The only dog wagging at the end of that tail is you, buttercup.The regions of WTC 1 and WTC 2 that had fireproofing materials reportedly reapplied to their structural steel, are also the same regions within which each building structurally failed and that were struck by American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines flight 175 on September 11, 2001.
Another one bites the dust.
Wag The Dog Magic Show By US Is Grand Illusion
You didn't give your link a great deal of thought, now did you? Planting explosives/thermite on the floors they planned on crashing the jet into, seems like a dubious proposition at best. Even if any survived the initial impact in place, how exactly were they going to control it? The writer's theory is a gravity driven collapse as the result of failure. The exact same theory as the official, pack of lies, explanation. He doesn't support the theory of a controlled demolition, but a controlled failure and letting gravity take its course.
Which is a more certain theory?
A) The fireproofing on the steel that had survived the impact and explosion of the jet, was blown to kingdom come. The resulting fires weakened the remaining steel to the point of failure and gravity driven collapse.
B) The fireproofing on the steel that survived the impact and explosion of the jet, remained firmly in place and was actually a theorized concoction on thermite and fireproofing material (a plot line that I've seen on NCIS, by the way) that had been secretly planted on the very same floors that the jets would impact two years later (coincidence? you think not) and then in an act of controlled gravity driven failure, somehow detonated to bring down the building, which otherwise wouldn't have happened.