Proof that Evolution is a Hoax

Proof that Evolution is a Hoax

Posted in the Top Stories Forum

First Prev
of 5
Next Last

“JESUS CHRIST IS LORD”

Since: Apr 09

United States

#1 Jul 10, 2010
Recently, a thought captivated my mind that proves that the theory of evolution is a big hoax. The thought is simple and yet profound ... why is there no recorded history before approximately 4,000 B.C.? The answer is obvious ... there was no history! Think about it! Evolutionists claim that man evolved over billions of years (that's billions with a "B"). If there were any truth to these false claims by unscrupulous scientists, then man's historical record should span back at least hundreds-of-thousands of years, if not millions. There is no record of a cataclysmic event that destroyed mankind prior to 4,000 B.C. And if there, surely some of the survivors would have passed this information down to generations to follow. The Bible dates creation, as we know it today, at approximately 4,000 B.C. Thus, it was approximately 6,000 years ago that God, Jesus Christ, created the heavens and the earth in 6-days. It was 6,000 years ago that Jesus Christ spoke the stars into existence. It was 6,000 years ago that Jesus spoke animals, fish, plants, and land into existence. And it was 6,000 years ago that God formed man out of the dust of the earth.

Such Biblical claims seem absurd to modern evolutionists, who have convinced themselves that the earth is billions of years old. Ironically, they have absolutely NO EVIDENCE of such longevity. Evolutionists have sought out dishonest scientists, who distort the facts, use faulty testing methods, and make erroneous assumptions (unethically stating such assumptions as if they were facts). Evolution is at best still a THEORY. Yet, children are brainwashed in godless public schools all across the world, with evolution, which is taught as if it were a fact. This is evil. It is evil to deny students the Biblical account of creationism. The Word of God makes infinite more sense than the fairytale of evolution.

One of the simplest and best proofs that evolution is a joke, is the FACT that there is NO recorded history prior to 4,000 B.C. The world's history is CLEARLY defined by SIX world powers since time began: Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome. Since Rome's fall in 476 A.D., there have been no world-powers (many super-powers; but, no world-powers). At the time of Moses, Egypt ruled the world. The Israelites were used as slave labor by Pharaoh to build the pyramids. Before Egypt, there is absolutely nothing recorded in history about a world power. It is NO coincidence that Revelation 17:10 speaks of these world-powers, "...five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space." At the writing of Revelation, Rome was still a world-power. The Apostle John, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, tells us that Rome is the 6th world-power, and there is one more to come. The 7th world-power will be the beast system, the kingdom of the antichrist. This diabolical New World Order is quickly forming now (i.e., a universal religious view, global centralized government, a one-world economic system, a cashless society, etc.).

Do you think it's a mere coincidence that the Word of God is so concise on world history? The Bible records the beginning of mankind at about 4,000 B.C., and secular history is eerily silent before 4,000 B.C. for those who claim to believe in evolution. If I were an evolutionist, I would be extremely disturbed by this FACT. Prove me wrong! I dare you. I triple-dog dare you to show me any recorded civilization before 4,000 B.C. And I don't mean some pottery jug or item that you claim is 14,000 years old--Show me any evidence of civilization prior to 4,000 B.C. You cannot. In fact, it is difficult to find much recorded history before 2,500 B.C., because the flood of Noah's day destroyed most of it. How can evolutionists be so naive and foolish as to totally ignore this incredibly obvious fact?
eternalgod

Denver, CO

#2 Jul 10, 2010
Humans are puppets being controlled by the God system. So if there is a God system puppeteering the humans and laying downing all the artifacts and records of humans on earth, and then have the humans believe in all that then with more of the historical record before 4,000 B.C., it just will have the same effect on humans as before.
eternalgod

Denver, CO

#3 Jul 10, 2010
I am the eternal god. Believe that.
eternalgod

Denver, CO

#4 Jul 10, 2010
Human evolution is a hoax.
eternalgod

Denver, CO

#5 Jul 10, 2010
Maybe you're right about no record history before 4,000 B.C.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#6 Jul 10, 2010
Go back to school, take science and math courses, when you graduate rewrite your article after apologizing for been so stupid.

Don't confuse human evolution with the origin of the universe. Creationist made you confused about the two.

Life might have been around in various forms for a very long time, but scientist do not claim that the evolution of humans from an ancestral form took one billion years.

Do a search in Wikipedia for apes, in fact since you might be unable to find it yourself, here is the link, although I am totally certain that it is beyond your comprehension.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape

"new biochemical evidence indicated that the last common ancestor of humans and other hominins occurred between 5 and 10 million years ago"

Molecular Biology and DNA comparison shows that taxonomic ally we are a member of the ape family.

This is hard science, this is provable and this alone should prove human evolution to you.

Again if you are having difficulty with it, my original recommendation stands. Go back to school and try to learn the things you failed to learn during your first time in school.

“JESUS CHRIST IS LORD”

Since: Apr 09

United States

#7 Jul 10, 2010
There is NO recorded history prior to 4,000 B.C.--no writings, no carved stones, no battles, no wars, no countries, no nothing! It's as if mankind just suddenly began (which is exactly what the Bible teaches happened). God created man out of the dirt, the elements, of the earth.

There were no humans before approximately 4,000 B.C. Hard to imagine? Why should it be? There is no history to indicate that humans existed prior to 4,000 B.C. This fact is irrefutable. Oh sure, some stubborn evolutionists are going to start talking about carbon-dating, archeological findings, etc. BUT, the bottom line is that the history of mankind should be traceable far beyond 4,000 B.C., going back millions of years IF evolution were true.

WHY 7,000 LANGUAGES?

If, as evolutionists claim, all of mankind evolved from the SAME primitive life-source, then how did we end up with 7,000 different languages? The Bible teaches that God created all the different languages at Babel... "Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech ... Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth" (Genesis 11:7,9). It is far more reasonable to accept the Biblical claim that God created all of mankind's different languages; than it is to believe that some space-dust from a massive chaotic explosion somehow became life, and then took on intelligence, and then from the same evolutionary process ended up with 7,000 different languages. That makes no sense at all.

There are no "primitive" languages. All languages have a system of sounds, words, and sentences that can adequately communicate the content of culture. This is evidence of a divine Creator. The languages of the so-called "primitive" peoples are often very complex in their grammatical structures. If mankind had advanced through an evolutionary process, then there should still be developing languages today; but in fact, one language disappears every 2-weeks...

The fact that mankind's languages are vanishing from civilization at an alarming rate is proof that evolution is a lie. If evolution were true, then the process by which mankind has obtained 7,000 languages would be continuing today. Has the evolutionary process ceased? According to the Bible it never happened in the first place. One would have to be a fool to follow the nonsense of evolution. It's amazing to me how people continually place God and the Bible on trial; yet unquestioningly accept the theories of evolution. This just shows their wicked heart of unbelief in the Word of God.

Since: Nov 08

Castro Valley, CA

#8 Jul 10, 2010
I believe that person was stating that there was no recorded history, he was willing to accept. Yet, they will accept a Bible that was written hundreds of years after the death of Christ. There is all kinds of proof of life on this earth that goes back millions of years. That person put themselves out to be an expert, and just proved that Evolution stopped with him.
jj4u wrote:
Go back to school, take science and math courses, when you graduate rewrite your article after apologizing for been so stupid.
Don't confuse human evolution with the origin of the universe. Creationist made you confused about the two.
Life might have been around in various forms for a very long time, but scientist do not claim that the evolution of humans from an ancestral form took one billion years.
Do a search in Wikipedia for apes, in fact since you might be unable to find it yourself, here is the link, although I am totally certain that it is beyond your comprehension.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape
"new biochemical evidence indicated that the last common ancestor of humans and other hominins occurred between 5 and 10 million years ago"
Molecular Biology and DNA comparison shows that taxonomic ally we are a member of the ape family.
This is hard science, this is provable and this alone should prove human evolution to you.
Again if you are having difficulty with it, my original recommendation stands. Go back to school and try to learn the things you failed to learn during your first time in school.

Since: Nov 08

Castro Valley, CA

#9 Jul 10, 2010
You mean there is no recorded history you are willing to accept. Mankind was there before Adam and Eve, if you will just READ the Bible.
A Brother in Christ wrote:
There is NO recorded history prior to 4,000 B.C.--no writings, no carved stones, no battles, no wars, no countries, no nothing! It's as if mankind just suddenly began (which is exactly what the Bible teaches happened). God created man out of the dirt, the elements, of the earth.
There were no humans before approximately 4,000 B.C. Hard to imagine? Why should it be? There is no history to indicate that humans existed prior to 4,000 B.C. This fact is irrefutable. Oh sure, some stubborn evolutionists are going to start talking about carbon-dating, archeological findings, etc. BUT, the bottom line is that the history of mankind should be traceable far beyond 4,000 B.C., going back millions of years IF evolution were true.
WHY 7,000 LANGUAGES?
If, as evolutionists claim, all of mankind evolved from the SAME primitive life-source, then how did we end up with 7,000 different languages? The Bible teaches that God created all the different languages at Babel... "Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech ... Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth" (Genesis 11:7,9). It is far more reasonable to accept the Biblical claim that God created all of mankind's different languages; than it is to believe that some space-dust from a massive chaotic explosion somehow became life, and then took on intelligence, and then from the same evolutionary process ended up with 7,000 different languages. That makes no sense at all.
There are no "primitive" languages. All languages have a system of sounds, words, and sentences that can adequately communicate the content of culture. This is evidence of a divine Creator. The languages of the so-called "primitive" peoples are often very complex in their grammatical structures. If mankind had advanced through an evolutionary process, then there should still be developing languages today; but in fact, one language disappears every 2-weeks...
The fact that mankind's languages are vanishing from civilization at an alarming rate is proof that evolution is a lie. If evolution were true, then the process by which mankind has obtained 7,000 languages would be continuing today. Has the evolutionary process ceased? According to the Bible it never happened in the first place. One would have to be a fool to follow the nonsense of evolution. It's amazing to me how people continually place God and the Bible on trial; yet unquestioningly accept the theories of evolution. This just shows their wicked heart of unbelief in the Word of God.

“JESUS CHRIST IS LORD”

Since: Apr 09

United States

#10 Jul 10, 2010
SOMETHING ELSE TO CONSIDER

IF, as evolutionists claim, the earth is billions of years old, and mankind has evolved from a lower and simpler form of life, then why has mankind gone from writing upon stones to laser printers in just the past 3,500 years? When God gave Moses the Ten Commandments, they were written upon stone. It is abundantly clear that the Egyptians carved messages into stone (hieroglyphics). So why is it that mankind has only discovered better inventions in the past few thousand years? If mankind had evolved, as evolutionists claim, then why didn't man discover ink a million years ago? Think about it. This is an astonishing thought--There were NO planes, cars, computers, refrigerators, electricity, lights, gas, powered-equipment, telephones, recording devices, CD players, MP3 players, electric razors, televisions, record players, movie cameras, or a million other modern technological inventions--just a mere 170 years ago. Civilization has advanced from utter primitiveness to incredible mind-boggling achievements in just a little over 100 years. So why didn't mankind discover any of this stuff 100,000,000 years ago, or 100,000 years ago for that matter?

Look at the ignorance of doctors over the past few centuries. Sanitary practices, such as washing hands, were laughed at by doctors, while thousands of patients continued to die. It was unimaginable to doctors back then, that washing one's hands somehow was related to a patient's health in the operating room. Can you believe that? Evolutionists today are just as ignorant of the truth of God's Word, and of common sense itself. It's hard to imagine that millions of people were dying from a simple lack of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) just a couple hundred years ago. If evolution is true, then it took man billions of years to learn all these kindergarten lessons. And ironically, man has only learned these lessons in the past couple hundred years. You've got to be kidding me! Don't tell me that it took mankind BILLIONS of years to learn to wash his hands to prevent disease! The truth is that mankind has taken baby-steps since 4,000 B.C., and it did take him nearly 6,000 years to learn to wash his hands. This is just another undeniable PROOF that evolution is a lie. If mankind had evolved over millions of years, then men would have discovered these inventions a very long time ago.

The truth is that evolutionists are hardhearted against the truth of God's Word. The Word of God declares that God created the world at approximately 4,000 B.C.-YOU'D BE A FOOL NOT TO BELIEVE IT, BECAUSE THERE'S NO HISTORY PRIOR TO 4,000 B.C. As incredible as this fact is, it is undeniable proof against evolution.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#11 Jul 11, 2010
A Brother in Christ wrote:
SOMETHING ELSE TO CONSIDER
IF, as evolutionists claim, the earth is billions of years old, and mankind has evolved from a lower and simpler form of life, then why has mankind gone from writing upon stones to laser printers in just the past 3,500 years? When God gave Moses the Ten Commandments, they were written upon stone. It is abundantly clear that the Egyptians carved messages into stone (hieroglyphics). So why is it that mankind has only discovered better inventions in the past few thousand years? If mankind had evolved, as evolutionists claim, then why didn't man discover ink a million years ago? Think about it. This is an astonishing thought--There were NO planes, cars, computers, refrigerators, electricity, lights, gas, powered-equipment, telephones, recording devices, CD players, MP3 players, electric razors, televisions, record players, movie cameras, or a million other modern technological inventions--just a mere 170 years ago. Civilization has advanced from utter primitiveness to incredible mind-boggling achievements in just a little over 100 years. So why didn't mankind discover any of this stuff 100,000,000 years ago, or 100,000 years ago for that matter?
Look at the ignorance of doctors over the past few centuries. Sanitary practices, such as washing hands, were laughed at by doctors, while thousands of patients continued to die. It was unimaginable to doctors back then, that washing one's hands somehow was related to a patient's health in the operating room. Can you believe that? Evolutionists today are just as ignorant of the truth of God's Word, and of common sense itself. It's hard to imagine that millions of people were dying from a simple lack of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) just a couple hundred years ago. If evolution is true, then it took man billions of years to learn all these kindergarten lessons. And ironically, man has only learned these lessons in the past couple hundred years. You've got to be kidding me! Don't tell me that it took mankind BILLIONS of years to learn to wash his hands to prevent disease! The truth is that mankind has taken baby-steps since 4,000 B.C., and it did take him nearly 6,000 years to learn to wash his hands. This is just another undeniable PROOF that evolution is a lie. If mankind had evolved over millions of years, then men would have discovered these inventions a very long time ago.
The truth is that evolutionists are hardhearted against the truth of God's Word. The Word of God declares that God created the world at approximately 4,000 B.C.-YOU'D BE A FOOL NOT TO BELIEVE IT, BECAUSE THERE'S NO HISTORY PRIOR TO 4,000 B.C. As incredible as this fact is, it is undeniable proof against evolution.
Your level of stupidity is so amazing, not amusing. Why dont you stop while you are ahead. Shut up, with every word that comes out of your mouth you show how stupid you are.

If you believe that god created man, why did he not create us with all of the things that we had to create ourselves. If we could create it, then he certainly could, being all-mighty and all of that bereseth(BS).

I never wanted to go into any details with you because I think that intelligent statements would be wasted on you.

You have no concept of what evolution means.

Evolution tends to be a slow process. What we consider to be evolution tends to be a "positive" flow of change from simple to more complex. However, change occurs all of the time. With time all of what is possible for that context might occur. Subjectively, the changes can go in both negative and positive direction, and since we are speaking subjectively we should consider the fact that changes can occur that can have neutral results on the larger systems that they are a part of. Some changes may be catalyst for other changes. Things change all of the time as long as there is energy available to fuel the change.
deep thoughts

United States

#12 Jul 11, 2010
jj4u wrote:
<quoted text>
Your level of stupidity is so amazing, not amusing. Why dont you stop while you are ahead. Shut up, with every word that comes out of your mouth you show how stupid you are.
If you believe that god created man, why did he not create us with all of the things that we had to create ourselves. If we could create it, then he certainly could, being all-mighty and all of that bereseth(BS).
I never wanted to go into any details with you because I think that intelligent statements would be wasted on you.
You have no concept of what evolution means.
Evolution tends to be a slow process. What we consider to be evolution tends to be a "positive" flow of change from simple to more complex. However, change occurs all of the time. With time all of what is possible for that context might occur. Subjectively, the changes can go in both negative and positive direction, and since we are speaking subjectively we should consider the fact that changes can occur that can have neutral results on the larger systems that they are a part of. Some changes may be catalyst for other changes. Things change all of the time as long as there is energy available to fuel the change.
Try addressing his main point.
Why did recorded human history begin so recently, and so abruptly.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#13 Jul 11, 2010
A Brother in Christ wrote:
SOMETHING ELSE TO CONSIDER
IF, as evolutionists claim, the earth is billions of years old, and mankind has evolved from a lower and simpler form of life, then why has mankind gone from writing upon stones to laser printers in just the past 3,500 years?
...
The truth is that evolutionists are hardhearted against the truth of God's Word. The Word of God declares that God created the world at approximately 4,000 B.C.-YOU'D BE A FOOL NOT TO BELIEVE IT, BECAUSE THERE'S NO HISTORY PRIOR TO 4,000 B.C. As incredible as this fact is, it is undeniable proof against evolution.
If we can achieve absolute zero in a limited space, then in that space there could be minimal change. Change is always present, it is the way of the world.

No one ever implied that there was a single point when mankind evolved from an extremely primitive state to the state that he is in today biologically and if that happened technology would immediately get to the state that it is today.

That kind of talk is bible talk.

Life evolved slowly, that is life on earth. The earth went thru changes as organic molecules fed by energy from the sun and from thermal energy developed into primitive living organism. They created the oxygen rich atmosphere.

This allowed other organism to dominate and they too alter the earth's ecosystem.

To speed things up a bit, when we get to our early ancestors, speech as we know it today had to be developed. Unfortunately this did not happen as soon as our early ancestors appeared. Again you are confusing science with biblical thinking.

Speech evolved and technology evolved. I will give you a number of examples.

The computer technology you are using to write the crap that you write did not appear all of a sudden. It happened in stages, magnetic relays were used, electronic tubes were used, transistors were used before we got into large scale integration of electronic circuits on a single silicon chip.

Computer hard drives evolved, once a 20 megabyte hard drive was the size of a washing machine, now a hard drive much larger than that fits inside of a laptop.

Look around you, many other examples can be found. Reality shows that things evolved.

Only the bible and its adherents mistakenly believe that a world of change can occur in six days.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#14 Jul 11, 2010
deep thoughts wrote:
<quoted text>
Try addressing his main point.
Why did recorded human history begin so recently, and so abruptly.
Not you too?

An other confused soul.

Why are you expecting early man to have advanced technology.

As early man was evolving, his abilities and his abilities to create and use tools were also evolving.

Who ever convinced you that our abilities and specifically our abilities to create tools and technology should be present immediately after the emergence of our more primitive ancestors, does not know what he is talking about and has grossly misled you.

Even after man's brain was biologically the size it is today, man had to evolve culturally and societally. His large brain size did not immediately result in language and cultural development. All of this takes time.

Everything takes time, sometimes a very long time. This is hard to explain to people who have difficulties understanding and using very large numbers.

Man landed on the moon, this does not mean that he can land on mars immediately after. The distance is much greater, the distance changes. It takes time to advance our technology. Some technology requires the availability of other technologies to be present before they can be developed, like scaffolding.

Why is it so hard to understand this?
deep thoughts

United States

#15 Jul 11, 2010
jj4u wrote:
<quoted text>
Not you too?
An other confused soul.
Why are you expecting early man to have advanced technology.
As early man was evolving, his abilities and his abilities to create and use tools were also evolving.
Who ever convinced you that our abilities and specifically our abilities to create tools and technology should be present immediately after the emergence of our more primitive ancestors, does not know what he is talking about and has grossly misled you.
Even after man's brain was biologically the size it is today, man had to evolve culturally and societally. His large brain size did not immediately result in language and cultural development. All of this takes time.
Everything takes time, sometimes a very long time. This is hard to explain to people who have difficulties understanding and using very large numbers.
Man landed on the moon, this does not mean that he can land on mars immediately after. The distance is much greater, the distance changes. It takes time to advance our technology. Some technology requires the availability of other technologies to be present before they can be developed, like scaffolding.
Why is it so hard to understand this?
A two year old will scratch symbols into a wall if you don't watch them. Get off your "technology" kick and answer the questions.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#16 Jul 11, 2010
deep thoughts wrote:
<quoted text>
A two year old will scratch symbols into a wall if you don't watch them. Get off your "technology" kick and answer the questions.
So I guess you know nothing about cave men art and cave painting.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11200085/

My point is still valid. You and your buddy have a misunderstanding about what evolution is.

Do some research! You both have access to computers!

“JESUS CHRIST IS LORD”

Since: Apr 09

United States

#17 Jul 11, 2010
If mankind has been on earth over a million years, as the evolutionists tell us, then why do the records of their activity only go back a few thousand years? The evidence agrees with the Biblical account, not with the evolutionists. Evolutionary theory is a myth. God created everything; the evidence clearly points to it. Nothing else can explain the mountain of evidence.

Man, whom the evolutionists claim to have come into existence over a million years ago, is said to have "stopped evolving" 100,000 years ago. Why then do we not have at least 100,000 years of civilizations, cities, and human remains?

The records of ancient languages never go back beyond 3,000 B.C.

The earliest man is said, by the evolutionists, to have existed one or two million years ago. Yet, they add quite emphatically, that he "stopped evolving" about 100,000 years ago. Why then do we not have 100,000 years of civilizations, cities, and remains of all kinds? But we do not. The reason is the Bible is right and the evolutionists are wrong.

@jj4u You can't handle the truth, because the truth hurts. You have no explanation and no answer to my questions. Take your crap somewhere else.
eternalgod

Denver, CO

#18 Jul 11, 2010
The evidence in the human body. Everything in the body has a function of body support. Is evolution is about survival of the fittest, but the body has a lot of parts that have functions that are for fanciness and decoration rather than for survival. You can just be a rock and survive the best.

And how does the body has so many parts with intertwining functions that complement one another? Random movements and adaptation cannot make that.

Evolution is not the only hoax out there, but it is a hoax.
Abraxas

United States

#19 Jul 11, 2010
A Brother in Christ wrote:
Recently, a thought captivated my mind that proves that the theory of evolution is a big hoax. The thought is simple and yet profound ... why is there no recorded history before approximately 4,000 B.C.? <edit> Prove me wrong! I dare you. I triple-dog dare you to show me any recorded civilization before 4,000 B.C. And I don't mean some pottery jug or item that you claim is 14,000 years old--Show me any evidence of civilization prior to 4,000 B.C. You cannot. In fact, it is difficult to find much recorded history before 2,500 B.C., because the flood of Noah's day destroyed most of it. How can evolutionists be so naive and foolish as to totally ignore this incredibly obvious fact?
Gobekli Tepe is 12,000 years old, it predates writing, it predates
everything, and is literally believed to be in, the garden of Eden.
It is proof of mans advent from the hunter gatherer to farming.
These people who built this place , were survivors of the Ice Age
10,000 BC, and the domestication of farm animals specifically
Pigs & Goats took place very near there.



http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/multimedia/phot...

The origins of man are coming to light, will you be afraid to see
all the way back to the original sin?
eternalgod

Denver, CO

#20 Jul 11, 2010
Talk about record history, DNA of lower life forms can't evolve to that of a higher life form through random mutation. Random DNA mutation from lower animal can't make the DNA of a human that has intertwining parts with complementing and fanciful functions.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 3 min Riverside Rednek 51,756
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 4 min waaasssuuup 445,969
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 31 min kent 693,164
Those in the twin towers who saw the jets coming 58 min Doctor REALITY 33
Allah is Satan hiding behind the name 1 hr Doctor REALITY 13
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 hr whatgod 991,937
Skype gay sex (Dec '14) 8 hr c840xba 26
More from around the web