Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,792 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3519 Mar 28, 2013
waste of water

A steel plate. Is that what superman used to eat dinner on? Maybe the Hulk had his lunch on steel plates.
.
Your lack of controlled demolition knowledge is astounding. Tell us where did you get your education in explosive demolition?
.
Are you an ex seal or a junior frogman?
.
Pimping yourself out to play shill dis-information hasbarat for a little extra income in your old age?
.
You Do Believe In Magik Or You Are Lying Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#3520 Mar 28, 2013
Gerrard wrote:
<quoted text>Yours are the tactics of a bankrupt shill. Anyone who bothers to see the video of the destruction of WTC-7 and bothers to read the definition of building implosion will see that WTC-7 is a superbly executed example. The top floor is dropping straight down at free fall acceleration through the space where once the lower floors were, indicating that the lower floors are exerting absolutely no structural resistance at all! The building has been broken entirely and fell into its footprint. Considering the size of the building and redundancy of the many structural supports, this is indeed a masterpiece!

This is truly remarkable!
We BLEEV street corner JEEBUS!

We BLEEV!
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#3521 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
No unauthorized, private imagery was captured on September 11, 2001.
.
Most - if not all - of the imagery we have of that morning’s events is prefabricated and/or manipulated.
.
The September Clues video research – and many similar independent studies - have amply demonstrated the unfettered complicity of the mainstream media – a disturbingly 'reliable' partner in crime.
.
The 9/11 morning broadcasts were, by and large, digital computer-animations and all successive, so-called “amateur” video snippets (featuring crashing planes or collapsing towers) have likewise been methodically exposed as a series of poorly crafted forgeries.
.
The defining time-windows of the day (tower strikes and tower collapses) were certainly not meant to be captured on film - much less aired on television: As it is, no real footage of the real-life morning events is to be found.
.
To be sure, the existence of specific, military-grade technology able to achieve this precise aim is well documented.
.
In all likelihood, electromagnetic weaponry (EMP/HERF) routinely employed in war zones was employed, causing the temporary jamming of all unshielded camera equipment in lower Manhattan.
.
With no real footage being captured, the TV networks could ‘safely’ broadcast their substitute, artificial imagery of the morning’s events.
.
If its on TV then it must be real Huh Eh !
.
All Pure Wag The Dog Magikal Mystery
LMFAO! That's HILARIOUS! Did you write that all by yourself?

Of course, there are TONS of reports of electronic equipment being fried on/about the time of the 9/11 crashes. It was in all the papers.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3522 Mar 28, 2013
At the moment of the impact by the planes on the Twin Towers and their collapse, as well as that of WTC7, seismic waves were generated.
.
To the degree that:
seismic waves are only created by brief impulses
.
low frequencies are associated with an energy (magnitude) that is comparable to a seismic event, these waves undeniably have an explosive origin
.
Even if the planes' impact and the fall of the debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their magnitude was insufficient to be recorded 34 km away, and they should have been similar.
.
However, the composition and magnitude of the seismic signals show significant differences, above all in their propagation speed, even though their paths were identical under identical conditions.
.
This last difference being physically unexplainable in the official version, we must put into question the calculation of the speeds effectuated from the origin shown on the video images.
.
We can only conclude that in reality, the (explosive) source was manually detonated, thus accounting for the variable shift for each origin in relation to the videos.
.
The composition of the waves is revealing both in terms of the location of the source and the magnitude of the energy transmitted to the ground..
The subterranean origin of the waves emitted when WTC1 collapsed is attested by the presence of the P and S volume waves along with the Rayleigh surface waves, which are present in all five explosions.
.
The placement of the source of the four other explosions is subaerial, attested by the unique presence of Rayleigh waves. The aerial explosions visible on the videos of the upper floors of the Twin Towers do not produce seismic waves 34 km from the source.
.
There is a factor of ten between the power of the explosions at the time of the impacts on the twin Towers (as well as at the time of the collapse of WTC7) and the strength of those more powerful ones at the time of their collapse, the subterranean explosion under WTC1 being the one that transmitted the most energy to the ground.
.
Note as well that the degree to which the surface waves disperse (their speed depends upon their frequency), the duration of the recorded signal is not representative of the duration of the signal at the source.
.
Finally, the controlled demolition of the three towers, suggested by the visual and audio testimony, as well as by observations of their collapse, is thus demonstrated by the analysis of the seismic waves emitted at the moments of the plane impacts and at the moments of the collapse.
.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopoliti...
.
Thermite / thermate burns rapidly instead of exploding. Steel cutting effects can be accomplished without large aural explosions.
.
NIST and other government agencies have been studying and developing stealthy explosives since the 70's.
.
Unless Of Course You Believe In Magik

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3524 Mar 28, 2013
Did you see the video of molten metal dripping out the side of the buildings?
.
No it wasn't aluminum. Aluminum doesn't glow red in daylight. And it wasn't hot enough of a fire to melt any aluminum anyway.
.
That was likely thermite used to weaken the building. The demolition charges were probably in toward the center near the elevator shafts where you could access the steel core. That's one way of making it less obvious.
.
If you look at the antenna attached to the core steel structure on one of the buildings. It sunk straight down and was the first thing to collapse..
This means there was no support from the steel core.
.
If the alleged planes caused the collapse the building would have just fallen over at that point in the structure.
.
It wouldn't have taken the whole building down through undamaged, unheated solid steel that gets stronger as you go down.
.
Unless Of Course Yo Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3525 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Did you see the video of molten metal dripping out the side of the buildings?
.
No it wasn't aluminum. Aluminum doesn't glow red in daylight. And it wasn't hot enough of a fire to melt any aluminum anyway.
.
That was likely thermite used to weaken the building. The demolition charges were probably in toward the center near the elevator shafts where you could access the steel core. That's one way of making it less obvious.
.
If you look at the antenna attached to the core steel structure on one of the buildings. It sunk straight down and was the first thing to collapse..
This means there was no support from the steel core.
.
If the alleged planes caused the collapse the building would have just fallen over at that point in the structure.
.
It wouldn't have taken the whole building down through undamaged, unheated solid steel that gets stronger as you go down.
.
Unless Of Course Yo Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
So you don't think hi-rise fires get that hot? Go do some more homework.

FAIL

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3526 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Did you see the video of molten metal dripping out the side of the buildings?
.
No it wasn't aluminum. Aluminum doesn't glow red in daylight. And it wasn't hot enough of a fire to melt any aluminum anyway.
.
That was likely thermite used to weaken the building. The demolition charges were probably in toward the center near the elevator shafts where you could access the steel core. That's one way of making it less obvious.
.
If you look at the antenna attached to the core steel structure on one of the buildings. It sunk straight down and was the first thing to collapse..
This means there was no support from the steel core.
.
If the alleged planes caused the collapse the building would have just fallen over at that point in the structure.
.
It wouldn't have taken the whole building down through undamaged, unheated solid steel that gets stronger as you go down.
.
Unless Of Course Yo Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
False. The fire was hot enough to melt aluminum because it also melted steel at a higher temperature.

What tangible evidence is there of Thermite use? If so, how would it have been done? Sorry, this dog doesn't bark.

False, the whole upper part of the building tilted in the direction of the huge hole. The antenna can be clearly seen tilting along with the rest at the start of collapse. You conclusion is unfounded.

The upper part did fall over initially.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3527 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
(post ripped off from: http://septemberclues.info/visual_control.htm )
.
Unless Of Course You Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
Still incapable of original thought, eh sheep? Sweetie, the only believers in magic are you and the idiot whose blog thingy you ripped off. Thanks for playing...

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3528 Mar 28, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Still incapable of original thought, eh sheep? Sweetie, the only believers in magic are you and the idiot whose blog thingy you ripped off. Thanks for playing...
Good job of ignoring the facts, information presented, dismissing the source and ridiculing the poster.
.
Obviously you don't have any refutations for the material.
.
Does that mean you don't know or can not?
.
Or Is It Really You Who Believes In Magik? Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3529 Mar 28, 2013
These are the first 11 minutes of the September 11, 2001 LIVE TV BROADCASTS.
.
The five major US TV networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, NBS and CNN) are synchronized - visually - using cues from apparent, shared 'satellite feeds' seen in the various broadcasts.
.
In spite of this, several inexplicable synch offsets occur randomly - at various times of the broadcasts. A host of aberrations suggest that these 'LIVE broadcasts' simply cannot be real: artificial, saturated, monochromatic color schemes; unrealistic camera motions; numerous/aimless chopper fly-bys; one single, surreal bird-flock fly-by, etc.
.
One must wonder what those many 'choppers' are up to in the first place: most simply fly across the screen at sustained speed.
.
Some are synched (between the networks), while some are not - or altogether missing.
.
All of this suggests these images are merely a pre-fabricated batch of computer simulations designed to fool the world.
.
Keep in mind that these broadcasts should represent the immediate aftermath of a most unexpected event (the 1st “hijacked plane’s” strike at 8:46AM).
.
Yet, the 5 rival TV networks appear to be instantly interconnected – often sharing identical images in real-time, as if all were actually mixed in a single TV studio.
.
A series of other oddities occur in these crucial minutes of the day's 'newscasts. I have chosen to point out only a few significant ones – leaving the opportunity for anyone to pick out the rest. Test your observation skills !
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Or Do You Believe In Magik? Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3530 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
These are the first 11 minutes of the September 11, 2001 LIVE TV BROADCASTS.
.
The five major US TV networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, NBS and CNN) are synchronized - visually - using cues from apparent, shared 'satellite feeds' seen in the various broadcasts.
.
In spite of this, several inexplicable synch offsets occur randomly - at various times of the broadcasts. A host of aberrations suggest that these 'LIVE broadcasts' simply cannot be real: artificial, saturated, monochromatic color schemes; unrealistic camera motions; numerous/aimless chopper fly-bys; one single, surreal bird-flock fly-by, etc.
.
One must wonder what those many 'choppers' are up to in the first place: most simply fly across the screen at sustained speed.
.
Some are synched (between the networks), while some are not - or altogether missing.
.
All of this suggests these images are merely a pre-fabricated batch of computer simulations designed to fool the world.
.
Keep in mind that these broadcasts should represent the immediate aftermath of a most unexpected event (the 1st “hijacked plane’s” strike at 8:46AM).
.
Yet, the 5 rival TV networks appear to be instantly interconnected – often sharing identical images in real-time, as if all were actually mixed in a single TV studio.
.
A series of other oddities occur in these crucial minutes of the day's 'newscasts. I have chosen to point out only a few significant ones – leaving the opportunity for anyone to pick out the rest. Test your observation skills !
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Or Do You Believe In Magik? Huh Eh !
I suggests no such thing. You are ignoring the thousands of people on the street and those taking their own pictures which confirm the validity of the news broadcaster's coverage.

Yes, broadcasters use the same feeds often. Proves nothing.

Your observation skills are deficient, but we already know that.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3531 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Or Is It Really You Who Believes In Magik? Huh Eh !
Why respond to individual "facts" when the entire notion is pretty preposterous? You seriously have been convinced by the idiot that you ripped off that not only does the capacity exist to digitally remaster every cell phone camera, digital camera, video camera and film camera in the entire New York City metropolitan area, AS THEY WERE RECORDING, to show the digitally remastered aircraft in place of missiles/whatevers, but this capacity was used and somehow no one anywhere noticed this happening. Are you stoned or really that stupid?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#3532 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Did you see the video of molten metal dripping out the side of the buildings?
.
No it wasn't aluminum. Aluminum doesn't glow red in daylight. And it wasn't hot enough of a fire to melt any aluminum anyway.
.
That was likely thermite used to weaken the building. The demolition charges were probably in toward the center near the elevator shafts where you could access the steel core. That's one way of making it less obvious.
.
If you look at the antenna attached to the core steel structure on one of the buildings. It sunk straight down and was the first thing to collapse..
This means there was no support from the steel core.
.
If the alleged planes caused the collapse the building would have just fallen over at that point in the structure.
.
It wouldn't have taken the whole building down through undamaged, unheated solid steel that gets stronger as you go down.
.
Unless Of Course Yo Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
TESTIFY STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

TEST-I-FY!!!!!!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3533 Mar 28, 2013
Ever hear of the military jamming the enemy's radar so their missiles don't work? They been doing it for years.
.
All of lower Manhattan was jammed. No cell phones, digital camera or digital anything worked. Except the shielded cameras set up specially for this staged event.
.
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event..
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew: in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
See for yourself here:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
THE 45 “AMATEUR” VIDEOS: A Formidable Fakery Festival

1) CLONED IMAGERY: As we compare the “amateur videos”, one by one, even the layman will notice their obvious falseness. Many simply turn out to be different versions (cropped/warped/seam-carved) of a single scenery. The shots compared below are purportedly authored by five different cameramen.
.
But they are all taken from the exact same spot. All are rock steady from a shielded camera mounted on a tripod.
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
If this entire notion is preposterous to you, just ignore it and go back to the gay porn video you were watching.
.
I'm sorry if what I post bothers you so much. Don't pay me no never mind.
.
Go On And Believe Your Magik Without Me Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3534 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Ever hear of the military jamming the enemy's radar so their missiles don't work? They been doing it for years.
.
All of lower Manhattan was jammed. No cell phones, digital camera or digital anything worked. Except the shielded cameras set up specially for this staged event.
.
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event..
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew: in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
See for yourself here:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
THE 45 “AMATEUR” VIDEOS: A Formidable Fakery Festival
1) CLONED IMAGERY: As we compare the “amateur videos”, one by one, even the layman will notice their obvious falseness. Many simply turn out to be different versions (cropped/warped/seam-carved) of a single scenery. The shots compared below are purportedly authored by five different cameramen.
.
But they are all taken from the exact same spot. All are rock steady from a shielded camera mounted on a tripod.
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
If this entire notion is preposterous to you, just ignore it and go back to the gay porn video you were watching.
.
I'm sorry if what I post bothers you so much. Don't pay me no never mind.
.
Go On And Believe Your Magik Without Me Huh Eh !
Not applicable.

False inference. The network overloaded which is perfectly understandable.

False. There are many private videos in existence confirming the validity of what was broadcast. That's simple another unfounded Twoofer claim.

Chopper shots? Of course. Those would have been traffic coverage right?

What plotters? The plotter were the hijackers and nobody else. More subjective Twoofer nonsense.

FAIL AGAIN.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3535 Mar 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Ever hear of the military jamming the enemy's radar so their missiles don't work? They been doing it for years.
.
All of lower Manhattan was jammed. No cell phones, digital camera or digital anything worked. Except the shielded cameras set up specially for this staged event.
.
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event..
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew: in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
See for yourself here:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
THE 45 “AMATEUR” VIDEOS: A Formidable Fakery Festival
1) CLONED IMAGERY: As we compare the “amateur videos”, one by one, even the layman will notice their obvious falseness. Many simply turn out to be different versions (cropped/warped/seam-carved) of a single scenery. The shots compared below are purportedly authored by five different cameramen.
.
But they are all taken from the exact same spot. All are rock steady from a shielded camera mounted on a tripod.
.
See for yourself.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
If this entire notion is preposterous to you, just ignore it and go back to the gay porn video you were watching.
.
I'm sorry if what I post bothers you so much. Don't pay me no never mind.
.
Go On And Believe Your Magik Without Me Huh Eh !
You can repeat this nonsense over and over. It will never be true. This dog doesn't hunt buddy.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3536 Mar 28, 2013
Looks like mu shu is getting religion. Good for you pig meat. LOL
.
Ain't No Pot Sticker Believe In No Magik! Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#3537 Mar 28, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>You can repeat this nonsense over and over. It will never be true. This dog doesn't hunt buddy.
Like Rick pointed out, he says nothing himself. All he does is mindlessly repeat others opinions...then call us sheep.

It's priceless!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3538 Mar 28, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Like Rick pointed out, he says nothing himself. All he does is mindlessly repeat others opinions...then call us sheep.
It's priceless!
Of course he does. He buys Twoofer pablum because he lacks critical thinking skills.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3539 Mar 28, 2013
When you can't refute, dismiss, and Ad Hom with plenty of ridicule.
.
Call the whole idea preposterous and use that as an excuse for not having to argue the ideas presented.
.
YOu may go on back to talking between yourselves. LOL
.
Keep On Believing In That Old Govie Magik Huh Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 16 min andet1987 6,140
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 19 min USA Born 596,308
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 32 min Peace_Warrior 612,615
The Christian Atheist debate 38 min Burke Devlin 1,001
Why do Turkish men cheat (Aug '10) 43 min Lady Godiva 510
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 49 min I Am No One_ 444,337
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 50 min Stilgar Fifrawi 854,817
More from around the web