What do u think of Jesus Christ?(God)

“Primum non nocere”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#75398 Nov 22, 2012
How hard is it to post a citation? I guess in your case very hard when you are trying to find a citation for a primary soure that doesn't exist. Most of Murdock's claims abour the origins of Horus are torn apart in the third hymn to Osiris which you can find in the Egyptian Book of the Dead. See? Not that hard when the source exists.
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Hoe many more times would you like to be provided with a link to the primary sources Murdock used in Christ in Egypt which I have listed previously listed for you?
It's not surprising that you're a liar because your disingenuous cult criticized Murdock for a lack of primary sources in her first book even though factual statements cited from another book are still facts.
Murdock has provided primary sources in her subsequent books even if a death-denying coward like you is incapable of accepting the irrefutable historical fact that organized religion is nothing more than a cruel hoax created by nefarious opportunists to control the retarded.
You're certifiably insane and should take my advice to seek professional help and cease making a complete ass of yourself on an international forum, kid.
Jeff

San Jose, CA

#75399 Nov 22, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, there's no such thing as a belief system. Rational adults don't have beliefs. Rational adults study science based in reality on observation and experimentation.
Don't be silly. Everyone has a belief system. You could not live without it. Science is a belief system that has some value for some things. The problem with science is that it is constantly changing with new theories and its not always possible to know what reality really is. Hope this helps.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#75402 Nov 22, 2012
atheists dont have a clue wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because people like him are arrogant and selfish.
The real irony of atheism (or anti-theism) is the circular reasoning they use, while calling us illogical or unintelligent. There's a reason that anti-theists like Pomona Atheist (aka Myth Buster) reject apologetics. They like to claim that apologetics is just a set of canned responses to silence critics, and that's not true at all.

Apologetics is just a logical and very reasonable defense of our own faith. The real reason that PAMB and those like him (Pamona Atheist aka PA + Myth Buster aka MB = PAMB) don't like apologetics is because apologetics corrects their presuppositions. They don't like to be corrected. Correcting them causes them to question their own worldview, and in turn if they question their worldview too much, it compromises their comfort zone. It implies that they could be wrong. This is something that atheists who wish to maintain their worldview must avoid at all costs if they are to hold onto that. So it's not really logical at all. Sure they'll try to revert to scientific data to assure themselves that God doesn't exist, but that's more circular reasoning. Science is completely compatible with spiritual beliefs. Science answers the processes, while spirituality answers the bigger questions such as "who" and "why."

The real enemy of science isn't religion or spirituality, but naturalism. Naturalism is the dogmatic, ethnocentric belief that every event must have a natural cause. This isn't really true. The laws of nature are as not rigid and absolute as the atheist wants to believe. The laws of nature are such that they describe what generally happens. The laws of nature are not supposed to declare what can and can't happen. If there is an all powerful creator, then it's only logical to presume that He could intervene as needed and act outside of the normal events within nature.

The atheist rejection is based more upon emotion. They can't stand the thought of being wrong, but they take it to extremes to make their premises and conclusions the same. This is what I find ironic.

Then when we point this out, they respond with more ad hominem. At this point, consistent with his posting style, PAMB has two choices:

1- Ignore this post altogether like he did on my post about correct methodology in regard to historical research or;

2- Reply with more ad hominem arguments.(Insults)

Anyone care to place a wager on which way he will go?

I hope everyone is having a great Thanksgiving.

“Primum non nocere”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#75403 Nov 22, 2012
I bet a drum stick he'll go for the ad hominem.
Resurrectionologist wrote:
<quoted text>
The real irony of atheism (or anti-theism) is the circular reasoning they use, while calling us illogical or unintelligent. There's a reason that anti-theists like Pomona Atheist (aka Myth Buster) reject apologetics. They like to claim that apologetics is just a set of canned responses to silence critics, and that's not true at all.
Apologetics is just a logical and very reasonable defense of our own faith. The real reason that PAMB and those like him (Pamona Atheist aka PA + Myth Buster aka MB = PAMB) don't like apologetics is because apologetics corrects their presuppositions. They don't like to be corrected. Correcting them causes them to question their own worldview, and in turn if they question their worldview too much, it compromises their comfort zone. It implies that they could be wrong. This is something that atheists who wish to maintain their worldview must avoid at all costs if they are to hold onto that. So it's not really logical at all. Sure they'll try to revert to scientific data to assure themselves that God doesn't exist, but that's more circular reasoning. Science is completely compatible with spiritual beliefs. Science answers the processes, while spirituality answers the bigger questions such as "who" and "why."
The real enemy of science isn't religion or spirituality, but naturalism. Naturalism is the dogmatic, ethnocentric belief that every event must have a natural cause. This isn't really true. The laws of nature are as not rigid and absolute as the atheist wants to believe. The laws of nature are such that they describe what generally happens. The laws of nature are not supposed to declare what can and can't happen. If there is an all powerful creator, then it's only logical to presume that He could intervene as needed and act outside of the normal events within nature.
The atheist rejection is based more upon emotion. They can't stand the thought of being wrong, but they take it to extremes to make their premises and conclusions the same. This is what I find ironic.
Then when we point this out, they respond with more ad hominem. At this point, consistent with his posting style, PAMB has two choices:
1- Ignore this post altogether like he did on my post about correct methodology in regard to historical research or;
2- Reply with more ad hominem arguments.(Insults)
Anyone care to place a wager on which way he will go?
I hope everyone is having a great Thanksgiving.

Since: Nov 12

Nottingham, UK

#75404 Nov 22, 2012
http://www.tenpasenta.org/ donate your money to this fantastic church.
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75405 Nov 22, 2012
Jeff wrote:
Science is a belief system
The Christian indoctrination center that produced a world class ignoramus like you needs to be shutdown immediately. Religions are dogma-based indoctrination not faith-based belief systems.

Science is based on facts not beliefs. Unlike Dark Ages religious dogma, our scientific knowledge is always increasing. Yet, no scientific evidence exists in support of supernatural creatures, kid.
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75406 Nov 22, 2012
Doctor REALITY wrote:
What do I think of Him?? I think He' SO powerful that He CREATED 'THIS': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =A2Y6ay-41NoXX
The universe wasn't created by your imaginary friend, freak.
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75407 Nov 22, 2012
Doctor REALITY wrote:
Look at those flames shooting THOUSANDS of miles high in that video!!! And who's responsible for such an awesome display of power??!!
A religiously retarded redneck's willful ignorance of science and nature is proof of religious brainwashing not the mythical deity of their barbaric cult.
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75408 Nov 22, 2012
Resurrectionologist wrote:
<quoted text>
The real irony of atheism (or anti-theism) is the circular reasoning they use, while calling us illogical or unintelligent. There's a reason that anti-theists like Pomona Atheist (aka Myth Buster) reject apologetics. They like to claim that apologetics is just a set of canned responses to silence critics, and that's not true at all.
Apologetics is just a logical and very reasonable defense of our own faith. The real reason that PAMB and those like him (Pamona Atheist aka PA + Myth Buster aka MB = PAMB) don't like apologetics is because apologetics corrects their presuppositions. They don't like to be corrected. Correcting them causes them to question their own worldview, and in turn if they question their worldview too much, it compromises their comfort zone. It implies that they could be wrong. This is something that atheists who wish to maintain their worldview must avoid at all costs if they are to hold onto that. So it's not really logical at all. Sure they'll try to revert to scientific data to assure themselves that God doesn't exist, but that's more circular reasoning. Science is completely compatible with spiritual beliefs. Science answers the processes, while spirituality answers the bigger questions such as "who" and "why."
The real enemy of science isn't religion or spirituality, but naturalism. Naturalism is the dogmatic, ethnocentric belief that every event must have a natural cause. This isn't really true. The laws of nature are as not rigid and absolute as the atheist wants to believe. The laws of nature are such that they describe what generally happens. The laws of nature are not supposed to declare what can and can't happen. If there is an all powerful creator, then it's only logical to presume that He could intervene as needed and act outside of the normal events within nature.
The atheist rejection is based more upon emotion. They can't stand the thought of being wrong, but they take it to extremes to make their premises and conclusions the same. This is what I find ironic.
Then when we point this out, they respond with more ad hominem. At this point, consistent with his posting style, PAMB has two choices:
1- Ignore this post altogether like he did on my post about correct methodology in regard to historical research or;
2- Reply with more ad hominem arguments.(Insults)
Anyone care to place a wager on which way he will go?
I hope everyone is having a great Thanksgiving.
Congratulations! You just posted one of the most inane comments in the history of topix. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, but a brainless and spineless godbot like you will grasp at anything to desperately cling to your Dark Ages dogma.

There's no circular logic to anti-theism, which is the opposition to religious brainwashing. This irrefutable fact has been explained to you repeatedly, but your pathetically brainwashed mind can't handle facts in contradiction to your programming.

The apologetic defense of religion is so illusive and illogical that it is a basic mental default; a remnant left over from the mystical and superstitious childhood years fed and modified by the professional (paid) clergy. The rush to lock a young mind into a god complex is the main goal of all denominations, sects and cults. The old Catholic maxim “Given be a child to the age of twelve and I’ll give you a Catholic for life.” can also be seen in fervent missionary movements especially in the LDS Mormons, who, like the Blues Brothers Jake and Elroy, are “on a mission from God”.

http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/200...
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75409 Nov 22, 2012
RN Student wrote:
I bet a drum stick he'll go for the ad hominem.
How stupid do you have to be to be a Christian apologist?

http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/06/24/how...

"The only way to present many of the arguments Christian apologists have in their arsenal is to be dishonest, too lazy to check your facts, or incapable of understanding what you do read."
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75410 Nov 22, 2012
tigergirl47 wrote:
fantastic church
The ultimate oxymoron.

“Primum non nocere”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#75411 Nov 22, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
How stupid do you have to be to be a Christian apologist?
http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/06/24/how...
"The only way to present many of the arguments Christian apologists have in their arsenal is to be dishonest, too lazy to check your facts, or incapable of understanding what you do read."
Yay, that's two ad hominems: triple drumstick time. You still haven't cited that Egyptian text there PAMB.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#75412 Nov 22, 2012
RN Student wrote:
I bet a drum stick he'll go for the ad hominem.
<quoted text>
His consistency makes up for his lack of intelligence. He'll never understand. He's just not mentally capable.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#75413 Nov 22, 2012
RN Student wrote:
<quoted text>
Yay, that's two ad hominems: triple drumstick time. You still haven't cited that Egyptian text there PAMB.
Oh he won't. He can't. His options are either ignore or reply with insults. You should have seen some of his meltdowns on other threads!
Myth Buster

Glendale, AZ

#75414 Nov 22, 2012
RN Student wrote:
You still haven't cited that Egyptian text there
You've been provided with the primary sources used by the author and you're still a death-denying cowardly Christian cultist rationalizing your self-degrading cultist lifestyle because you lack the guts to seek professional help for your mental illness, kid.
Myth Buster

Phoenix, AZ

#75415 Nov 22, 2012
Resurrectionologist wrote:
His consistency makes up for his lack of intelligence. He'll never understand. He's just not mentally capable.
You're unquestionably one of the most deeply disturbed godbots to ever post in these forums and completely blinded to your own hypocrisy. The above post actually describes yourself to a tee.

Numerous studies have confirmed the common sense observation that religious indoctrination retards intellectual development. The world's most intelligent and educated are the least religious. The world's least intelligent and uneducated are the most religious.

In all probability, you'll simply waste away your entire worthless life with the intellectual capacity of a mentally retarded child because you're as spineless as you are brainless and don't have the guts to seek out knowledge in contradiction to your programming.

Although it's beyond the very limited intellectual capacity of pathetically brainwashed godbot like to comprehend, rational people see right through your inane posts to rationalize your self-degrading cultist lifestyle.

You're the sort of godbot who uses Christian pseudoscience that you don't have the capacity to understand or you wouldn't continue humiliating yourself by posting such bullshit here. Rational people can identify Christian pseudoscience and understand it's the deliberate misuse of science to promote thoroughly discredited Dark Ages Christian dogma.

There's absolutely no chance of a coward like you being reached by any rational person. You'll need to be institutionalized for any chance at a successful de-conversion, but cowards like you would rather make complete asses of themselves on an international forum than seek the help they desperately need.

“Primum non nocere”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#75416 Nov 22, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
You've been provided with the primary sources used by the author and you're still a death-denying cowardly Christian cultist rationalizing your self-degrading cultist lifestyle because you lack the guts to seek professional help for your mental illness, kid.
The only thing she cites is other Christ mythers and herself. Look up the part where Horus was supposed to be born of a Virgin, what Egyptian text did she get that from?

“Thank you GOD for JESUS”

Since: Jul 07

And thank you JESUS for caring

#75417 Nov 23, 2012
Myth Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
There was a time when some of the rational people here sympathized with your staggeringly ignorant posts and assumed you were a home-schooled child being abused by misguided parents.
You've since acknowledged being a perceived victim of abuse who joined a religious cult to escape reality instead of being adequately treated mental health care professionals.
Religious cults prey on young children and troubled adults. You were the sort of lily-livered coward that religious cults devour. Today, you're so dangerously delusional that you believe fairies are your friends.
You're not a sympathetic figure. You're just a revolting bitch with the intellectual capacity of a mentally retarded child sharing your inane personal delusions with other godbots. Rational people see right through retards like you.
You are such a lovely person, PA, that it is easy to see why you write so often into so many forums on Christianity. You just love to share your love :)

“Thank you GOD for JESUS”

Since: Jul 07

And thank you JESUS for caring

#75418 Nov 23, 2012
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't be silly. Everyone has a belief system. You could not live without it. Science is a belief system that has some value for some things. The problem with science is that it is constantly changing with new theories and its not always possible to know what reality really is. Hope this helps.
Exactly ~ not having a belief system is in itself having a belief system :O)

“Thank you GOD for JESUS”

Since: Jul 07

And thank you JESUS for caring

#75419 Nov 23, 2012
Resurrectionologist wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh he won't. He can't. His options are either ignore or reply with insults. You should have seen some of his meltdowns on other threads!
I've seen 'em......

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min Truth Buster 48,039
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min Phooey 646,361
How do I own a forum? 10 min Norm 2
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 52 min VIKING 971,581
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr RiccardoFire 44,641
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr bad bob 182,620
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr WelbyMD 281,224
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 3 hr Rosa_Winkel 105,548
More from around the web