Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,792 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3430 Mar 26, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Sweetie, the existence of previous false flag operations imagined and/or conducted by the US government is not proof this was one. You might as well be saying that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and the sinking of the Maine are proof that 9/11 had to be a false flag operation.
<quoted text>There was a whole lot of inaccurate and badly informed "reporting" on 9/11, that's what happens in the rush to be first and live television.
<quoted text>And yet multiple cell calls went through, as well as air phone calls. A number of them were recorded, people talked to people they knew. But of course, this was all impossible in 2001. Even though from personal experience I know you're wrong and if you were bouncing off AT&T's network, making and even receiving cell calls in flight was not usually a problem unless you were flying some distance from urban areas away from the coasts.
<quoted text>Yes dear, people kept hearing and witnessing explosions in areas of the buildings that weren't directly impacted by the jets. The force of the impact affected multiple floors of each building. No one reports seeing bombs, they witnessed explosions, they assumed bombs were the cause. Aside from a few burnt speculations, there has been no report of any explosive, incendiary or other residues that would indicate the presence of "bombs".
<quoted text>So, you're not completely misinformed. It's a start.
<quoted text>The crime scene was a multistory high pile of burning toxic debris shutting down several square miles of the city, keeping hundreds of thousands out of work and thousands out of their homes. It needed to be cleared quickly and the investigation conducted off site. Yes some of the steel was shipped off for recycling, but the steel from the relevant portions of the building was all studied when it was recovered. If you want WTC steel, there is still plenty of it around, all over the country.
<quoted text>Yes dear, much has been made of Silverstein's recorded "pulled" comment. To think that someone allegedly in on the plot would give such an order in a conversation he knew to be being recorded kind of defies imagination, don't it? I know a number of people who were in WTC 7 when this happened, I used to work as a consultant for a previous incarnation of the company that it was its primary tenant. You really have no idea.
Exactly.

Let's look at the "pulled it" statement.

1. Demolishing a steel framed building the size of WTC7 would take around 5 tons of steel plating per floor securely attached at each demolition point. This would be a highly invasive procedure which could not be done undetected.

2. It would take at least 2,000 lbs of explosive materials.

3. It would be a criminal act to endanger the occupants of a building which is scheduled for demolition.

4. Nobody would admit publicly to such a criminal act.

The bottom line is the building collapsed due to damage and structural failure as the firemen who were there attested too.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3432 Mar 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should we care if he dismissed they facts and the evidence? He is perfectly free to continue making a fool of himself.
Why DO you care what I say? What is your agenda? You suddenly came here and are here everyday, all day long.
.
Is this the forum you were assigned to by your section boss?
.
Are you a jew hasbarat shill dis-information specialist?
.
Do You Believe In Magik ?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3433 Mar 26, 2013
The Four Horsemen of Banking,
(Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo)
own the Four Horsemen of Oil,
(Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths.
.
But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.
.
According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.[1]
.
So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?
.
This information is guarded much more closely. My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds. This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.
.
One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust Corporation – founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America. A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild. Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley.[2]
.
J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US.
.
They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
.
These are our Masters.
.
Remember them when hyperinflation is upon us and your bank account is seized.
.
Or Do You Believe In Magik?
.
Audit The Fed Now!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3434 Mar 26, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Sweetie,
**********
the existence of previous false flag operations imagined and/or conducted by the US government is not proof this was one. You might as well be saying that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and the sinking of the Maine are proof that 9/11 had to be a false flag operation.
**********
Since you admit the US has engaged in false flag operations. It is PROOF that the US has lied about false flag ops, murders of famous men, and various political intentions before. So why should it not lie about 9/11?
.
You forgot to mention that the government still maintains that Oswald killed JFK, Sirhan Sirhan killed RFK, James Earl Ray killed MLK, and Pearl Harbor was a surprise. These are all lies also.
.
Unless of course you
.
Believe In Magik Huh Eh !

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3435 Mar 26, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you admit the US has engaged in false flag operations. It is PROOF that the US has lied about false flag ops, murders of famous men, and various political intentions before. So why should it not lie about 9/11?
.
You forgot to mention that the government still maintains that Oswald killed JFK, Sirhan Sirhan killed RFK, James Earl Ray killed MLK, and Pearl Harbor was a surprise. These are all lies also.
.
Unless of course you
.
Believe In Magik Huh Eh !
Once more, since obviously you weren't paying attention, the evidence of previously exposed false flag operations does not prove that 9/11 was one. It isn't even all that convincing that it might even be one. Despite your paranoid fears of our government's omniscience and omnipotence, they've never been that good, not even close. Get back to me when you have credible evidence, not just speculation.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3436 Mar 26, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Once more, since obviously you weren't paying attention, the evidence of previously exposed false flag operations does not prove that 9/11 was one. It isn't even all that convincing that it might even be one. Despite your paranoid fears of our government's omniscience and omnipotence, they've never been that good, not even close. Get back to me when you have credible evidence, not just speculation.
Get back to you! Who in the fook do you think you are?
.
I post what I want, when I want. Your opinion matters not a whit to me.
.
I'm not trying to "prove" anything to you.
.
A liar is a liar and can not be counted on to tell any truth. Why should they, if they can get it over on sheeple like you.
.
Do you have all your immunizations I hope?
.
I Do Not Believe In Govie Magik.
click

Logan, WV

#3437 Mar 26, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Once more, since obviously you weren't paying attention, the evidence of previously exposed false flag operations does not prove that 9/11 was one. It isn't even all that convincing that it might even be one. Despite your paranoid fears of our government's omniscience and omnipotence, they've never been that good, not even close. Get back to me when you have credible evidence, not just speculation.
hey clickhead, you know it's pretty obvious you are a govie shill, because no one could possibly be so gullible as to believe everything the government says.(btw, cl=d)
click

Logan, WV

#3438 Mar 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
There is photographic evidence of the hijackers passing through airport security. Not only that, Airline personnel also identified them. That would be considered irrefutable evidence in any court of law.
There were thousands of people in Manhattan on the streets going to work. I think they would know what they saw. You made a claim of using Photoshop. There are evidence pictures, videos and witnesses who saw the jet engine in the street. Looks like your opinion is wrong. These too would be considered irrefutable evidence in a court of law.
There was quite a few aircraft skin fragments but much of the airplanes penetrated the buildings proving again, that your Photoshop claim is false. What about serial numbers? Are you saying the planes with were seen leaving nearby airports and tracked on radar were substituted? If so, where did they go? What about the phone calls which were also witnessed and documented by many impartial people such as Airline personnel and close relatives? Your claim about serial numbers is meaningless given all the other evidence.
The evidence is available and also on the internet. Why lie about it?
because you too are a clickhead, that's why
click

Logan, WV

#3439 Mar 26, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
There's nothing even remotely contradictory in my post oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots glop but thanks for failing reading comprehension...again!
And the claim that explosives is the only way to achieve free fall is yet unsupported.
Btw, why haven't any twoofers shown that free fall is inherent in all the many controlled demolition videos available on the net?
Ya know, to show correlation rather than just mindlessly claiming it.
And what about the the collapse as a whole which was slower than free fall?
Was just part of it a cd and the rest not?
And how about that time you were knee high to a grassy knoll and you threw a match into a big 'ol bucket of gas and it didn't light on fire?
Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots glop, perhaps you should answer with your pretend engineer proxy socky!
yeah whatever, govie jizz slurping clickhead

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3441 Mar 26, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Why DO you care what I say? What is your agenda? You suddenly came here and are here everyday, all day long.
.
Is this the forum you were assigned to by your section boss?
.
Are you a jew hasbarat shill dis-information specialist?
.
Do You Believe In Magik ?
Project much?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3442 Mar 26, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Once more, since obviously you weren't paying attention, the evidence of previously exposed false flag operations does not prove that 9/11 was one. It isn't even all that convincing that it might even be one. Despite your paranoid fears of our government's omniscience and omnipotence, they've never been that good, not even close. Get back to me when you have credible evidence, not just speculation.
Exactly.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3443 Mar 26, 2013
click wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah whatever, govie jizz slurping clickhead
Childish comment.

Since: Sep 08

.

#3444 Mar 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Childish comment.
Gloop.

&NR =1&feature=endscreen

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3445 Mar 26, 2013
The Gloop wrote:
<quoted text>Gloop.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =NrdH3RL7NKcXX&NR=1&fe ature=endscreen
Perfect!!!

Love it.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#3446 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>I came to the realization that the 9/11 conspiracy happened inside the minds of Twoofers. Guess it was an inside job after all. ROTFLMAO
Ha!

Maybe that's why their beliefs seem so childishly stupid.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#3447 Mar 27, 2013
click wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah whatever, govie jizz slurping clickhead
Jeez, I looked over, under and behind your post and there's still no proof that free fall can only be achieved with explosives.

Colour me....laughing.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#3448 Mar 27, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Why DO you care what I say? What is your agenda? You suddenly came here and are here everyday, all day long.
.
Is this the forum you were assigned to by your section boss?
.
Are you a jew hasbarat shill dis-information specialist?
.
Do You Believe In Magik ?
Here's the deal oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots glop, everyday people drive on congested hi-ways and pay zero attention to the thousands of cars around them.

But they do slow down to give attention to the schmuck who rear ended the dump truck...you're that schmuck!

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots schmuck!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Olds, Canada

#3449 Mar 27, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>.
1. Planes were hijacked. The evidence shows the hijackers boarding the planes and passing through airport security.
.
There is no photographic evidence of the alleged hijackers boarding the planes and going thru security.
.
2. Phone calls were made from the planes describing the hijacking and one verbal exchange was head by ATC.
.
These phone calls were phony.(sic)

3. There is plenty of evidence such as thousands of eye witnesses and video footage of what actually happened.
.
Everyone knows lower Manhattan does not have thousands of people with nothing to do but look up and watch the sky at this time of the morning.
.
4. Airplane debris was recovered at the scenes.
.
What little debris alleged to be from the aircraft that was gathered was never identified by serial number back to the aircraft's maintenance records for a positive identification.
.
5. Other aircraft pilots also witnessed what happened.
.
What were the names of these alleged pilots who allegedly witnessed what happened?
.
6. ATF and FBI forensic teams collected and documented evidence.
.
None of which was ever revealed to the public for inspection.
.
All of the above are spurious and unsubstantiated claims and are hereby rejected.
.
Unless You Believe In Government Magik ! Huh eh
Behold the mind of kook!

Where there is a lack of record (video of hijackers), that spells conspiracy.

Where there is a record (the phone calls), it's phoney!

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots schmuck!

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3450 Mar 27, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Get back to you! Who in the fook do you think you are?
.
Someone who doesn't play well with idiots. Guess what?
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
I post what I want, when I want. Your opinion matters not a whit to me.
.
Which is why you are replying to to my opinion?
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
I'm not trying to "prove" anything to you.
.
Well hon, you've been doing a damn fine job proving to me that you are are a completely useless useful idiot. That wasn't deliberate?
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
A liar is a liar and can not be counted on to tell any truth. Why should they, if they can get it over on sheeple like you.
Says the idiot in the wooly white coat bleating from a flock of similarly attired idiots who aren't bright enough to grasp their actual reality. Sweetie, you would not recognize truth if it was a 300lb stripper, painted neon purple and had given you naked lap dances on a weekly basis since you turned 18.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Do you have all your immunizations I hope?
.
Do you have a good therapist?
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
I Do Not Believe In Govie Magik.
Um cupcake, that is the ONLY thing you believe in. You probably haven't noticed, but it is YOU FOLK who believe that our government can actually pull off the downright miraculous. We know that most of our leaders can barely pull off the competent. Rational folk know that our government has never been in the same neighborhood of the omniscience and omnipotence you folk believe without question.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3451 Mar 27, 2013
click wrote:
hey clickhead, you know it's pretty obvious you are a govie shill, because no one could possibly be so gullible as to believe everything the government says.
Sweetie, it's pretty obvious that you are an idiot, because I don't believe everything the government says. That would be just as colossally simple minded as believing that everything that the government says is a lie. I've had many, many dealings with agents of our government over the years. Some are more than happy to lie and are darn good at it; others are happy to lie, but are just shyte when they try; others aren't happy about it, but do it anyways; others just don't lie and others who can't even if they tried. You believe that everything the government says has to be a lie, that makes you the gullible one.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 13 min June VanDerMark 596,647
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 16 min trifecta1 855,635
The Christian Atheist debate 17 min Kaitlin the Wolf ... 1,057
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 36 min Freebird USA 177,217
avandia 2014 (Jan '14) 41 min WRM4 365
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 47 min DebraE 100,766
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 47 min WasteWater 6,155
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr New Age Spiritual... 612,646
More from around the web