created by: inquiring minds | Jan 4, 2013

Top Stories

17,784 votes

Was 911 an Inside Job

Click on an option to vote

  • YES
  • No
  • Don't know
  • Possibly
Adam

Frankfurt Am Main, Germany

#3513 Mar 28, 2013
O Rick in Kansas you perverted evil spirit. You have already perverted the kids and the youth in your area with your thoughts and yiur sick teaching and now you try it through the internet. What a great opportunity for you to spread your perversions sickness and lies.Look how the death of the perverted sinners was who became sick of HIV, Aids anal cancers etc. I guess you will be next. But that doesn´t give you what you want. You want to pervert the youth and even the kids with your satanic perverted thoughts to satisfy your wicked abnormal perverted lusts on them. You probably dream all long about anal sex and blow jobs with males. I bet your computer must be full of disgusting abnormal perverted gay pornografic stuff.Your end is near Rick in Kansas sooner as you thought.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3514 Mar 28, 2013
Visual Control of 9/11
.
Since the core of the 9/11 operation relied on airing fake imagery on TV (to simulate the real-life events of the day), it would be only logical to assume that a solid infrastructure was in place to ensure 'success'.
.
To be sure, the news media has been caught red-handed many times in the past, shamelessly airing outright fake news. This time, however, more sophisticated safeguards were necessary in order to control and impede any inconvenient private footage being captured - most embarassingly leaking out and exposing the hoax.
.
Here, we will look at some technology which conceivably could achieve these goals. Admittedly, addressing this issue requires some level of speculation - yet one may well presume that this operation would have put to good use the most advanced technology available.
.
Pure Wag The Dog
.
If total visual control of the wider Manhattan area was a top priority of the 9/11 psyop, it would have been essential to impede any authentic footage to be captured in NY that morning. Electromagnetic weaponry (EMP/HERF or HPM) is routinely used in war zones to jam the enemy’s electronics.
.
Conceivably, this technology was used to prevent any private footage being recorded throughout the limited (102min) time-window in which the defining 9/11 events took place (from first "plane" strike to last tower collapse).
.
To be sure, the research into this field has long been a top military priority: with this in mind, we may reasonably consider that this well-tested technology was employed on 9/11.
.
It is, all in all, a hypothesis grounded in logic and (military) common sense.
.
Do we have any indications from the day that may back-up this hypothesis? Indeed, we do: it is a well-known fact that thousands of electronic devices malfunctioned - or blacked-out altogether.
.
As many as 4 important electronics-related disruptions were reported in the 9/11 aftermath :
.
1): all New York cell phones
.
2): the firefighters' NYFD radio-transmitters
.
3): the WTC’s internal communication system
.
4): the Port Authority's transmission repeater on top of WTC5
.
These disruptions caused quite some controversy - and were explained away with claims such as:
.
1):“the NY cell phone network was overloaded”
.
2):“the NYFD had faulty radios/was confused over new T-R channels”
.
3):“the WTC intercom wiring was damaged by the crashing airplane”
.
4): The Port Authority simply denied that their equipment malfunctioned.
.
The official explanations for these four serious and (apparently) unrelated disruptions, all seem appallingly contrived.
.
Now, even though EMP/HERF beams can be calibrated to disrupt a specific Hz range, one may reasonably surmise that some ‘bleed’ may have occurred - thus affecting more than the targeted videocamera circuits.
.
In any case, an electromagnetic "storm" would keep any private cameras from operating. Only special cameras shielded in protective faraday-cages would function.
.
Why don’t we have a single authentic video of the crucial 9/11 events? Firstly, there are many indications that a blanket evacuation of Lower Manhattan took place after the first "plane" strike at 8:46AM.
.
Few people were likely left dwelling around snapping pictures. In any circumstances, the chances for anyone capturing a clear image of an unexpected, sky-diving 550mph+ object are extremely slim.
.
These factors alone drastically reduced the probabilites of undesired image recordings in the area.
.
Nevertheless, one must assume that the 9/11 military-backed operation would have required no less than a 110% "safety level".
.
It should also be safe to say that the perpetrators relied on top-end military technology.
.
All Pure Wag The Dog Magikal Mystery Stuff
.
Unless Of Course You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#3515 Mar 28, 2013
Gerrard wrote:
<quoted text>
The top floor is dropping straight down at free fall acceleration through the space where once the lower floors were, indicating that the lower floors are exerting absolutely no structural resistance at all!
Sorry, Not freefall, you just ran out of fingers to count on.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#3516 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
No unauthorized, private imagery was captured on September 11, 2001.
Any proof of that, of course not, I love No Planers, talking about drinking the koolaid and not thinking for themselves, total Sheeple!

“WELL PAID GOVIE SHILL ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#3517 Mar 28, 2013
"Any detonation of explosives within WTC 7 would have been detected by multiple seismographs monitoring ground vibration in the general area. No such telltale “spike” or vibratory anomaly was recorded by any monitoring instrument." –Brent Blanchard of Protec Field Monitoring Systems

SORRY PROXY SOCK, YOU LOSE AGAIN
Gerrard wrote:
<quoted text>
Yours are the tactics of a bankrupt shill. Anyone who bothers to see the video of the destruction of WTC-7 and bothers to read the definition of building implosion will see that WTC-7 is a superbly executed example. The top floor is dropping straight down at free fall acceleration through the space where once the lower floors were, indicating that the lower floors are exerting absolutely no structural resistance at all! The building has been broken entirely and fell into its footprint. Considering the size of the building and redundancy of the many structural supports, this is indeed a masterpiece!
This is truly remarkable!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3518 Mar 28, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
"Any detonation of explosives within WTC 7 would have been detected by multiple seismographs monitoring ground vibration in the general area. No such telltale “spike” or vibratory anomaly was recorded by any monitoring instrument." –Brent Blanchard of Protec Field Monitoring Systems
SORRY PROXY SOCK, YOU LOSE AGAIN
<quoted text>
Also the use of explosives on steel framed buildings requires steel plating on each side to propel the charge inward. It is extremely invasive and requires tons of material. It could not have been done undetected by the people using the building. It would also be done on every floor.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3519 Mar 28, 2013
waste of water

A steel plate. Is that what superman used to eat dinner on? Maybe the Hulk had his lunch on steel plates.
.
Your lack of controlled demolition knowledge is astounding. Tell us where did you get your education in explosive demolition?
.
Are you an ex seal or a junior frogman?
.
Pimping yourself out to play shill dis-information hasbarat for a little extra income in your old age?
.
You Do Believe In Magik Or You Are Lying Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#3520 Mar 28, 2013
Gerrard wrote:
<quoted text>Yours are the tactics of a bankrupt shill. Anyone who bothers to see the video of the destruction of WTC-7 and bothers to read the definition of building implosion will see that WTC-7 is a superbly executed example. The top floor is dropping straight down at free fall acceleration through the space where once the lower floors were, indicating that the lower floors are exerting absolutely no structural resistance at all! The building has been broken entirely and fell into its footprint. Considering the size of the building and redundancy of the many structural supports, this is indeed a masterpiece!

This is truly remarkable!
We BLEEV street corner JEEBUS!

We BLEEV!
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#3521 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
No unauthorized, private imagery was captured on September 11, 2001.
.
Most - if not all - of the imagery we have of that morning’s events is prefabricated and/or manipulated.
.
The September Clues video research – and many similar independent studies - have amply demonstrated the unfettered complicity of the mainstream media – a disturbingly 'reliable' partner in crime.
.
The 9/11 morning broadcasts were, by and large, digital computer-animations and all successive, so-called “amateur” video snippets (featuring crashing planes or collapsing towers) have likewise been methodically exposed as a series of poorly crafted forgeries.
.
The defining time-windows of the day (tower strikes and tower collapses) were certainly not meant to be captured on film - much less aired on television: As it is, no real footage of the real-life morning events is to be found.
.
To be sure, the existence of specific, military-grade technology able to achieve this precise aim is well documented.
.
In all likelihood, electromagnetic weaponry (EMP/HERF) routinely employed in war zones was employed, causing the temporary jamming of all unshielded camera equipment in lower Manhattan.
.
With no real footage being captured, the TV networks could ‘safely’ broadcast their substitute, artificial imagery of the morning’s events.
.
If its on TV then it must be real Huh Eh !
.
All Pure Wag The Dog Magikal Mystery
LMFAO! That's HILARIOUS! Did you write that all by yourself?

Of course, there are TONS of reports of electronic equipment being fried on/about the time of the 9/11 crashes. It was in all the papers.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3522 Mar 28, 2013
At the moment of the impact by the planes on the Twin Towers and their collapse, as well as that of WTC7, seismic waves were generated.
.
To the degree that:
seismic waves are only created by brief impulses
.
low frequencies are associated with an energy (magnitude) that is comparable to a seismic event, these waves undeniably have an explosive origin
.
Even if the planes' impact and the fall of the debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their magnitude was insufficient to be recorded 34 km away, and they should have been similar.
.
However, the composition and magnitude of the seismic signals show significant differences, above all in their propagation speed, even though their paths were identical under identical conditions.
.
This last difference being physically unexplainable in the official version, we must put into question the calculation of the speeds effectuated from the origin shown on the video images.
.
We can only conclude that in reality, the (explosive) source was manually detonated, thus accounting for the variable shift for each origin in relation to the videos.
.
The composition of the waves is revealing both in terms of the location of the source and the magnitude of the energy transmitted to the ground..
The subterranean origin of the waves emitted when WTC1 collapsed is attested by the presence of the P and S volume waves along with the Rayleigh surface waves, which are present in all five explosions.
.
The placement of the source of the four other explosions is subaerial, attested by the unique presence of Rayleigh waves. The aerial explosions visible on the videos of the upper floors of the Twin Towers do not produce seismic waves 34 km from the source.
.
There is a factor of ten between the power of the explosions at the time of the impacts on the twin Towers (as well as at the time of the collapse of WTC7) and the strength of those more powerful ones at the time of their collapse, the subterranean explosion under WTC1 being the one that transmitted the most energy to the ground.
.
Note as well that the degree to which the surface waves disperse (their speed depends upon their frequency), the duration of the recorded signal is not representative of the duration of the signal at the source.
.
Finally, the controlled demolition of the three towers, suggested by the visual and audio testimony, as well as by observations of their collapse, is thus demonstrated by the analysis of the seismic waves emitted at the moments of the plane impacts and at the moments of the collapse.
.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopoliti...
.
Thermite / thermate burns rapidly instead of exploding. Steel cutting effects can be accomplished without large aural explosions.
.
NIST and other government agencies have been studying and developing stealthy explosives since the 70's.
.
Unless Of Course You Believe In Magik

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3524 Mar 28, 2013
Did you see the video of molten metal dripping out the side of the buildings?
.
No it wasn't aluminum. Aluminum doesn't glow red in daylight. And it wasn't hot enough of a fire to melt any aluminum anyway.
.
That was likely thermite used to weaken the building. The demolition charges were probably in toward the center near the elevator shafts where you could access the steel core. That's one way of making it less obvious.
.
If you look at the antenna attached to the core steel structure on one of the buildings. It sunk straight down and was the first thing to collapse..
This means there was no support from the steel core.
.
If the alleged planes caused the collapse the building would have just fallen over at that point in the structure.
.
It wouldn't have taken the whole building down through undamaged, unheated solid steel that gets stronger as you go down.
.
Unless Of Course Yo Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3525 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Did you see the video of molten metal dripping out the side of the buildings?
.
No it wasn't aluminum. Aluminum doesn't glow red in daylight. And it wasn't hot enough of a fire to melt any aluminum anyway.
.
That was likely thermite used to weaken the building. The demolition charges were probably in toward the center near the elevator shafts where you could access the steel core. That's one way of making it less obvious.
.
If you look at the antenna attached to the core steel structure on one of the buildings. It sunk straight down and was the first thing to collapse..
This means there was no support from the steel core.
.
If the alleged planes caused the collapse the building would have just fallen over at that point in the structure.
.
It wouldn't have taken the whole building down through undamaged, unheated solid steel that gets stronger as you go down.
.
Unless Of Course Yo Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
So you don't think hi-rise fires get that hot? Go do some more homework.

FAIL

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3526 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Did you see the video of molten metal dripping out the side of the buildings?
.
No it wasn't aluminum. Aluminum doesn't glow red in daylight. And it wasn't hot enough of a fire to melt any aluminum anyway.
.
That was likely thermite used to weaken the building. The demolition charges were probably in toward the center near the elevator shafts where you could access the steel core. That's one way of making it less obvious.
.
If you look at the antenna attached to the core steel structure on one of the buildings. It sunk straight down and was the first thing to collapse..
This means there was no support from the steel core.
.
If the alleged planes caused the collapse the building would have just fallen over at that point in the structure.
.
It wouldn't have taken the whole building down through undamaged, unheated solid steel that gets stronger as you go down.
.
Unless Of Course Yo Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
False. The fire was hot enough to melt aluminum because it also melted steel at a higher temperature.

What tangible evidence is there of Thermite use? If so, how would it have been done? Sorry, this dog doesn't bark.

False, the whole upper part of the building tilted in the direction of the huge hole. The antenna can be clearly seen tilting along with the rest at the start of collapse. You conclusion is unfounded.

The upper part did fall over initially.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3527 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
(post ripped off from: http://septemberclues.info/visual_control.htm )
.
Unless Of Course You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
Still incapable of original thought, eh sheep? Sweetie, the only believers in magic are you and the idiot whose blog thingy you ripped off. Thanks for playing...

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3528 Mar 28, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Still incapable of original thought, eh sheep? Sweetie, the only believers in magic are you and the idiot whose blog thingy you ripped off. Thanks for playing...
Good job of ignoring the facts, information presented, dismissing the source and ridiculing the poster.
.
Obviously you don't have any refutations for the material.
.
Does that mean you don't know or can not?
.
Or Is It Really You Who Believes In Magik? Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3529 Mar 28, 2013
These are the first 11 minutes of the September 11, 2001 LIVE TV BROADCASTS.
.
The five major US TV networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, NBS and CNN) are synchronized - visually - using cues from apparent, shared 'satellite feeds' seen in the various broadcasts.
.
In spite of this, several inexplicable synch offsets occur randomly - at various times of the broadcasts. A host of aberrations suggest that these 'LIVE broadcasts' simply cannot be real: artificial, saturated, monochromatic color schemes; unrealistic camera motions; numerous/aimless chopper fly-bys; one single, surreal bird-flock fly-by, etc.
.
One must wonder what those many 'choppers' are up to in the first place: most simply fly across the screen at sustained speed.
.
Some are synched (between the networks), while some are not - or altogether missing.
.
All of this suggests these images are merely a pre-fabricated batch of computer simulations designed to fool the world.
.
Keep in mind that these broadcasts should represent the immediate aftermath of a most unexpected event (the 1st “hijacked plane’s” strike at 8:46AM).
.
Yet, the 5 rival TV networks appear to be instantly interconnected – often sharing identical images in real-time, as if all were actually mixed in a single TV studio.
.
A series of other oddities occur in these crucial minutes of the day's 'newscasts. I have chosen to point out only a few significant ones – leaving the opportunity for anyone to pick out the rest. Test your observation skills !
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Or Do You Believe In Magik? Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3530 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
These are the first 11 minutes of the September 11, 2001 LIVE TV BROADCASTS.
.
The five major US TV networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, NBS and CNN) are synchronized - visually - using cues from apparent, shared 'satellite feeds' seen in the various broadcasts.
.
In spite of this, several inexplicable synch offsets occur randomly - at various times of the broadcasts. A host of aberrations suggest that these 'LIVE broadcasts' simply cannot be real: artificial, saturated, monochromatic color schemes; unrealistic camera motions; numerous/aimless chopper fly-bys; one single, surreal bird-flock fly-by, etc.
.
One must wonder what those many 'choppers' are up to in the first place: most simply fly across the screen at sustained speed.
.
Some are synched (between the networks), while some are not - or altogether missing.
.
All of this suggests these images are merely a pre-fabricated batch of computer simulations designed to fool the world.
.
Keep in mind that these broadcasts should represent the immediate aftermath of a most unexpected event (the 1st “hijacked plane’s” strike at 8:46AM).
.
Yet, the 5 rival TV networks appear to be instantly interconnected – often sharing identical images in real-time, as if all were actually mixed in a single TV studio.
.
A series of other oddities occur in these crucial minutes of the day's 'newscasts. I have chosen to point out only a few significant ones – leaving the opportunity for anyone to pick out the rest. Test your observation skills !
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Or Do You Believe In Magik? Huh Eh !
I suggests no such thing. You are ignoring the thousands of people on the street and those taking their own pictures which confirm the validity of the news broadcaster's coverage.

Yes, broadcasters use the same feeds often. Proves nothing.

Your observation skills are deficient, but we already know that.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3531 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Or Is It Really You Who Believes In Magik? Huh Eh !
Why respond to individual "facts" when the entire notion is pretty preposterous? You seriously have been convinced by the idiot that you ripped off that not only does the capacity exist to digitally remaster every cell phone camera, digital camera, video camera and film camera in the entire New York City metropolitan area, AS THEY WERE RECORDING, to show the digitally remastered aircraft in place of missiles/whatevers, but this capacity was used and somehow no one anywhere noticed this happening. Are you stoned or really that stupid?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#3532 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Did you see the video of molten metal dripping out the side of the buildings?
.
No it wasn't aluminum. Aluminum doesn't glow red in daylight. And it wasn't hot enough of a fire to melt any aluminum anyway.
.
That was likely thermite used to weaken the building. The demolition charges were probably in toward the center near the elevator shafts where you could access the steel core. That's one way of making it less obvious.
.
If you look at the antenna attached to the core steel structure on one of the buildings. It sunk straight down and was the first thing to collapse..
This means there was no support from the steel core.
.
If the alleged planes caused the collapse the building would have just fallen over at that point in the structure.
.
It wouldn't have taken the whole building down through undamaged, unheated solid steel that gets stronger as you go down.
.
Unless Of Course Yo Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
TESTIFY STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

TEST-I-FY!!!!!!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3533 Mar 28, 2013
Ever hear of the military jamming the enemy's radar so their missiles don't work? They been doing it for years.
.
All of lower Manhattan was jammed. No cell phones, digital camera or digital anything worked. Except the shielded cameras set up specially for this staged event.
.
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event..
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew: in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
See for yourself here:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
THE 45 “AMATEUR” VIDEOS: A Formidable Fakery Festival

1) CLONED IMAGERY: As we compare the “amateur videos”, one by one, even the layman will notice their obvious falseness. Many simply turn out to be different versions (cropped/warped/seam-carved) of a single scenery. The shots compared below are purportedly authored by five different cameramen.
.
But they are all taken from the exact same spot. All are rock steady from a shielded camera mounted on a tripod.
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
If this entire notion is preposterous to you, just ignore it and go back to the gay porn video you were watching.
.
I'm sorry if what I post bothers you so much. Don't pay me no never mind.
.
Go On And Believe Your Magik Without Me Huh Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 7 min HipGnozizzz 173,652
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 7 min Truths 601,034
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 8 min onemale 259,241
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 14 min Ratloder 118,228
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 32 min It aint necessari... 738,863
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 1 hr Rosa_Winkel 441,338
sex (May '13) 2 hr Lucky 74
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 hr hojo 542,147
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••