Why Are White Supremacists and Klansmen Overwelmingly Republicans?

Posted in the Top Stories Forum

“Proud Liberal Voting for Obama”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1 Oct 16, 2012
Is there a link that the Republican Party has to White Supremacists and Ku Klux Klansmen that these men overwelmingly vote for their party?

Seems to me the Republican Party is the Party of "Bigotry".

What do you think?

P.S. And please don't give me that crap about the Republicans freeing the slaves. We both know that the roles of Democrats and Republicans have REVERSED since those days when Democrats were the bigots to now with Republicans being the Bigots after they started trying to woo the Southern white male vote back under Nixon which was hostile to minorities.

Since: Aug 12

Brewster, NY

#2 Oct 17, 2012
The Democrats have always been the racists.

First Democrats were behind the KKK & segergation of Blacks.

Now Democrats have been behind reverse discrimination & affirmitive action as a racist qouta against White males.

So you see Democrats have always been on the racist opression band wagon.
Jerry

Kent, WA

#4 Nov 7, 2012
@Halonen is Conan OBrien

The Democrats during the Lincoln era were for the dixie south and the Republicans were for the union and the roles have reversed since then. If you were saying the Democrats have always been racist, and you even agree the parties have reversed, why would you feel the democrats are racists?? You're being contradictory. The liberal Democrats are trying to uplift and bring people together regardless of race just like during the civil war to fight for the union while the Republicans do not want social change and are in favor of segregating. You have to act like a conservative, straight, protestant white male to be Republican, otherwise conservative Republicans (except for moderates) won't accept you.
FACT

Port Moody, Canada

#5 May 15, 2013
republicans are for the whitemans agenda and are racists therefore they are white supremists!why do you think they lost the election campaigns because nobody likes whites period!they are illegal and racist on asiatic land!
Dport

East Brunswick, NJ

#6 May 15, 2013
The "white man's agenda" founded the country and there's nothing racist about any more than the Chinese who founded Chin a or Japanese of Japan. Real racism claims others are subhuman as with evolution theories like ww2 Nazi Party we all witnessed in recent history. This is why the word 'racism' is not even in the dictionary before marxism (see: 1828 Webster's dictionary) Instead some refer to the culture, not racism. Multiculturalism is a marxist globalist agenda. Anyone who opposes this agenda is said to be so-called 'racist'.

The USA like much of the western nations was largely segregated before JFK's civil rights policy changes that most of America opposed at the time. When the schools were finally integrated the military had to be brought in to keep the peace. The results have not been an improvement.
FACT

Port Moody, Canada

#7 May 15, 2013
this country was founded by asiatic tribes when crossing over from asia to the berring strait into north america and it was the olmecs and pre-clovis after that then came clovis
FACT

Port Moody, Canada

#8 May 15, 2013
white man was NOT' the first to arrive to north american soil.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#9 May 16, 2013
FACT wrote:
republicans are for the whitemans agenda and are racists therefore they are white supremists!why do you think they lost the election campaigns because nobody likes whites period!they are illegal and racist on asiatic land!
__________

Well, the VERY stupid, simple, slow minded, weak minded & inferior African American (Descendant of a black American slave) boy is back.

Still typing up the truly very stupid, trivial & juvenile tripe. Such as what you were typing up awhile back on several different threads on Topix Top Stories & African American forums.

I remember our blog discussion & debate on another thread back in September, 2012.--- You mentioned that you were 37 years old.

You being 37 years old, you having the mentality, mindset & maturity level such as what you have. That is TRULY sad & tragic.

Since this is a public forum, for blog discussions & debates, I'll still address your previous posts on this thread.

After I'm done addressing lillys post.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#10 May 16, 2013
blacklilly wrote:
Is there a link that the Republican Party has to White Supremacists and Ku Klux Klansmen that these men overwelmingly vote for their party?
__________

lilly, I do see your premise above.

It isn't just the Whites who are with the Ku Klux Klan (KKK).

It is most White-Americans collectively.

This is why.--- From the mid 1960s till now, the Democratic Party has given African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) preferential treatment, special privileges & special protections.

AT THE EXPENSE OF White-Americans.

The Democratic Party has done this, for the African American vote. So that the candidates of the Democratic Party could get elected or re-elected to office.

So, from the mid 1960s till now.--- Most White-Americans feel that the Democratic Party has elevated & advanced African Americans. AT THE EXPENSE OF White-Americans.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#11 May 16, 2013
blacklilly ---- To expound upon the dynamic.---

Way, way back in the United States.---- There were some African American (Descendants of black American slaves) union leaders who were aligned with some White-American union leaders.

This alliance was in effect, in relation to having some common ground in regards to certain labor related issues.

But, this relationship didn't change the very, very deep divisions in this nation between African Americans & White-Americans collectively.

The very, very deep divisions between the African American masses & the White-American masses in regards to ideology, class, race & culture.

There were some African Americans aligned with White-Americans as a result of the Democrats "New Deal Coalition", from late 1932 till 1964.

The breakup of the New Deal Coalition took place back in 1964.

The New Deal Coalition broke up as a result of divisions regarding Civil Rights, the Vietnam War, urban riots, the American left wing counterculture & Affirmative Action.

The New Deal Coalition also broke up as a result of the policies of the Republican Party. The Republican Party greatly championing lower taxes & the controlling of crime.

As a result of this, many White-American blue collar workers & voters, who were socially & culturally Conservative abandoned the Democratic Party.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#13 May 16, 2013
blacklilly wrote:
Seems to me the Republican Party is the Party of "Bigotry".
What do you think?
__________

Republicans who are racist, their racism is more outward & apparent.

But, there is also racism from the United States non-Hispanic White political left wing.

Examples of this.--- Way back, when African American (Descendants of black American slaves) union leaders had alliances with non-Hispanic White union leaders.

The non-Hispanic White union leaders had an alliance with these African American union leaders.--- NOT because they genuinely liked African Americans.

The non-Hispanic White union leaders only had the alliance with the African American union leaders, was because they NEEDED these African American union leaders & the African American union members.

As a support base. To achieve their goals & objectives.

In each & every instance, of the non-Hispanic White union leaders having the alliance with the African American union leaders.---- The non-Hispanic White union leaders & members were always in a WAY more dominant position.

This was primarily the case in regards to these unions.---

International Ladies' Garment Workers Union, American Federation of Labor (AFL), Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), Women's Trade Union League (WTUL), International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), United Auto Workers (UAW), American Federation of Teachers & the United Federation of Teachers.

This was ESPECIALLY the case with these unions.----

International Ladies' Garment Workers Union, American Federation of Teachers, United Federation of Teachers, United Auto Workers (UAW) & the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT).

In addition, ALL of the unions who were under the umbrella of the AFL & CIO.

The racism from the United States political Right wing might be more outward.

But, there is also quite a bit of racism from the non-Hispanic White political left wing.

The racism from the non-Hispanic White political left wing isn't as outward. As what it is from the political Right wing.

But, nonetheless, it still exists. It exists right up to this very day.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#14 May 16, 2013
blacklilly wrote:
What do you think?
__________

Actually, from 1968 till now, it has been the non-Hispanic White political left wing.--- Which has done the MOST damage to African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) collectively.

It is due to these 2 left wing entities in the United States.---

1. United States feminism.

2. The United States abortion movement.

In regards to #1, United States feminism.--- Starting back in 1968.---- Non-Hispanic White left wing women feminists told African American women that they didn't have to marry. That they didn't need a man.

Well, from 1968 till now, the illegitimate birth rates in the African American "community" has been 70% to over 80%.

So, left wing feminism has destroyed the African American family unit.

Left wing feminism has led African American women to devalue African American family life.

Left wing feminism has also led African American women to devalue African American children.

In regards to #2.--- The United States abortion movement. When abortion became legal in the United States, till now.---

Abortion has been a form of genocide to African Americans.

Here's a link which points this dynamic out.----

http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html .

So, from 1968 till now.--- It has been the political left wing in the United States which has taken the LARGEST toll upon African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#15 May 16, 2013
blacklilly wrote:
What do you think?
__________

A few other examples. Which show that it has been the non-Hispanic White political left wing which has taken the LARGEST toll upon African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).

1. It has mainly been the non-Hispanic White political left wing which pushed for Americans who came from an African American parent & a White parent.--- To have SEPARATE racial classification. DIFFERENT from African Americans.

2. Back in 1990.--- The United States federal government first had an open box. Specifically for Americans who came from an African American parent & a White parent. For them to write in a racial classification. DIFFERENT from African Americans.

3. From 1995 till 2000.--- It was the non-Hispanic White political left wing which primarily pushed for Americans who came from an African American parent & a White parent.--- To form organizations. For multiracial / mixed people. Here are a few links which show many different organizations for multiracial / mixed people.---

http://www.mixedfolks.com/links.htm .

http://mixedheritagecenter.org/index.php... .

http://www.mavinfoundation.org/new/ .

4. Back in 2000.---- For the census, the United States federal government officially got rid of the "one drop rule" in regards to "race". Implemented the "2 or more races" (Multiracial / mixed) category.

5. From 2000 till now.---- Americans who come from an African American parent & a White parent, have VERY much been encouraged to classify as 2 or more races (Multiracial / mixed).

6. From 2000 till now.---- Many Americans who come from an African American parent & a White parent have been classifying as 2 or more races (Multiracial / mixed).

This is fracturing & fragmenting the African American "community".

7. From 2000 till now.---- It has primarily been the non-Hispanic White political left wing, which has been pushing blacks in the United States who have ancestral roots from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa.---To seek SEPARATE classification. DIFFERENT from African Americans.

Blacks in the United States who have ancestral roots from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa haven't received the separate classification yet. But, in years to come, they will.

Once this happens, this will even FURTHER fracture & fragment the African American "community" even more.

It is the United States non-Hispanic White political left wing which is primarily pushing for all of these different social engineering policies.

Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#16 May 16, 2013
FACT wrote:
because nobody likes whites period!
__________

Not true.

Granted, most Asian-Americans & Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) vote Democrat.

But, Asians are NOT a threat to White America.

Asians are NOT a threat to the American System.

Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) are NOT a threat to White America.

Hispanics (Afro-Latinos included) are NOT a threat to the American System.

Blacks from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa are NOT a threat to White America.

Blacks from the Anglophone, French / Creole speaking Caribbean black nations & from Africa are NOT a threat to the American System.

However though, African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) ARE a threat to White America.

African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves) ARE a threat to the American System.

This is why, that many different types of public policy initiatives & social engineering policies are being undertaken.

AGAINST African Americans (Descendants of black American slaves).
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#17 May 16, 2013
FACT wrote:
why do you think they lost the election campaigns because nobody likes whites period!
__________

Uh, in this last election.--- The United States president, Democrat Barack Obama received 43% of the non-Hispanic White vote.

Clearly, Barack didn't receive a majority of the non-Hispanic White vote.

But, still & regardless, 43% of the non-Hispanic White vote.--- In regards to numbers, that is still a very, very sizeable number of non-Hispanic Whites who voted for Obama.

In addition, the Republicans were able to maintain their large numerical majority in the House of Representatives.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#18 May 16, 2013
FACT wrote:
why do you think they lost the election campaigns because nobody likes whites period!
__________

Your statement above.---- Yet another VERY stupid, simple & ignorant comment from you. Yet again. Just like your other very stupid, simple & ignorant statements which you typed up on several other threads on Topix Top Stories & African American forums.

That is NOT the reason why the United States president, Democrat Barack Obama was re-elected president.

These are the reasons why Barack was re-elected president this last election.---

These policies by the Democrat Obama administration kept the coalition which won the presidency back in November, 2008.---

1. The Obama administration signing into law the "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009".

This kept most of Americas women voting bloc on the side of the Obama administration.

Especially non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic White women comprise a numerical majority of women in the United States.

2. The Obama administration protecting reproductive rights. Protecting abortion rights.

This kept most of Americas women voting bloc on the side of the Obama administration.

Especially non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic White women comprise a numerical majority of women in this nation.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#19 May 16, 2013
FACT wrote:
why do you think they lost the election!
__________

Other reasons. Why our nations president, Democrat Barack Obama was able to maintain the coalition.----

3. The Obama administration giving aid to college students.

This kept most of Americas college students on the side of the Obama administration.

Especially non-Hispanic White students. Non-Hispanic White students comprise a numerical majority of college students in the United States.

4. The Obama administration bailing out the United States automobile industry.

5. The Obama administration bailing out the United States automobile unions.

This kept Americas non-Hispanic White male union leaders & members on the side of the Obama administration.

Americas non-Hispanic White women who are the wives & girlfriends of the non-Hispanic White male union leaders & members.---

Since their husbands or boyfriends were bailed out, they were also grateful.

This kept the non-Hispanic White women who are the wives or girlfriends of the non-Hispanic White male union leaders & members.--- On the side of the Obama administration.

So, in the leadup to this last election.--- It is no surprise that the Democrat Obama administration was able to maintain their coalition. The coalition which elected them back in November, 2008.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#20 May 16, 2013
FACT wrote:
this country was founded by asiatic tribes when crossing over from asia to the berring strait into north america and it was the olmecs and pre-clovis after that then came clovis
__________

You are incorrect. You are incorrect, yet again.

Geez, don't you ever "think" BEFORE you type up your posts?

Can you now see why I called you VERY stupid, simple, slow minded, weak minded & inferior on that other thread when we were blogging with our discussion & debate?

In my next post, I'll list 5 different examples. Which totally debunk your incorrect claims above.
Johnny

Milwaukee, WI

#21 May 16, 2013
FACT wrote:
this country was founded by asiatic tribes when crossing over from asia to the berring strait into north america and it was the olmecs and pre-clovis after that then came clovis
__________

You are incorrect. You are incorrect, yet again.

These human skeletons are WAY, WAY older. Than any such "alleged" human crossing of the Bering Strait. Here are the examples.----

1. The very, very ancient human skeletal remains which were found at the Calico Early Man Site. Near Barstow. In San Bernardino.

At least 500,000 years old.----

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calico_Early_Man... .

2. The very ancient human skeletal remains found at the Topper archaeological site. Located in the present day American state of South Carolina.

At least 50,000 years old.----

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topper_ (archaeological_site).

3. The very ancient human skeletal remains found at Monte Verde. Located near Puerto Montt. In southern Chile.

Going back to 33,000 BC.---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Verde .

4. The very ancient human skeletal remains found at Cactus Hill. Located in the region of southern Virginia, United States.

At least 19,700 years old.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cactus_Hill .

5. The very ancient human skeletal remains found at the Meadowcroft Rockshelter. Located near Avella, in Washington County. In southwestern Pennsylvania, United States.

At least 19,000 years old.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meadowcroft_Rock... .

The 5 different examples which I listed in my post here.--- They are WAY, WAY older. Than any such "alleged" human crossing of the Bering Strait.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 7 min Lumajuice 793,219
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min June VanDerMark 567,265
There is Everything Wrong with Abortion (Nov '07) 12 min feces for jesus 221,517
Thousands march in Holocaust memorial (Apr '06) 15 min Yumpin Yimminy 437
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 25 min An NFL Fan 120,611
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 28 min ChromiuMan 5,752
Homosexuality isn't just 'sin'......it's AN ABO... 39 min Rick in Kansas 6
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr truth 607,032
Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 2 hr Pegasus 267,249
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 3 hr Ex_Irontonian 97,404
More from around the web