For Women - How has wearing a headcov...

For Women - How has wearing a headcoving blessed you?

Posted in the Top Stories Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
yon

United States

#1 Aug 25, 2014
How has wearing a headcoving blessed you?

yon

United States

#2 Aug 25, 2014
1 Corinthians 11:10

"For this reason the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels."
yon

United States

#3 Aug 25, 2014
There are good ones(angels) and bad ones.
LAYLA MANABAT

Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

#4 Sep 3, 2014
Your comment of How wearing the headcovering blessed '' muslim women '': I supposed , you mean muslim women ?
1 -- it is an order from God who created you & I , & all the worlds seen or unseen , & all created being , animate or inanimate , in order for us to live in this physical world , who are we not to obey !??
2-- since time immemorial women cover their hair , even Mary covered her hair ( although no one has seen her in person ), but she was moulded in a form of a statue with her hair covered .
3 -- its like a pearl , before women wears them , the hardship of a diver who goes down to the deepest part of the sea to harvest shells that has pearls on them , in the old days , now it is still being harvested in a modern way , then pearls will be polished by a jeweler or a gem experts to have its higher value or sold
4 - once again please , verify the authenticity of the whole chapter & verses of the Bible , yes , according to my research its authenticity is only about 7 % more or less !

So all women are blessed if they do cover their hair according to the order of God , obedience is the key that women are blessed ! Thank you for your comment .

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#5 Sep 3, 2014
What nonsense. It is not literallty talking about head covering such as a hat or a rag etc. The head covering it was actually speaking of is CHRIST. They should have Christ as their covering and notice it stated ......BECAUSE OF THE ANGELS. Has no one ever wondered what the angels has to do with it? Think for a minute people. Because of the angels. Why the angels? Good grief folks.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#6 Sep 3, 2014
Let me give a hint on the subject. Scripture states that the sons of God ( the fallen angels) saw that the daughters of man was fair (or beautiful) and they took wives of all that they chose which was a no no in Gods eyes. A spirit creature co-habiting with a flesh creature. This was an abominable thing.
PDX Dave

Portland, OR

#7 Sep 4, 2014
No woman has ever been "blessed" by wearing a headscarf – it's merely a ritual, a convention of some religions. And people always confuse religion, with God! God is God, religions are of men. All religions are invented institutions, created by humans doing their best to understand God (which no human truly ever can do) so wear headscarves if you want, if that's what your religion requires you to do and you're willing to go along with it. But I think it's foolish to think that God cares one way or the other.
fred

Miami Beach, FL

#9 Sep 4, 2014
We live in a world both seen and unseen.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#10 Sep 5, 2014
Bible Reader wrote:
To Tony17:
The first thing we need to confirm is that angels are not sexual beings. Jesus addressed this in Luke 20:34-36 when he answered the question from the Sadducees (who do not believe in the resurrection or Angels). Jesus said "The children of this world marry, but they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world (referring to heaven & the new earth), and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are children of God, being the children of the resurrection" (Compare with Matthew 22:29-30 and Mark 12:24-25)
By looking at this statement, we find that Christ taught that the angels do not take part in sexual activity. We also see that we will be like the angels in this regard in the new earth because the earth will be filled with the redeemed: those who have fought the good fight and are victorious through Jesus Christ. So there really won't be a need to reproduce. Whatever God has planned for us will be better than anything we know of on this earth or anything we can even imagine!(1 Corinthians 2:9)
In Genesis 6:2-6, we see that it refers to "the sons of God". Many have been confused about the identity of these "sons of God". This section of Scripture has puzzled and perplexed a great number of scholars and Bible students for centuries. Some immediately assume the "sons of God" must be fallen angels, but we have already discovered that the Bible teaches that this can't be talking about angels since they don't even have sex with each other, which means that they certainly don't have sexual intercourse with human beings either! It is true that the book of Job uses the phrase "sons of God" in connection with angels, but that is the only book in the whole Bible where this can be found. It's dangerous to build a belief on just one portion of the Bible; You need to compare Scripture with Scripture in order to get the whole meaning and idea of a certain teaching or principle.
The phrase "sons of God" is used many times in the Bible to refer to men, but more specifically, God's followers here on earth (see Hosea 1:10). In Luke 3:38, Adam is called "the son of God" and throughout the new Testament, Christians are referred to as "the sons of God". Take for instance these familiar verses: "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is." (1 John 3:1-2) Notice that John uses this title twice in reference to believers in Jesus Christ. Again in John 1:12, we find him using it again in the same manner, "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name". Paul also used this phrase the same way in Romans 8:15 and Philippians 2:5.
For a complete understanding on the rest of this course click here:
http://www.wordoftruthradio.com/questions/50....
Why did it not then say that the sons of God saw that the daughters of God were fair instead of the daughters of men? There is much that you are missing my friend.

The fact that scripture says that offspring were born to them and scripture seems to show that their offspring were mongrels or giants which evidently was the result of them co-habitating with humans and they were exceptionally evil.

This is what caused God to bring about the flood of Noah which was meant to wipe out this group of evil beings.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#11 Sep 5, 2014
Bible Reader wrote:
To Tony17:
The first thing we need to confirm is that angels are not sexual beings. Jesus addressed this in Luke 20:34-36 when he answered the question from the Sadducees (who do not believe in the resurrection or Angels). Jesus said "The children of this world marry, but they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world (referring to heaven & the new earth), and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are children of God, being the children of the resurrection" (Compare with Matthew 22:29-30 and Mark 12:24-25)
By looking at this statement, we find that Christ taught that the angels do not take part in sexual activity. We also see that we will be like the angels in this regard in the new earth because the earth will be filled with the redeemed: those who have fought the good fight and are victorious through Jesus Christ. So there really won't be a need to reproduce. Whatever God has planned for us will be better than anything we know of on this earth or anything we can even imagine!(1 Corinthians 2:9)
In Genesis 6:2-6, we see that it refers to "the sons of God". Many have been confused about the identity of these "sons of God". This section of Scripture has puzzled and perplexed a great number of scholars and Bible students for centuries. Some immediately assume the "sons of God" must be fallen angels, but we have already discovered that the Bible teaches that this can't be talking about angels since they don't even have sex with each other, which means that they certainly don't have sexual intercourse with human beings either! It is true that the book of Job uses the phrase "sons of God" in connection with angels, but that is the only book in the whole Bible where this can be found. It's dangerous to build a belief on just one portion of the Bible; You need to compare Scripture with Scripture in order to get the whole meaning and idea of a certain teaching or principle.
The phrase "sons of God" is used many times in the Bible to refer to men, but more specifically, God's followers here on earth (see Hosea 1:10). In Luke 3:38, Adam is called "the son of God" and throughout the new Testament, Christians are referred to as "the sons of God". Take for instance these familiar verses: "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is." (1 John 3:1-2) Notice that John uses this title twice in reference to believers in Jesus Christ. Again in John 1:12, we find him using it again in the same manner, "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name". Paul also used this phrase the same way in Romans 8:15 and Philippians 2:5.
For a complete understanding on the rest of this course click here:
http://www.wordoftruthradio.com/questions/50....
And understand what is meant in Jude by they left their habitation.
One more thing. There were no females in the first world and heaven age. This is why when angels saw females in this age,the second age some of them became very attracted to them,aka the daughters of man.

And FYI ,Iam not a novice in the word of God. I have been a Bible student in Gods word for about 48 years now. It's gotten to the point that I have found that even Th.D's are rather Biblically illiterate when it comes to RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF GOD.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#12 Sep 5, 2014
Bible Reader wrote:
To Tony17:
The first thing we need to confirm is that angels are not sexual beings. Jesus addressed this in Luke 20:34-36 when he answered the question from the Sadducees (who do not believe in the resurrection or Angels). Jesus said "The children of this world marry, but they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world (referring to heaven & the new earth), and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are children of God, being the children of the resurrection" (Compare with Matthew 22:29-30 and Mark 12:24-25)
By looking at this statement, we find that Christ taught that the angels do not take part in sexual activity. We also see that we will be like the angels in this regard in the new earth because the earth will be filled with the redeemed: those who have fought the good fight and are victorious through Jesus Christ. So there really won't be a need to reproduce. Whatever God has planned for us will be better than anything we know of on this earth or anything we can even imagine!(1 Corinthians 2:9)
In Genesis 6:2-6, we see that it refers to "the sons of God". Many have been confused about the identity of these "sons of God". This section of Scripture has puzzled and perplexed a great number of scholars and Bible students for centuries. Some immediately assume the "sons of God" must be fallen angels, but we have already discovered that the Bible teaches that this can't be talking about angels since they don't even have sex with each other, which means that they certainly don't have sexual intercourse with human beings either! It is true that the book of Job uses the phrase "sons of God" in connection with angels, but that is the only book in the whole Bible where this can be found. It's dangerous to build a belief on just one portion of the Bible; You need to compare Scripture with Scripture in order to get the whole meaning and idea of a certain teaching or principle.
The phrase "sons of God" is used many times in the Bible to refer to men, but more specifically, God's followers here on earth (see Hosea 1:10). In Luke 3:38, Adam is called "the son of God" and throughout the new Testament, Christians are referred to as "the sons of God". Take for instance these familiar verses: "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is." (1 John 3:1-2) Notice that John uses this title twice in reference to believers in Jesus Christ. Again in John 1:12, we find him using it again in the same manner, "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name". Paul also used this phrase the same way in Romans 8:15 and Philippians 2:5.
For a complete understanding on the rest of this course click here:
http://www.wordoftruthradio.com/questions/50....
I like to try the spirits by the word of God so having stated that let me pose a question to you. When scripture states that a woman should not pray with her head uncovered because of the angels, why do you think it stated because of the angels? Why were angels mentioned?
Warriorgirl

Sydney, Australia

#13 Sep 5, 2014
It's all bullshit. Why don't you people wake up and think about real things. Like how to make each other happy, how to improve the lives of the animals we exploit, how to live in harmony with the environment.
Life is too short to wonder about non-existent beings and a story that was made up by priests for their own purposes.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#14 Sep 5, 2014
Warriorgirl wrote:
It's all bullshit. Why don't you people wake up and think about real things. Like how to make each other happy, how to improve the lives of the animals we exploit, how to live in harmony with the environment.
Life is too short to wonder about non-existent beings and a story that was made up by priests for their own purposes.
The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.
andet1987

Chicago, IL

#15 Sep 5, 2014
Hijab (veil)

Most often, it is worn by Muslim women as a symbol of modesty, privacy, and morality.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab
Horny Bob

Erin, TN

#16 Sep 6, 2014
What! No sex in Heaven? Then I don't want to go. Send me where the hot Women are going to be, so what if it is a little warm.

“ Xue Rengui”

Since: Oct 09

Khitan extraordinaire

#17 Sep 6, 2014
Bible Reader wrote:
To Tony17:
The first thing we need to confirm is that angels are not sexual beings. Jesus addressed this in Luke 20:34-36 when he answered the question from the Sadducees (who do not believe in the resurrection or Angels). Jesus said "The children of this world marry, but they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world (referring to heaven & the new earth), and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are children of God, being the children of the resurrection" (Compare with Matthew 22:29-30 and Mark 12:24-25)
By looking at this statement, we find that Christ taught that the angels do not take part in sexual activity. We also see that we will be like the angels in this regard in the new earth because the earth will be filled with the redeemed: those who have fought the good fight and are victorious through Jesus Christ. So there really won't be a need to reproduce. Whatever God has planned for us will be better than anything we know of on this earth or anything we can even imagine!(1 Corinthians 2:9)
In Genesis 6:2-6, we see that it refers to "the sons of God". Many have been confused about the identity of these "sons of God". This section of Scripture has puzzled and perplexed a great number of scholars and Bible students for centuries. Some immediately assume the "sons of God" must be fallen angels, but we have already discovered that the Bible teaches that this can't be talking about angels since they don't even have sex with each other, which means that they certainly don't have sexual intercourse with human beings either! It is true that the book of Job uses the phrase "sons of God" in connection with angels, but that is the only book in the whole Bible where this can be found. It's dangerous to build a belief on just one portion of the Bible; You need to compare Scripture with Scripture in order to get the whole meaning and idea of a certain teaching or principle.
...(Shortened for space)
You are on the right track ,IMHO. Genesis 6:4 is very controversial. One of the great "in house" debates. I'll elaborate on your thought a little further. Demons do not have >flesh and bone<bodies. They ,like angels ,are incorporeal. Jesus even mentions this to His disciples in Luke 24:39 - " For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.” Being they have no body,no sex organs - a sexless "race" of being, as insinuated in the verses you provided in Matthew and Mark.

The only way a demon could pull this off would be to "create a body" ,but that would put them in the league of God, and creative ability is His exclusive domain. Demons can >possess< ,but not create , a body.

Now ,if a demon COULD have sex with a human female then, who's to say it couldn't happen today ,ending up with "Rosemary's Baby" running around? This would go back to the pagan idea of >Incubus and Succubus<. Augustine touched on the idea in Christian tradition in "The City of God".

I hold to the view the "sons of God.." being the Godly descendents of Seth intermingling (cohabiting) with the ungodly line of Cain - "Daughters of men".

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#18 Sep 6, 2014
Senecus wrote:
<quoted text>
You are on the right track ,IMHO. Genesis 6:4 is very controversial. One of the great "in house" debates. I'll elaborate on your thought a little further. Demons do not have >flesh and bone<bodies. They ,like angels ,are incorporeal. Jesus even mentions this to His disciples in Luke 24:39 - " For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.” Being they have no body,no sex organs - a sexless "race" of being, as insinuated in the verses you provided in Matthew and Mark.
The only way a demon could pull this off would be to "create a body" ,but that would put them in the league of God, and creative ability is His exclusive domain. Demons can >possess< ,but not create , a body.
Now ,if a demon COULD have sex with a human female then, who's to say it couldn't happen today ,ending up with "Rosemary's Baby" running around? This would go back to the pagan idea of >Incubus and Succubus<. Augustine touched on the idea in Christian tradition in "The City of God".
I hold to the view the "sons of God.." being the Godly descendents of Seth intermingling (cohabiting) with the ungodly line of Cain - "Daughters of men".
Yet spirit beings can eat our food and we can eat theirs . Why would A Spirit being need food? There is much humans do not comprehend when it comes to what they can do. Now if a spirit being (sons of God) did not intend to have sex with humans ,why take wives as we are shown they did in Genesis 6. One of the purposes of "taking a wife" is for reproduction which is what they did. This was yet another attempt by Satan to corrupt or destroy that seedline through which the Savior was to come. Had Satan been able to destroy that Seedline ,thus the seed through which Christ would eventually be born then his own doom and judgement would have been averted.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#19 Sep 6, 2014
Senecus wrote:
<quoted text>
You are on the right track ,IMHO. Genesis 6:4 is very controversial. One of the great "in house" debates. I'll elaborate on your thought a little further. Demons do not have >flesh and bone<bodies. They ,like angels ,are incorporeal. Jesus even mentions this to His disciples in Luke 24:39 - " For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.” Being they have no body,no sex organs - a sexless "race" of being, as insinuated in the verses you provided in Matthew and Mark.
The only way a demon could pull this off would be to "create a body" ,but that would put them in the league of God, and creative ability is His exclusive domain. Demons can >possess< ,but not create , a body.
Now ,if a demon COULD have sex with a human female then, who's to say it couldn't happen today ,ending up with "Rosemary's Baby" running around? This would go back to the pagan idea of >Incubus and Succubus<. Augustine touched on the idea in Christian tradition in "The City of God".
I hold to the view the "sons of God.." being the Godly descendents of Seth intermingling (cohabiting) with the ungodly line of Cain - "Daughters of men".
You both need to read this. You need a deeper study.

http://www.theseason.org/jude/jude1.htm

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#20 Sep 6, 2014

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#21 Sep 6, 2014
A point I would like to make. Scripture refers to THE SONS OF GOD and the mistaken thinks this reference is to men. Yet when referring to females the women are not called DAUGHTERS OF GOD as the males. Females instead are referred to as daughters of men instead of DAUGHTERS OF GOD. Females should be insulted.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Was 9/11 a conspiracy?? (Oct '07) 1 min onemale 286,523
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 3 min Star Wars 16,790
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min Buck Crick 983,134
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 min Michael 683,861
Chinese are dishonest, greedy and cold-blooded. (Jan '14) 24 min Peter Ross 44
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 55 min lil whispers 619,699
O.J. Simpson is about to be a free man once again. 58 min Mad US Veteran 25
More from around the web