery. The shots compared below are purportedly authored by five different cameramen.
.
But they are all taken from the exact same spot. All are rock steady from a shielded camera mounted on a tripod.
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
If this entire notion is preposterous to you, just ignore it and go back to the gay porn video you were watching.
.
I'm sorry if what I post bothers you so much. Don't pay me no never mind.
.
Go On And Believe Your Magik Without Me Huh Eh !
Not applicable.

False inference. The network overloaded which is perfectly understandable.

False. There are many private videos in existence confirming the validity of what was broadcast. That's simple another unfounded Twoofer claim.

Chopper shots? Of course. Those would have been traffic coverage right?

What plotters? The plotter were the hijackers and nobody else. More subjective Twoofer nonsense.

FAIL AGAIN.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3535 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Ever hear of the military jamming the enemy's radar so their missiles don't work? They been doing it for years.
.
All of lower Manhattan was jammed. No cell phones, digital camera or digital anything worked. Except the shielded cameras set up specially for this staged event.
.
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event..
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew: in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
See for yourself here:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
THE 45 “AMATEUR” VIDEOS: A Formidable Fakery Festival
1) CLONED IMAGERY: As we compare the “amateur videos”, one by one, even the layman will notice their obvious falseness. Many simply turn out to be different versions (cropped/warped/seam-carved) of a single scenery. The shots compared below are purportedly authored by five different cameramen.
.
But they are all taken from the exact same spot. All are rock steady from a shielded camera mounted on a tripod.
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
If this entire notion is preposterous to you, just ignore it and go back to the gay porn video you were watching.
.
I'm sorry if what I post bothers you so much. Don't pay me no never mind.
.
Go On And Believe Your Magik Without Me Huh Eh !
You can repeat this nonsense over and over. It will never be true. This dog doesn't hunt buddy.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3536 Mar 28, 2013
Looks like mu shu is getting religion. Good for you pig meat. LOL
.
Ain't No Pot Sticker Believe In No Magik! Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#3537 Mar 28, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>You can repeat this nonsense over and over. It will never be true. This dog doesn't hunt buddy.
Like Rick pointed out, he says nothing himself. All he does is mindlessly repeat others opinions...then call us sheep.

It's priceless!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3538 Mar 28, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Like Rick pointed out, he says nothing himself. All he does is mindlessly repeat others opinions...then call us sheep.
It's priceless!
Of course he does. He buys Twoofer pablum because he lacks critical thinking skills.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3539 Mar 28, 2013
When you can't refute, dismiss, and Ad Hom with plenty of ridicule.
.
Call the whole idea preposterous and use that as an excuse for not having to argue the ideas presented.
.
YOu may go on back to talking between yourselves. LOL
.
Keep On Believing In That Old Govie Magik Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3540 Mar 28, 2013
Posted: 09/07/2011
.
(WXYZ)- Why are the nearly 3,000 victims of 9/11 missing from an official federal registry of death?
.
According to the Death Master File -- the official record of 90 million deceased Americans who were issued Social Security cards since 1937 -- there were 6,298 deaths recorded on that awful day in 2001 when terrorists struck the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a rural area in Pennsylvania.
.
But since an average of 6,200 Americans die every day, there should have been more than 9,000 deaths recorded for Sept. 11, 2001.
.
Conspicuous by their absence in the federal file are many prominent victims of the attacks, including New York City Fire Chief Peter Ganci Jr., Fire Department Chaplain Mychal Judge and businessmen Daniel Lewin, founder of Akamai Technologies, and Thomas Burnett Jr. chief operating officer of Thoratec Corp.
.
"The mystery about 9/11 baffles me," said Beth Givens, executive director of the San Diego-based Privacy Rights Clearinghouse which has received complaints about the accuracy of the death file. "The only things that come to mind are some of the conspiracy theories that we hear out there -- and I don't want to go there."
.
Conspiracy theorists, indeed, have noticed and are questioning whether the government has told the truth about what happened that day. A video posted on YouTube entitled "Where are the 9/11 Victims?" shows that only 405 people are listed as dying in the state of New York that day.
.
http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/why-are-the-near...
.
More Magik ? Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3541 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
When you can't refute, dismiss, and Ad Hom with plenty of ridicule.
.
Call the whole idea preposterous and use that as an excuse for not having to argue the ideas presented.
.
YOu may go on back to talking between yourselves. LOL
.
Keep On Believing In That Old Govie Magik Huh Eh !
The ideas presented are based solely upon unfounded opinions and suppositions with no basis in fact or evidence. I have already explained. You keep going in circles.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3542 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Posted: 09/07/2011
.
(WXYZ)- Why are the nearly 3,000 victims of 9/11 missing from an official federal registry of death?
.
According to the Death Master File -- the official record of 90 million deceased Americans who were issued Social Security cards since 1937 -- there were 6,298 deaths recorded on that awful day in 2001 when terrorists struck the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a rural area in Pennsylvania.
.
But since an average of 6,200 Americans die every day, there should have been more than 9,000 deaths recorded for Sept. 11, 2001.
.
Conspicuous by their absence in the federal file are many prominent victims of the attacks, including New York City Fire Chief Peter Ganci Jr., Fire Department Chaplain Mychal Judge and businessmen Daniel Lewin, founder of Akamai Technologies, and Thomas Burnett Jr. chief operating officer of Thoratec Corp.
.
"The mystery about 9/11 baffles me," said Beth Givens, executive director of the San Diego-based Privacy Rights Clearinghouse which has received complaints about the accuracy of the death file. "The only things that come to mind are some of the conspiracy theories that we hear out there -- and I don't want to go there."
.
Conspiracy theorists, indeed, have noticed and are questioning whether the government has told the truth about what happened that day. A video posted on YouTube entitled "Where are the 9/11 Victims?" shows that only 405 people are listed as dying in the state of New York that day.
.
http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/why-are-the-near...
.
More Magik ? Huh Eh !
More suppositions leading to what exactly?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3543 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Posted: 09/07/2011
.
(WXYZ)- Why are the nearly 3,000 victims of 9/11 missing from an official federal registry of death?
.
According to the Death Master File -- the official record of 90 million deceased Americans who were issued Social Security cards since 1937 -- there were 6,298 deaths recorded on that awful day in 2001 when terrorists struck the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a rural area in Pennsylvania.
.
But since an average of 6,200 Americans die every day, there should have been more than 9,000 deaths recorded for Sept. 11, 2001.
.
Conspicuous by their absence in the federal file are many prominent victims of the attacks, including New York City Fire Chief Peter Ganci Jr., Fire Department Chaplain Mychal Judge and businessmen Daniel Lewin, founder of Akamai Technologies, and Thomas Burnett Jr. chief operating officer of Thoratec Corp.
.
"The mystery about 9/11 baffles me," said Beth Givens, executive director of the San Diego-based Privacy Rights Clearinghouse which has received complaints about the accuracy of the death file. "The only things that come to mind are some of the conspiracy theories that we hear out there -- and I don't want to go there."
.
Conspiracy theorists, indeed, have noticed and are questioning whether the government has told the truth about what happened that day. A video posted on YouTube entitled "Where are the 9/11 Victims?" shows that only 405 people are listed as dying in the state of New York that day.
.
http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/why-are-the-near...
.
More Magik ? Huh Eh !
If you did your research, you would find those deaths were either recorded in a different list or were never identified. What would be remarkable about either?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3544 Mar 28, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The ideas presented are based solely upon unfounded opinions and suppositions with no basis in fact or evidence. I have already explained. You keep going in circles.
Where does it say that what I post here has to have a basis in fact or may not be unfounded opinion?
.
Most of what I post here was written by someone else anyway. Has nothing to do with me. I give them credit for their hard work in trying to uncover the official government lies about 9/11.
.
All your Ad Hom attacks just shows how anxious you are for me to stop posting this information. Why do you care?
.
All you do is say NOOOOO that's not true, and then you spout off another lie.
.
I don't care if you like it or not.
.
Why do you care if I go in circles?
.
How come you can not just ignore me?
.
Do I threaten you and your masters?
.
You keep going in squares and I could give a fuhk.
.
But I Don't Believe In Magik Unlike Yourself Et Al Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3545 Mar 28, 2013
Of course, eye-witness testimonies are notoriously unreliable, particularly in the case of brief, rapidly unfolding events.
.
In spite of this commonly-accepted fact, many people seem to be strongly attached to what (they perceive) was reported by "thousands" of eye-witnesses in Manhattan.
.
A key question should be raised: Did most people report a “large passenger airliner?” The firm answer to this is: No.
.
Of those people who provided details of the object they saw, the majority reported anything but a large airliner. I submit below a cross-section of such testimonies: Of course, this selective list is only meant to get an idea of the variety of the 9/11 eye-witness reports – and is not intended to establish any conclusive proof.
.
However, it goes to show that there was no general consensus on what precisely hit WTC2 :
.
See for yourself:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Unless You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#3546 Mar 28, 2013
How funny is it you and your proxy socks have been left here holding the Twoofer Bag HAhahahahahahahahahaaaaaa
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Of course, eye-witness testimonies are notoriously unreliable, particularly in the case of brief, rapidly unfolding events.
.
In spite of this commonly-accepted fact, many people seem to be strongly attached to what (they perceive) was reported by "thousands" of eye-witnesses in Manhattan.
.
A key question should be raised: Did most people report a “large passenger airliner?” The firm answer to this is: No.
.
Of those people who provided details of the object they saw, the majority reported anything but a large airliner. I submit below a cross-section of such testimonies: Of course, this selective list is only meant to get an idea of the variety of the 9/11 eye-witness reports – and is not intended to establish any conclusive proof.
.
However, it goes to show that there was no general consensus on what precisely hit WTC2 :
.
See for yourself:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Unless You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3547 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Where does it say that what I post here has to have a basis in fact or may not be unfounded opinion?
.
Most of what I post here was written by someone else anyway. Has nothing to do with me. I give them credit for their hard work in trying to uncover the official government lies about 9/11.
.
All your Ad Hom attacks just shows how anxious you are for me to stop posting this information. Why do you care?
.
All you do is say NOOOOO that's not true, and then you spout off another lie.
.
I don't care if you like it or not.
.
Why do you care if I go in circles?
.
How come you can not just ignore me?
.
Do I threaten you and your masters?
.
You keep going in squares and I could give a fuhk.
.
But I Don't Believe In Magik Unlike Yourself Et Al Huh Eh !
The point is your opinions and suppositions must be based on facts and evidence if you expect intelligent people to take you seriously.

What you have quoted is based upon supposition rather than evidence. It is easily debunked with factual information. None stands up to scrutiny.

An Ad hominem attack is a personal attack against you as an individual. I haven't done that. You are misusing the definition in this context.

I challenge you to show me what lie I have made.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#3548 Mar 28, 2013
Whatever happened to that gay little fella from Kentucky ??

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3549 Mar 28, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The point is your opinions and suppositions must be based on facts and evidence if you expect intelligent people to take you seriously.
What you have quoted is based upon supposition rather than evidence. It is easily debunked with factual information. None stands up to scrutiny.
An Ad hominem attack is a personal attack against you as an individual. I haven't done that. You are misusing the definition in this context.
I challenge you to show me what lie I have made.
I challenge you to answer any of my questions first.
.
Unless You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3550 Mar 28, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
Whatever happened to that gay little fella from Kentucky ??
He wants to piss on you ... bad !
.
Myself, I don't want to get close.
Corbett

Absecon, NJ

#3551 Mar 29, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, Not freefall, you just ran out of fingers to count on.
You are still denying free-fall acceleration, silly boy?

It's proven. NIST has been forced to concede free-fall. WTC-7 fell at a rate indistinguishable from free fall for over 100 feet.

And WTC7 fell at free fall symmetrically!!

Here's a high school physics teacher to walk you through this proven fact:

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#3552 Mar 29, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>Where does it say that what I post here has to have a basis in fact or may not be unfounded opinion?
.
Most of what I post here was written by someone else anyway. Has nothing to do with me. I give them credit for their hard work in trying to uncover the official government lies about 9/11.
.
All your Ad Hom attacks just shows how anxious you are for me to stop posting this information. Why do you care?
.
All you do is say NOOOOO that's not true, and then you spout off another lie.
.
I don't care if you like it or not.
.
Why do you care if I go in circles?
.
How come you can not just ignore me?
.
Do I threaten you and your masters?
.
You keep going in squares and I could give a fuhk.
.
But I Don't Believe In Magik Unlike Yourself Et Al Huh Eh !
Ladies and gentlemen, behold the mind of an utter fool and an admitted sheep^!

TESTIFY STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

WE BLEEB!!!!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#3553 Mar 29, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>The point is your opinions and suppositions must be based on facts and evidence if you expect intelligent people to take you seriously.

What you have quoted is based upon supposition rather than evidence. It is easily debunked with factual information. None stands up to scrutiny.

An Ad hominem attack is a personal attack against you as an individual. I haven't done that. You are misusing the definition in this context.

I challenge you to show me what lie I have made.
He doesn't get that his belief system is based on nothing more than bias...he actually thinks accepting unverified supposition as fact is exercising sound logic.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min Tide with Beach 733,043
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 22 min onemale 258,001
Are truck drivers faithful?? (Sep '08) 24 min Ginger 64 169
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 28 min tamil 5,319
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 29 min guest 538,995
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 31 min eduardomanalo 117,973
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 42 min Tuco Blondie 226,358
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr Peace_Warrior 599,943
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 3 hr Blck 106
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••