Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2764 Mar 7, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Was 911 an Inside Job
No 8,638 59%
YES 5,863 40%
Possibly 40 0%
Don't know 31 0%
Current Total 14,572
SAYS IT ALL!
This the goofiest poll I have ever seen.
Charlie Sheen

Matthews, NC

#2765 Mar 7, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
This the goofiest poll I have ever seen.
It's from Team Twoof, that's a requirement.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#2766 Mar 7, 2013
Timesten wrote:
I see piglet is on one of his all day coffee breaks again as usual. Come to tell the truthers they are wrong, as he so faithfully has for the past 4 years.... Yes he is our very own troll shill professor on 911. Hesays we are all wrong anf he and his 3 buds are all right... Hmmmmmmm. Let's see....

Here's the first post Pigpie started off with on this forum
#108312 May 31, 2009
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Boob!
Howya doin' scumbag!
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
.
If you care to deny it pig pie, than you show us all your first post.
Here's my first post ....
#160038 Opening Statement
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
from there on...
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TR4E9LJ...
.
Yet Pigpie says he is 'Educated with Certifications', and we should listen to his words of wisdom..
.
We asked Porkpie what his views are on 911.
Here are some comments made by this Great Scientific Scholar:
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Sorry vulgar-tommy but I don't have to say you're wrong since reality already proves it.

Oh and that wasn't my first post so you're wrong about that too.

You may return to spamming stupid and trolling now.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#2767 Mar 7, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>LMFAO!
He's admitting he's a mindless shill for ignorance and it explains why he never addresses any on topic posts.
You Just Blew it

Chico, CA

#2768 Mar 7, 2013
snake2yoface wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe it to be a "from the side job" but anyway, you just keep plugging along and find the missing pieces of the truth puzzle. I'm sure we will all gather around the towers and sing songs of liberty, and talk, talk, talk, talk. Nothing but talk.
Bomb a building to show us how it's supposed to happen...
Are you inciting someone to commit a terrorist act?
REPORTED

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#2769 Mar 7, 2013
WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11

The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else.
.
The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic:
.
The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used:
SMOKESCREENS.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area.
.
In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event.
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Can you say Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#2770 Mar 7, 2013
WHY FAKE THE NEWS BROADCASTS ?
.
The 9/11 TV broadcasts were designed to ‘sell’ a fictitious terror attack to the world– by replacing the real-life events of the day (the WTC demolitions) with fake imagery.
.
The official story was quite surreal - as were the TV images of the day and the preposterous tale of 19 kids roundly outfoxing the US Air Defense.
.
It is essential to judge with one's own eyes the broadcasts actually aired by ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and CNN.

WHAT ABOUT THE "AMATEUR" VIDEOS ?
.
All the other videos (endlessly replayed on TV) were released only later.
.
They have all been extensively analyzed by scores of video analysts; each and every video snippet of "amateur imagery" has been methodically dissected and compared - and empirically proved to be nothing else than computer-generated fabrications.
.
HOW WERE PRIVATE VIDEOS IMPEDED ?
.
In order for the 9/11 TV-deception to succeed, full visual control of the Manhattan area had to be in place.
.
The existence of EMP/HERF technology is undisputable: only the hypothesis of it being used on 9/11 remains unverifiable.
.
It is, however, a reasonable postulation supported by a series of electronic blackouts which occurred in NYC that morning.
.
In any event, the logic of using EMP/HERF holds water and effectively explains the ruse with disarming simplicity:
.
NO private photography of the real-life events was allowed: thus, the imagery aired by the TV networks feared no comparison and was passed off as reality.
.
All anyone had to do, who saw anything but a blur and heard an explosion, was to look at the TV and what they thought they saw became clear.
.
Of course its real. It's on the TV isn't it.
.
Right out of Wag The Dog.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Look up in the sky, it's a bird, it's a plane, what the hell is THAT?
.
Oh now it's on the TV. Oh yeah that's what I saw.
.
Deception is the most powerful force on the planet.
.
9/11 was pure deception.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2771 Mar 7, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else.
.
The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic:
.
The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used:
SMOKESCREENS.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area.
.
In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event.
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Can you say Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile?
False. What about the people on the street who witnessed it? What about the people who videotaped from their apartments?

Yes, plenty of footage exists on YouTube today.

Are you trying to make a fool of yourself?

What a Jackass.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#2772 Mar 7, 2013
Errata:
Deception is the most powerful POLITICAL force on the planet.

“ Soon: too late to protest”

Since: Jan 09

Location hidden

#2773 Mar 7, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey socko, Still claiming that no planes hit the towers when thousands of New Yourkers saw it.
Byt hey, what do they know, you have youtube!
I don’t know if you need glasses, are stoned, or what, but your comments don’t make any sense.

“ Soon: too late to protest”

Since: Jan 09

Location hidden

#2774 Mar 7, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie.
.
It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the smoking towers - and very little else.
.
The sum total of “Action Shots”(“Planecrash” and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
.
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality.
.
Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic:
.
The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV -(or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film).
.
The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been.
.
Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used:
SMOKESCREENS.
.
More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area.
.
In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event.
.
Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Can you say Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile?
My main point is, what’s the purpose of investigating this for NOTHING? What did they do when JFK and his son were murdered by the same people? Nothing.
If the idiot masses continue to be too scared, and conservatives keep voting for that treason, then it’s a waste of time. I’m not saying they’ll never get mad enough, but that it will be waaay tooo late.
At the very least, every Topix reader with a functioning brain should be confronting, persuading, or whatever it takes, to educate conservatives and the airhead masses.
It’s not like anybody is saying we have to take up arms and fight this war, but suggesting people actually fight like their survival depends on it.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Banff, Canada

#2775 Mar 8, 2013
You know, if you forget about facts, reality, truth, physics, knowledge and sanity...twoof makes a lot of sense!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Banff, Canada

#2776 Mar 8, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
False. What about the people on the street who witnessed it? What about the people who videotaped from their apartments?
Yes, plenty of footage exists on YouTube today.
Are you trying to make a fool of yourself?
What a Jackass.
In his looniverse, everyone who witnessed it is a plant.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#2777 Mar 8, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Sarcasm aside,

List of unsupported claims by Ignorance is Bliss;

1) Newspaper articles I posted in the past showing reports of molten steel are common in fires were referring to "plated steel".

2) "Plated steel" has a lower melting point than non-plated steel.

3) Molten steel indicates controlled demolition.

4) NIST didn't follow the scientific method.

5) Molten steel can be discerned by sight alone.

6) Controlled demolitions can be differentiated from a gravity driven collapse by visual examination of video of the live event.

7) Free fall is an indicator for CD.

Break out the whine and cheeze!
Still nothing from Ignorance is Bliss.

Funny that he has no expectation for scientific rigour to be applied to the idiocy he shills.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#2778 Mar 8, 2013
Protester wrote:
<quoted text>
My main point is, what’s the purpose of investigating this for NOTHING? What did they do when JFK and his son were murdered by the same people? Nothing.
Gosh, you cracked it, what were these peoples names?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#2779 Mar 8, 2013
Q:“What about the many private videos of the 9/11 events showing the plane crash?”

A: All the alleged “Amateur” stills and videos depicting crucial moments of the day (“planes”/“tower collapses”) are forgeries - and demonstrably so.
.
The “9/11 plotters” manufactured a large image-pool to be attributed to private cameramen for three main purposes :
.
1: To imprint the notion that many bystanders captured the event on film
.
2: To supply more shocking and memorable close-up views of the event
.
3: To outweigh the poor LIVE TV show with a great number of shots
.
The skeptics argue that “too many videos of the airplane were captured, therefore all cannot be fake ...” Too many indeed: there are a simply ludicrous amount of “lucky” shots.
.
In fact, the sheer amount of existing 'airplane' images is grossly absurd in itself: We now have more than 45 “amateur videos”(some of which were released - inexplicably - as late as June 2008!)
.
We also have at least 10 still pictures depicting alleged “Flight 175”“in its very last second of flight”:
.
10 ALLEGED “AMATEUR” SNAPSHOTS OF “FLIGHT 175” in its “last second of flight”
.
For in-depth info and sourcing of the above pictures, see: WTC Crash research by Killtown.
.
Here’s where any rational-minded person should stop and ponder: What are the odds that so many amateur cameramen would capture a clear shot of an unexpected 550mph airplane in its very last second of flight - both 'plane' and towers nicely framed - with no apparent motion blur of either?
.
There are, for instance, no such precedents in the history of motorsport photography: no speedway crash has ever been captured by 55+ cameramen, in crowded arenas where hundreds of lenses are aimed right at the action.
.
On most occasions, only a handful of professionals will capture an image sharp enough for publication.
.
CLONED IMAGERY: As we compare the “amateur videos”, one by one, even the layman will notice their obvious falseness.
.
Many simply turn out to be different versions (cropped/warped/seam-carved) of a single scenery.
.
The shots compared below are purportedly authored by five different cameramen.
.
The sheer goofiness of the 9/11 image fakery crew is, in fact, breathtaking:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Look Up In The Sky Woops What Was THAT ?
.
Oh Look It's On TV Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#2780 Mar 8, 2013
IMPOSSIBLE PHYSICS:
.
Other “amateur” shots depict the actual impact of the "airplane" on the tower façade: The aluminum airframe is seen integrally penetrating the steel tower with no deceleration – without as much as a rear aileron breaking off.
.
This is, of course, utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics. This ‘shortcut compromise’ was chosen by the fakery crew for obvious reasons:
.
More realistic forgeries (with many bits and pieces shredding at impact) would have required vastly superior computing power in order to simulate convincingly all the various viewing angles of the “planecrash”.
.
Doncha just love the way the "plane" melts all the way into the metal framed building like butter and then explodes in a Hollywood fireball and obscuring smoke huge explosion.
.
I especially like the disappearing wing video.
.
Deception = Wag The Dog = 9/11

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#2781 Mar 8, 2013
Why don’t we have a single authentic video of the crucial 9/11 events?
.
Firstly, there are many indications that a blanket evacuation of Lower Manhattan took place after the first "plane" strike at 8:46AM.
.
Few people were likely left dwelling around snapping pictures. In any circumstances, the chances for anyone capturing a clear image of an unexpected, sky-diving 550mph+ object are extremely slim.
.
These factors alone drastically reduced the probabilites of undesired image recordings in the area.
.
Nevertheless, one must assume that the 9/11 military-backed operation would have required no less than a 110% "safety level".
.
It should also be safe to say that the perpetrators relied on top-end military technology.
.
Thus, we may formulate a plausible hypothesis - based on the known objectives which had to be met.
.
If total visual control of the wider Manhattan area was a top priority of the 9/11 psyop, it would have been essential to impede any authentic footage to be captured in NY that morning.
.
Electromagnetic weaponry (EMP/HERF or HPM) is routinely used in war zones to jam the enemy’s electronics.
.
Read about it here
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Conceivably, this technology was used to prevent any private footage being recorded throughout the limited (102min) time-window in which the defining 9/11 events took place (from first "plane" strike to last tower collapse).
.
To be sure, the research into this field has long been a top military priority: with this in mind, we may reasonably consider that this well-tested technology was employed on 9/11.
.
It is, all in all, a hypothesis grounded in logic and (military) common sense.
.
If They Could, They Would, And Did
.
Pure Wag The Dog

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#2782 Mar 8, 2013
If you want to know the answers to:
.
What about what the "thousands" of eyewitnesses saw?
.
What about the many amateur videos of the planes?
.
Why did all cell-phone communication cease?
.
Why did all regular TV programming go off the air except for the BIG four synchronized TV broadcasts of ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX:?
.
Yet another indication that the 9/11 TV "LIVE" broadcasts were managed by one single, centralized studio.
.
Just go here:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Or as the bwunker mu shu pot sticker would say septemberclueless. He likes to ridicule whatever he can not refute.
.
Oh What A Tangled Web We Weave yadda yadda yadda


Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#2783 Mar 8, 2013
I was in lower Manhattan that day and I can say that you are an IMBECILE
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Q:“What about the many private videos of the 9/11 events showing the plane crash?”
A: All the alleged “Amateur” stills and videos depicting crucial moments of the day (“planes”/“tower collapses”) are forgeries - and demonstrably so.
.
The “9/11 plotters” manufactured a large image-pool to be attributed to private cameramen for three main purposes :
.
1: To imprint the notion that many bystanders captured the event on film
.
2: To supply more shocking and memorable close-up views of the event
.
3: To outweigh the poor LIVE TV show with a great number of shots
.
The skeptics argue that “too many videos of the airplane were captured, therefore all cannot be fake ...” Too many indeed: there are a simply ludicrous amount of “lucky” shots.
.
In fact, the sheer amount of existing 'airplane' images is grossly absurd in itself: We now have more than 45 “amateur videos”(some of which were released - inexplicably - as late as June 2008!)
.
We also have at least 10 still pictures depicting alleged “Flight 175”“in its very last second of flight”:
.
10 ALLEGED “AMATEUR” SNAPSHOTS OF “FLIGHT 175” in its “last second of flight”
.
For in-depth info and sourcing of the above pictures, see: WTC Crash research by Killtown.
.
Here’s where any rational-minded person should stop and ponder: What are the odds that so many amateur cameramen would capture a clear shot of an unexpected 550mph airplane in its very last second of flight - both 'plane' and towers nicely framed - with no apparent motion blur of either?
.
There are, for instance, no such precedents in the history of motorsport photography: no speedway crash has ever been captured by 55+ cameramen, in crowded arenas where hundreds of lenses are aimed right at the action.
.
On most occasions, only a handful of professionals will capture an image sharp enough for publication.
.
CLONED IMAGERY: As we compare the “amateur videos”, one by one, even the layman will notice their obvious falseness.
.
Many simply turn out to be different versions (cropped/warped/seam-carved) of a single scenery.
.
The shots compared below are purportedly authored by five different cameramen.
.
The sheer goofiness of the 9/11 image fakery crew is, in fact, breathtaking:
.
http://www.septemberclues.info/
.
Look Up In The Sky Woops What Was THAT ?
.
Oh Look It's On TV Huh Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 3 min Frank N Stine 15,801
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Gabriel 983,108
So how exactly did O.J. Simpson pull off a doub... 10 min Doctor REALITY 6
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr kent 683,651
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 3 hr Here For Now 619,690
What did O.J. Simpson do with the murder weapon... 6 hr Doctor REALITY 17
Kyrie makes it OFFICIAL: he's SICK of LeBron!!! 9 hr Mirrormirorwall 2
More from around the web