Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

Pearls Before_

Austin, TX

#3340 Mar 25, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Dear, YOU were the fool who told us he found "speculations", not me.He claims that he is looking at a form of thermite that he only theorizes to exist. It doesn't take a BA in chemical engineering to see the obvious holes in his "science".
Not only are you scientifically illiterate, but you don't comprehend irony.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3342 Mar 25, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
I found out that False Flag represents the substitution of airplanes, which all the evidence shows to be impossible. The updrafts in high-rise fires are tremendous.
The idea behind a False Flag operation is to commit an act and then pin the blame on your choice of enemies. They aren't a new concept, they've been around for centuries. Nero having most of Rome burned down so he could remodel and blaming it on the Christians is in essence a false flag op. Sometimes they can get quite elaborate and completely staged, like when Germans dressed up in Polish uniforms to attack a radio station just inside the German border. The "Gleiwitz Incident" was Hitler's basis for invading Poland. The false flag here is that of the "terrorists", there were no "terrorists" involved and if they were, they were our terrorists. The true flag is that of the real culprits, the evil, all-powerful they. They flew the false flag of the "terrorists" when they did this, whatever this is this week and we fell for it.
aquasana

Dallas, TX

#3343 Mar 25, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
.. What's more, steel frame buildings are never brought down with explosives. Why do you keep advocating that the government waste money testing for something that couldn't possibly have been used?
Steel frame buildings are never brought down with explosives? Really? NEVER? Why is that?

If I find an example that proves you wrong, will you swirl on down the drain and undergo some very necessary treatment and filtration?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3344 Mar 25, 2013
Pearls Before_ wrote:
Not only are you scientifically illiterate, but you don't comprehend irony.
I comprehend irony quite well dear, you on the other hand, might just want to look up the meaning of the word and try again. You may just get there yet. I may not be the most scientifically learned person in the room. my degrees are in communications, political science and business, but I be a whole lot smarter than you give me credit for. He burned dust, he surmises that said dust burned like a form of thermite that may or may not actually exist. Others burning dust have said it burns like paint. No one burning dust other than your BS wielding chemical engineer has said the dust burns like thermite, theoretical or known to exist versions. You were saying?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3345 Mar 25, 2013
aquasana wrote:
<quoted text>
Steel frame buildings are never brought down with explosives? Really? NEVER? Why is that?
If I find an example that proves you wrong, will you swirl on down the drain and undergo some very necessary treatment and filtration?
They are tipped over and dismantled, never imploded.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3346 Mar 25, 2013
Oh the reason? The reason is simple. Reinforced concrete crumbles and breaks into relatively small pieces while steel frames form a jumble of long pieces which are hard to dismantle. It is easier to take them down piece by piece or cut them up when they are on the ground instead of vertical. Everything comes down to a cost benefit analysis. Complete destruction of the U.S. economy would not benefit anyone who maintains power or is connected with the established power structure. Therefore, like building demolitions, only the actual hijackers had a reasonable motive.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3347 Mar 25, 2013
The shills, dis-information specialists, hasbarats and outright liars are really getting desperate trying to convince people of the government lies and spending so much energy on this forum trying to convince a kooky radical fringe element who thinks for themselves otherwise.
.
Complete destruction of the economy is the only thing that will benefit the real movers and shakers of the NWO as they print more worthless fiat dollars, create hyperinflation, seize our bank accounts and then offer us a way out, which by that time we (you fools also) will be more than willing to accept as a way out.
.
Have you heard of Cypress and what is happening in the EU? It's already started dearie.
.
9/11 was a piece of cake compared to what your bosses have in store for the world.
.
Wag The Dog Magic Show In The Main Tent At 9 PM.
.
Can't Miss It. LOL Huh Eh !
Says It All

Santa Cruz, CA

#3348 Mar 25, 2013
Was 911 an Inside Job
No 8,783 58%
YES 6,028 40%
Possibly 43 0%
Don't know 34 0%
Current Total 14,888

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3349 Mar 25, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The shills, dis-information specialists, hasbarats and outright liars are really getting desperate trying to convince people of the government lies and spending so much energy on this forum trying to convince a kooky radical fringe element who thinks for themselves otherwise.
.
Complete destruction of the economy is the only thing that will benefit the real movers and shakers of the NWO as they print more worthless fiat dollars, create hyperinflation, seize our bank accounts and then offer us a way out, which by that time we (you fools also) will be more than willing to accept as a way out.
.
Have you heard of Cypress and what is happening in the EU? It's already started dearie.
.
9/11 was a piece of cake compared to what your bosses have in store for the world.
.
Wag The Dog Magic Show In The Main Tent At 9 PM.
.
Can't Miss It. LOL Huh Eh !
No you are the master of smoke and mirrors. Got any real evidence yet Twoofer Shill?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3352 Mar 25, 2013
vice wrote:
<quoted text>
Biltmore Hotel, Oklahoma City, OK, 1977. Steel frame. demolished.
Did you read how they did it? Do you still maintain that building demolition is a plausible explanation for the WTC complex?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3354 Mar 25, 2013
The regions of WTC 1 and WTC 2 that had fireproofing materials reportedly reapplied to their structural steel, are also the same regions within which each building structurally failed and that were struck by American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines flight 175 on September 11, 2001.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/13272
.
Another one bites the dust.
.
Wag The Dog Magic Show By US Is Grand Illusion

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3355 Mar 25, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The regions of WTC 1 and WTC 2 that had fireproofing materials reportedly reapplied to their structural steel, are also the same regions within which each building structurally failed and that were struck by American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines flight 175 on September 11, 2001.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/13272
.
Another one bites the dust.
.
Wag The Dog Magic Show By US Is Grand Illusion
Meaning what exactly? The fact of the matter is the exterior had no fireproofing material at all. WTC1 and WTC2 had most support on the perimeter of the building. At least you admit the two were hit by flight 175 and flight 11. Great. You are way ahead of many Twoofers who claim that those planes either did not hit the buildings or that no planes hit the buildings.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#3356 Mar 25, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The regions of WTC 1 and WTC 2 that had fireproofing materials reportedly reapplied to their structural steel, are also the same regions within which each building structurally failed and that were struck by American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines flight 175 on September 11, 2001.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/13272
.
Another one bites the dust.
.
Wag The Dog Magic Show By US Is Grand Illusion
More goofy opinions.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canmore, Canada

#3357 Mar 26, 2013
Pearls Before_ wrote:
<quoted text>Not only are you scientifically illiterate, but you don't comprehend irony.
Gawd I love irony!

Tell us again how ignition of a material proves its chemical composition....

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canmore, Canada

#3358 Mar 26, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The shills, dis-information specialists, hasbarats and outright liars are really getting desperate trying to convince people of the government lies and spending so much energy on this forum trying to convince a kooky radical fringe element who thinks for themselves otherwise.
.
Complete destruction of the economy is the only thing that will benefit the real movers and shakers of the NWO as they print more worthless fiat dollars, create hyperinflation, seize our bank accounts and then offer us a way out, which by that time we (you fools also) will be more than willing to accept as a way out.
.
Have you heard of Cypress and what is happening in the EU? It's already started dearie.
.
9/11 was a piece of cake compared to what your bosses have in store for the world.
.
Wag The Dog Magic Show In The Main Tent At 9 PM.
.
Can't Miss It. LOL Huh Eh !
After 11 years of claims that realists are "desperate" the only conclusion that fits is the one which states conspirasheep are delusional.

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots glop!
Mik

Lithuania

#3359 Mar 26, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Gawd I love irony!
Tell us again how ignition of a material proves its chemical composition....
Spectral analysis gives data on composition.

Combustion is simply a rearrangement of original elements, with, in some cases, the addition of oxygen from the environment. In the case of thermite and related compounds, the oxygen is already a component of the original.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3360 Mar 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
Did you read how they did it? Do you still maintain that building demolition is a plausible explanation for the WTC complex?
http://www.controlled-demoliti on.com/biltmore-hotel

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#3361 Mar 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Meaning what exactly? The fact of the matter is the exterior had no fireproofing material at all. WTC1 and WTC2 had most support on the perimeter of the building. At least you admit the two were hit by flight 175 and flight 11. Great. You are way ahead of many Twoofers who claim that those planes either did not hit the buildings or that no planes hit the buildings.
What part of illusion don't you understand?
.
Don't ya just love the way the plane or the cgi of a plane simply melts all the way into the steel box beams of the facade of WTC 1 & 2 right up to the tippy tip of the trailing surfaces without a scratch and explodes in a gigantic fireball?
.
By deception we will do war.
.
Do you have a savings account? Too bad.
.
You Really Should Believe In Magic. It Explains A Lot. Huh Eh !

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#3362 Mar 26, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The regions of WTC 1 and WTC 2 that had fireproofing materials reportedly reapplied to their structural steel, are also the same regions within which each building structurally failed and that were struck by American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines flight 175 on September 11, 2001.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/13272
.
Another one bites the dust.
.
Wag The Dog Magic Show By US Is Grand Illusion
The only dog wagging at the end of that tail is you, buttercup.

You didn't give your link a great deal of thought, now did you? Planting explosives/thermite on the floors they planned on crashing the jet into, seems like a dubious proposition at best. Even if any survived the initial impact in place, how exactly were they going to control it? The writer's theory is a gravity driven collapse as the result of failure. The exact same theory as the official, pack of lies, explanation. He doesn't support the theory of a controlled demolition, but a controlled failure and letting gravity take its course.

Which is a more certain theory?

A) The fireproofing on the steel that had survived the impact and explosion of the jet, was blown to kingdom come. The resulting fires weakened the remaining steel to the point of failure and gravity driven collapse.

B) The fireproofing on the steel that survived the impact and explosion of the jet, remained firmly in place and was actually a theorized concoction on thermite and fireproofing material (a plot line that I've seen on NCIS, by the way) that had been secretly planted on the very same floors that the jets would impact two years later (coincidence? you think not) and then in an act of controlled gravity driven failure, somehow detonated to bring down the building, which otherwise wouldn't have happened.

Amsel

Netherlands

#3363 Mar 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you read how they did it? Do you still maintain that building demolition is a plausible explanation for the WTC complex?
You have proven wrong. Steel frame buildings can and have been destroyed with explosives.

I do not see you acknowledging your error. Why do you not acknowledge your error?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min Jim-ca 17,555
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 6 min PadMark 683,941
MESSAGE 4 Kyrie Irving of the Cleveland Cavaliers 12 min Doctor REALITY 3
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 28 min waaasssuuup 619,712
Poll Why Canada sucks (Oct '10) 1 hr quebec sucks 573
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr waaasssuuup 983,266
Girl snapchat names (Feb '15) 3 hr eli_mitchell137 2
More from around the web