Exactly.<quoted text>Sweetie, the existence of previous false flag operations imagined and/or conducted by the US government is not proof this was one. You might as well be saying that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and the sinking of the Maine are proof that 9/11 had to be a false flag operation.
<quoted text>There was a whole lot of inaccurate and badly informed "reporting" on 9/11, that's what happens in the rush to be first and live television.
<quoted text>And yet multiple cell calls went through, as well as air phone calls. A number of them were recorded, people talked to people they knew. But of course, this was all impossible in 2001. Even though from personal experience I know you're wrong and if you were bouncing off AT&T's network, making and even receiving cell calls in flight was not usually a problem unless you were flying some distance from urban areas away from the coasts.
<quoted text>Yes dear, people kept hearing and witnessing explosions in areas of the buildings that weren't directly impacted by the jets. The force of the impact affected multiple floors of each building. No one reports seeing bombs, they witnessed explosions, they assumed bombs were the cause. Aside from a few burnt speculations, there has been no report of any explosive, incendiary or other residues that would indicate the presence of "bombs".
<quoted text>So, you're not completely misinformed. It's a start.
<quoted text>The crime scene was a multistory high pile of burning toxic debris shutting down several square miles of the city, keeping hundreds of thousands out of work and thousands out of their homes. It needed to be cleared quickly and the investigation conducted off site. Yes some of the steel was shipped off for recycling, but the steel from the relevant portions of the building was all studied when it was recovered. If you want WTC steel, there is still plenty of it around, all over the country.
<quoted text>Yes dear, much has been made of Silverstein's recorded "pulled" comment. To think that someone allegedly in on the plot would give such an order in a conversation he knew to be being recorded kind of defies imagination, don't it? I know a number of people who were in WTC 7 when this happened, I used to work as a consultant for a previous incarnation of the company that it was its primary tenant. You really have no idea.
Let's look at the "pulled it" statement.
1. Demolishing a steel framed building the size of WTC7 would take around 5 tons of steel plating per floor securely attached at each demolition point. This would be a highly invasive procedure which could not be done undetected.
2. It would take at least 2,000 lbs of explosive materials.
3. It would be a criminal act to endanger the occupants of a building which is scheduled for demolition.
4. Nobody would admit publicly to such a criminal act.
The bottom line is the building collapsed due to damage and structural failure as the firemen who were there attested too.