Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75637 Dec 1, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
pusillanimous
The undeniable truth is it's YOU who has surrendered control of your mind and free will to a cult that's the most divisive political force in our country's history.

In exchange, your brainwashed brainwasher feeds your inane delusions of an imaginary father figure in the sky and an afterlife fantasyland for ignorant, cowardly and bigoted slaves to unconscionable Dark Ages dogma.

You're a death-denying coward, a national embarrassment, an outright disgrace to the human race and a complete waste of a sperm cell with absolutely nothing of value to contribute to society, punk.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#75638 Dec 1, 2012
Scutter wrote:
There were likely 2 Jesuses:
The Historical Jesus: Jesus of Nasarith
The Christian one with the made up last name: Jesus Christ
Whether the 2 were the same or even if Jesus of Nasarith would ever recognize or agree w/ what Jesus Christ was said to be about (especially the one Paul sold to the world) is entirely debateable!
Sorry, but you sure have never STUDIED the Bible. Christ is not a "last name". It is a title meaning anointed one of God.

“Primum non nocere”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#75639 Dec 1, 2012
Keikihipa wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, but you sure have never STUDIED the Bible. Christ is not a "last name". It is a title meaning anointed one of God.
He also didn't spell Nazareth correctly either. Then again that is par for the course when dealing with the JNE thesis.
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#75640 Dec 1, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
The undeniable truth is it's YOU who has surrendered control of your mind and free will to a cult that's the most divisive political force in our country's history.
In exchange, your brainwashed brainwasher feeds your inane delusions of an imaginary father figure in the sky and an afterlife fantasyland for ignorant, cowardly and bigoted slaves to unconscionable Dark Ages dogma.
You're a death-denying coward, a national embarrassment, an outright disgrace to the human race and a complete waste of a sperm cell with absolutely nothing of value to conThe undeniable triuth is your blinders are welded to your headtribute to society, punk.
The undeniable truth is you are a babbling idiot with blinders, You are a myth in your own cell deprived mind. Tell us again how life was created from non living matter and try to explain it with a straight face. Remember,Frankenstein doesn't count even if he is the cause of your genetic code, dipsh!t.
Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75641 Dec 1, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
Tell us again how life was created from non living matter
A religiously retarded imbecilic sociopathic godbot's willful ignorance of science isn't proof for their imaginary friends. All of the scientific evidence fully supports entirely natural origins for the universe and life on earth without the need of any supernatural creature.

There are hypotheses regarding the origin of life or abiogenesis. Unfortunately, the presence of life itself makes the replication of the first living cell dependent on the sterile conditions of the laboratory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis

You're an especially ignorant godbot and would be well-advised to seek professional help for your mental illness instead of totally humiliating yourself on an international forum.
Mysterious

New York, NY

#75643 Dec 2, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
There are hypotheses regarding the origin of life or abiogenesis. Unfortunately, the presence of life itself makes the replication of the first living cell dependent on the sterile conditions of the laboratory.
Well then this should tell you that these various hypotheses aren't viable, since the early conditions on planet earth would not even come close to modern sterile laboratory conditions. You just shot your own argument in the foot. I recommend that you stop making a fool of yourself in an international forum, kid.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#75644 Dec 2, 2012
Mysterious wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then this should tell you that these various hypotheses aren't viable, since the early conditions on planet earth would not even come close to modern sterile laboratory conditions. You just shot your own argument in the foot. I recommend that you stop making a fool of yourself in an international forum, kid.
you really understand at such a low level?

you must be a christian

“Primum non nocere”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#75645 Dec 2, 2012
Mysterious wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then this should tell you that these various hypotheses aren't viable, since the early conditions on planet earth would not even come close to modern sterile laboratory conditions. You just shot your own argument in the foot. I recommend that you stop making a fool of yourself in an international forum, kid.
Even if abiogenesis were true you don't know when it occured and therefore what condition the planet would have been in. Abiogenesis relies on specific environmental conditions to occur and and if you change even a few of those conditions you can take your entire model and throw it out the window. For those of us who are familiar with other planets even the most desolate and apparently lifeless of planets has it's own weather, how would that factor in.

There is too much guess work and not enough proof in abiogenesis, it falls outside of science and into the realm of faith. Darwinists attempt to explain the world based on a presupposition rather than keeping an open mind. What if it turns out life didn't evolve on Earth at all and was placed here as a wildlife refuge by an advanced alien race and what humans refer to as gods are these alien caretakers? Unlikely but still a possibility...however people still want to pound the square peg in the round hole.

I digress, this thread is about Jesus of Nazereth and the question has been raised of his historical existence. The resident JNE thesis proponent has little to offer however I would like to offer one more nail in the coffin of this matter. The Zeitgeist companion by Acharya S., in this book she attempts to defend many of the questions posed by the claims she made in the first part of the Zeitgeist movie when people called her on her lies. For instance Horus being born on 12/25, she says that since he is linked to the sun he is essentially born every day....what? So you can also say Horus was born on 12/14, 4/25, 6/12, etc. nevermind the fact that he is a sky god amd not the sun god (Ra), why would she keep this out of the movie and her previous books? They are lies and she got caught, that's why she only mentions it now.
Mysterious

New York, NY

#75646 Dec 2, 2012
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
you really understand at such a low level?
you must be a christian
You stereotype everybody at such a low level?

You must be an anti-theist.
Mysterious

New York, NY

#75647 Dec 2, 2012
RN Student wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if abiogenesis were true you don't know when it occured and therefore what condition the planet would have been in. Abiogenesis relies on specific environmental conditions to occur and and if you change even a few of those conditions you can take your entire model and throw it out the window. For those of us who are familiar with other planets even the most desolate and apparently lifeless of planets has it's own weather, how would that factor in.
There is too much guess work and not enough proof in abiogenesis, it falls outside of science and into the realm of faith. Darwinists attempt to explain the world based on a presupposition rather than keeping an open mind. What if it turns out life didn't evolve on Earth at all and was placed here as a wildlife refuge by an advanced alien race and what humans refer to as gods are these alien caretakers? Unlikely but still a possibility...however people still want to pound the square peg in the round hole.
I digress, this thread is about Jesus of Nazereth and the question has been raised of his historical existence. The resident JNE thesis proponent has little to offer however I would like to offer one more nail in the coffin of this matter. The Zeitgeist companion by Acharya S., in this book she attempts to defend many of the questions posed by the claims she made in the first part of the Zeitgeist movie when people called her on her lies. For instance Horus being born on 12/25, she says that since he is linked to the sun he is essentially born every day....what? So you can also say Horus was born on 12/14, 4/25, 6/12, etc. nevermind the fact that he is a sky god amd not the sun god (Ra), why would she keep this out of the movie and her previous books? They are lies and she got caught, that's why she only mentions it now.
I wasn't aware of that companion book. I looked it up after reading your post. The entire JNE thesis is so fraught with historical errors that no history scholar in good academic standing even entertains them.

Are you aware of Dr. Michael Licona and his refutations of Archaya S?
Here's a good link to his articles on her work. She read one of his rebuttals and took it personally even though he said nothing negative about her personally. Apparently she is so emotionally dependent upon her own work that she views a rebuttal on her work as a personal attack. Can you say "projection?"

Link to Mike Licona's refutation of Archaya S.

http://www.risenjesus.com/a-refutation-of-ach...

http://www.risenjesus.com/licona-replies-to-a...
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#75648 Dec 2, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
A religiously retarded imbecilic sociopathic godbot's willful ignorance of science isn't proof for their imaginary friends. All of the scientific evidence fully supports entirely natural origins for the universe and life on earth without the need of any supernatural creature.
There are hypotheses regarding the origin of life or abiogenesis. Unfortunately, the presence of life itself makes the replication of the first living cell dependent on the sterile conditions of the laboratory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
You're an especially ignorant godbot and would be well-advised to seek professional help for your mental illness instead of totally humiliating yourself on an international forum.
So you post a bunch of hypotheses yet can't tell us how life began from non living matter and then go off into your childish rants born out of ignorance.

"When it comes to the origin of life there are only two possibilities: Creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot ACCEPT that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: That life arose spontaneously by chance!
One has to only contemplate the magnitude of this task to concede that the spontaneous generation of a living organism is impossible. Yet we are hereľas a result, I believe, of spontaneous generation."

Harvard University biochemist and Nobel Laureate, George Wald

That conclusion is equivalent to a person walking through a cage with 200 hungry lions and walking out the other end untouched and claiming the reason he survived is because he is still alive.
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#75649 Dec 2, 2012
karl44 wrote:
<quoted text>
you really understand at such a low level?
you must be a christian


Abiogenesis is a myth of naturalism. The simple cell is more sophisticated than the most complex machinery ever created by modern man. If you found a fully functioning 2013 red Ferrari in a forest would you argue that it was randomly created by nature because it had billions of years to do so or would you admit that such a fine piece of machinery was intelligently designed??
Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75650 Dec 2, 2012
Mysterious wrote:
Well then this should tell you that these various hypotheses aren't viable, since the early conditions on planet earth would not even come close to modern sterile laboratory conditions.
Congratulations! You just posted one of the most staggeringly ignorant comments in the history of topix proving that you're a world class ignoramus without any capacity to understand science.

Creationism is juvenile mythology not science. I strongly advise you to cease making a complete ass of yourself on an international forum and seek professional help for your mental illness, punk.
Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75651 Dec 2, 2012
karl44 wrote:
you really understand at such a low level?
you must be a christian
This forum is currently infested with the most severely retarded Christian godbots I've ever encountered without any capacity to grasp facts in contradiction to their programming. The only possible use to society of these complete waste of sperm cells would be as examples to the horrors of Christian brainwashing.
Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75652 Dec 2, 2012
RN Student wrote:
What if it turns out life didn't evolve on Earth at all and was placed here as a wildlife refuge by an advanced alien race and what humans refer to as gods are these alien caretakers?
You'd clutch at anything to avoid accepting your own mortality like a man. Science is based on facts not faith. It's a fact that life on earth began naturally and evolved from single cell organisms.

The religiously retarded imbecilic sociopathic evolution and death denying cowardly fundiseased Christian redneck godbot, such as you, is a disgrace to the human race and amongst the world's most blissfully ignorant godbots without any soically redeemable qualities.

You're totally humiliating yourself and proving only that you're certifiably insane. You should stop making a complete ass of yourself on an international forum and seek professional help for your mental illness immediately, kid.
Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75653 Dec 2, 2012
RN Student wrote:
The resident JNE thesis proponent has little to offer however I would like to offer one more nail in the coffin of this matter.
The historical facts are irrefutable even if a gutless puke like you doesn't have the guts to accept them. Christianity is a derivative religious cult with very little originality and the entirely fictional story of the biblical Jesus was plagiarized from the imaginary saviors preceding the damn bible. There are precious few documents supposedly supporting an historical Jesus and each is a blatant forgery. You should be totally ashamed of yourself for not having the guts to seek professional help, kid.
Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75654 Dec 2, 2012
Mysterious wrote:
Mike Licona's
You'll simply waste the one life you have as a national embarrassment and world class ignoramus if you rely on the likes of the thoroughly discredited Licona for info.

http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/201...

http://skepticink.com/debunkingchristianity/

http://www.truthbeknown.com/licona.htm#.ULvRN...
Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75655 Dec 2, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
That conclusion is equivalent to a person walking through a cage with 200 hungry lions and walking out the other end untouched and claiming the reason he survived is because he is still alive.
The rationalizations of dangerously delusional nutcases like you are self-degrading and absolutely pathetic. If the universe and life on earth were created by design then there would be overwhelming evidence of design.

There has never been a single scientific observation in the history of the human race in support of design. Science understands how life on earth began and is currently working towards duplicating the entirely natural process in a controlled environment.
Myth Buster

Cottonwood, AZ

#75656 Dec 2, 2012
downhill246 wrote:
Abiogenesis is a myth of naturalism.
Wrong! Creationism is juvenile mythology not science. Life on earth had an entirely natural origin whether or not a cowardly ignoramus like you ever has the intelligence, common sense and courage to accept irrefutable scientific facts in contradiction to your Christian brainwashing.
Mysterious

New York, NY

#75657 Dec 2, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Congratulations! You just posted one of the most staggeringly ignorant comments in the history of topix proving that you're a world class ignoramus without any capacity to understand science.
Creationism is juvenile mythology not science. I strongly advise you to cease making a complete ass of yourself on an international forum and seek professional help for your mental illness, punk.
Straw-man fallacy. I never even mentioned creationism in my post. I only pointed out that you shot down your own argument about abiogenesis. You really should learn how to stay out of adult conversations. This is no place for a childish mind like yours punkette.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 29 min Blagoja 809,015
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 33 min MUQ2 39,597
Why Do I Waste My Time on Topix?????? 1 hr Madre68 21
Moses never existed 1 hr River Tam 1,253
Never trust an American woman; they are all lia... (Jul '08) 2 hr Silk 125
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr Seentheotherside 573,728
CAPE TOWN: Lesbian/Bisexual Women Whatsapp (Feb '14) 3 hr levy 18
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) 3 hr hehehe7385 17
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 5 hr Black Thunder 42 608,134
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 5 hr Ice-9 268,804
More from around the web