What do u think of Jesus Christ?(God)
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75779 Dec 5, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
Apparently you went from hope to hate
A human converted to a human-in-name-only godbot, such as you, has gone from hope to hate although only a small percentage are hateful monsters like you, punk.
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75780 Dec 5, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
Talk about mental retardation. Atheists believe in cause and effect until they discuss the Big Bang. The atheist believes in the beginning there was nothing and it exploded ...... Kind of like getting hit twice in the head with snowballs that nobody threw.
Congratulations! You just proved that you're a severe case of mental retardation via Christian indoctrination, punk.

http://www.amazon.com/Universe-Nothing-There-...

One of the few prominent scientists today to have crossed the chasm between science and popular culture, Lawrence Krauss describes the staggeringly beautiful experimental observations and mind-bending new theories that demonstrate not only can something arise from nothing, something will always arise from nothing.

With a new preface about the significance of the discovery of the Higgs particle, A Universe from Nothing uses Krauss’s characteristic wry humor and wonderfully clear explanations to take us back to the beginning of the beginning, presenting the most recent evidence for how our universe evolved—and the implications for how it’s going to end.

Provocative, challenging, and delightfully readable, this is a game-changing look at the most basic underpinning of existence and a powerful antidote to outmoded philosophical, religious, and scientific thinking.
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75781 Dec 5, 2012
Eddy Boyd wrote:
It seems rather odd that such an observant, and intelligent fellow as you would be satisfied with just one side of the debate.
There's absolutely no debate amongst rational adults. There's never been a single scientific observation in support of the juvenile concepts of mythical deities and afterlife fantasylands. If the universe had been created by design then there would be overwhelming evidence of the designer and design and absolutely none exists.

Primitive cultures invented the concept of mythical deities out of ignorance of natural phenomena. Nefarious opportunists hijacked the concept as the essential element of dogma-based indoctrination systems to gain power and convince the gullible that their personal prejudices were divinely inspired.

It can be stated in near absolute terms that there wasn't any supernatural involvement in the origin of the universe. It can be stated in absolute terms that all of the thousands of documented deities are entirely man-made myths.

Organized religious brainwashing is the greatest abomination in the history of the human race and has us on the path to a premature demise. An international ban is inevitable and the sooner the better. It's time for YOU to leave the Dark Ages behind and rejoin the modern world.

http://articles.exchristian.net/2002/10/becom...

“Primum non nocere”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#75782 Dec 5, 2012
I want to touch back on the subject of abiogenesis again. Here are my problems with abiogenesis and I think anyone with an objective scientific mind should see a problem here too:

1. You cannot replicate it, the brightest minds in the world today can't get life from non-life so how can you replicate it?

2. Since you cannot replicate it and nobody was alive during the time albiogenesis was supposed to take place there is no way you can observe it.

3. It doesn't happen today so there is no way you can study it and show that it happens in the natural world.

So there is this concept that is unfalsifiable, non-repeatable, that you can"t observe. This isn't science! Science by definition is knowledge gained through observartion and study and a good theory must be falsifiable and repeatable. We simply don't have that here.
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75783 Dec 5, 2012
RN Student wrote:
I want to touch back on the subject of abiogenesis again.
A religiously retarded imbecilic sociopathic evolution and death denying fundiseased Christian redneck godbot's willful ignorance of science isn't a valid rationalization to mindlessly adhere to a dogma-based indoctrination system.

Charles Darwin suggested that the original spark of life may have begun in a "warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, lights, heat, electricity, etc. present, so that a protein compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes".

He went on to explain that "at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed." In other words, the presence of life itself makes the search for the origin of life dependent on the sterile conditions of the laboratory.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#75784 Dec 5, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
There's absolutely no debate amongst rational adults.
Rational adults realize that there are at least two sides to issues like this. Now when you say there is no debate, it's not that there isn't a debate, but simply the fact that you're not willing to enter into debate. For you it's an open and shut case. I recognize your right to think that and to express it, but I disagree that it's a rational approach.
Myth Buster wrote:
There's never been a single scientific observation in support of the juvenile concepts of mythical deities and afterlife fantasylands.
That's quite a statement to make. Firstly, there is no reason to think that a deity should be subject to scientific observation let alone verification or falsification of the observation. Secondly, since we live here and now, how do we know what others have or have not observed throughout history other than through their accounts of such events?
Myth Buster wrote:
If the universe had been created by design then there would be overwhelming evidence of the designer and design and absolutely none exists.
Again, that's quite an astounding claim and is subjective in it's own right. What do you think might constitute this overwhelming evidence? Why does it need to be overwhelming? Is there any reason that such evidence can't be subtle and collective rather than singular and overwhelming?
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75785 Dec 5, 2012
Eddy Boyd wrote:
What do you think might constitute this overwhelming evidence?
You're obviously in desperate need of a science lesson. In the real world, scientific hypotheses or educated guesses based on observation must be proven and verified by multiple teams of independent researchers before being accepted as scientific theories.

There's never been a single scientific observation in support of the juvenile concept of supernatural beings. In fact, all of the scientific evidence fully supports an entirely natural origin without any supernatural involvement.

There are many questions still to be answered regarding the origin of the universe and these will be answered by scientists in the years ahead. No rational person relies on Dark Ages dogma for answers to scientific matters or moral guidelines.

http://www.amazon.com/God-Failed-Hypothesis-S...

Physicist Victor J. Stenger contends that, if God exists, some evidence for this existence should be detectable by scientific means, especially considering the central role that God is alleged to play in the operation of the universe and the lives of humans.Treating the traditional God concept, as conventionally presented in the Judeo-Christian and Islamic traditions, like any other scientific hypothesis, Stenger examines all of the claims made for God's existence. He considers the latest Intelligent Design arguments as evidence of God's influence in biology. He looks at human behavior for evidence of immaterial souls and the possible effects of prayer. He discusses the findings of physics and astronomy in weighing the suggestions that the universe is the work of a creator and that humans are God's special creation. After evaluating all the scientific evidence, Stenger concludes that beyond a reasonable doubt the universe and life appear exactly as we might expect if there were no God.
downhill246

Delray Beach, FL

#75786 Dec 5, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Only in the dangerously delusional mind of a fellow godbot like you.
He kicked your ass bot butt!!
downhill246

Delray Beach, FL

#75787 Dec 5, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Congratulations! You just proved that you're a severe case of mental retardation via Christian indoctrination, punk.
http://www.amazon.com/Universe-Nothing-There-...
One of the few prominent scientists today to have crossed the chasm between science and popular culture, Lawrence Krauss ....


Krauss
"He asserts that the universe came from “nothing” rather than from God. However, the different “nothings” that Krauss appeals to for his explanations are really “some things”—“some things” that demand nothing less than the existence and involvement of the biblical God.....

But has Krauss really proved that “God is dead”? His fans may say so, but Krauss himself backs away slightly from such a bold claim. Rather, he admits on the basis of physics and logic that “one cannot rule out such a deistic view of nature.”2 However, he does claim that this deistic view “bears no logical connection to the personal deities of the world’s great religions.”3 In other words, God may not be dead, but, according to Krauss, he certainly is not personal or presently active....

Virtual Creation
While Krauss ends up saying the same thing as Hebrews 11:3—that the stuff we humans detect was not made from detectable stuff—he does not start out that way. He first proposes that virtual particle production serves as an analogy for how the universe came to exist.

Virtual particle production is a natural outcome of the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics. This principle states, in part, that quantum fluctuations in the universe’s space-time fabric will generate particles, provided those particles revert to quantum space-time fluctuations before any human observer can detect their appearance. Typically, the particles so produced must disappear in less than a quintillionth of a second. Since these particles cannot be detected directly, physicists refer to them as virtual particles. Krauss suggests that the entire universe may have popped into existence by the same means.

However, this idea has caveats. To begin with, for a system as massive as the observable universe, the time for it to arise from nothingness (the space-time fabric) and revert back to nothingness (the space-time fabric) must be less than 10-102 seconds (101 zeroes between the decimal point and 1). This episode is a bit briefer than the 14-billion-year age of the universe!

A second inadequacy in Krauss’ suggestion comes from another principle of quantum mechanics. The probability of a quantum outcome occurring increases in proportion to the passage of time. That is, the larger the time interval, the greater the probability that a quantum outcome, like the production of a virtual particle, will take place. This principle implies that if the time interval is zero, the probability for any quantum event is zero.5

The space-time theorems prove that time has a beginning coincident with the beginning of the universe. Thus, the time interval at the beginning of the universe is zero. This eliminates quantum mechanics as a possible candidate for natural generator of the universe........

http://www.reasons.org/articles/universe-from...

Busted again!!!
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75788 Dec 5, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
He kicked your ass bot butt!!
Only in the dangerously delusional mind of a fellow godbot like you!!
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75789 Dec 5, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
However, the different “nothings” that Krauss appeals to for his explanations are really “some things”—“some things” that demand nothing less than the existence and involvement of the biblical God.....
I don't doubt that there's "nothing" between your ears. The god hypothesis is a failed scientific hypothesis because here's no scientific evidence that the universe was created by design. No sane person would believe the ignorant and hateful monstrous deity of Christian folklore ever existed to create anything.

Once again, you're certifiably insane and should be institutionalized immediately instead of making a complete ass of yourself on an international forum with your inane personal delusions, punk.
downhill246

Delray Beach, FL

#75790 Dec 5, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
You're obviously in desperate need of a science lesson. In the real world, scientific hypotheses or educated guesses based on observation must be proven and verified by multiple teams of independent researchers before being accepted as scientific theories.
There's never been a single scientific observation in support of the juvenile concept of supernatural beings. In fact, all of the scientific evidence fully supports an entirely natural origin without any supernatural involvement.
There are many questions still to be answered regarding the origin of the universe and these will be answered by scientists in the years ahead. No rational person relies on Dark Ages dogma for answers to scientific matters or moral guidelines.
http://www.amazon.com/God-Failed-Hypothesis-S...
Physicist Victor J. Stenger contends that, if God exists, some evidence for this existence should be detectable by scientific means, especially considering the central role that God is alleged to play in the operation of the universe and the lives of humans.Treating the traditional God concept, as conventionally presented in the Judeo-Christian and Islamic traditions, like any other scientific hypothesis, Stenger examines all of the claims made for God's existence. He considers the latest Intelligent Design arguments as evidence of God's influence in biology. He looks at human behavior for evidence of immaterial souls and the possible effects of prayer. He discusses the findings of physics and astronomy in weighing the suggestions that the universe is the work of a creator and that humans are God's special creation. After evaluating all the scientific evidence, Stenger concludes that beyond a reasonable doubt the universe and life appear exactly as we might expect if there were no God.
There has never been a single scientific observation of the ideological based and Frankensteinish claim that life was randomly created from non living matter.
Not one-zilch--zero!

"The belief that life on earth arose spontaneously from non-living matter, is simply a matter of faith in strict reductionism and is based entirely on ideology."
Bioinformatician and nuclear physicist Hubert Yockey

"The categorical mistake of the atheist is to assume that God is natural, and therefore within the realm of science to investigate and test. By making God an ordinary part of the natural world, and failing to find Him there, they conclude that He does not exist. But God is not and cannot be part of nature. God is the reason for nature, the explanation of why things are. He is the answer to existence, not part of existence itself."
Kenneth R. Miller, professor of biology at Brown University and the author of Finding Darwin's God: A Scientist's Search for Common Ground between God and Evolution and of Only a Theory: Evolution and the Battle for America's Soul.

Busted!!
downhill246

Delray Beach, FL

#75791 Dec 5, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Only in the dangerously delusional mind of a fellow godbot like you!!
Wow, he kicked your ass-bot butt.

Recently the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life has published its mammoth study on Religion in America based on 35,000 interviews...

According to the Pew Forum a whopping 37% of atheists never marry as opposed to 19% of the American population, 17% of Protestants and 17% of Catholics. Arrogance anyone?

“Primum non nocere”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#75793 Dec 5, 2012
Can you falsify, observe, or replicate abiogenesis?
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
A religiously retarded imbecilic sociopathic evolution and death denying fundiseased Christian redneck godbot's willful ignorance of science isn't a valid rationalization to mindlessly adhere to a dogma-based indoctrination system.
Charles Darwin suggested that the original spark of life may have begun in a "warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, lights, heat, electricity, etc. present, so that a protein compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes".
He went on to explain that "at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed." In other words, the presence of life itself makes the search for the origin of life dependent on the sterile conditions of the laboratory.
ReligionMustDie

Oakland, CA

#75794 Dec 5, 2012
Yesa...
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Liberal European countries are making a huge mistake by allowing Muslim cultists to immigrate for the purpose of establishing terrorist cells.
It is no mistake though. It is happening by design. It isn't just European countries. Burma, Obama sides with the Muslims. It is happening all over the Middle east, the U.S, Britain ,etc. If britons says one word about it in Britain, they face jail time as a racist and so forth.
Not unlike here in the U.S. Mosques are popping up all over the place. Say a word about it in public and...
Libs are f'n up this country, too.
ReligionMustDie

Oakland, CA

#75795 Dec 5, 2012
So, you like magic beans and fairy dust, do ya...
downhill246 wrote:
<quoted text>
The categorical mistake of the atheist is to assume that God
http://www.spellsandmagic.com

And , lil fella, just what do you assume?
ReligionMustDie

Oakland, CA

#75796 Dec 5, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>Yep....
(((BS!!)))
ReligionMustDie

Oakland, CA

#75797 Dec 5, 2012
Share enough time with a parrot and he can say...
Martha Olivares wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus lives with us. He loves us. Pray.
The sign of the cross.
In the name of the Father and of the
Son and of the Holy Spirit.
Our Father
who art in heaven hallowed be thy name.
Thy Kingdom come thy will be done on earth
as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily
bread and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive
those who trespass against us and lead us not into
temptation but deliver us from evil. Amen.
Hail Mary full of grace the Lord is with thee.
Blessed art thou among all women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb Jesus. Holy Mary mother of God pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen. For the Kingdom and the power and the glory are yours now and forever. Amen.
Oh my Jesus forgive us our sins save us from the fires of hell.
Lead all souls to heaven. Especially those in most need of thy mercy.
ReligionMustDie

Oakland, CA

#75798 Dec 5, 2012
Here is something for you christies to read..

http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/51/5...

You buthole surfers better gun-up.
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75799 Dec 5, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
There has never been a single scientific observation of the ideological based and Frankensteinish claim that life was randomly created from non living matter.
The following advice is the best you'll ever receive. A religiously retarded imbecile should keep their inane delusions of an imaginary father figure in the sky and an afterlife fantasyland to themselves.

The universe and life on earth had entirely natural origins whether or not your brainwashed mind is ever capable of processing facts in contradiction to your Christian indoctrination.

Christian revisionist history isn't history and Christian pseudoscience isn't science. You're certifiably insane and making a complete ass of yourself, punk.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 min River Tam 92,720
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 55 min MUQ2 286,086
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 58 min MUQ2 46,040
Israel End is Near (Feb '15) 1 hr MUQ2 1,101
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr truth 667,942
London TV viewers fixed on trump Inaugural process 3 hr truth 7
rajkot to chotila gey sex (Nov '15) 4 hr raj 37
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 hr trifecta1 979,463
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 7 hr lisw 183,629
More from around the web