People should not fall for the tactics of a spambot, dis-info agent who calls himself PorkPie...<quoted text>Speaking of ignorant, are you ever going to explain how momentum would remain constant when both mass and velocity are increasing?
Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!
To argue with a coward who employs the tactics of name-calling, slander, and deceit to coverup the fact that his entire argument is baseless, is pointless.
As is engaging a person who shows up under false pretenses to simply repeat assertions in a childish manner by saying "it was". Then when pressed it answers "because, so there".
These are the proponents of the official lie, they employ the same tactics of NIST and the media to further that lie. They all follow the principle If a lie is repeated enough people will believe it.
Gravity was so apparent to cause the collapse NIST never checked for explosives, yet the firefighters placed their command center during the firefight in the WTC lobby just waiting to die.
Isn't momentum represented in physics by a lower case p, Mr. Wizard?
M=mv or p=mv? But either way, I'll assume you are trying to talk about momentum.
Now p=mv is a physics equation, but doesn't explain the WTC collapse, simply because it is apparent in the photographs of the collapse that mass was laterally ejected, and would be unable to exert downward force on the undamaged lower floors of WTC.
The conservation of energy principle is also shown when the the upper floors disintegrate upon impact with the lower undamaged floors. This upward disintegration will further lesson the downward force and momentum exerted on the lower undamaged floors.
p=mv is simply not the entire story of WTC collapses, and only a scientifically dishonest and morally bankrupt person who spends his days spreading childish insults on the Internet will say that it does.
Heses a 10 minute vid explaining the theories of WTC collapse.
For those not prone to heavy drooling and spamming, that is.
Insults Are Easier