Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,786 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#320 Jan 20, 2013
absolutely wrong Dingus, there was no thermite in the dust as was confirmed by an independent lab in Feb 2012
911 was an inside job wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll respond to you once, Mr. "Yellow Piss," for the benefit of others who wander by.
IT'S ALSO TRUE THAT NO ONE REPORTED EVIDENCE OF TREBUCHETS AND OTHER MEDIEVAL SIEGE ENGINES AT THE SCENE (as far as I know), but as much as I would like to believe the official version, I have eyes that tell me a different story.
It is clear from the videos that the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7 were destroyed with prepositioned pyrotechnics. As an illustration, here is a textbook example of a "building implosion" -- fits the very definition, and not an easy thing to pull off:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =LD06SAf0p9AXX
That was ten seconds of very compelling evidence, for anyone with a brain. But in addition, there are TONS of thermitic residues and nanothermitic materials that have no business being in the dust (I believe that trumps "blasting caps and copper connectors,") and I'm pretty sure the dogs working the pile were focused on finding survivors and likely didn't have the noses for thermitic compounds...or "copper connectors."
Have I mentioned that thermitic compounds and extremely high temperature residues HAVE BEEN FOUND IN ABUNDANCE IN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER DUST BY MANY RESEARCHERS?
One example:
http://911research.com/essays/thermite/explos...
With regard to seismic signatures, read:
http://journalof911studies.com/resources/Rous...
.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#322 Jan 20, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, stay in Kansas, Toto. You are just a long winded, condescending windbag who cherry picks what to respond to, to avoid relevant weaknesses in your own argument, as you conflate every theory you ever heard to assign to those you need to imply are paranoid and crazy.
Sweetie, it really isn't my fault that you can't compose a decent intelligent argument, it's your factually challenged material.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
NIST covered up by not following scientific protocols and not adhering to the scientific method, the method by which all science is based.
So you claim, your expertise in this would be what?
Insults Are Easier wrote:
No explosives were found because none were looked for by NIST, a circular argument meant to convince people like you who have zero critical thinking skills.
Ignoring the reality that NIST was not the only agency examining and testing material from the site, none of which found explosives. Those claiming to have located said explosives have not had their work confirmed independently by anyone and in fact there are a number of posts to this thread which prove those findings to be impossible. If you could even fake having critical skills, you would know that you are being fed a constant and steady supply of bullsh*t, not by the government but by the so-called truth movement.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
"Its not the crime that normally gets you, it's the cover-up." -Richard M. Nixon-
As always,
Insults Are Easier
You haven't proved a crime moron, let alone a cover up. Get back when you actually have something that might pass as facts.

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#323 Jan 20, 2013
why ddn't Dr. André Rousseau have his paper peer reviewed and published ??!?!?!?

Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001,
Recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources.
.
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations
which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of
the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
.
First of all, we show the contradictions in the official explanation between the seismic data and the timing of the events. Then we point out that it is strange that identical events (percussions of identical towers on the one hand, and collapses of
identical towers on the other hand) at the same location would have generated seismic sources of different magnitudes.
.
We demonstrate that only strong explosives could be the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low frequencies.
.
According to the nature of the recorded waves (body and surface waves), we can propose a location of each explosive source. According to the presence of shear waves or the presence of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean or a subaerial explosion.
.
The magnitude of an aerial explosion is insufficient to provide seismic waves at 34 km.
.
The witnesses and video observation confirm our conclusions of subaerial explosions close to the times of aircraft impacts on WTC1 and WTC2, a strong subterranean explosion closely correlated with the WTC1 collapse, and subaerial explosions closely correlated with the WTC2 and WTC7 collapses, WTC7 not having been hit by a plane.
.
As a consequence, we draw the conclusion that the three buildings were demolished by a controlled process.
.
http://journalof911studies.com/resources/Rous...
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha hah ah aha h ah ha ah
.
That's A Good Little Boy Who Is Still In Kansas Huh eh !
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#324 Jan 20, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
says the high school dropout who pretends to be a famous
guitarist on youtube
<quoted text>
Have no ideal what your talk'en bout ,freak.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#325 Jan 20, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Sweetie, it really isn't my fault that you can't compose a decent intelligent argument, it's your factually challenged material.
Insults Are Easier wrote, "NIST covered up by not following scientific protocols and not adhering to the scientific method, the method by which all science is based."

So you claim, your expertise in this would be what? Insults Are Easier wrote, " No explosives were found because none were looked for by NIST, a circular argument meant to convince people like you who have zero critical thinking skills."

Ignoring the reality that NIST was not the only agency examining and testing material from the site, none of which found explosives. Those claiming to have located said explosives have not had their work confirmed independently by anyone and in fact there are a number of posts to this thread which prove those findings to be impossible. If you could even fake having critical skills, you would know that you are being fed a constant and steady supply of bullsh*t, not by the government but by the so-called truth movement.
Insults Are Easier wrote, ""Its not the crime that normally gets you, it's the cover-up." -Richard M. Nixon-
As always,
Insults Are Easier"

You haven't proved a crime moron, let alone a cover up. Get back when you actually have something that might pass as facts.
Tell us in your supremely logical and intelligent mind how you can suggest controlled demolitions mimic uncontrolled accidental collapses.

Insults Are Easier
truths

Pittsfield, MA

#326 Jan 20, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
Really Retard !!?!?!?!?? go down to your local firehouse and ask a fireman
<quoted text>
Why you'd just deny what they said as well...
That's what you govie shills do the best.
We say the sun is hot and you simple sheeple shills jump up and say: "No it's not and we proved that to you twoofers many times already"
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T80OHV1...

“the summer home in Cape Cod”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#327 Jan 21, 2013
OH THE IRONY ...... why is it when the FDNY say that WTC 7 was fully engulfed in flames, burning out of control , and structurally unstable you still go around saying "WTC 7 collapsed mysteriously from a few small fires ?!?!?!?!?!

why don't you just admit you are a mindless conspiracy nut
truths wrote:
<quoted text>
Why you'd just deny what they said as well...
That's what you govie shills do the best.
We say the sun is hot and you simple sheeple shills jump up and say: "No it's not and we proved that to you twoofers many times already"
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/T80OHV1...

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#328 Jan 21, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Tell us in your supremely logical and intelligent mind how you can suggest controlled demolitions mimic uncontrolled accidental collapses.
Insults Are Easier
Tell me oh wise one, how and why I am wrong? You keep claiming that I am and I'd love for you to prove it, or at least give it the old college try for once.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#329 Jan 21, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Don't worry Pork, I'm not going to spam the mistake endlessly around your neck the way you do to other posters. Nor am I going call you childish names, thats your job here after all.

Since you're going to claim word salad if I say something in depth, I'll keep this short... Just tell me, what was the ejected mass during the collapse you claim is so negligible?

p=mv after all.

Insults Are Easier
I wouldn't worry anyway. The truth is that I admit when I make a mistake but won't let shysters like yourself off with a free pass when you misinform and lie for twoof.

Steel plating is a textbook example of that and unless if you would have admitted to your claim being a mistake right from the start, I would drop it.

Regarding the amount if mass ejected, studies done on the collapses conclude that once initiation was over, all accumulated mass (aside from the upper block) could be ejected and all that would change would be the time it took to collapse.

Bazant made reference to various processes which would have, aside from chaos, determined mass shedding and interestingly, the first engineer I spoke with brought two of these processes up in our discussions.

One would be compression. How much could the mass compress in the collapse front zone.

We have artifacts of compression that illustrate multiple floors being compressed into one chunk less than 5' thick so this is definitely relevant.

The other issue is that the towers were 95% air so the majority of of mass that doesn't defect over the side cans be assumed to simply follow the direction of gravity; straight down.

Again, science has already answered these questions and some of those answers exists as common knowledge to engineers who've studied to understand such things.

It's all good that you can ask such questions but the reality is that aside from those gullible enough to believe people like you, your queries and claims would never make it if pit to the test in front of those knowledgable enough to see through them.

Steel plating.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#330 Jan 21, 2013
Forgotten faith wrote:
Here's an offbeat question...?!

What the hell is a 'Twoofer' anyway??

Lol. Sorry just never heard of such an odd ball word before.
A twoofer is a person who will only accept answers that conform to their belief systems and ideology...and refuses to learn.

Timesten, Insults and Zorders are twoofers.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#331 Jan 21, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>Those are govt posted blogs and sites, Pork shill is passing out..
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
.
Here's some other sites, not endorsed by the govt.
https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight...
.
Go here and read/talk to people interested in the real truth.
http://fightingforliberty.ning.com/
None of them aside from links to NIST have anything to do with government and your ad hom attacks amount to nothing but logical fallacy.

Which summarizes your entire belief system regardless of subject.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#332 Jan 21, 2013
Timesten wrote:
<quoted text>You are so ignorant....
Such delicious irony!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#333 Jan 21, 2013
Commander Bunny wrote:
Hi Kids.
All the oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots sockies are here!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#334 Jan 21, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>I have a feeling the reason people are interested in these kinds of questions is this...

There is far more to this world than taught in our schools, shown in the media, or proclaimed by the church and state. Most of mankind lives in a hypnotic trance, taking to be reality what is instead a twisted simulacrum of reality, a collective dream in which values are inverted, lies are taken as truth, and tyranny is accepted as security. They enjoy their ignorance and cling tightly to the misery that gives them identity.

Fortunately, some are born with spiritual immune systems that sooner or later give rejection to the illusory worldview grafted upon them from birth through social conditioning. They begin sensing that something is amiss, and start looking for answers. Inner knowledge and anomalous outer experiences show them a side of reality others are oblivious to, and so begins their journey of awakening. Each step of the journey is made by following the heart instead of following the crowd and by choosing knowledge over ignorance.

Knowledge is the key to unlocking our potential. It gives us the self-​determination, responsibility, and power necessary to cast off the chains of covert oppression. Knowledge is therefore the greatest protector, for it also gives us foresight to impeccably handle the challenges of life and, most importantly, to sidestep the traps on the path to awakening. The more you know of higher truths and apply what you know, the more you begin operating under higher laws that transcend the limitations of the lower.

This is why

Insults Are Easier
Oh noes, it's the matrix!

What a load of rubbish!
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#335 Jan 21, 2013
Pulled pork and Rape kit both work hard on the plantation. They're a type of slave master. They surpress truth hopeing the peasants don't get to much info and revolt.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#336 Jan 21, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>.
Whether you're a twoofer, a birfer, or a bwunker can expect a lot
of school yard name calling on this forum.
.
The object of the game here is a twoofer asks a question or provides some information or posts the link of a video that explains some point of view they are trying to promulgate or simply lets others know of this new idea or angle and the bwunkers (debunkers of twoofers) immediately try to refute the claim or information, dismiss the original source and then comes the school yard name calling. Oh they are sooo lame too!
.
"Oh the delicious irony." mu shu says this a lot LOL
.
Try it, post an unfounded claim and see who replys to what you post. It's a Hoot. sorry charlie, say the truth, mu shu pig pork boy, yellowpissreality, aussiegayboy, ratdick, someone will get back to you don't worry.
.
Watch .*.*
.
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOBBITY JOB JOB !!?!?!?!?!
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha h aha h ah ah ah
.
That's A Good & Funny One Huh eh !
And what's so funny is its you losers always whining even though you do it all the time.

Hell, Ignorance is Bliss spent days trying to insult me by insulting all 30+ million Canadians over and over....yet still whines like a baby about insults (actually just those directed at twoofsheep, he doesn't have an
issue when it's twoofcultists doing the insulting!).
Say the Truth

San Rafael, CA

#337 Jan 21, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
And what's so funny is its you losers always whining even though you do it all the time.
Hell, Ignorance is Bliss spent days trying to insult me by insulting all 30+ million Canadians over and over....yet still whines like a baby about insults (actually just those directed at twoofsheep, he doesn't have an
issue when it's twoofcultists doing the insulting!).
Waaaah Waaaah Whine Whine mu shu pork boy can sure Whine can't he ?

This thread is down 100 votes in 17 days. You've lost already ! LOL

Oh but the vote is not peer reviewed and journal published! LOL

Children don't know it when they are being insulted
Say the Truth

San Rafael, CA

#338 Jan 21, 2013
Oh the foul tasting irony !?!?!?!?!? LOL
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#339 Jan 21, 2013
Say the Twoof wrote:
Oh the foul tasting irony !?!?!?!?!? LOL
C0<K$UC<K1NG TRoll!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#340 Jan 21, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
why ddn't Dr. André Rousseau have his paper peer reviewed and published ??!?!?!?
<quoted text>
It costs too much.
.
Jet Fuel ha ha ha ha ah ha ha ha
.
That's A Good One Huh eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 3 min ChromiuMan 5,471
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 3 min RADEKT 261,687
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 5 min Dr_Zorderz 4,781
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 7 min Stilgar Fifrawi 750,801
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min June VanDerMark 548,735
Dubai massage Body To Body full service 0559... (Feb '14) 9 min Dubai Massage 055... 118
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 12 min waaasssuuup 441,441
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 13 min AnnieJ 602,188
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 33 min ChristineM 230,023

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE