Was 911 an Inside Job

Was 911 an Inside Job

Created by inquiring minds on Jan 4, 2013

17,795 votes

Click on an option to vote

YES

No

Don't know

Possibly

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#213 Jan 17, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Speaking of ignorant, are you ever going to explain how momentum would remain constant when both mass and velocity are increasing?

M=mv

Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots!
People should not fall for the tactics of a spambot, dis-info agent who calls himself PorkPie...

To argue with a coward who employs the tactics of name-calling, slander, and deceit to coverup the fact that his entire argument is baseless, is pointless.

As is engaging a person who shows up under false pretenses to simply repeat assertions in a childish manner by saying "it was". Then when pressed it answers "because, so there".

These are the proponents of the official lie, they employ the same tactics of NIST and the media to further that lie. They all follow the principle If a lie is repeated enough people will believe it.

Gravity was so apparent to cause the collapse NIST never checked for explosives, yet the firefighters placed their command center during the firefight in the WTC lobby just waiting to die.

Isn't momentum represented in physics by a lower case p, Mr. Wizard?

M=mv or p=mv? But either way, I'll assume you are trying to talk about momentum.

Now p=mv is a physics equation, but doesn't explain the WTC collapse, simply because it is apparent in the photographs of the collapse that mass was laterally ejected, and would be unable to exert downward force on the undamaged lower floors of WTC.

The conservation of energy principle is also shown when the the upper floors disintegrate upon impact with the lower undamaged floors. This upward disintegration will further lesson the downward force and momentum exerted on the lower undamaged floors.

p=mv is simply not the entire story of WTC collapses, and only a scientifically dishonest and morally bankrupt person who spends his days spreading childish insults on the Internet will say that it does.

Heses a 10 minute vid explaining the theories of WTC collapse.

http://youtu.be/QxKB9hNvwX0

For those not prone to heavy drooling and spamming, that is.

Insults Are Easier

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#214 Jan 17, 2013
Forgotten faith wrote:
Ok again. I've only read a small portion, a rough skimming.

What I want to understand as it is right now in regads to a controlled demo....

Most of what I'm seeing is the comparison of a 'legit' controlled demo....
Standards, regulations, cause and affects....
But.....
Who's to say that 'IF' it was controlled the EXACT same standards would be used!?!

'A building of that size has never been demo'd before so who knows exactly how it would fall....' I believe it was said...

Now that in itself is a question for either side...
Isnt it??

No I'm not picking out what suites my beliefs... Again I don't know.
But when a statement leaves a question in my mind there is more to be answered which is not a complete truth.

But with this being said i will love to sit down and read through more thoroughly.
What it comes down to is whether the person asking the question has relevant knowledge to understand whether their query has merit to begin with.

Given that no evidence for explosives has been presented and the only similarity between WTC 7 and a controlled demolition is that they both fall in the direction of gravity, the question of explosives really has nothing but pure speculation to support it.
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#215 Jan 17, 2013
Pulledpork and Rapekit tend to stay on 9\11 threads.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#216 Jan 17, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
People should not fall for the tactics of a spambot, dis-info agent who calls himself PorkPie...

To argue with a coward who employs the tactics of name-calling, slander, and deceit to coverup the fact that his entire argument is baseless, is pointless.

As is engaging a person who shows up under false pretenses to simply repeat assertions in a childish manner by saying "it was". Then when pressed it answers "because, so there".

These are the proponents of the official lie, they employ the same tactics of NIST and the media to further that lie. They all follow the principle If a lie is repeated enough people will believe it.

Gravity was so apparent to cause the collapse NIST never checked for explosives, yet the firefighters placed their command center during the firefight in the WTC lobby just waiting to die.

Isn't momentum represented in physics by a lower case p, Mr. Wizard?

M=mv or p=mv? But either way, I'll assume you are trying to talk about momentum.

Now p=mv is a physics equation, but doesn't explain the WTC collapse, simply because it is apparent in the photographs of the collapse that mass was laterally ejected, and would be unable to exert downward force on the undamaged lower floors of WTC.

The conservation of energy principle is also shown when the the upper floors disintegrate upon impact with the lower undamaged floors. This upward disintegration will further lesson the downward force and momentum exerted on the lower undamaged floors.

p=mv is simply not the entire story of WTC collapses, and only a scientifically dishonest and morally bankrupt person who spends his days spreading childish insults on the Internet will say that it does.

Heses a 10 minute vid explaining the theories of WTC collapse.

http://youtu.be/QxKB9hNvwX0

For those not prone to heavy drooling and spamming, that is.

Insults Are Easier
Another substance-less word salad?

Steel plating?

And seriously, if you're going to pretend you understand physics, at least learn enough to fool yourself first!

The amount of material being ejected was negligible to the increasing energy being released and the further the collapse progressed, the higher the velocity AND the more mass involved in crushing at the collapse front was available.

But then you still think free fall is a speed so what should be expected of your useless, inept, lying azz?

More steel plating?

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#217 Jan 17, 2013
Substance-less, like M=mv that you fail to address is really expressed as p=mv?

What was the mass of the negligible material ejected during collapse? Rhetorical, because I really would rather not read your insults as you cover up the fact that you don't know.

The official NIST cover up proves 9/11 was an intelligence operation by the ruling power structure. The initial media black out and subsequent biased reporting proves it is controlled as well.

Censorship is only needed in a society predicated upon deceit, and 9/11 was a lie that still requires censorship and media hit pieces. No different to the tactics of PorkPie Hat that you will see on internet forums day by day.

Write a paper questioning 9/11, speak publicly about it, lose your teaching job. So don't ask a relevant professional about it, because they will protect their jobs and family above all else, and nobody can blame them for that.

But we can blame dis-info agents like Porkpie, because he takes joy in the slander and insulting of others.

Scientific illiteracy begins with people unable to see the official NIST investigation for what it is, a biased circular argument of no explosives were found, even though no explosives were looked for, that assumed the aircraft is what brought down the towers and provided no physical tests to prove its hypothesis.

The competing theories of 9/11

http://youtu.be/QxKB9hNvwX0

This is why

Insults Are Easier
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#218 Jan 17, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Substance-less, like M=mv that you fail to address is really expressed as p=mv?
What was the mass of the negligible material ejected during collapse? Rhetorical, because I really would rather not read your insults as you cover up the fact that you don't know.
The official NIST cover up proves 9/11 was an intelligence operation by the ruling power structure. The initial media black out and subsequent biased reporting proves it is controlled as well.
Censorship is only needed in a society predicated upon deceit, and 9/11 was a lie that still requires censorship and media hit pieces. No different to the tactics of PorkPie Hat that you will see on internet forums day by day.
Write a paper questioning 9/11, speak publicly about it, lose your teaching job. So don't ask a relevant professional about it, because they will protect their jobs and family above all else, and nobody can blame them for that.
But we can blame dis-info agents like Porkpie, because he takes joy in the slander and insulting of others.
Scientific illiteracy begins with people unable to see the official NIST investigation for what it is, a biased circular argument of no explosives were found, even though no explosives were looked for, that assumed the aircraft is what brought down the towers and provided no physical tests to prove its hypothesis.
The competing theories of 9/11
http://youtu.be/QxKB9hNvwX0
This is why
Insults Are Easier
I agree, alot of people think Pulled pork and rape kit get paid for doing damage contoll for someone.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#219 Jan 17, 2013
WTC 1 & 2 was never a controlled demolition in the classic sense, it was a top-down explosive collapse intended to look like the result of a terrorist attack.

Thats why they steel was recycled long before the investigations could examine it.

Thats why NIST never did their jobs and checked for any explosives or incendiaries to rule out the possibilities of anything other then the terrorist did it all scenerio.

Thats why the media never reported that people even questioned it until the hit pieces could be put in place.

And thats why dis-info agents like Porkpie and his followers of deceit spend their days insulting and deflecting, and why

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#220 Jan 17, 2013
Elohimsokie wrote:
<quoted text>I agree, alot of people think Pulled pork and rape kit get paid for doing damage contoll for someone.
Paid disinfo agents definitely exist, as do brainwashed people who simply repeat that disinfo... So its hard to know who is what, but the results are quite the same.

Insults Are Easier

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#221 Jan 17, 2013
are you sure the steel was recycled long before the investigations could examine it!?!?!?!?!?

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2...

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jT7bU4frgJs/Tm4wKw3...

http://s3.amazonaws.com/nasathermalimages/pub...
Insults Are Easier wrote:
WTC 1 & 2 was never a controlled demolition in the classic sense, it was a top-down explosive collapse intended to look like the result of a terrorist attack.
Thats why they steel was recycled long before the investigations could examine it.
Thats why NIST never did their jobs and checked for any explosives or incendiaries to rule out the possibilities of anything other then the terrorist did it all scenerio.
Thats why the media never reported that people even questioned it until the hit pieces could be put in place.
And thats why dis-info agents like Porkpie and his followers of deceit spend their days insulting and deflecting, and why
Insults Are Easier

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#222 Jan 17, 2013
why did you lie about being the Fret Killer !!?!?!?!?!
Elohimsokie wrote:
<quoted text>I agree, alot of people think Pulled pork and rape kit get paid for doing damage contoll for someone.
Elohimsokie

Broken Bow, OK

#223 Jan 17, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
why did you lie about being the Fret Killer !!?!?!?!?!
<quoted text>
Have no ideal what your talk'en bout.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#224 Jan 17, 2013
A few pictures of some debris from 9/11 and RADEKT will have you believe the majority of the debris was not recycled in China and India before the NIST investigation began.

The victim families were even complaining to Mayor Bloomberg at the time for this destruction of evidence, and he claimed it was ok to destroy the material, because investigating the building collapse did not require it. But who cares what the victims families say, right? This is public information, look it up for yourselves.

NIST had a few hundred samples it saved from WTC to base its deception on. Clearly saving the pieces it wanted that showed what it wanted, and destroying the rest that might contradict its biased hypothesis.

NIST never checked for the residue of explosives or thermitic incendiaries, when fireman and other witnesses at the scene testified they saw molten steel, and they heard explosions of secondary devices as a good investigation requires.

Now notice how RADEKT accuses people of being someone else. He provides no evidence of this mind you, he just accuses to derail the discussion, he just attacks the messenger to avoid the evidence. He doesn't even have the courtesy of punctuating his posts properly.

These are the tactics of paid and unpaid agents of dis-info, mere parrots of NIST propaganda.

There is one reason I disagree with the official story, it failed to follow the scientific method. It used a computer model instead of physically proving its hypothesis and does not allow for independent review.

Thats not science, its propaganda.

This is why

Insults Are Easier

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#226 Jan 18, 2013
The 9/11 story you are not supposed to know. James McCullough from the mysterious “Council” gives a special assignment to CIA agent Aaron Delgado to attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and pin the blame on Muslim Terrorists.
http://fightingforliberty.ning.com/video/oper...
.
https://www.google.com/search...

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#227 Jan 18, 2013

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#228 Jan 18, 2013
you claimed "Thats why they steel was recycled long before the investigations could examine it"

my pictures prove that, as always, YOU ARE WRONG

have a nice day
Insults Are Easier wrote:
A few pictures of some debris from 9/11 and RADEKT will have you believe the majority of the debris was not recycled in China and India before the NIST investigation began.
The victim families were even complaining to Mayor Bloomberg at the time for this destruction of evidence, and he claimed it was ok to destroy the material, because investigating the building collapse did not require it. But who cares what the victims families say, right? This is public information, look it up for yourselves.
NIST had a few hundred samples it saved from WTC to base its deception on. Clearly saving the pieces it wanted that showed what it wanted, and destroying the rest that might contradict its biased hypothesis.
NIST never checked for the residue of explosives or thermitic incendiaries, when fireman and other witnesses at the scene testified they saw molten steel, and they heard explosions of secondary devices as a good investigation requires.
Now notice how RADEKT accuses people of being someone else. He provides no evidence of this mind you, he just accuses to derail the discussion, he just attacks the messenger to avoid the evidence. He doesn't even have the courtesy of punctuating his posts properly.
These are the tactics of paid and unpaid agents of dis-info, mere parrots of NIST propaganda.
There is one reason I disagree with the official story, it failed to follow the scientific method. It used a computer model instead of physically proving its hypothesis and does not allow for independent review.
Thats not science, its propaganda.
This is why
Insults Are Easier

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#229 Jan 18, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Substance-less, like M=mv that you fail to address is really expressed as p=mv?
I'm sure you're desperately hoping to turn a simple mistake into something more elaborate little fella but the reality is that it was nothing more than a minor error due to distraction.

I started writing "Momentum", was distracted for about ten minutes then came back and added"=mv".

I even copied and pasted the same mistake in another post.

What's very funny about something like this is that I have no issues with being corrected on a simple mistake and have no issues admitting that it was a mistake, yet you've repeatedly been caught telling bold faced lies about steel plating and trying to defend ridiculous statements like "free fall speed".

Given that I've written p=mv hundreds of times here, your attempt to make something out of me making a simple mistake all while spewing crap a 7th grade physics class wouldn't buy is quite rich!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#230 Jan 18, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
WTC 1 & 2 was never a controlled demolition in the classic sense, it was a top-down explosive collapse intended to look like the result of a terrorist attack.

Thats why they steel was recycled long before the investigations could examine it.

Thats why NIST never did their jobs and checked for any explosives or incendiaries to rule out the possibilities of anything other then the terrorist did it all scenerio.

Thats why the media never reported that people even questioned it until the hit pieces could be put in place.

And thats why dis-info agents like Porkpie and his followers of deceit spend their days insulting and deflecting, and why

Insults Are Easier
Funny, you and I discussed this on another thread with you not being able to argue your point.

Again, the ASCE visually inspected the steel at ground zero as well as at the storage facilities it was moved to.

The steel was subjected to many positive material identification tests which would have exposed the presence of explosives or incendiaries.

Your half baked, twoofer sanctioned claim rests on nothing but speculation and the lie that it was all shipped away.

And just like a twoofer, when you couldn't support your dumb claim the first time you just dropped it then waiting a while before recycling the same stupid over again.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#231 Jan 18, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
<quoted text>you claimed "Thats why they steel was recycled long before the investigations could examine it"

my pictures prove that, as always, YOU ARE WRONG

have a nice day
And he's had his silly azz whooped repeatedly on the exact same subject yet pretends it never happened.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#232 Jan 18, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
A few pictures of some debris from 9/11 and RADEKT will have you believe the majority of the debris was not recycled in China and India before the NIST investigation began.

The victim families were even complaining to Mayor Bloomberg at the time for this destruction of evidence, and he claimed it was ok to destroy the material, because investigating the building collapse did not require it. But who cares what the victims families say, right? This is public information, look it up for yourselves.

NIST had a few hundred samples it saved from WTC to base its deception on. Clearly saving the pieces it wanted that showed what it wanted, and destroying the rest that might contradict its biased hypothesis.

NIST never checked for the residue of explosives or thermitic incendiaries, when fireman and other witnesses at the scene testified they saw molten steel, and they heard explosions of secondary devices as a good investigation requires.

Now notice how RADEKT accuses people of being someone else. He provides no evidence of this mind you, he just accuses to derail the discussion, he just attacks the messenger to avoid the evidence. He doesn't even have the courtesy of punctuating his posts properly.

These are the tactics of paid and unpaid agents of dis-info, mere parrots of NIST propaganda.

There is one reason I disagree with the official story, it failed to follow the scientific method. It used a computer model instead of physically proving its hypothesis and does not allow for independent review.

Thats not science, its propaganda.

This is why

Insults Are Easier
Residue would have been extremely evident by the PMI results.

You losers seriously need to educate yourselves with something other than twoof.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#233 Jan 18, 2013
Engineers from FEMA and ASCE were in NY on Sept 13th to look at the the steel and debris ..... are you saying that in two days all the steel was shipped to China and India !?!?!?!?!?
Insults Are Easier wrote:
A few pictures of some debris from 9/11 and RADEKT will have you believe the majority of the debris was not recycled in China and India before the NIST investigation began.
The victim families were even complaining to Mayor Bloomberg at the time for this destruction of evidence, and he claimed it was ok to destroy the material, because investigating the building collapse did not require it. But who cares what the victims families say, right? This is public information, look it up for yourselves.
NIST had a few hundred samples it saved from WTC to base its deception on. Clearly saving the pieces it wanted that showed what it wanted, and destroying the rest that might contradict its biased hypothesis.
NIST never checked for the residue of explosives or thermitic incendiaries, when fireman and other witnesses at the scene testified they saw molten steel, and they heard explosions of secondary devices as a good investigation requires.
Now notice how RADEKT accuses people of being someone else. He provides no evidence of this mind you, he just accuses to derail the discussion, he just attacks the messenger to avoid the evidence. He doesn't even have the courtesy of punctuating his posts properly.
These are the tactics of paid and unpaid agents of dis-info, mere parrots of NIST propaganda.
There is one reason I disagree with the official story, it failed to follow the scientific method. It used a computer model instead of physically proving its hypothesis and does not allow for independent review.
Thats not science, its propaganda.
This is why
Insults Are Easier

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min Joe Fortuna 69,989
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min The Hangman 974,594
HILLARY CLINTON lS DEAD! 5 min Passing Through 7
Topix is getting CRAZY 9 min whut 6
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 14 min here 282,835
Dirty k,.k 15 min daveejo 1
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 16 min bad bob 183,438
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 27 min Anthony MN 658,355
Should Black People Forgive White People for Sl... (Jun '07) 1 hr gundee123 4,918
More from around the web